I've been recently accused of "misgendering" a gay man because I called him "he" and not "she." Just so we get this right, there is this crazy notion going around these days that says everyone should play the Democrats' silly game of accepting gay men as women. Well, some of us refuse to play along with the insanity of schizophrenics who want to play "pretend."
Let me make something else really clear, the truth is the truth no matter what political group tries to change it. While it's obvious that today, if I tell the truth and call a spade a spade, and I don't lie about what he is, then I'm "misgendering." But, that's only if we all play along with the crazies who think we will. And really, I don't live in a world where lying is required and the truth is avoided. That's just a fact.
So while there are people in parts of the United States that want to live in what I call the "go along with schizophrenics world," that's not where I live my life. And by the way, if people think that we can live and prosper in a world that demands that Liberal Politics over-rule the truth -- then they need to come to grips with the fact that politics does not over-rule the truth. Politics spins the truth. It even neglects to recognize the truth. But it never over-rules the truth.
You see, the problem for the Democrats is very simple. More than half of all Americans refuse to play their silly games. I see Drag Queens for what they are. Men in drag. Men dressed as women. Gay men dressed as women trying to entice other gay men. And really, no matter what sort of propagandistic language, euphemisms, or how many ways they try to inverse the meanings of words, more than half of America agrees with me.
As for the other half? Well, those are the Democrats that are on their knees. That's the half that are on their knees bowing down to the Democrat Party's political intimidation.
Democrats demanding that everyone call gay men in women's clothing "Trans" is just not going to happen. The fact of the matter is that I can confidently say that more than half the nation will refuse to play the Democrats' silly game of "let's placate the schizophrenics in the gay community" -- gay men and gay women. And really, Democrats and their use of the Federal Government don't have the power to intimidate or force people like me into calling men "women" and women "men."
What really surprises me is how public school teachers and university professors are going along with the Democrat Party's efforts to make women seem so menial. Why do Democrats see women as being so inferior? What makes a Democrat think that a gay man pretending to be a woman makes him a woman? Do real women lack worth or importance to Democrats? Why do all Democrats see women as subservient and unimportant? Is there something about gay men in drag that's appealing to Democrats?
As sad as it is, public school teachers want the children in the classes to "pretend" that it's biologically possible for a human being to "transition" from one sexual gender to another. This sort of indoctrination in our schools has made teachers a danger to our children. This is especially true since teachers are now bypassing the wishes of parents in the efforts to convince children that they should have gender mutilation surgeries and take sex-altering drugs. Things that should never be used on children. And think about this, why is it so important to Democrats, including some Democrat state governors, to provide sex change treatments for minors?
These are some of the reasons that I refuse to go along with the Left's insanity. And really, no amount of "shaming" and name-calling is going to change my mind. They know full well that Science says it's not possible to transition from one gender to another. And yet, it is important to them to push sex changes and the LGBT agenda on children.
Democrats can scream all they want about how some gay man should now be considered a woman because that gay man had his penis removed -- but that doesn't make it so. And no, not even the largest amounts of money that the Gay Community can funnel to the Democrats in the form of political contributions is going to change the simple fact of life that there are only two genders.
Let's face the real facts of life. Cut the balls off a bull and you have a steer which is a neutered male bovine. Cut the balls off a stallion and you have a gelding which is a neutered male horse. Neither a steer nor a gelding will produce a calf or foal, or the milk that it takes to feed them. While Democrats might see females in the world as lacking importance, they should realize that women do what men can't. One would think that even Democrats can understand that!
Of course, Democrats are supporting gay men who claim to "identify" as "women." But really, isn't that the dumbest thing that you've ever heard. Just because someone "identifies" as Black or Asian or a baby or 2,000 pounds doesn't make it so. People have to understand that things are what they are and people can't claim to be something they are not.
If a person "identifies" as a Veteran, we ask for proof that they served in the military. If a person "identifies" as a Veteran and was never in the military, but still decides that he is going to wear a uniform with medals that he did not earn, we call that "Stolen Valor." People who were never in the military but claim to be Veterans are imposters, fakes, hoaxers, and frauds.
So really, why would anyone accept a man as a women's champion swimmer if we know they are not a woman? In my opinion, claiming to "identify" as a woman for personal gains such as obtaining a national title is a criminal act. It is fraud. It is a wrongful act. It is criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
And while Democrats don't seem to care that such fraud cheats those deserving woman who works so hard to compete against others on a level playing field, Democrats should not support criminal fraud and hoaxsters who claim to be something they are not.
This brings me to the saddest thing that I've seen in recent years. That of a United States government official, a lady who is now a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, who can't answer the simple question "What is a woman?" Frankly, such an endless amount of stupid is beyond my understanding.
And what's worse, the woman who could not define "what a woman is" now sits on the U.S. Supreme Court. She is the prime example of the modern Democrat Party and the reason we get authoritarian autocratic politicians like Joe Biden and Gavin Newsom who see themselves as rulers with total power and control over the people.
It's the Biden and the Newsom supporters, those who see Democrats as doing no wrong, that have allowed the Democratic Party to wage a war against women recently. You don't think so? Well, it's Democrats today that support gay men stealing the thunder and the dignity that belongs to women.
Gay men posing as "women" don't know the first thing about the challenges, the hard work, how it has been to fight the "Glass Ceiling," what the average woman has been through, or anything about being a woman. And frankly, I don't care if a gay man cuts off his penis, he will never know what it is to be born and evolve into a mature woman -- they never will.
I don't care if Democrats are too dumb to know what a woman is. I don't care if Democrats are so dumb that they accept the insanity that says, "A woman can be a man who defines himself as a woman." As crazy as it might sound to them, maybe some should educate themselves to understand that women are adult female human beings, they give and support life, and they should be respected and not cheapened by gay men in drag wanting to call themselves women.
Why can't Democrats accept the fact that no matter how many surgeries a gay man goes through, and no matter how many hormones a gay man takes to try to be a female, gay men are not women? Why can't they accept the facts of life as it has been and stop catering to a Liberal voter base that's either mentally ill or too dumb to understand the facts of life?
Of course, Democrats see nothing wrong with declaring a gay man in women's clothing "Woman of the Year." Jill Biden did just that. And yes, Democrats see nothing wrong with gay men who were failures competing against other men deciding to "redefine" themselves as women so that they can compete in Women's Sports. Democrats don't care about the unfairness of that. But then again, that shouldn't surprise anyone. After all, while Americans believe in fairness, the American notion of fairness is foreign to Democrats.
Democrats totally dismiss the efforts and sacrifices made by women athletes -- all in the name of allowing gay men in Women's Sports. Why? Because Democrats don't care if a female athlete has worked all her life just to lose to a gay man who is biologically bigger and stronger. The examples of this taking place these days are numerous; swimming, golf, wrestling, boxing, MMA fighting, weight lifting, etc. All sports have recently seen "women's records" broken by gay men being allowed to "compete" against real women. As for the woman MMA fighter who fought against a gay man who "identified" as a woman, the real woman was almost killed.
While there is no fairness in that, Democrats don't care about fairness as long as their political agenda of gay inclusion is implemented at all costs. That's what is most important to them -- no matter how detrimental their political agenda is to our society.
Of course, that's the reason that their agenda has to be stopped. And frankly, we can stop their agenda if we demonstrate that we are not afraid of them -- and because of that, we will refuse to play the Democrats' silly games of gay pronouns, political correctness, and their idea that we have to accept their sense of what the world should be like.
I refuse to ignore the strides made by women. I don't like that Democrats are demeaning women everywhere by saying that all it takes to be a woman is to be a gay man in drag. And frankly, I refuse to play along with Democrats and accept their sick idea that a woman can be a gay man who simply wants to call himself "a woman." And yes, I've actually wondered if Democrats are intelligent enough to understand how they are humiliating women?
As for news outlets that refer to a gay man in women's clothing as a "trans woman"? They lose credibility right off for going along with the Left's politically correct speech and I refuse to watch them.
As for television shows that try to portray gay men as real women? I don't like the way that demeans women, so I refuse to what those shows.
As for some idiot in the Democrat Party who insists on calling some gay man a "trans" as if that was something real, and refers to him as "her," I refuse to condone that sort of stupidity. And yes, the same goes for "Woke" companies like Anheuser-Busch and others who are using gay men in drag to promote their products.
There is something inherently sick about having a gay man be the face of women's hygiene products, birth control, or women's clothing. As for the notion of using a gay man to advertise your beer? That's not smart since a lot of men see things the same as I do. And truthfully, I find the very sight of Drag Queens and gay men pretending to be women as absolutely repulsive.
So yes, my reasons for refusing to go along with the Democrats and play their silly political games are very simple. Every time their news outlets, Democrat politicians, and "Woke" companies talk about, support, or use gay men in drag in the advertising, whether they know it or not, they are belittling and disparaging women. And clearly, it's just not right.
Now, before you write to say that I'm "homophobic," don't bother. The fact is that I don't have a "dislike of or prejudice against gay people." I don't care if someone is gay. That's just their preference and it means nothing to me. The preference of who someone wants to be with is not mine to dictate. As I said before, to be real honest, I don't care if people are gay. They are unimportant to me.
What is important is how Democrats are trying to force Americans to accept the unacceptable. And really, I don't like people telling me that I have to "accept" people or things that I see as having no redeeming qualities. And being even more honest, I vehemently dislike anyone demanding that I refer to gay men in drag as something that they are not -- and they are not women.