Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Bigger Than "Hogzilla"

In 2007, Alabama 11 Year Old Boy Killed 1,051 Pound Monster Pig

2_21_052507_MonsterPig.jpg

Jamison Stone, 11, poses with a wild pig he killed near Delta, Ala. (AP)

An 11-year-old Alabama boy used a pistol to kill a wild hog that just may be the biggest pig ever found.

Jamison Stone's father says the hog his son killed weighed a 1,051 pounds and measured 9-feet-4 from the tip of its snout to the base of its tail. Think hams as big as car tires.

If the claims are accurate, Jamison's trophy boar would be bigger than Hogzilla, the famed wild hog that grew to seemingly mythical proportions after being killed in south Georgia in 2004.

Hogzilla originally was thought to weigh 1,000 pounds and measure 12 feet in length. National Geographic experts who unearthed its remains believe the animal actually weighed about 800 pounds and was 8 feet long.

After seeing the pig in person, taxidermist Jerry Cunningham told The Anniston Star it was "the biggest thing I'd ever seen ... it's huge."

The Anniston Star reported that the feral hog was weighed at the Clay County Farmer's Exchange in Lineville.

Workers at the co-op verified that the basic truck scales used were recently certified by the state. But no workers from the co-op were present when the hog was weighed.

Jamison is reveling in the attention over his pig, which has a Web site put up by his father — http://www.monsterpig.com — that is generating Internet buzz.

"It feels really good," Jamison, of Pickensville, said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "It's a good accomplishment. I probably won't ever kill anything else that big."

Jamison, who killed his first deer at age 5, was hunting with father Mike Stone and two guides in east Alabama on May 3 when he bagged Hogzilla II. He said he shot the huge animal eight times with a .50-caliber revolver and chased it for three hours through hilly woods before finishing it off with a point-blank shot.

Through it all there was the fear that the animal would turn and charge them, as wild boars have a reputation of doing.

"I was a little bit scared, a little bit excited," said Jamison, who just finished the sixth grade on the honor roll at Christian Heritage Academy, a small, private school.

His father said that, just to be extra safe, he and the guides had high-powered rifles aimed and ready to fire in case the beast with 5-inch tusks decided to charge.

With the pig finally dead in a creek bed on the 2,500-acre Lost Creek Plantation, a commercial hunting preserve in Delta, trees had to be cut down and a backhoe brought in to bring Jamison's prize out of the woods.

It was hauled on a truck to the Clay County Farmers Exchange in Lineville, where Jeff Kinder said they used his scale, which was recently calibrated, to weigh the hog.

Kinder, who didn't witness the weigh-in, said he was baffled to hear the reported weight of 1,051 pounds because his scale — an old, manual style with sliding weights — only measures to the nearest 10.

"I didn't quite understand that," he said.

Mike Stone said the scale balanced one notch past the 1,050-pound mark, and he thought it meant a weight of 1,051 pounds.

"It probably weighed 1,060 pounds. We were just afraid to change it once the story was out," he said.

The hog's head is now being mounted on an extra-large foam form by Cunningham of Jerry's Taxidermy in Oxford. Cunningham said the animal measured 54 inches around the head, 74 inches around the shoulders and 11 inches from the eyes to the end of its snout.

Mike Stone is having sausage made from the rest of the animal. "We'll probably get 500 to 700 pounds," he said.

Jamison, meanwhile, has been offered a small part in "The Legend of Hogzilla," a small-time horror flick based on the tale of the Georgia boar. The movie is holding casting calls with plans to begin filming in Georgia.

The Anniston Star reported that congratulatory calls have come all the way from California, where Jamison appeared on a radio talk show. Jamison apparently has gotten words of congratulation from Rickey Medlocke of Lynyrd Skynyrd, country music star Kenny Chesney, Tom Knapp of Benelli firearms and Jerry Miculek of Smith & Wesson.

Jamison is enjoying the newfound celebrity generated by the hog hunt, but he said he prefers hunting pheasants to monster pigs.

"They are a little less dangerous."

(AP)



Sunday, October 27, 2013

Some of America's Great Banned Books - Part One


The Library of Congress created an exhibit, "Banned Books that Shaped America," that explores books that "have had a profound effect on American life" yet have been banned in one way or another. 

Below are some of my favorites from the list of books from that exhibit that have been banned or has had its language or content challenged.

One of the very interesting part of this is that some of these works are considered some of America's greatest literary treasures.

These are not all of the banned books from that exhibit listed, these are just my personal favorites which I found to be great reads.

And yes, these are books that I have read. Why did I repeat that? Well, for a person who has a hard time getting through a novel because they lose my interest - my saying that is a big deal to me.

Something written really has to hold on to my interest for me to get through, that is the reason I love Short Stories instead of Novels.

Warning! The titles of what has been banned might surprise you.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain, 1884

Commonly named among the Great American Novels, the work is among the first in major American literature to be written throughout in vernacular English, characterized by local color regionalism.

It is told in the first person by Huckleberry "Huck" Finn, a friend of Tom Sawyer and narrator of two other Twain novels (Tom Sawyer Abroad and Tom Sawyer, Detective).

It is a direct sequel to The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.

And by the way, as an interesting side note, Twain named his fictional character Tom Sawyer after a San Francisco fireman whom he met in June 1863.

The real Tom Sawyer was a local hero, famous for rescuing 90 passengers after a shipwreck.

The two remained friendly during Twain's three-year stay in San Francisco, often drinking and gambling together

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is noted for its colorful description of people and places along the Mississippi River during the mid 1800s.

Set in a Southern antebellum society that had ceased to exist about twenty years before the work was published, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is an often scathing satire on entrenched attitudes - particularly racism.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was criticized upon release because of what some called "coarse" language and became even more controversial in the 20th century because of its perceived use of racial stereotypes.

That was mostly due to its frequent use of the 19th century colloquialism "nigger".

Of course, this was all despite the many who still argue that the protagonist in the story as well as the tenor of the book is in reality anti-racist.

Because of the language, the first ban of Mark Twain’s American Classic came in 1885 from the same stiff neck folks who burned witches up there in Massachusetts.

Someone who's name is now completely forgotten even called it "trash and suitable only for the slums."

Objections to the book have evolved, but only marginally. Some hate literature that doesn't lie while others enjoy perpetuating the lie.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn does not lie. It tells us how things really were. 

Twain’s book is one of the most-challenged of all time and is frequently challenged even today because of its frequent use of the word "nigger" - which was not a word looked upon as something taboo in the 1800s.  

Those who want it banned allege the book is "racially insensitive," "oppressive," and "perpetuates racism" - when in fact it fights racism by telling the truth about what too place.

Gone With the Wind, Margaret Mitchell, 1936


Slavery in Gone with the Wind is a backdrop to a story that is essentially about other things. 

Southern plantation fiction (also known as Anti-Tom literature) from the early 19th century - culminating in Gone With the Wind - is written from the perspective and values of the slaveholder and tends to present slaves as docile and happy.

The characters in the novel are organized into two basic groups along class lines: the white planter class, such as Scarlett and Ashley, and the black house servant class.

The slaves depicted in Gone with the Wind are primarily loyal house servants, such as Mammy, Pork, Prissy, and Uncle Peter.  

House servants are the highest "caste" in Mitchell's caste system of the slaves. They stay on with their masters after the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 and subsequent Thirteenth Amendment of 1865 sets them free.

Of the servants that stayed on at Tara, Scarlett thinks to herself, "There were qualities of loyalty and tirelessness and love in them that no strain could break, no money could buy."

One criticism leveled at Gone with the Wind is for its portrayal of African Americans in the 19th century South.

Former field hands during the early days of Reconstruction are described behaving "as creatures of small intelligence might naturally be expected to do. Like monkeys or small children turned loose among treasured objects whose value is beyond their comprehension, they ran wild—either from perverse pleasure in destruction or simply because of their ignorance."

For me, why read a lie about how it was in the South before or after the Civil War. If I want to know how slaves were looked upon - why should I go to some work which as been cleansed and sanitized so not to offend someone.

Gone With The Wind is a Pulitzer-prize winning novel which follows the life of the spoiled daughter of a Southern plantation owner just before and then after the fall of the Confederacy and decline of the South in the aftermath of the Civil War.

Just three years after its publication, it became an Academy-Award Winning film. Today, it considered one of the best films ever made - a true classic.

Critically praised for its thought-provoking and realistic depiction of ante- and post-bellum life in the South, it has also been banned for more or less the same reasons.

Its realism has come under fire, specifically its realistic portrayal – though at times perhaps tending toward optimistic - of slavery and use of the words “nigger” and “darkies.”

It was banned from the Anaheim, California Union High School District’s English classrooms in 1978, according to the Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association, for its depiction of the behavior of Scarlett O’Hara and the freed slaves in the novel.

It was also challenged in the Waukegan, Illinois School District in 1984 because of the novel’s above-mentioned use of the word “nigger.”

Uncle Tom's Cabin, Harriet Beecher Stowe, 1852

Like Huck Finn, and Gone With the Wind, the contextual, historically and culturally accurate depiction of the treatment of black slaves in the United States has rankled would-be censors.

It is said that the impact of Uncle Tom’s Cabin was tantamount to its popularity as the second best-selling book of the 19th century behind the Bible.


Published in 1852, it did indeed have great influence by giving a needed shot in the arm to the Republican Abolitionist Movement bend on defeating the Democrats who supported the buying and selling of slaves as wee as the owning of black slaves.

While this book gave life to ridding the nation of slavery, Democrats and prosperous plantation owners had some influence too - and banned the book due to its anti-slavery themes.

Surprisingly, they were not alone in their decision. Tsarist Russia did the same in objection to the book’s “undermining religious ideals” and presenting a model of equality.

Another subtheme was the moral authority of motherhood.

The author, Stowe, saw motherhood as the “ethical and structural model for all of American life,” and believed that only women had the moral authority to save the United States from slavery.

Critics have noted that Stowe’s female characters are often domestic clichés instead of realistic women - but then how much weight can you put in what her critics say.

Like most Democrats at the time, those who were critical of her work wanted her book killed and gone - and yes, they would use any excuse they could find to do it.

Unable to stop her, Stowe’s novel nevertheless reaffirmed the importance of women’s influence and helped lay the seeds for the women’s suffrage movement and women's rights several decades later.

Why Are Democrats In Favor Banning Books?

In the same way that the Nazi Party in Germany in to the 1930s burned books to keep the truth and ideas of freedom out of the heads of those who they were trying to enslave, Democrats have wanted to bury their deeds because their history is not very nice to look at.

They want to bury and ban a lot of America's Greatest Literature simply because Democrats don't want us to know that they were in fact against freeing black slaves, that it was Democrats who started the Ku Klux Klan, and were a part of the same Democrat Party who fought against giving freed blacks their 2nd Amendment rights to guns to defend themselves against Democrats and the Klan.

Democrats have been against Christians and Catholics, and have a long history of being against women's rights.

One way to hide their infamous history is to ban books showing what they have done.

And yes, that in itself is the real reason that most Democrats who are teachers, school administrators, on school boards, and are in politics fight to suppress some of America's greatest literature.

They simply don't want us knowing about their past before Franklin D. Roosevelt, and they use the excuse that certain literature is racist to keep it from us.

Think about it, would you?

During the 1840s and 1850s, Democrats insisted on protecting slavery in all the territories while Republicans resisted them and fought to fight the spread of slavery.

In 1860, Democrats adopted a pro-slavery platform in an election campaign that was won by Abraham Lincoln and the newly formed Republican Party which consisted of people who were anti-slavery.

Democrats took the nation to war over their beloved slavery. After the Civil War, most opposed the Republican Party's Radical Reconstructions support of black civil and political rights.

The Democrat Party identified itself as the "white man's party" and demonized the Republican Party as being "Negro dominated."

Determined to re-capture the South, Democrats considered it a mission to "redeem" state after state - sometimes it was peacefully, other times by fraud and violence.

By 1877, when Reconstruction was officially over, the Democratic Party controlled every Southern state.



The South remained a one-party region until the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

Democrats throughout the nation, most of whom had prejudicial attitudes towards blacks, offered no challenge to the discriminatory policies of their brothers in South.

One of the consequences of the Democratic victories in the South was that many Southern Congressmen and Senators were almost automatically re-elected every election.

Due to the importance of seniority in the U.S. Congress, Democrats were able to control most of the committees in both houses of Congress and kill any civil rights legislation.

Even though Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a Democrat, he rarely challenged the powerfully entrenched liberal Democrat politicians during that time.

To give you an example of how racist Democrats were under FDR: when the House passed a Republican Anti-Lynching bill several times in the 1930s with bi-partisan support, the Democrat senators filibustered it to death in the Democrat controlled Senate.


by Tom Correa

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

No One Said Liberals Are Very Smart


Democratic Party Campaign Ad 1860

Dear Readers,

After reading about what Liberal have to say about the issues, whether its about the horrible fiscal policies that have us spending more than we take in or regarding social issues such as black-on-white racial attacks, it is apparent that Liberals are spreading hate and inciting violence against Conservatives.

Take for example a Hollywood actor type by the name of Chris Noth. And yes, I never hear of him either - at least not until I read this report.

The guy had the nerve to threaten Tea Party members with "being horsewhipped".

Now, as a matter of full disclosure, after reading the story I wanted to send this Hollywood bozo a horsewhip and offer him the opportunity to follow through with his statement.

It's true, I really wanted to send him a horsewhip and ask him if he'd like to come try to dish out the punishment he had in mind  -- on me!
He would have found out that I'm not the kind of Christian that turns the other cheek.

You see, I hate people who think they are better than others. I also don't like being threatened. or seeing others threatened.

 In fact, in my younger days, I'd take it real personal if or when someone did such a thing.

Actor Chris Noth saying that "Every Tea Party member should be horsewhipped" was a challenge that I'm sure he wouldn't want someone to take him up on.

Like most Liberals, for some reason Chris Noth sees himself as a privileged class of people - and political activism as something meant to be exclusively for Liberals.

I would love the chance to ask him, "I'm a member of the Tea Party because I believe in fiscal discipline because our nation in going broke. And for that, for that, you think I should be horsewhipped?"

Noth tweeted his desire to see everyone in the Tea Party "horsewhipped."

It was reported on October 17th, that second-rate actor Chris Noth of “Law and Order” and “Sex and the City” tweeted a call for violence against every member of the Tea Party.

"Every Tea Party member should be horsewhipped," he tweeted in early October.

Just one minute prior to issuing that violent message, he accused Republicans of racism, and falsely claimed they forced the partial shutdown that took place after Senate Majority Leader Democrat Harry Reid refused to consider a single Republican proposal to keep the government open.

"Highest level of racism was showed yesterday when Republicans forced a shutdown of our government. Mostly because our President is black," Noth said.

Imagine what sort of idiot equates a difference on fiscal policies and a new law that exempts the privileged and the powerful to racism?

"[I]s this America? Are we now not allowed to have our own opinions? We are not wrong if we don't agree with you, diff strokes," one person said in response to Noth's call to beat everyone in the Tea Party.

"[H]ave your opinions and own it," Noth said in response.

Yes, I'll own it. And if supporting becoming active in our government, supporting core American principles of freedom and liberty and self-government, and calling for fiscal responsibility makes be deserving of a horsewhipping?

Well then, Noth is one screwed up actor. And as for horsewhipping someone? 

Well Noth must be a real bad ass, especially when he's surrounded by security, but of course that fits the bill for most Democrats.

How do I know this? Because it is the way they operate!

For some time now, liberals have advocated violence against Conservatives and have especially targeted members of the Tea Party.

561839_4655744011943_1758877181_nHere an example: the man in the picture to the left was inspired to make death threats against Republican Sen Ted Cruz by Liberal Democrats. 

And yes, their rhetoric is so out of control.

The man under FBI investigation for making violent threats against Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz was inspired to encourage violence by Democratic Party messaging efforts.

We know this because he is in custody and has confessed to as much.

Troy Gilmore, Jr., who identifies himself as having served in the U.S. Navy, is under FBI investigation for possible violent threats on Twitter against Texas Republican Senator Cruz.

The FBI has communicated with Gilmore as part of the investigation and is monitoring for possible violence inspired by Gilmore’s online writings. …

The Twitter account of Gilmore, named “DarkNight,” is now protected.

But Gilmore wrote numerous threats toward Cruz on his Facebook page, the address of which ends with the term “countdown543,” while linking to anti-Republican activist web pages paid for by the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and a Democratic congressional campaign.

“I WILL SAY IT AGAIN LET’S GO TO TED CRUZ,HOME AND KICK HIS STINKING ASS FOR CAUSING THIS MESS.YOU CAN BET HE HAS HIS PAYCHECK AND HEALTH BENEFITS FROM THE SENATE AND CANADA. HE LIVES AT [address redacted by The Daily Caller], THE F@#$KING SCUM,” Gilmore posted on Facebook October 14, linking to a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee web page entitled “Demand Ted Cruz Denounce Disgusting Tea Party Attacks on President Obama.”

There’s much more at the link. Gilmore posted over and over again Cruz’s home address, possibly inspiring other unhinged liberals to go after Cruz and his family.

Yes, Ted Cruz is now living a life in a sort of protective-custody because of Liberals who see violence as the answer.

And please, please don't think this is only the Lefts reaction to something right now. Facts are that Democrats, extreme Liberal types, have been encouraging violence against Conservative for years.

Here are some examples:

"A spoiled child (Bush) is telling us our Social Security isn't safe anymore, so he is going to fix it for us. Well, here's your answer, you ungrateful whelp: [audio sound of 4 gunshots being fired.] Just try it, you little b*stard. [audio of gun being cocked]." -- A "humor bit" from the Randi Rhodes Show

Can you just imagine if that was said about President Obama instead of Bush? Let's face facts, Rhodes would have been arrested!
"I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health" -- New York city councilman Charles Barron

"..And then there's Rumsfeld who said of Iraq 'We have our good days and our bad days.' We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall and say 'This is one of our bad days' and pull the trigger." -- From a fundraising ad put out by the St. Petersburg Democratic Club

"I believe in ecoterrorism." -- James Cameron, Hollywood Director of the movie Titanic

"...In an ideal world, American consumers could be convinced to do the right thing through an appeal to logic with public service messages like the 'What Would Jesus Drive?' TV campaign, but the kind of people who would buy a car that increases the risk to other motorists in an accident can't be reasoned with. They're selfish and stupid. It's unfortunate that drivers must worry that their SUVs are being targeted by insulting stickers and Molotov cocktails, but one thing's for sure: It couldn't be happening to a more deserving group of people." -- Ted Rall winks at ecoterrorism

"F*** God D*mned Joe the God D*mned Motherf*cking plumber! I want Motherf*cking Joe the plumber dead." -- Liberal talk show host Charles Karel Bouley on the air.

"Republicans don't believe in the imagination, partly because so few of them have one, but mostly because it gets in the way of their chosen work, which is to destroy the human race and the planet. Human beings, who have imaginations, can see a recipe for disaster in the making; Republicans, whose goal in life is to profit from disaster and who don't give a hoot about human beings, either can't or won't. Which is why I personally think they should be exterminated before they cause any more harm." -- The Village Voice's Michael Feingold, in a theater review of all places

(Rush Limbaugh)" just wants the country to fail. To me that's treason. He's not saying anything different than what Osama Bin Laden is saying. You might want to look into this, sir, because I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight. ... Rush Limbaugh, I hope the country fails, I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?" -- Wanda Sykes

"You guys see Live and Let Die, the great Bond film with Yaphet Kotto as the bad guy, Mr. Big? In the end they jam a big CO2 pellet in his face and he blew up. I have to tell you, Rush Limbaugh is looking more and more like Mr. Big, and at some point somebody’s going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he’s going to explode like a giant blimp. That day may come. Not yet. But we’ll be there to watch. I think he’s Mr. Big, I think Yaphet Kotto. Are you watching, Rush?" -- Chris Matthews

"I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow....I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact." -- Bill Maher

"Drudge? Aw, Drudge, somebody ought to wrap a strong Republican entrail around his neck and hoist him up about six feet in the air and watch him bounce." -- Liberal radio host, Mike Malloy

"I know how the 'tea party' people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health-care reform. I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their 'Obama Plan White Slavery' signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads." -- The Washington Post's Courtland Milloy

Some, like talk show host Mike Malloy, have expressed a bloodthirsty desire to see everyone in the small-government movement of the Tea party murdered.

Liberals in the media are helping to foment violence against Conservatives with even calls for military force and other action.

The day after he said we members of the Tea Party need a horsewhipping, he was in an interview with the Huffington Post.

Noth called members of the Tea Party "Confederates" and accused them of being "un-American" racists for opposing Obama.

So f irst Noth tweets a message saying that everyone in the Tea Party should "be horsewhipped," then he let's his mouth run away with itself and calls all of us Tea Party folks "un-American."

The jerkweed went on to tell the Huffington Post, "I think its gotta be the worst Congress since right before the Civil War. And I think rightly – who was it? Was it Carter or someone who called them a bunch of ‘Confederates. I mean they practically are. Why don’t they just secede from the Union?”

A Democrat Representative might have been listening to Noth's stupidity, because just yesterday Florida Rep. Grayson sent out an e-mail that portrays the Tea Party as Ku Klux Klan.

Photo: DISTURBING: Fundraising Email Apparently Connected to Democrat Congressman Features KKK and a Burning Cross

[ Read Email: http://goo.gl/fDSV1U ]

SHARE to Spread

As incredibly stupid as it sounds, Rep. Alan Grayson, Democrat from Florida, sent his supporters an email with the image of a burning cross comparing the Tea Party and its members to the Ku Klux Klan.

And the horrible thing, I'm betting that he has Democrat constituents who believe such Liberal horseshit!

In a Monday campaign email, Grayson included the transcript of an interview he did recently with MSNBC in which he said the politics of the government shutdown had turned many Americans away from the Tea Party, the Orlando Sentinel reported.

"At this point, the tea party is no more popular than the Klan," Grayson told the newspaper.

The email included a photograph of a burning cross with Klansmen in the background. The cross forms the "T" in the words "Tea Party" superimposed over the picture.

Below is the caption: "Now you know what the 'T' stands for," the Sentinel reported.

The email drew immediate criticism.

"The depiction of burning crosses in Congressman Alan Grayson's most recent fundraising ask is despicable and needlessly hurtful to the many millions of families that still deal with the wounds of racial prejudice," wrote Republican Jorge Bonilla, who's challenging Grayson in 2014, the Sentinel reported.

"What's worse, he does so for no other reason than to troll for donations for his re-election campaign."

Jennifer Burke, national outreach director of TheTeaParty.net, called the email "deplorable," CNN reported.

"As a black tea party activist, I could say that there's nothing more offensive than equating the Tea Party with the Ku Klux Klan," Ms Burke said.

"The hate speech uttered by sitting congressman Alan Grayson is deplorable, even by the low levels reached in recent years when Democrats routinely call us racists and suicide bombers."

Republican operatives at the Republican National Committee, as well as the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee, called on President Barack Obama and Democratic counterparts to condemn the language.

Grayson is using tactics straight out of  Nazi Germany when the Socialist there sought control of their people.

The campaign Grayson is using is the very same that the Nazi used against the Jews to turn the German people against them.

As the Nazis rose to prominence in the 1930s, they were supported by many in the Democrat Party back here in America.

Contrary to what people think, the Nazis in America remain a Leftist group simply because they do not believe in equality, individual liberty or tolerance, which are the principles that inspired the Founding Fathers and forged the American character.

The KKK, similarly, was founded by Democrats to oppose the equality and personal liberty of blacks freed slaves and Republicans in the Democrat controlled South.

Republicans were lynched and shot and mutilated along side the blacks. All done by Democrats in the KKK during Reconstruction.

Democrats created the KKK, invented Segregation, and installed a system of putting down black-Americans until the 1964 Civil Rights Act which the Democrats fought tooth and nail to stop.

And yes, they have the nerve to call Tea Party folks "racist."

It wasn't that long ago that the Democrat Party included a prominent KKK member who rose within the KKK to the position of Grand Cyclops.

Democrat Robert Byrd was a KKK Recruiter and wouldn't fight for the United States during World War II. Yet, Byrd rose to prominence in the U.S. Senate as a member of the Democrat Party.

If not the Tea Party, than who does the Democrat Party see themselves as having something is common with?

How about, The American Communist, Socialist and Nazi Parties, all of which have endorsed the Occupy Wall Street movement - just as the Democrat Party has.

None of them have endorsed the Tea Party or the Republican Party.

It is the Democrat Party that has the legacy of being racist and segregationists in America.

They have the history bringing the nation to war to keep their beloved Slavery; they were the Slave-Masters; they fought against every opportunity to better the lives of blacks and Hispanics; they kept blacks in the back of the bus.

And yes, in Birmingham, Alabama, Bull Connor was a Democrat!

It was Democrats who unleashed the dogs and fire hoses on those black-Americans.  

As for us Tea Party members, veterans, and other believers in the Constitution being threatened for our beliefs, our stance, our very fortitude to not take the socialization of American just laying down?

My belief is that we don't have a choice. We have to fight back and be steadfast in our beliefs that we are Americans and that we are doing right for our nation.

Besides, just ask yourself where your beliefs would fit in better?

Would it be at a Tea Party rally, or at an Occupy Wall Street demonstration backed by the Democrats?

Despite the Left's many attempts to inspire racism and violent incidents at Tea Party rallies, you won't find any reports of crimes instigated by Conservatives.

Now as for Liberal protests, in comparison there are usually rapes, thefts, fights, drug use, and of course the burning of police cars and smashing of shop windows.

Besides being stupid, completely ignorant of American history to not know that their own party created both the KKK and segregation in the South, they are too dumb to understand that all the destruction that they do during their Occupy protests mostly effects the blue-collar workers and small businesses who are usually having a tough time getting by.

So yes, preaching hate and violence seems to be the thing that Democrats do best these days.

But unlike days gone by where the Liberals simply pointed over at the Republicans to divert the attention away from themselves, we the American people are not buying it and see exactly what they are up to.

We understand the twisted logic and screwed way of thinking coming out of Liberals. And yes, it's true, no one said Liberal are very smart.

by Tom Correa

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Shutdown Deliberately Orchestrated by White House...


According to the former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor-in-chief of the New York Times Magazine, "the shutdown was deliberately orchestrated by the White House."

Did the White House intentionally cause such pain as a ploy to win votes, some believe that's the case.

Many are coming forward to say that that is one aspect of why it was done, the other being Obama's desire to destroy the Republican Party.

Author Ed Klein told the New York Post that President Obama’s closest adviser, Valerie Jarrett, developed a strategy to force a showdown with Republicans over ObamCare.

Jarrett recommended shutting down government because, Klein said, she believed voters would pin the blame on Republicans.

Supposedly, with the help of those vile folks at MSNBC, she believed the people would be so mad at the Republicans that that would give Democrats the win and subsequent control of the House of Representatives in the 2014 midterm elections.

Klein wrote a critical biography about Obama last year called “The Amateur.” He said he interviewed more than a half dozen White House and former presidential advisers about the shutdown plan.

Think you know the real Barack Obama? You don’t – not until you’ve read “The Amateur.”

He called Jarret the "architect" of the strategy of refusing to negotiate with Republicans over ObamaCare.

"She convinced the president that a government shutdown and default offered a great opportunity to demonize the Republicans and help the Democrats win back a majority in the House of Representatives in 2014," he explained.

"Valerie also came with the idea of using the words 'hostage,' and 'ransom' and 'terrorists' against the Republicans," Klein maintained.

He said Jarrett’s advice to Obama was, "Do not cooperate one iota on ObamaCare. Don’t give an inch. Let the Republicans stew in their own juice."

Klein added, "Republicans walked into a trap set up by Valerie Jarrett and President Obama."

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, believes there was evidence in plain view that the administration planned the shutdown in advance.

Gohmert told Fox News that on the eve of the shutdown, Sept. 30, the administration already had barricades and cones in place.

"They had worked out in advance they were closing these things down."

The congressman said "that’s the only thing that explains" why the White House turned down their proposals and compromises.

Klein said White House insiders call Jarrett the "The Night Stalker" because she is the only presidential aide who is allowed to spend much time in the family quarters.

"Everyone in the Beltway knew Valerie Jarrett was influential," he said. "They didn’t know how influential she was."

He quoted top Democratic insider Vernon Jordan, whose wife is a cousin of Jarrett, as saying, "Her power derived from one simple fact — proximity. No one except Michelle Obama is closer to the president than Valerie."

This is one of those stories that I file under thanks, but I really already had an idea that that was what really took place.

I'm putting it here because I know there are those out there who want to blame Republicans for everything, but many of us don't need to have people confirm what we already knew.

I believe that many of my readers see Obama for what he is, a con artist, a street punk, a puppet to his masters on the other end of his teleprompter, a jerk who couldn't lead a boy scout troop nevertheless a nation.

He tried to inflict pain upon the American people during the shutdown. He closed parks and memorials that were not his to close. He spend more money trying to hurt us than simply leaving us alone.

Obama might have a thousand or even ten thousand who will ignore what he does and who will support him even if they themselves personally witnessed his setting a match to the Constitution - for those people, I actually feel sorry for them.

Like Christ Mathews and his ilk, they are America's Judas and work for silver.

They are Benedict Arnolds, but yet see themselves as being above us. They are the scum who have a microphone but not a shred of honor.

Yes, while Obama has a thousand Chris Matthews all marching lock step, there are millions of us who know better than what they are trying to sell us.

We will always remember the barricades and the police that were brought in to keep 80 and 90 year old veterans from visiting their memorials - maybe for the last time.

Come election day, though Obama and his stooges might think that us in the Tea Party are done, we will remember the little girl who as a last wish wanted to see the Statue of Liberty but was turned away by Obama's stooges in the National Parks Department.

Come election day 2014, we will remember that arrogant Democrats and some idiot Republicans believed that they are above following the same laws as the rest of us.

There are millions of us who might hate John McCain for his backstabbing other Republicans, but we also remember that it was Obama that needlessly went out of his way to make things harder and inflict pain on American citizens.

To have an American President actually go out of his way to make life harder on Americans just to show us that he is boss!  No, we won't forget very soon - if not at all!

Our job between now and the next election is to remember that it wasn't Republicans, it was Obama and his conspirators in the Democrat Party - criminals who one day should be brought to justice.


by Tom Correa