Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Homeland Security's 30 Tips for Emergency Preparedness

Arizona and other parts of the West are on fire. There is flooding around the country. Rivers are cresting and breaching levees. Tornadoes have wrecked havoc and death upon areas that have seen no mercy. Yes, that's in America.

And in other places around the world, like in Japan, the poor people effected by Mother Nature's wrath are digging their way out slowly but surely. In Japan, it is the testament to a great and noble people that they are working as hard as they are to overcome the devastation that was set upon them.

People are resilient. We endure and we prevail. And yes, sometimes it ain't bad to get a few tips that will help us through emergencies.

Because of what is happening in the world around us, I've gone to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and copied their recommendation for us.

Here are their 30 tips to help you and your family, all of us, become better prepared for an emergency.

Preparedness Tip #1

Prepare escape routes and prepare your emergency plan.

Take a moment to imagine that there is an emergency, like a fire in your home, and you need to leave quickly. What are the best escape routes from your home? Find at least two ways out of each room. Now, write it down — you’ve got the beginning of a plan.

Preparedness Tip #2

Pick a place to meet after a disaster.

Designate two meeting places.

Choose one right outside your home, in case of a sudden household emergency, such as a fire. The second place you choose needs to be outside your neighborhood, in the event that it is not safe to stay near or return to your home.

Preparedness Tip #3

Choose an emergency contact person outside your area because it may be easier to call long distance than locally after a local/regional disaster.

Take a minute now to call or e-mail an out-of-town friend or family member to ask him or her to be your family’s designated contact in the event of an emergency. Be sure to share the contact's phone number with everyone in the family. During an emergency, you can call your contact who can share with other family members where you are; how you are doing; and how to get in contact with you.

Preparedness Tip #4

Complete an emergency contact card and make copies for each member of your family to carry with them.

Be sure to include an out-of-town contact on your contact card. It may be easier to reach someone out of town if local phone lines are out of service or overloaded. You should also have at least one traditionally wired landline phone, as cordless or cellular phones may not work in an emergency. Visit or for sample emergency contact cards.

Preparedness Tip #5

Dogs may be man’s best friend, but due to health regulations, most emergency shelters cannot house animals. Find out in advance how to care for your pets and working animals when disaster strikes. Pets should not be left behind, but could be taken to a veterinary office, family member’s home or animal shelter during an emergency. Also be sure to store extra food and water for pets. For more information, visit the Animal Safety section on or visit the Humane Society Web site at

Preparedness Tip #6

Go through your calendar now, and put a reminder on it — every six months — to review your plan, update numbers, and check supplies to be sure nothing has expired, spoiled, or changed. Also remember to practice your tornado, fire escape or other disaster plans.

Preparedness Tip #7

Check your child’s school Web site or call the school office to request a copy of the school’s emergency plan.

Keep a copy at home and work or other places where you spend a lot of your time and make sure the school’s plan is incorporated into your family’s emergency plan. Also, learn about the disaster plans at your workplace or other places where you and your family spend time.

Preparedness Tip #8

Teach your children how and when to call 9-1-1 or your local Emergency Medical Services number for help.

Post these and other emergency telephone numbers by telephones.

Preparedness Tip #9

Practice. Conduct fire drills and practice evacuating your home twice a year. Drive your planned evacuation route and plot alternate routes on a map in case main roads are blocked or gridlocked. Practice earthquake and tornado drills at home, school and work. Commit a weekend to update telephone numbers, emergency supplies and review your plan with everyone.

Preparedness Tip #10

A community working together during an emergency makes sense.

•Talk to your neighbors about how you can work together during an emergency.
•Find out if anyone has specialized equipment like a power generator, or expertise such as medical knowledge, that might help in a crisis.
•Decide who will check on elderly or disabled neighbors.
•Make back-up plans for children in case you can't get home in an emergency.

Sharing plans and communicating in advance is a good strategy

Preparedness Tip #11

What if disaster strikes while you’re at work? Do you know the emergency preparedness plan for your workplace? While many companies have been more alert and pro-active in preparing for disasters of all types since the September 11, 2001 attacks, a national survey indicates that many employees still don’t know what their workplace plan is for major or minor disasters. If you don’t know yours, make a point to ask. Know multiple ways to exit your building, participate in workplace evacuation drills, and consider keeping some emergency supplies at the office. Visit and click on Ready Business for more information about business preparedness.

Preparedness Tip #12

You should keep enough supplies in your home to meet the needs of you and your family for at least three days. Build an emergency supply kit to take with you in an evacuation. The basics to stock in your portable kit include: water, food, battery-powered radio and flashlight with extra batteries, first aid supplies, change of clothing, blanket or sleeping bag, wrench or pliers, whistle, dust mask, plastic sheeting and duct tape, trash bags, map, a manual can opener for canned food and special items for infants, elderly, the sick or people with disabilities. Keep these items in an easy to carry container such as a covered trash container, a large backpack, or a duffle bag.

Preparedness Tip #13

Preparing for emergencies needn’t be expensive if you’re thinking ahead and buying small quantities at a time.

Make a list of some foods that:

•Have a long shelf-life and will not spoil (non-perishable).
•You and your family like.
•Do not require cooking.
•Can be easily stored.
•Have a low salt content as salty foods will make you more thirsty.

Keep the list in your purse or wallet and pick up a few items each time you’re shopping and/or see a sale until you have built up a well-stocked supply that can sustain each member of your family for at least three days following an emergency.

Preparedness Tip #14

Take a minute to check your family’s first aid kit, and note any depleted items — then, add them to your shopping list. Don’t have a first aid kit? Add that to the list or build a kit yourself. Just add the following items to your shopping list and assemble a first aid kit. Consider creating a kit for each vehicle as well:

First Aid Kits - Assemble a first aid kit for your home and one for each car.

•(20) adhesive bandages, various sizes
•(1) 5" x 9" sterile dressing
•(1) conforming roller gauze bandage
•(2) triangular bandages
•(2) 3 x 3 sterile gauze pads
•(2) 4 x 4 sterile gauze pads
•(1) roll 3" cohesive bandage
•(2) germicidal hand wipes or waterless alcohol-based hand sanitizer
•(6) antiseptic wipes
•(2) pair large medical grade non-latex gloves
•Adhesive tape, 2" width
•Anti-bacterial ointment
•Cold pack
•Scissors (small, personal)
•CPR breathing barrier, such as a face shield
•First Aid Manual

Non-Prescription and Prescription Drugs

•Aspirin or non-aspirin pain reliever
•Anti-diarrhea medication
•Antacid (for stomach upset)
•Syrup of Ipecac (use to induce vomiting if advised by the Poison Control Center)
•Activated charcoal (use if advised by the Poison Control Center)
•Prescription drugs, as recommended by your physician, and copies of the prescriptions in case they need to be replaced

For more information about first aid kits, visit

Preparedness Tip #15

Keep at least a three-day supply of water per person. Store a minimum of one gallon of water per person per day (two quarts for drinking, two quarts for food preparation and sanitation). Store water in plastic containers such as soft drink bottles. Avoid using containers that will decompose or break, such as milk cartons or glass bottles. A normally active person needs to drink at least two quarts of water each day. Hot environments and strenuous activity can double that amount. Children, nursing mothers, and people who are sick will also need more.

Preparedness Tip #16

One of the easiest ways you can prepare for emergencies is to keep some supplies readily available. Every kit is unique and can be tailored to meet the specific needs of your family, but below is a general list of supplies you may want to consider:

Tools and Supplies (Essential Items are Marked with an Asterisk *)

•Mess kits, or paper cups, plates, and plastic utensils
•Emergency preparedness manual and a copy of your disaster plan, including your emergency contacts list
•Battery-operated radio and extra batteries*
•Flashlight and extra batteries*
•Cash or traveler's checks, change*
•Non-electric can opener, utility knife*
•Fire extinguisher: small ABC type stored near where fires are likely to occur such as a kitchen, or near a fireplace. It should not be kept in the disaster supplies kit.
•Tube tent
•Duct Tape*
•Matches in a waterproof container
•Aluminum foil
•Plastic storage containers
•Signal flare
•Paper, pencil*
•Needles, thread
•Medicine dropper
•Shut-off wrench or pliers, to turn off household gas and water
•Plastic sheeting*
•Map of the area (for locating shelters and evacuation routes)

(Continued in the next tip)

Preparedness Tip #17

Also include items for sanitation in your emergency supply kit. Consider the following:

Sanitation (Essential Items are Marked with an Asterisk *)

•Toilet paper, towelettes*
•Soap, liquid detergent*
•Feminine supplies*
•Personal hygiene items*
•Plastic garbage bags, ties (for personal sanitation uses)*
•Plastic bucket with tight lid
•Household chlorine bleach

(Continued in the next tip)

Preparedness Tip #18

Include at least one complete change of clothing and footwear per person in your emergency supply kit. We suggest long pants and long sleeves for additional protection after a disaster.

Clothing and Bedding (Essential Items are Marked with an Asterisk *

•Sturdy shoes or work boots*
•Rain gear*
•Blankets or sleeping bags*
•Hat and gloves
•Thermal underwear

Preparedness Tip #19

You should also keep a smaller version of your emergency supply kit in your vehicle, in case you are commuting or traveling when disaster strikes.

Emergency Kit For Your Vehicle

•Bottled water and non-perishable high energy foods, such as granola bars, raisins and peanut butter
•Flashlight and extra batteries
•Booster cables
•Fire extinguisher (5 lb., A-B-C type)
•First aid kit and manual
•Tire repair kit and pump
•Flares or other emergency marking devices

Preparedness Tip #20

Teach children how to dial 9-1-1 in an emergency. Review emergency action steps with all family members:

•Check the scene and the victim
•Call 9-1-1 or your local emergency number posted by the telephone
•Care for the victim

Help your children learn more about emergencies by visiting Red Cross' "Masters of Disaster."

Preparedness Tip #21

Read the information on your city, county and/or state government Web sites as well as the “Be Prepared” section of or and print emergency preparedness information. Be sure to keep a copy with your disaster supplies kit. It can provide telephone numbers, addresses and other information you need when electronic connections are not available options for obtaining the information.

Preparedness Tip #22

When water is of questionable purity, it is easiest to use bottled water for drinking and cooking if it is available. When it’s not available, it is important to know how to treat contaminated water. In addition to having a bad odor and taste, water from questionable sources may be contaminated by a variety of microorganisms, including, bacteria and parasites that cause diseases such as dysentery, cholera, typhoid, and hepatitis.

All water of uncertain purity should be treated before use. Use one or a combination of these treatments:

•Filter: Filter the water using a piece of cloth or coffee filter to remove solid particles.
•Boil: Bring it to a rolling boil for about one full minute. Cool it and pour it back and forth between two clean containers to improve its taste before drinking it.

◦Add 16 drops (1/8 teaspoon) of liquid chlorine bleach per gallon of water. Stir to mix. Sodium hypochlorite of the concentration of 5.25% to 6% should be the only active ingredient in the bleach. There should not be any added soap or fragrances. A major bleach manufacturer has also added Sodium Hydroxide as an active ingredient, which they state does not pose a health risk for water treatment.

◦Let stand 30 minutes.

◦If it smells of chlorine. You can use it. If it does not smell of chlorine, add 16 more drops (1/8 teaspoon) of chlorine bleach per gallon of water, let stand 30 minutes, and smell it again. If it smells of chlorine, you can use it. If it does not smell of chlorine, discard it and find another source of water.

Flood water can also be contaminated by toxic chemicals. Do NOT try to treat flood water.

Preparedness Tip #23

In some emergencies you may be required to turn off your utilities. To prepare for this type of event:

•Locate the electric, gas and water shut-off valves.
• Keep necessary tools near gas and water shut-off valves
•Teach adult family members how to turn off utilities.

If you turn off the gas, a professional must turn it back on. Do not attempt to do this yourself.

Preparedness Tip #24

Understand that during an emergency you may be asked to “shelter-in-place” or evacuate. Plan for both possibilities and be prepared to listen to instructions from your local emergency management officials. Visit and for more information on sheltering-in-place.

Preparedness Tip #25

A disaster can cause significant financial loss. Your apartment or home may be severely damaged or destroyed. You may be forced to live in temporary housing. Income may be cut off or significantly reduced. Important financial records could be destroyed. Take the time now to assess your situation and ask questions.

To help you, consider using the Emergency Financial First Aid Kit (EFFAK), a tool developed by Operation Hope, FEMA and Citizen Corps or contact your local Red Cross chapter for Disasters and Financial Planning: A Guide for Preparedness.

Preparedness Tip #26

Learn if earthquakes are a risk in your area by contacting your local emergency management office, local American Red Cross chapter, or state geological survey or department of natural resources. Information about earthquake risk is also available from the U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazards project.

Preparedness Tip #27

Floods are among the most frequent and costly natural disasters in terms of human hardship and economic loss. As much as 90 percent of the damage related to all natural disasters (excluding draught) is caused by floods and associated debris flow. Most communities in the United States can experience some kind of flooding. Melting snow can combine with rain in the winter and early spring; severe thunderstorms can bring heavy rain in the spring or summer; or hurricanes can bring intense rainfall to coastal and inland states in the summer and fall. Regardless of how a flood occurs, the rule for being safe is simple: head for higher ground and stay away from floodwater. Even a shallow depth of fast-moving floodwater produces more force than most people imagine. You can protect yourself by being prepared and having time to act. Local radio or television stations or a NOAA Weather Radio are the best sources of information in a flood situation.

Preparedness Tip #28

When there is concern about a potential exposure to a chemical or other airborne hazard, local officials may advise you to "shelter-in-place “ and “seal the room.” This is different from taking shelter on the lowest level of your home in case of a natural disaster like a tornado. If you believe the air may be badly contaminated or if you are instructed by local officials, follow the instructions below to create a temporary barrier between you and the contaminated air outside.

To shelter-in-place and seal-the-room:

•Close and lock all windows and exterior doors.
•Turn off all fans, heating and air conditioning systems.
•Close the fireplace damper.
•Get your disaster supplies kit and turn on your battery-powered radio.
•Go to an interior room that is above ground level and without windows, if possible. In the case of a chemical threat, an above-ground location is preferable because some chemicals are heavier than air, and may seep into basements even if the windows are closed.
•If directed by local authorities on the radio, use duct tape to seal all cracks around the door and any vents into the room. Tape plastic sheeting, such as heavy-duty plastic garbage bags, over any windows.
•Listen to your radio or television for further instructions. Local officials will tell you when you can leave the room in which you are sheltering, or they may call for evacuation in specific areas at greatest risk in your community

Preparedness Tip #29

If there is an explosion:

•Take shelter against your desk or a sturdy table.
•Exit the building immediately.
•Do not use elevators.
•Check for fire and other hazards.
•Take your emergency supply kit if time allows.

If there is a fire:

•Exit the building immediately.
•If there is smoke, crawl under the smoke to the nearest exit and use a cloth, if possible, to cover your nose and mouth.
•Use the back of your hand to feel the upper, lower, and middle parts of closed doors.
•If the door is not hot, brace yourself against it and open slowly.
•If the door is hot, do not open it. Look for another way out.
•Do not use elevators.
•If your clothes catch on fire, stop-drop-and-roll to put out the fire. Do not run.
•If you are at home, go to your previously designated outside meeting place.
•Account for your family members and carefully supervise small children.
•GET OUT and STAY OUT. Never go back into a burning building.
•Call 9-1-1 or your local emergency number.

Preparedness Tip #30

Unlike an explosion, a biological attack may or may not be immediately obvious. Most likely local health care workers will report a pattern of unusual illness or a wave of sick people seeking medical attention. The best source of information will be radio or television reports.

Understand that some biological agents, such as anthrax, do not cause contagious diseases. Others, like the smallpox virus, can result in diseases you can catch from other people.

In the event of a biological attack, public health officials may not immediately be able to provide information on what you should do. It will take time to determine exactly what the illness is, how it should be treated, and who may have been exposed. You should watch TV, listen to the radio, or check the Internet for official news including the following:

•Are you in the group or area authorities believe may have been exposed?
•What are the signs and symptoms of the disease?
•Are medications or vaccines being distributed?
•Where? Who should get them and how?
•Where should you seek emergency medical care if you become sick?

During a declared biological emergency:

•If a family member becomes sick, it is important to be suspicious.
•Do not assume, however, that you should go to a hospital emergency room or that any illness is the result of the biological attack. Symptoms of many common illnesses may overlap.
•Use common sense, practice good hygiene and cleanliness to avoid spreading germs, and seek medical advice.
•Consider if you are in the group or area authorities believe to be in danger.
•If your symptoms match those described and you are in the group considered at risk, immediately seek emergency medical attention.

If you are potentially exposed:

•Follow instructions of doctors and other public health officials.
•If the disease is contagious expect to receive medical evaluation and treatment. You may be advised to stay away from others or even deliberately quarantined.
•For non-contagious diseases, expect to receive medical evaluation and treatment.

If you become aware of an unusual and suspicious substance nearby:

•Quickly get away.
•Protect yourself. Cover your mouth and nose with layers of fabric that can filter the air but still allow breathing. Examples include two to three layers of cotton such as a t-shirt, handkerchief or towel. Otherwise, several layers of tissue or paper towels may help.
•Wash with soap and water.
•Contact authorities.
•Watch TV, listen to the radio, or check the Internet for official news and information including what the signs and symptoms of the disease are, if medications or vaccinations are being distributed and where you should seek medical attention if you become sick.
•If you become sick seek emergency medical attention.

The above information is provided by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 

These tips have been copied and posted here so that you can be aware of what the U.S. Department of Homeland Security recommends for us. It is important to know what to do in case of any emergency.

My first rule is remain calm and use common sense. Second, you must think about what needs to be done and act quickly. Don't drag your feet in an emergency, or getting ready for one.

Hesitation is not your friend in an emergency.

Above all else please remember that if you're not completely prepared, don't worry because all is not lost.

If you simply keep focused, keep your head together, adapt to the situation, improvise what you need, then yes, my friend, you will overcome.

May God Bless You And Yours! Be Ready! Be Safe!

Story by Tom Correa

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Are You Ready For Jay Leno's Questions?

During Jay Leno's show the other night, he had a segment where he went out "on the street" to quiz a few "average" Americans about American History.

Now I don't know if it's just Los Angeles, or if it's everywhere, but it seems that every time Leno does this he finds some of the most uninformed people in the country.

And honestly, most of the time these people are asked some really easy questions.

It's not as if he were asking trick questions, or questions that only ardent Historians would know. We're talking basic American History!

So to help those folks in Los Angeles, and especially in Hollywood, who may be stopped by Jay Leno. I decided that these folks might need a short lesson in American History that they might be asked about.

First things first, the document that says “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” is the Declaration of Independence.

The man who's name is most prominent on the Declaration of Independence is John Hancock. According to legend, John Hancock signed his name large and clear "so that King George could read it without his spectacles."

Jay Leno has a habit of stumping people on simple questions. So remember, yes, it was John F. Kennedy who said those immortal words during his inauguration "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country!"

And yes, Historians agree that Sarah Palin was right in that Paul Revere did indeed warn the British not to tangle with the heavily armed Minutemen when he made his famous ride warning that the British Army was coming.

Sorry that the Liberal Media wants to paint everything out of Sarah Palin as wrong, but the fact is that she was correct.

Fact is that later "Revere was captured and questioned by the British soldiers at gunpoint. He told them of the Army's movement from Boston, and that British army troops would be in some danger if they approached Lexington because of the large number of hostile militia gathered there.

Revere and other captives taken by the British patrol were still escorted east toward Lexington, until about a half mile from Lexington they heard a gunshot. The British major demanded Revere explain the gunfire, and Revere replied it was a signal to “alarm the country”. As the group drew closer to Lexington, the town bell began to clang rapidly, upon which one of the captives proclaimed to the British soldiers “The bell's a'ringing! The town's alarmed, and you're all dead men!” The British soldiers gathered and decided not to press further towards Lexington but instead to free the prisoners and head back to warn their commanders. The British confiscated Revere's horse and rode off to warn the approaching British army column." (per Wikipedia).

I can't help but wonder how many people know that Sarah Palin was correct?

But it doesn't mater because I'm sure Jay Leno would never ask such question about Paul Revere, or would he?

Just in case, here's more so that you'll be really ready.

The Great Chicago Fire started at about 9 p.m. on Sunday, October 8, 1871, in or around a small barn that bordered the alley behind 137 DeKoven Street. Because most, if not all the buildings were made of wood, the great fire wiped out Chicago. The traditional account of the origin of the fire is that it was started by a cow kicking over a lantern in the barn owned by Patrick and Catherine O'Leary. 

Though the fire did start in O'Leary's Barn, later in 1893, Michael Ahern who was a reporter for the Chicago Republican newspaper admitted to creating the cow story. Even back then, you couldn't trust the News Media. He said he made it up because he thought it would make a better story.

It was President Abe Lincoln who proclaimed the first national Thanksgiving Day in 1863. Tough luck for turkeys!

The first Minimum Wage Law in the U.S. was instituted in 1938. The minimum wage was 25 cents per hour. Imagine that for a moment.

Yellowstone Nation Park is the world's first national park. It was dedicated in 1872. And yes, that's where the famous geyser "Old Faithful" is located just in case Jay does ask.

In 1865, several veterans of the Confederate Army formed a "private social club" in Pulaski, Tennessee, called the Ku Klux Klan. Can you imagine that they actually has the cojones to call it a "Social Club"?

The first losing candidate in a U.S. presidential election was Thomas Jefferson. He lost to John Adams.

George Washington had been unopposed when he ran for office. I mean come on here, who in his right mind would've run against George Washington?

Martha Washington, Pocahontas, Sacajawea, and Susan B. Anthony are the only 4 women to have been represented on U.S. currency.

The White House, in Washington DC, was originally gray, the color of the sandstone it was built out of. After the War of 1812, during which it had been burned by British troops, the outside walls were painted white to hide the smoke stains. Now you know the reason why it's white.  

The first U.S. Marines wore high leather collars to protect their necks from sabres, hence the name "leathernecks." I know you were curious about it!

The very first bomb dropped by the Allies on Berlin during World War II actually killed the only elephant in the Berlin Zoo. No kidding, it's true! Not exactly shock and awe was it? Unless of course you were that elephant.

And in case Jay decides to ask, yes, during the Civil War the Union ironclad, the U.S.S. Monitor, was the first U.S. ship to have a flush toilet.

Lastly, yes, Colonel George Armstrong Custer died at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. But it's true that no one can confirm that Custer's last words were "Where the Hell did all of these Indians come from?!"

Imagine that!

Story by Tom Correa

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

I miss Country Western Music!

Jim Reeves
I really do! I miss Country Western Music!

I really miss being able to hear great songs that weren't hard to sing along with. I miss music that's not blaring and as no melody and beat. I miss the days when bands knew how to drop their sound back and let the vocalist sing his or her heart out.

That's what I really miss? I miss great vocals with silky voices as smooth as a good whiskey. I miss so-so vocals on catchy tones that stuck in my head and couldn't shake them. I miss the words as well as the music!

The test of this modern music is how long it will live, and I don't see it around to pass the test of time.

In contrast Big Band leader Glenn Miller died more than 65 years ago, his sound brought an entire generation through World War II, and yes friends he's still being played today.

Bob Wills
Bob Wills, was an American Western Swing musician, songwriter and a band leader, who is considered the father of Western swing. Bob Wills name will forever be associated with Western Swing. His work lives on and people enjoy it.

There are Country Western voices like Jim Reeves, Elvis Presley, Marty Robbins, Bo Gibson, Eddy Arnold, Frankie Lane, Don Williams, Charley Pride, Ed Bruce, Tom T. Hall, and that of Patsy Cline, Loretta Lynn, Anne Murray, Emmylou Harris, and groups like the The Statler Brothers who live on.

People bought their music because they could sing and it was wonderful music. It sure wasn't for the theatrics of in your face booming noise and pyrotechnics at their concerts. It was for the words!

Yes, I miss great Western vocals. I miss the words that used to come with great stories and poetry.

Lyrics that made you feel good inside and you enjoyed it. Above all else, I miss vocals that were sung and not screamed. I miss songs that were not overpowered by instrumentals, electric bass guitars, drums, and the rise of synthesizers that void the lyrics.

Yes, Jim Reeves! He had a voice. He sang. And yes, he didn't scream out a song!

I hate screaming being passed off as music. I hate, absolutely hate, the whole idea that some idiot with a loud obnoxious band can be called Musicians.

I have a sister that can't hold a note or play a single musical instrument. She has been like that all her life, but that does not stop her from trying to sing at Christmas. God Bless her for trying, but the fact is that she can't sing.

I remember when she was a child and she used to rap her bowl on her high chair. Trust me when I say that that she wasn't a musician by any stretch of the imagination. It wasn't music that she was making, it was just noise.

It makes me wonder how many of today's so-called "musician" really believe they have talent when all they are doing is making noise. Noise, white noise, loud noise, bad horrible noise. Heck, I can't help but wonder these days if some of these bands hire their so-called musicians just for their ability to help the band drown out a lousy vocalist who like my sister can't really carry a tone but yet earnestly trys because she thinks she can.

There was once upon a time when music had heart and voices that lifted your spirit and made you want to sing. There was a time when music didn't forcefully throw away the words, and yes you would actually be able to hear what was being said.

There were beautiful stories, there was poetry, there was emotion that made you feel something deep inside you and stirred memories and fascination, pride and wonder. Maybe the song touched you to the point of you shedding a tear? Maybe you felt a smile sweep across your face? Maybe it was a good feeling and it touched some cord in you that wanted to join in the song?

There was a time when a handful of singers came forth because they could sing and they had voices that people wanted to listen to. The music wasn't designed to disguise a singers lack of talent or disappointing range, it was there to proudly present the singer and showcase their abilities.

It was singing and not screaming, and please don't mistake screaming for singing, I've known screamers who thought they had talent and screamed thinking they're singing. Trust me when I say that they weren't.

Janis Joplin trying to get through "Piece of my heart" was a first class offender of this. Heck, maybe she was the start of the whole let's scream through songs style of preforming.  

There was a time when songs had words and they meant something. Most were written as sort of poetry for singers who had voices that made you want to turn up the radio and listen to their emotion pouring through the radio.

Emotion? Yes, there was emotion. Love and heartache, loneliness and yearning, pride and admiration, a great message.

So where did it go? What happened to wonderful voices like that of Shelly West and Kathy Mattea? Heck, what has happened to Country Western Music?

Well, first they took the Western out of it along with the steel guitar. And lately, as though getting rid of the Western part of the genre wasn't bad enough, now they the Nashville Country Music executives want to take the Country out of it as well.

I remember going to a Hank Williams Jr. concert back about 12 years or so ago. During his show which was mostly Heavy Metal, he went into an almost 15 minute electric guitar riff solo.

First off I couldn't believe it. Then I couldn't believe my eyes as I sat there and watched people get up and leave. Yes, it was that bad.

It was interesting that he didn't cut it short when more than half of the audience walked out. It was a horrible show. I thought he stunk!

Lately I find that Brad Paisley seems to prefer throwing in those long guitar riff solos into his music. When I'm listening to one of his songs on the radio and hear him going into a riff, I change the Station to something else.

I honestly hope that he has better luck keeping an audience. I know that I won't go to listen to a guitar riff.  I think long drawn out riffs have a way of destroying a song.

Thanks God that we've had a few great hold outs in the County Music world. Thank God for wonderful singers from the old school when Western music meant singing.

Thank God for George Strait, Alan Jackson, and Reba McEntire, who haven't hid their wonderfully gifted voices behind blaring synthesizers.

George Strait's Cross My Heart demonstrates that Country Music can be enjoyable and touching and last the test of time.

And by the way, there is hope! Yes there is. There are some relatively new singers like Easton Corbin and Josh Turner, and yes a few others, who are fighting an uphill battle against Nashville.

Nashville where Country Music executives want to turn all of today's Country Music into just more horribly noisy Southern Rock.

Yes, there are a few out there who still sing and can be sung with. And yes, I support their efforts to bring back the steel guitar, the fiddle, and sing in a way that they can be heard.

To me, most of today's Country Music is just loud obnoxious Rock and Roll. It is mostly nothing but noise and headache material. Most of it seems to be meant as what is called "Cross Over" music trying to appeal to the kids who like loud in your face noise.

It seems that Country Music is now for Head Bangers, Metal Heads, Heavy Metal Dropouts and Old Hippies, all who seem to believe that loud senseless noise is considered music.

They say, "Play I Loud!"

I say, "Turn It Off!"

Story by Tom Correa

Monday, June 20, 2011

Factual and Attributable to Barrack Obama 2011

Every once in a while I'll get an e-mail that I need to forward. Mostly it's because it got me thinking about it's subject in one way or another. This is one of those e-mails.

If any other of our presidents, say Ronald Reagan or say George W. Bush, had doubled America's National Debt in just one year, that's twice the amount as has ever been accumulated in over two hundred years of our existence as a Nation, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had then proposed to Double the debt again within the next 10 years, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had criticized a State Law that he openly admitted that he never even read, would you think that he's just an ignorant hot head who really doesn't know what he's talking about?

If any other of our presidents joined in with a Foreign Country and sued one of our 50 States, would you give him a pass and say "So what!"

If any other president sued any State to continue to allow Illegal Aliens into that State, would you question his who's side he was on?

If any other of our presidents had pronounced the Marine Corps as if it were the Marine "Corpse" would you think him an idiot?

If any other of our presidents had put 87,000 American workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one foreign company had an accident, would you have agreed?

If any other of our presidents had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87000 American workers unemployed, would you support him?

If any other of our presidents had been the first President to need a teleprompter just to be able to talk to Americans, and especially to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own?

If any other president had needed a device of some sort to aid him when he's speaking to the American people, would that have made you think that he's not very bright or that maybe someone else has to give him answers to questions being asked? Would you wonder who's really in control behind the scenes?

If any other of our presidents had spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to take his First Lady to Dinner and Play in New York City, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had to increase his First Lady's personal taxpayer funded budget so that she can spend enormous amounts of taxpayer dollars on extravagance like her $375,000 Taxpayer Paid Vacation in Spain that included renting over 60 rooms at a Five Star hotel for 40 of her friends, would that have been OK with you especially in a time when millions of Americans are out of work? Would it surprise you that she has been dubbed by the press as “Michelle Antoinette”?

If any other of our presidents had reduced your retirement plan holdings of GM stock by 90% while at the same time paying back his Union supporters by giving the Unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had made a joke about the Special Olympics kids, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had given British Prime Minister Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs right after that same British Head-Of-State had given our president a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved or thought it classless and conceited?

If any other of our presidents had given the Queen of England an IPod containing videos of his own speeches, would you have thought it to be a proud moment for America ?

If any other of our presidents had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip or would you wonder how smart he is?

If any other of our presidents had filled his Cabinet and circle of Advisers with people who cannot keep their own Income Taxes paid, would you have approved? What if it were Bush who had done that, and say it was Donald Rumsfeld who hadn't been paying his Taxes, would you have given him a pass?

If any other of our presidents had stated that there were "57 States" in the United States, and obviously not know how many stars are on the American Flag, wouldn't you have had second thoughts about his mental capabilities? Would you wonder if he's smarter than a 1st grader?

If any other of our presidents would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how bringing the Olympic Games to Chicago would personally benefit him because it would mean he would be able to walk out his front door in his home town and see it, would you not have thought he was a self-absorbed, self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?

If any other of our presidents had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was Cinco de Mayo "The 5th of May," and then continue to flub it when he tried again, wouldn't you have winced in embarrassment or just laughed at him like everyone else did?

If any other of our presidents had on Earth Day, would you have concluded that maybe he's just a Political Hypocrite?

If any other of our presidents' Administrations had OK'd Air Force One to fly low over millions of people in downtown Manhattan and then be followed by an Air Force jet fighter causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether that president's Administration actually understands the significance of what happened to those same people on 9-11?

If any other of our presidents had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest, with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans during Katrina, would you want it made into a major ongoing Political issue with claims of racism and incompetence like what was done during Katrina?

If any other of our presidents had created the positions of 32 taxpayer paid Czars who report directly to him, would you have approved? Czars that have not been examined at least in the same way that Cabinet Members are examined through confirmation hearing in Congress, would that be OK with you?

If any other of our presidents had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had No Constitutional Authority to do so, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, what is it about Barrack Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Maybe it was the picture of him drinking a pint of stout in an Irish Pub in Ireland right after Joplin, Missouri, was hit recently by devastation and loss of life?

Maybe it is his Justice Department, and his personally appointed Attorney General and Homeland Security Chief, all of who allowed almost 3,000 assault weapons to be given to Mexican Cartel murderers right across the U.S.-Mexico Border? Recently, yes, recently. If it were any other president, would it matter to you?

It should matter to you. And if you aren't worried about it, well you should be because he's done all these things in the short time that he has been in office as president.

If you can't think of anything that impresses you about Obama, you're not alone. But remember that there are people who don't care about Obama's feelings of "illusory superiority".

He has supporters who believe that none of this matters, and they want to re-elect him. 

-- end of email.

Think about this, and ask yourself if you really think our country can handle re-electing him for one more term? Every statement and action in this email is true, they factual and correctly attributable to Barrack Hussein Obama.

Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable. Ask yourself if he should stay in the White House? Doing nothing to get him out of office is just as good as voting for him.

Remember, "All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

And yes, that's the way I see it.
Tom Correa

Sunday, June 19, 2011

King Kalakaua Needed U.S. Marines In 1874

This is the story of America's First Military Intervention in Hawaii.

It is a story of a kingdom on the brink of civil war, of betrayal and coups and an overthrow, of a sister who tried to unseat her brother, of royalty against royalty, and how the U.S. Marines were called in to quiet things. And yes, the year was 1874 - not 1893 as most have been led to believe.

Early that year, Frank and Jesse James, with a small gang, robbed a train at Gads Hill, Missouri. Then later that year, the James Gang took a train to Muncie, Kansas. That was the year that Levi Strauss started marketing blue jeans with copper rivets, the price was $13.50 per dozen.

And yes, it was a time when back East in New York City, William Marcy "Boss" Tweed of Tammany Hall was convicted of defrauding the City of New York out of $6,000,000 (Six Million Dollars). Can you imagine Tweed was sentenced to 12 years in prison for his crime? Even back then, money could buy you political power and favorable judgments.

That year saw the Texas State Capitol turned into an armed camp with two rival legislatures. The outgoing Texas governor refused to surrender his office. Then when President U.S. Grant refused to support the outgoing governor's request for troops, he conceded and the new governor was inaugurated.

In 1874, Comanche Chief Quanah Parker and a Medicine-man to known as Esa-Tai, (literal name, "Coyote Dung") were defeated at Adobe Walls, where one of the defenders was a man that the Old West would come to know as Bat Masterson.

It was the year that Joseph F. Glidden patented barbed wire, which later led to range wars and the spilling of blood across the West. And yes, it was when law officers killed Jim Reed, who was the first husband of Myra Maybelle Shirley. She, of course, was better known as the famous bandit queen Belle Starr.

Also, in the continental United States, in a small town called Comer in Alabama, the White League - a racist group that, like the Ku Klux Klan, comprised of white Democrats - formed an armed mob and killed at least seven black Republicans and a white Republican judge's son. The attack injured at least 70 more and drove off over 1,000 defenseless Republicans from the polls, and coincidentally became known as the Alabama Election Riot of 1874.

As for what else was going on that year of interest to Americans?
Well, how about going to Hawaii?

In 1874, Americans saw the first time that U.S. Marines would land in Honolulu, Hawaii. In that circumstance, the Hawaiian government needed American Marines to protect a Hawaiian King.

Needed U.S. Marines? So were you also taught, as many are today, that American Marines were only used as the "imperialist muscle" of the United States? Were you too told that Americans took advantage of a chaotic situation in Hawaii, seeing it as an opportunity to overthrow the Hawaiian government, and cobbled up the island nation? That's the great re-write of history. 

Thankfully, I was taught something different than today's rewrite of what took place.

A lot of people know about or have heard of the time when the United States sent its Marines ashore in Hawaii in 1893 during the coup that overthrew Queen Liliuokalani. The involvement of the Marines during the overthrow of the Queen in that coup d'etat by her cabinet and prominent businessmen there at the time has always been a point of contention since it happened. 

Some say the U.S. Marines assisted in the coup, others like myself disagree and believe that the U.S. Marines who parked themselves across from Iolani Palace were there simply "on standby" in case of history repeats itself. Yes, in case Hawaiian history repeated itself.

Though it was a "bloodless" coup, it's a fact that Queen Liliuokalani was overthrown and that a Provisional Government was established. And as for the role of the U.S. Marines, well, I believe they were there to do as they had done once before in Hawaiian History during another episode where the Hawaiian government was in turmoil and the Hawaiian government requested American help. Yes, when the Hawaiian government requested help.

In reality, the 1893 use of the United States Marines was the second time U.S. Marines were involved in settling a Hawaiian political problem. The fact is, if it weren't for United States Marines, there might not have been Hawaii's most beloved Merrie Monarch - King David Kalakaua.

This is the story of how the new Hawaiian King, David Kalakaua, the King-elect of the Kingdom of Hawaii, needed the United States Marines.

How did it start?

When King Kamehameha V, the last ruler of the House of Kamehameha, died on December 11, 1872, without naming a successor, the Kingdom of Hawaii faced a political crisis. Under the Kingdom's 1864 constitution, if the King did not appoint a successor, a new king would be elected by the legislature from the eligible Hawaiian royals still alive. The election was between William Charles Lunalilo and David Kalakaua.

David Kalakaua was born David Laamea Kamanakapuu Mahinulani Nalaiaehuokalani Lumialani Kalakaua on November 16th, 1836. His lineage went back to many High Chiefs. Kalakaua was the second surviving son of his father High Chief Caesar Kaluaiku Kapaakea and his mother High Chiefest Analea Keohokalole.

When David Kalakaua was a child of four, he was returned to Oahu to live with his biological parents and begin his education at the Chiefs Children's School. At the Hawaiian school, David Kalakaua became fluent in English and the Hawaiian language, which was already being replaced by British English.

He began studying law at the age of 16, but because of his various government positions, he was prevented from fully completing his legal training.  Instead, by 1856, he was a major on the staff of King Kamehameha IV. In addition to his military duties, Kalakaua served in the Department of the Interior - and in 1863, he was appointed postmaster general.

He had also led a political organization known as the Young Hawaiians. The group’s motto was "Hawaii for the Hawaiians."

Lunalilo was the more popular of the two. His grandfather was Kalaimamahu, a half-brother of Kamehameha The Great, and was thus a cousin of King Kamehameha V. His grandmother was Queen Kalakaua Kaheiheimalie, sister of Kamehameha’s favorite wife, Queen Kaahumanu. 

Because of this, many people believed the throne rightly belonged to Lunalilo since the only person more closely related to Kamehameha V, was Bernice Pauahi Bishop, who made it clear that she did not want the throne.

Another contender was Princess Ruth Keelikolani, who was a half-sister to King Kamehameha V. She was a favorite among the Hawaiian Chiefs because of her adherence to the old Hawaiian ways. She was the governess of Hawaii and refused to speak English even though she was fluent in it.

This left Kalakaua and Lunalilo, and of the two, Lunalilo was greatly favored. In fact, Lunalilo's popularity was so great that some people believed that he could have simply walked into the capital and declared himself King. Lunalilo, however, insisted that the Hawaiian Constitution be followed.

It is interesting that King Lunalilo, unlike Kalakaua, wanted to amend the Constitution to make the government more democratic by removing property qualifications for voting. Land and property qualifications stopped a lot of Native Hawaiians from voting in the future.

It was decided that there would be a popular election to give the people a chance to have their voices heard. However, because the constitution gave the legislature the power to decide who would be the next king, the popular election would be unofficial. Lunalilo urged the people of the Kingdom to have their voices heard and the election was held on January 1, 1873.

Kalakaua was much more conservative than his opponent, Lunalilo. At the time, foreigners dominated the Hawaiian government. Kalakaua promised to put native Hawaiians back into the Kingdom's government. He also promised to amend the Kingdom's constitution.

On January 1, 1873, a popular election was held for the office of King of Hawaii. Lunalilo won with an overwhelming majority. The next day, the legislature confirmed the popular vote and elected Lunalilo unanimously. Kalākaua conceded.

Lunalilo won by an overwhelming majority. And yes, right after Lunalilo was voted in as King, it was speculated that the reason for the unanimous vote was because each legislator was required to sign his name on the back of his ballot. The Hawaii Legislators were afraid to go against the wishes of the people. Queen Emma later wrote in a letter that hundreds of Hawaiians were ready to tear to pieces anyone who opposed Lunalilo.

King Lunalilo

William Lunalilo was elected as King and was very popular with the people. He spent his reign trying to make the Hawaiian government more democratic. And yes, because the Kingdom was in an economic depression mainly due to a rapidly declining whaling industry, he wanted to improve Hawaii's economic situation.

Commerce groups asked King Lunalilo to look at sugar to improve the economy and recommended that a treaty be drawn with the United States to allow Hawaiian sugar to enter the U.S. tax-free. To make such a treaty, many thought that the Kingdom would have to offer the Pearl Harbor area to the United States in exchange.

The U.S. did not want a port but did want a coal refueling station. This was the era when steam power was replacing sails. Though negotiations started under his predecessor, there was much controversy over the coal station, and he subsequently dropped the proposal.

During Lunalilo's reign, a Mutiny took place in the small Hawaiian Army. The King intervened and actually interviewed the troops involved in the Mutiny to persuade them to lay down their arms. Following this, the king disbanded the army. From that point on, the Kingdom had no armed forces until the person who replaced him restored them.

After only one year and 25 days, King Lunalilo died on February 3, 1874, from tuberculosis at the age of 39. It is said that Lunalilo did not designate an heir to the throne because he wished to have the people choose their next ruler. However, the constitution of 1864 had charged the legislature, not the people, with the task of electing the next king. So again, with no successor named, again, a crisis was at hand.

According to the Kingdom of Hawaii's Constitution of 1864, Article 22 states, if the monarch dies before naming a successor, "such vacancy, shall cause a meeting of the Legislative Assembly, who shall elect by ballot some native Ali'i of the Kingdom as Successor." Therefore, the elections were held by the representatives. No, not the public. Please understand that Hawaiian elections never included Hawaiian people -- just the members of the Legislative Assembly -- the Chiefs.

The Hawaiian Election Of 1874

The Royal Election of 1874 was held in Hawaii on February 12, 1874. It was the second time that an election for head of state was held. This time the Hawaiian electoral process began with Queen Emma, the widowed wife of Kamehameha IV, running against David Kalakaua.

The day after Lunalilo died, Kalakaua declared himself a candidate for the throne. The next day Queen Emma did the same. And, that was when the animosity which was brewing between the Kamehamehas and the Kalakaua houses went public. 

The Hawaiian Election of 1874 was mud-slinging at its best. That election makes today's American elections look absolutely civil and polite. Leading up to the elections, businesses, and political interests, the newspapers of the time and early political parties developed strong opinions, and the public was divided between the two candidates.

To give an example of how horrible it had gotten. Her full name Emma Kalanikaumakaamano Kaleleonālani Naea Rooke of Hawaii, was Queen Consort of King Kamehameha IV from 1856 to his death in 1863. Yet, at one point, David Kalakaua and his sister Lydia Kamakaeha, who herself would become Queen Liliuokalani, criticized Queen Emma's claim of descent from Kamehameha's brother and subsequently the Kamehameha bloodline. They claimed it was false.

Imagine the animosity here, the Kalakaua family questioned who her parents were. They even charged that Emma had Caucasian blood. Besides claiming that that made her unfit to be King Kamehameha IV's bride, nevertheless a Hawaiian Queen, having Caucasian blood made her the enemy of the Hawaiian people. Yes, even then, Whites were hated in Hawaii.

Queen Emma

Emma was born on January 2, 1836, in Honolulu and was often called Emalani, which means "royal Emma". Her father was High Chief George Naea and her mother was High Chieftess Fanny Kekelaokalani Young.

She was adopted under the Hawaiian tradition of hanai by her childless maternal aunt, Chiefess Grace Kamaikui Young Rooke, and her husband who was Dr. Thomas C. B. Rooke.

Emma's father, Naea was the son of High Chief Kamaunu and High Chieftess Kukaeleiki - which of course, was her grandmother. Her grandmother, Kukaeleiki, was the daughter of Kalauawa, who was a Kauai noble, and she was a cousin of Queen Keopuolani, who was the most sacred wife of Kamehameha I - also known as Kamehameha The Great.

Emma was educated in Honolulu at the Royal School, which was established by American missionaries. In 1856, she married Alexander Liholiho, who a year earlier had assumed the throne as Kamehameha IV. Two years later, in 1858, Emma gave birth to a son, the Haku O Hawaii, Prince Albert Edward Kauikeaouli Kaleiopapa a Kamehameha. But tragically, Prince Albert died in August 1862 of "brain fever" while under the care of Princess Kapiolani.

The newspapers of the time reported the illness as "brain fever," now known as meningitis. The young Prince was only four years old. Afterward, the King fell into despair, blaming himself for the loss of his son. The King then ordered the construction of the Royal Mausoleum in Nuuanu Valley to house his son's body, since the old mausoleum had become too full. Today, the mausoleum is the burial site of most of the members of the Hawaiian royal family.

The King's depression was so severe that he considered abdicating the throne. A year later, a grief-stricken Kamehameha IV, who blamed himself for the boy’s death, also died. Queen Emma would not have any more children.

It was hard for me to believe that Kalakaua's sister, the future Queen Liliuokalani, would actually accuse Queen Emma of not being eligible to take the throne because of her lineage. Knowing full well that that was not the case. But then again, it just shows that politics in any country can bring out ruthlessness in people. I guess, Queen Liliuokalani was not exempt from that rule.
The fact is that Emma's candidacy was agreeable to many Native Hawaiians, not only because her husband was a member of the Kamehameha Dynasty, but she was also closer in descent to Hawaii's first king, Kamehameha I, than was her opponent.  

On foreign policy, she was like her husband, who was pro-British.  Her supporters styled themselves as "Emmaites" or "Queenites" and were made up of mostly Hawaiians and British subjects.

In comparison, Kalakaua, although being pro-Hawaiian and somewhat pro-British, he leaned more toward America. His supporters were Hawaiian business interests. And since he was seen as not being anti-American, he was also very popular with American citizens on the islands at the time.

She also strongly wished to stop Hawaii's dependence on American industry and to give the Native Hawaiians a more powerful voice in government, though she did not like the idea of a Republic where the people rule, she was a believer in the monarchy ruling the lower classes.

Emma was a popular choice among the people, especially in Honolulu, but her pro-British views were unpopular with the Hawaiian legislature dominated by pro-American factions.

Compared to Kalakaua, who was considered more sympathetic to the growing power of the American business interest in the islands, she wasn't in a good place when election day came on February 12th simply because the Hawaiian Legislative Assembly -- which actually elected the new monarch -- favored David Kalakaua.

Results, Riots, Revolution, And The Rebellion!

On Election Day, February 12, 1874, a crowd of citizens congregated at the legislature to be informed of the results of the elections. David Kalakaua won the election 39 to 6. Yes, an overwhelming victory when you consider there are only 45 votes to be counted. And please remember, the Hawaiian people did not have a right to vote. They had no say in the Royal Elections as only the 45 members of the assembly voted. 

Let's make something very clear here, for those people who write me to say that the Hawaiian people picked their King or Queen, you are wrong. The Hawaiian people never ever had the right to vote under the Kingdon of Hawaii. When elections for King or Queen started taking place, only the 45 members of the Hawaiian Legislature could vote. As much as some might not like it, it's a fact that Hawaiians did not get the right to vote for their own representatives until after 1900 when Hawaii became a Territory of the United States. Prior to that, the rights of Hawaiians were very few since they were merely subjects dominated by a monarchy. 

It was February 12, 1874, and it is known as the Honolulu Courthouse Riot of 1874. In reality, it was a rebellion. And yes, some even called it a "Revolution!" "The Honolulu Courthouse Riot" took place when Hawaiian followers of Queen Emma, known as Emmaites, attacked the supporters of King Kalakaua on election day, and riots broke out across Honolulu. 

Angered at the outcome, along with widespread talk of influence peddling and secret deals, the whole ordeal worked up the crowd of Emma supporters that had gathered at the courthouse into a heated state. News of her defeat raced through Honolulu like a wildfire. It triggered large-scale rioting throughout Honolulu. And really, to say that Queen Emma was unhappy with the decision would have been an understatement. Queen Emma, with her contentious pro-British supporters, violently opposed Kalakaua, and she did nothing to stop them.

The Old Honolulu Courthouse was built in 1852 and served as the government building of the Kingdom of Hawaii, where the Legislative Assembly and the Supreme Court met. It was damaged in the Royal Election of 1874 after the rioting by the Emmaites.

The election proceedings were held at the Honolulu Courthouse, but from her Nuuanu Valley home, Queen Emma decided to lead an angry mob of over a hundred followers - although some say that count was low and that there were many, many more than just 100 - to the courthouse. Queen Emma’s supporters, enraged by the results, attempted to punish the Representatives that voted against their candidate, initiating a riot amongst this faction of the crowd.

“The crowd surrounded the carriage and laid hands on them, and they attempted to defend themselves, as best they could without weapons, two of them were badly wounded before they effected entrance into the building to which they retreated.” --Hawaiian Gazette – March 4, 1874.

"A riot ensued and many of the legislators were attacked, with one subsequently dying from his injuries" (wrote Mr. Lonoaea, a representative from Wailuku, Maui).

Committeemen for Kalakaua attempting to deliver the election results got into the carriage in front of the court house - but were stopped and attacked by the rioters. They fled back into the courthouse while being beaten with clubs and sliced with machetes. Their carriage was broken apart and the pieces were used as clubs. 

It was about 2 p.m. when the question was decided and Major Moehonua and another person were directed to convey the information to the King.

Now the carriage that was waiting outside of the courthouse to deliver the news of the verdict to David Kalakaua, who was waiting at his home, was torn apart by an angry mob of Queen Emma's anti-American forces, and they rushed the courthouse. It all happened before the Hawaiian Electoral Committee could tell the driver to go tell the new King the news of his victory. But, somehow, the word still got to Kalakaua.

So what about the Hawaiian Police?

Well, when the Hawaiian Legislative Assembly was attacked, the Hawaiian Police tore off their badges and joined the rioters. It's true, Honolulu Police guarding the legislature initially held back the rioters from entering the court house but were overwhelmed.

“An extra Police force had been enrolled the day previous, but except from those stationed inside, little or no assistance was obtained from the Police, who simply stood by and looked on, apparently sympathizing with the mob. It may be added that none of them were armed even with batons.” -- Hawaiian Gazette – March 4, 1874

When the police were unable to stop the riot they removed their badges to save themselves from being targeted as members of the government establishment. 
Frankly, just because people want to say something did not happen, does not mean it did not. Whether people want to hear it or not, it is a historical fact the Honolulu police force deserted. It is a fact that many of them actually joined in the riot against the new King and his supporters. And to add to the problems, many former Hawaiian Army soldiers and Honolulu police officers ended up actually fighting against each other and those trying to restore order.

The rioters entered the court house beating the representatives and vandalizing the offices, One Hawaiian representative was thrown out an upper-story window. And yes, since the Hawaiian Army had been disbanded after a Mutiny against the officers and Royal family some months earlier under King Lunalilo. The local militias were considered unreliable and untrustworthy because they were filled with "foreigners" even though many of their families had already been there for generations.

No, there was no one to stop the riots that were spreading out of control.

It was a fight about political ideologies as much as it was about who won and who lost. It was sort of a Red State versus Blue State situation -- if you know what I mean. And yes, the King-elect was hated. 

Queen Emma's followers surrounded and attacked the Honolulu courthouse and then proceeded to attack the occupants of other buildings, other Hawaiians, which spread the riot throughout most of the city of Honolulu.

Revolution was in the air, and when it didn't look like the riot would subside, the King-elect along with Charles R. Bishop, who was Hawaii's Minister of Foreign Affairs, went to U.S. Minister Henry Pierce and requested U.S. military intervention to reestablish order. It was apparent to the Hawaiian kingdom, the King-elect and his Ministers, to their embarrassment, Hawaii was a nation that could not quell its own riot -- foreign intervention was the answer to quell what appeared to many to be the start of a revolution.

Let's remember that the Hawaiian army had been disbanded after a Mutiny sometime before, and the militias were unreliable, there was nobody to stop the riot. The Honolulu police force deserted and also joined in the unrest, even fighting against each other depending on their political sympathies.

“The only alternative, in this emergency, was to seek aid from the war vessels in port. About half-past 4 pm, a written request was sent by Charles R Bishop (the Minister of Foreign Affairs,) on behalf of the Government, to the American Minister Resident, for a detachment to be landed from the US ships Tuscarora and Portsmouth, lying in the harbor. And a similar request was transmitted to the British Consul General.” --Hawaiian Gazette – March 4, 1874

The request stated, “Sir: A riotous mob having unexpectedly made a violent attack upon the Court House and the Members of the Legislature which we have not the force at hand to resist, I have to request that you will cause to be furnished at the earliest moment possible aid from the US ships "Tuscarora" and "Portsmouth" to the Police, in quelling the riot and temporarily protecting life and property. Your obedient servant, Chas. R. Bishop” -- Hawaiian Gazette – March 4, 1874

The U.S. Navy In Hawaii

Back in 1865, the United States Navy established the North Pacific Squadron to take care of America's concerns on the West Coast and the Hawaiian Islands.

During those days, the USS Lackawanna was assigned the task of cruising among the islands, what was called "a locality of great and increasing interest and importance."

Among her assignments, the Lackawanna surveyed all of the islands and the reefs along the whole of the Hawaiian Island chain. That, my friends, means that she mapped out everything along a 1,500-mile string of more than 135 islands. In fact, on 28 August 1867, Captain William Reynolds of the USS Lackawanna formally took possession of the Midway atoll for the United States. Yes, the United States had possessions in the pacific in the 1860s.

Also called Midway Island, it is about one-third of the way between Honolulu, Hawaii, and Tokyo, Japan. It is about 2,800 nautical miles west of San Francisco, and 2,200 nautical miles east of Tokyo. Midway Island became the first Pacific island to be annexed by the United States.

By November of 1867, a total of 42 American flags flew over whaling ships and merchant vessels in Honolulu harbor versus only 6 of those flying other foreign flags. This fact did not go unnoticed in Washington D.C., a harbor of that importance was duly noted.

By request of the Kingdom of Hawaii, on March 1, 1869, the United States Congress allocated $50,000 in funds to deepen the approaches to Pearl Harbor. This was a great deal of money at the time. It would be the equivalent of about half a million dollars today.

Since 1868, when the U.S. Commander of the Pacific Fleet visited the Hawaiian islands to look after "American interests," Naval officers have played an important role in internal affairs. They served as arbitrators in business disputes, negotiators of trade agreements, and defenders of law and order.

Periodic voyages among the islands and to the mainland aboard U.S. warships were arranged for members of the Royal family and important island government officials. In effect, the American fleet acted as the Hawaiian Royal Family's personal navy.

When King Lunalilo died in 1873, there were two United States sloops-of-war, the USS Tuscarora and the USS Portsmouth, anchored in Honolulu Harbor. Both were there in Hawaii on an expedition of negotiation to see if an agreement could be reached to allow the exportation of sugar to the United States duty-free.

The agreement had been in negotiations for many years and was definitely something that David Kalakaua supported during his campaign. He felt stronger ties with the United States would assure economic growth for the islands. It was just that simple.

By Request Of The Kingdom Of Hawaii, Send In The Marines!

When the Continental Congress called for the creation of the Marine Corps, the primary duty of the Marines was to serve as "Soldiers of the Sea" on board Naval Warships.

U.S. Marine Corps Emblem 
U.S. Marine detachments had been maintained aboard American Navy ships since the American Revolution.

When the Marine Corps was re-established by the War Department through the Congressional  "Act to provide a Naval Armament of 18 March 1794," -- it specified the numbers of Marines to be recruited for each frigate.

Marine Detachments aboard warships, just like the mission of the Marine Corps itself, were in transition in the 19th century. The Navy's transition from sail to steam put into question the need for Marines on naval warships.

Meanwhile, while the politicians in Washington, D.C., wondered about what "role the Marine Corps" would have in the future, the Marines served as a convenient resource for interventions and landings to protect American lives and interests overseas.

Among the interventions was Hawaii in 1874

This was not the first time U.S. Marines landed in Honolulu. On September 21st, 1870, the United States Navy had its first mission in the Hawaiian Islands. Believe it or not, the U.S. Navy landed Marines to place the American flag at half-mast at the American consul.

It was when upon the death of Queen Kalama, who was the wife of King Kamehameha III, the American consul in Honolulu would not assume responsibility for lowering the American flag to half-mast. Imagine that! I guess that that shows that there have always been people out there who don't want to take the responsibility for things.

In 1874, when the call came in for help, the commanders of the USS Tuscarora and the USS Portsmouth both agreed to intervene by sending in their detachments of U.S. Marines on board. So yes, in 1874, a force of just over 150 American Marines and a handful of Sailors under the command of Lieutenant Commander Theodore F. Jewell were put ashore.

They formulated a plan to work in concert with the eighty or more British troops, most likely British Royal Marines, commanded by Captain Bay from the sloop-of-war HMS Tenedos.

American Marines headed straight for the courthouse, pushing back the rioters, and placing guards, they also occupied the city armory, the treasury, the station house, and the jail. British forces marched up Nuʻuanu Valley to Emma's house.

American Marines headed straight for the Honolulu Courthouse with the objective of securing it first. Once there, that is exactly what took place with many of the rioters - upon seeing the Marines - turning to "run like rats," as one newspaper put it.

Pushing back the rioters, they then placed guards, took custody, and formally occupied all of the Hawaiian government's buildings, such as the City Armory, the Treasury, the Station House, and even the Honolulu Jail. The Honolulu Jail was filled with angry prisoners who supported Queen Emma. The prisoners were angry and wanted to support Queen Emma. Believe it or not, Queen Emma was not a shrinking violet. She actually promised the prisoners that she would set them free -- but only if they supported her in her rebellion.

British forces marched up Nuuanu Valley to Queen Emma's house, where they dispersed a large crowd with force. After that, they went to Honolulu to join up with American Marines and man Iolani Palace and the barracks.

The fighting lasted into the night. By sundown, some of the rioters had been captured, but not all. Many still traveled the city in small groups trying to stir up support for Queen Emma.

For a few weeks in 1874, U.S. Marines occupied and controlled all aspects of the Hawaiian Government -- and kept the Kingdom safe for King Kalakaua.

Later the city was mostly quiet with the exception of sporadic gunfire and the sounds of locals looting businesses and destroying property. Yes, several people were killed or injured in the conflict, including one Hawaiian legislature who died later of his injuries. And yes, many foreign citizens were killed due to attacks by mobs of Emma supporters roaming the streets.

Fortunately, no British troops were lost during the conflict. And though many were wounded in the fighting to restore order, it is unclear how many American Marines were lost.  

“The American and English landing forces patrolled the city for a few nights and about one week later, no other disturbances occurring in the meantime, were withdrawn to their respective ships.”
(WHH Southerland)

During the 30 years from the end of the American Civil War to the end of the 19th century, U.S. Marines were involved in over 28 separate foreign interventions. And yes, Sea Going Marine Detachments on Navy ships of war, fought in every clime and place where they could take a gun. A sorry fact is that they would be back in Hawaii in less than 20 years -- again at the request of the Hawaiian government.  

Never Tried For Treason Against The Kingdom

Like Liliuokalani later, who tried overthrowing her own brother, King David Kalakaua, Emma was never tried, nor did she claim any part in the attempted rebellion or the riot. That was the case, even though all knew she supported, and in fact encouraged, the actions of her followers.

Though Queen Emma was never exiled or punished by the Hawaiian kingdom or its government for her role in the riot, and rebellion, she remained at her home in the valley for several years with her followers and friends. Her idea of overthrowing the Hawaiian Government by force failed, the riot she urged on gained nothing for her.

For the rest of her life, she remained bitter and did not communicate with King Kalakaua, his wife Queen Kapiolani, or later with Queen Liliuokalani when she assumed the throne. And no, She never forgave Liliuokalani for the attacks on her family during the political campaign.

As for Kapiolani, her first marriage was to High Chief Benjamin Namakehaokalani or sometimes called Bennet Namakeha. He was 35 years older than Kapiolani. He was an uncle of Queen Emma on her father George Naea's side. This made her the widowed aunt of Queen Emma. Kapiolani was the caretaker of Queen Emma's son, the Haku O Hawaii, Prince Albert Kamehameha, when he died in 1862.

Queen Emma blamed and never forgave Kapiolani for the child's death because he was under Kapiolani's care at the time. Even after Kapiolani became Queen after she married David Kalakaua, she never forgave her.

Thankfully for Emma, her instigation of the 1874 Hawaiian Rebellion is not the lasting legacy of Queen Emma. Her legacy lives on today thanks to her wonderful work back in 1859 while she was Queen. That was when Emma established Queen's Hospital in Honolulu. And yes, it is said that she visited patients there almost daily when she was in residence in Honolulu. Today, it is now called the Queen's Medical Center.   

As for Representatives William Thomas Martin and William Luther Moehonua, who survived the attack on the legislative assembly by Queen Emma's supporters on February 12, 1874, King Kalakaua made Moehonua his first minister of the interior and later governor of Oahu. But, because of the brain damage he received from that brutal attack, William Thomas Martin did not return to the legislature.

King Kalakaua

He was a man who would go from Hawaii's Hated New King to Hawaii's Beloved Merrie Monarch

The United States Marines ended their occupation of Hawaii's government at the end of February that year, essentially America's involvement in the establishment of a Hawaiian King had ended.

My teacher at Kaimuki High School, Mrs. DeMello, who was a great teacher of Hawaiian History (Hawaiiana class), once asked our class, to paraphrase her, "If the United States wanted to take Hawaii by force? They didn't need to wait until 1893 when they could have done it in 1874. And even then, in 1893, the American government had to be forced into annexing Hawaii years later. "

I believe she was right. It was the first time that U.S. Marines were called out to restore order and ensure a safe transition of power when assisting the Hawaiian government. 

As for David Kalakaua, well, he took the oath as King of the Kingdom of Hawaii on February 13th. His right to the throne was no longer in jeopardy for the time being. Of course, later, King Kalakaua would find further opposition in the way of attempted a number of coup d'etat by a few individuals, including his own sister - the woman who would become known as Queen Liliuokalani.

After the riots and the bitter partisanship, King Kalakaua traveled to all of the islands with his wife Queen Kapiolani. He did this to try to gain the trust of the Hawaiian people, while at the same time assuring his subjects with popular proposals that led to an increase in Hawaiian Patriotism at that time.

He negotiated a Reciprocity Treaty allowing Hawaiian goods into the United States duty-free. The Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 allowed for American use of Pearl Harbor in exchange for the elimination of tariffs on Hawaiian goods. The Reciprocity Treaty was something that previous Hawaiian Kings had been unable to accomplish. Hawaii's treaty with the United States granted exclusive trading rights between America and Hawaii.

Among his people, King Kalakaua's reputation soon grew as he gained a reputation as a man who enjoyed drinking and gambling, parties and dancing, horse racing, sailing, and canoe regattas at the Royal Boat House at Honolulu Harbor.

He did not like Protestant Missionaries because he felt they looked down on Hawaiians and their ways. It is impressive that their condemnation did not stop the King from accomplishing his goals of restoring Hawaii's cultural traits and ideals that had been so demonized by those very same Missionaries.

To the disdain of the Protestant Missionaries in the kingdom, King Kalakaua brought back the music and dance of the land, hula, and the art of the chant. He also attempted to revitalize the Hawaiian language, which had been replaced in many quarters by English. Above all else, he tried to reverse the dwindling Native Hawaiian population by encouraging births and staying in Hawaii. Many of the Native Hawaiians had been leaving Hawaii for opportunities elsewhere for many years. Many were tired of being Native Tenants and wanted land of their own. Because of their leaving, the bloodlines of the Hawaiian people were being mixed with those who were being brought there. By the time of King Kalakaua, Hawaiians were becoming more and more of a mixed race. The King wanted to reverse that, but simply couldn't.

Though he became extremely popular during his 17-year reign, it's also true that his administration licensed the sale of opium, created a lottery, and even tried to mint Kalakaua coins to use in lieu of the English pound or the American dollar. Some of these things were not always popular with the Hawaiian people, but business in Hawaii flourished. 

At the same time this was going on, the King's powers were weakened due to so-called "Reformists" who worked to undermine the monarchy. These people eventually took control of the Hawaii legislature. 

The Rebellion of 1887 - The Bayonet Constitution

On June 30, 1887, a meeting of residents, including the armed militia of the Honolulu Rifles and politicians who later formed the Reform Party of the Hawaiian Kingdom, demanded King Kalakaua dismiss his cabinet headed by the controversial Walter M. Gibson.

The meeting was called to order by Sanford B. Dole and chaired by Peter Cushman Jones. Lorrin A. Thurston prepared a list of demands for the king. The meeting also insisted a new constitution be written. The next morning, on July 1, 1887, a shipment of arms was discovered - although they were later found to be nothing more than smooth-bore hunting shotguns used to scare birds from farmers' fields.

The Honolulu Rifles took control and arrested Gibson. Kalakaua, in return, called in US Minister George W. Merrill, and the British, French, Portuguese, and Japanese representatives and requested help. They all suggested he comply with any demands, which he did. Thurston then became the powerful interior minister, although Englishman William Lowthian Green was nominally head of the cabinet as minister of finance. Over less than a week, the new constitution was drafted by a group of lawyers including Thurston, Dole, William Ansel Kinney, William Owen Smith, George Norton Wilcox, and Edward Griffin Hitchcock. Most were also associated with the Hawaiian League, which was actually in favor of ending the Kingdom and annexation by the United States.

Kalakaua signed the document on July 6, 1887, despite arguments over the scope of the changes. Basically, what the new Constitution did was create a Constitutional Monarchy like that of Great Britain. It essentially stripped the King of most of his personal authority and empowered the legislature and cabinet of the government. It has since become widely known as the "Bayonet Constitution" because of the threat of force used to gain Kalakaua's cooperation.

At the time Kalakaua had been forced to sign the constitution under threat of arms, military rifles were commonly fixed with bayonets. King Kalakaua was essentially stripped of much of his authority. King Kalakaua was reduced more or less to a figurehead.

To add to King Kalakaua's problems, in 1887, his sister, Liliuokalani, charged Kalakaua with cowardice. Then a conspiracy by R.W. Wilcox, C.B. Wilson, and Sam Nowlin, demanded that King Kalakaua abdicate the throne in favor of sister Liliuokalani. Liliuokalani was behind the coup against her own brother.

Yes, it's true. In April of 1889, King Kalakaua's own sister, Liliuokalani, planned an insurrection for another revolution following the revolution of 1887.

On July 30, 1889, Wilcox and 150 armed men occupied the Palace and attempts to have Kalakaua proclaim that the 1864 Constitution was to replace the 1887 Constitution. At the same time, supporters of Kalakaua took up arms against insurgents. Volunteer riflemen turned out to support the Government in what was called the Missionary Party. 

A legation was on the hotel premises when Mr. Merrill, the U.S. Minister, requested a contingent of U.S. Marines to be landed for a day in support of King Kalakaua and his government. U.S. Marines from the USS Adams went ashore again to support King Kalakaua and re-enforce Iolani Palace. Soon a duel between the insurgents and volunteers begins with artillery and rifle fire, by evening the fighting ends and the insurgents surrendered. 

It was reported later that United States Marine sharpshooters made the difference and kept the attempted coup by his sister Liliuokalani from succeeding.

On June 17, 1890, Kalakaua made conservative appointments of J.A. Cummins, C.N. Spencer, Godfrey Brown, and A.P. Peterson, a Royalists, to his cabinet. Some say that other than maybe King Kamehameha the first, King Kalakaua, who was known as the Merrie Monarch, remains the best known and loved of Hawaii's Kings.

The fact is that he had prepared himself to rule. Though not of Kamehameha bloodline, Kalakaua was educated, wise, and comfortable with both the Hawaiian and the Western cultures. He understood and respected both ways of life. He was also an extremely intelligent man who understood the art of diplomacy and political maneuvering. Because of him, the United States provided Hawaii with a trade deal that enabled Hawaii to sell its products in America tax-free. He had good relations and trade with other nations and corresponded with world leaders, including the United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, and Japan. 

He reigned for 17 years until his death on January 20, 1891.  He decided to take a trip to San Francisco to visit America and improve his health. The United States provided him with a warship to travel and use as he desired. The great King died of a stroke, kidney failure, and liver cirrhosis in California.

Queen Liliuokalani - The Last Hawaiian Monarch

In keeping with King Kalakaua's wishes, on January 29, 1891, his sister Liliuokalani became Queen. Almost immediately, she appoints C.B. Wilson as "Marshal of the Kingdom." And again, almost immediately, C.B. Wilson begins a Kingdom scandal by openly supporting opium smuggling. Her monarchy is faced with scandal after scandal and attempted coup after attempted coup by other Hawaiians. All one after the other. And yes, in case you're wondering, this was before the 1893 revolution that finally overthrew her.

Yes, her reign reads like a road map to abdication. The only question: "To who?"

Hawaiians were trying to overthrow her, just as her own cabinet would in the end.

In March 1892, native Hawaiians conducted an abortive revolution led by the Ashford brothers and her former fellow conspirator R.W. Wilcox of the Liberal Party.

Ironically, Liliuokalani supported R.W. Wilcox in an earlier attempted coup against her own brother King David Kalakaua. While Wilcox was unsuccessful in his effort to overthrow Queen Liliuokalani, he would change sides later, just as he did many times in his life. His loyalty was to himself and not one else.

R.W. Wilcox was a Native Hawaiian member of the Royal family who led uprisings against both the government of the Kingdom of Hawaii under King Kalakaua and Queen Liliuokalani, as well as the Republic of Hawaii under Sanford Dole -- what are now known as the Wilcox Rebellions. As for Wilcox, believe it or not, that Native Hawaiian was a man who would switch sides at the drop of a hat.

He was a supreme opportunist. And believe it or not, he was a traitor to King Kalakaua and Queen Liliuokalani. He was also the man in the Republic of Hawaii who would later be chosen as the first delegate for the Territory of Hawaii to the United States Congress. Imagine that!

For the Queen who once tried to overthrow her brother, since karma has a habit of coming around full swing, her fate would be just that.

On August 30, 1892, that was the day that the first introduction of the "Lottery Bill" was supported by C.B. Wilson, the appointed Kingdom marshal, and the bill was tabled due to strong opposition by the legislature.

In September 1892, Liliuokalani and the Hawaiian legislature were deadlocked on control because of differences in the opium and lottery bills. Three separate cabinets in succession were voted out by the legislature because they believed the cabinets were in sympathy with C.B Wilson, who was the Kingdom’s Marshal. 

In 1892, the so-called "Annexationists" feared that if Queen Liliuokalani died and Princess Kaiulani took control -- Kaiulani's father was Archibald Cleghorn, governor of Oahu, a Scotsman -- then she would bring a strong British influence into the palace.

Wodehouse, the English minister, his son had married a half-white sister of Kaiulani and several other sons held important political jobs. Later in 1892, Queen Liliuokalani yields to pressure and appoints a conservative cabinet of G.N. Wilcox, P.C. Jones, Mark Robinson, and Cecil Brown. That didn't last very long, and by January 9, 1893, Liliuokalani dismissed the G.N. Wilcox cabinet. And yes, she received strong opposition from the legislature relating to the lottery and opium bills, and to a new Constitution. Her response was to then appoint a new cabinet with John Colburn, W. Cornwell, Sam Parker, and Arthur Peterson -- all under intense public indignation.

On January 12, 1893, the lottery and opium license bills were approved by the legislative body. The new cabinet was voted out, and the lottery and opium bills were approved after neighbor island legislative members, who opposed the bills, returned home. On January 13, 1893, Liliuokalani announced the presentation of the new constitution and scheduled a public announcement of the new constitution for January 14, 1893. On January 14, 1893, Queen Liliuokalani proposes to promulgate a new constitution that would give her powers of a virtually absolute monarch not seen since Kamehameha The Great.

She would take control of the legislative, judicial as well as executive branch of government. Less than two years later, in 1893, Queen Liliuokalani announced plans for a New Constitution. Many in Hawaii saw this as too much intrusion by the government, and that was when a group of mostly European, American, and Hawaiian business leaders and residents formed a "Committee of Safety" with the mission to overthrow the Kingdom and seek annexation by the United States.

United States Government Minister John L. Stevens, responding to a request from the "Committee of Safety," requested that the company of Marines aboard the USS Boston be sent to the palace. So again, the United States Marines were called out. But this time, the Marines stationed themselves across the street from the palace grounds.

Unlike 1874, in 1893, the U.S. Marines did nothing! They just sat there at the ready, waiting for instructions.

It's true, compared to the Marines who took over all of the Hawaiian government in 1874, the Marines that landed were half the size as needed in 1874 -- and those Marines did nothing but sit camped across the street from Iolani Palace for two weeks before returning to their ship.

There were 162 United States Marines, and a handful of Sailors, who came ashore.  All, of course, were battle ready, but they were also under strict orders to assume a "position of neutrality" to what was considered a fluid situation.

Unlike in 1874, this time, the Marines did not ever enter the Palace grounds or take control of any government buildings whatsoever. In fact, unlike in 1874, this time, the U.S. Marines did not fire a single shot.

Some say they effectively intimidated the Queen and the Hawaiian royalist defenders, who completely outnumbered the Marines. The fact is, they numbered the Marines by over 500 men -- so essentially, they outnumbered the U.S. Marines by 3 to 1.

The Hawaiian royalist defenders were under the command of the Marshal of the Kingdom, Charles Wilson. They could have gone to battle for Queen and Country, but they didn't. If the Marine there were being used as an "intimidation force," then it obviously worked because Queen Liliuokalani resigned peacefully.

Others believe that since the Marines were there under strict orders to assume a "position of neutrality," they were there for the same reason as they were almost 20 years earlier. I believe that was the case. I believe that the Marines again landed there by request of the Hawaiian government -- whoever was in charge at the time -- to put down any riot and re-establish order if need be, just as they were requested to do in 1874.

It is interesting how Hawaiian history shouts about how the United States Marines were supposedly the number one factor used to oust Queen Liliuokalani, but never a word is said about how United States Marines helped install, without question, the most popular monarch in Hawaiian History.

As far as I'm concerned, looking back at when this first interested me, I can say without hesitation that my High School Hawaiiana teacher Mrs. DeMello was absolutely correct when she said that the United States did not have to wait until 1893 if they indeed wanted control of the Hawaiian government.

She asserted that the United States already had complete control of the Kingdom in 1874. It is too bad history books do not tell the story of how the United States took possession of Hawaii, its entire government, only to hand it over to their King-elect.

Just as the United States did not have to make plans to invade Hawaii to re-establish the Monarchy in 1895 during what became known as "Black Week," the United States did not have to wait to make Hawaii a U.S. territory until 1898, when the Republic of Hawaii formally requested annexation. The fact is, if there was a time when the United States could have kept control of the Hawaiian government, it was in 1874 when they had complete control over the entire Hawaiian government. But instead, they gave it back.

My teacher Mrs. DeMello was also right about something else: The Merrie Monarch, King Kalakaua, can thank his throne to United States Marines. It's true. If it weren't for United States Marines, there might not have been Hawaii's most beloved Merrie Monarch - King David Kalakaua.

And yes, I agree because that's the way I see it as well.

Tom Correa