Friday, October 4, 2013

Buried Bullion, Eureka Sentinel,1877

                                      BURIED BULLION

[The Eureka Sentinel, May 6th, 1877]

MURDER, ROBBERY, AND INSANITY.

If our old residents will recall the Spring of 1872, they will remember a bold stage robbery that occurred on the Pioche and Hamilton road at that time.

Not only was the stage robbed of a large amount of bullion, but the driver, James Mann, was killed, and a passenger wounded.

The plunder — six bars of bullion — amounted to over $8,000, and it was believed that it was buried somewhere in the vicinity.

Two men were arrested and taken to Belmont, and after an examination were discharged for want of proof of complicity in the robbery.

As these men were lurking around Eureka canyon both before and after their arrest, it was suspected that they had planted the treasure in the canyon, and in view of this suspicion they were shadowed for some time.

The men were too shrewd for the officers, and after lingering here for a couple of weeks they departed for Colorado Territory.

This was rendered necessary by the constant vigilance of the authorities and the impossibility of raising or disposing of buried bullion.

DEPARTURE.

They proceeded immediately to Denver City, and their career in that place was very brief.

Three weeks after their arrival there they became embroiled in a saloon row, in which one of them was killed and the other severely wounded, having been shot in the head.

He lingered along in the hospital for three months, an operation having been performed by which the bullet had been extracted and his skull trepanned.

He was finally discharged as cured, and in about a week became violently insane.

He was arrested, and after a proper examination committed to the asylum, where he was confined until about two years ago, when he died.

During his incarceration it was always necessary to confine him in a straight jacket, as he was very violent.

His attendant, a bright young follow, was impressed with the persistency with which he recurred to the fact of his having concealed a large amount of bullion in Eureka canyon.

When he first spoke of the subject, it was looked upon as the mere ravings of an insane man, but the constant reiteration of the story, and the details accompanying the statement, induced Bryson, the attendant, to listen with more attention.

By questioning the crazy man, he found out the whole story, from the inception of the robbery until his discharge from the hospital.

Bryson still looked upon it as the fancy of a disordered brain and gave it but little thought, except in building day dreams on the remote possibility of its truth.

During the last six months of Smith's (the surviving highwayman) imprisonment, he became very reticent, his mania taking another form, in marked contrast with his former garrulousness; moody and morose fits were finally succeeded by an idiotic state, and the poor fellow died from softening of the brain.

LOVE'S YOUNG DREAM.

Soon after this, Bryson had an altercation with the resident physician and was discharged.

This was some eighteen months ago, and he left for his home in Winterset, Iowa, where he went to work on a farm.

It was a dull life to him, and the probabilities are that he would not have remained in that humdrum community very long had it not been that he met his fate in the person of a charming young lady, the daughter of his employer.

He was a bright, and withal a good-looking young follow, and his manly ways soon wrought an impression on the girl's heart, and in a short time she reciprocated the passion.

It was the old story, love's young dream, "When love's well timed, 'tis not a fault to love; the strong, the brave, the virtuous and wise sink in the soft captivity together."

With mutual vows and tender flame those two lived on, concealing from the stern parent their passion and dreading the moment of its discovery.

He was penniless and she the only daughter of a sire who counted his acres of waving corn by the hundreds, and annually fattened numberless hogs for the Chicago market.

The disparity of their positions was great, but after a year's faithful service at the plow and around the farm, Bryson finally picked up courage to declare his love and ask the old man's consent.

REFUSAL.

The storm burst at once and our hero was covered with contumely.

How dare he aspire to the hand of an heiress of broad acres, the belle of the country and the apple of the old man's eye; he is a penniless adventurer, a hired man, etc.

He was discharged instanter, and found himself adrift on the wide world with the savings of a year's work as a nest-egg of the fortune that he must have to placate the father's anger, He went to town after a stolen interview with his beloved, in which both swore eternal constancy.

He tried to persuade her to elope, but her fears got the better of her love and she declined to precipitate matters, but suggested that it would be better for him to make a fortune and then demand a reconsideration of the old man's fiat.

He left for town, and, while pondering over his forlorn condition, his thoughts reverted to the chatterings of his former ward in the asylum.

SEEKING FOR INFORMATION.

Cogitating on the subject he finally wrote to Eureka to learn if any such robbery had ever been committed, and was startled to receive an answer that it had.

The more he thought over the matter the more he became possessed with the idea that there might be a grain of truth in Smith's story.

As there was no fortune in sight in Winterset, he came to the determination of taking the desperate chance and verifying the truth of the tale.

After a last stolen meeting and most affecting parting from his true love, he purchased an emigrant ticket, was soon en route, and at the conclusion of the eight-day journey he landed safely in Eureka [California].

Smith had dwelt on the particular spot that he had buried his stolen treasure and Bryson's excellent memory served him well.

Go up Eureka canyon to the gulch just north of the Roslin furnace, up this gulch 320 yards, and then turn up the hill to a clump of dwarfed cedar trees, and just 13 feet to the west of the first tree the bullion is buried.

Those were the directions that Smith had reiterated numberless times.

His first inquiry was for the Roslin furnace, and the next move was a visit to the locality.

There was the ruins of the old works, sure enough, and he quickly paced off 320 yards up the gulch.

The clump of dwarfed cedars were growing on the hill, and he was satisfied that everything tallied so far.

He did not examine further, but waited patiently for a moonlight night, when he once more proceeded to the spot and commenced his explorations with a beating heart and excited brain; he plied the pick and shovel lustily, and, after an hour's work he was rewarded with — but we will let his future movements tell the balance of the story.

CONCLUSION.

The next day he bought a stout packing case, and hiring a team, once more proceeded to the canyon.

After a short absence he drove to the depot and shipped the case to Chicago. The railroad boys grumbled terribly at its unusual weight, but did not suspect the contents.

He had money enough to purchase a return ticket, and departed on that evening's train.

In about a month from that date the Winterset Gazette contained the following item:

"Mr. Charles Bryson has purchased the farm adjoining Geo. Barrett's, paying $1,000 cash for the property."

The same issues of the paper recorded the following, under the head of "Married."

"At the residence of the bride's parents, by Rev. J. McKelvey, Chas. L. Bryson to Alice M. Barrett, all of this place."

Where did he raise the cash to buy that farm and pay the expenses of his wedding tour?

Echo answers, up in Eureka Canyon.

-- end of article.

EDITOR'S NOTE:

The story above is printed here as published in 1877. The original Eureka Sentinel article was reprinted in the Reno Evening Gazette on May 8th, 1877.

Only second to the California Gold Rush in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, prospectors discovered gold in the nearby Trinity region along the Trinity, Klamath, and Salmon Rivers.

Because miners needed a convenient alternate to the tedious overland route from Sacramento, schooners and other vessels soon arrived at the recently discovered Humboldt Bay.

Though the ideal location on Humboldt Bay adjacent to naturally deeper shipping channels ultimately guaranteed Eureka's development as the primary city on the bay, Arcata's proximity to developing supply lines to inland gold mines ensured supremacy over Eureka through 1856.

"Eureka" received its name from a Greek word meaning "I have found it!"

This exuberant statement of California Gold Rush miners is also the Official Motto of the State of California. Eureka is the only U.S. location to use the same seal as the state for its seal.

In the United States, Eureka, California is the largest of about a dozen towns and cities dating from the mid-nineteenth century that have the name Eureka.

It is interesting to note that the gold was worth more than $8,000.00 in 1872.  Gold prices at the time set gold at $23.19 an ounce.

To give you an idea of how much money that was in 1872, a Cowboy made between $25 and $30 a month in wages at the time.

At today's Gold price of say $1,400.00 an ounce, that same gold would be worth about $483,000.00!

That's a lot of money!

Tom Correa
Editor,
The American Cowboy Chronicles


 

Thursday, October 3, 2013

ObamaCare Is Wrong For America - Why I Hate It!

Dear Readers,

ObamaCare implementation deadline is January 1st, 2014.

There are huge problems with ObamaCare.

Instead of saying "I hate ObamaCare" without giving any reasons for my feelings, so I figured I'd give you my reasons.

Here are some of my reason why I feel this law should be repealed right now:
  • Americans may lose their doctors;
  • Americans may lose their health plans;
  • Middle class and poor Americans will have worsen health care;
  • There will be higher premiums because of ObamCare demands on insurers;
  • Higher taxes will be needed to pay for it since they low-balled estimates by Trillions of Dollars;
  • The budget deficit will increase because of its rising cost;
  • There are hiring freezes which are already taking place;
  • There are slashed workers’ hours taking place because of it right now;
  • It is killing existing jobs and is killing new jobs creation because employers don't what the burden and the cost involved;
  • It will be bad for small businesses because they simply cannot afford it;
  • Small business plans are being delayed;
The Obama administration delayed implementation of a program designed to provide affordable health insurance to small businesses, a program the New York Times called “a major selling point for the health-care legislation.”

Even extremely liberal NBC has discovered ObamaCare will cause some people to lose income, others to lose their jobs and some to lose their insurance.

Reporter Lisa Myers said they “spoke to almost 20 small businesses and other entities around the country. Almost all said because of the new law, they’d be cutting back hours for some employees” below 30 each week because they can’t afford to offer the health insurance mandated by ObamaCare.
  • Employer mandate being delayed;
The mandate requiring employers with 50 or more employees to provide health coverage has been postponed until after the 2014 election.

Labor Unions, who worked so hard to get ObamaCare passed, now complain it is most unfair to require employees – but not employers – to adhere to ObamaCare.
  • Labor Union opposition to ObamaCare;
The Labor Unions fought to elect and reelect President Obama. Some say they want concessions such as exemptions for their millions of dollars and thousands of Union workers supporting Barack Obama.

Well, they just found out that that is not going to happen!

Now that are against ObamaCare!

Right now, the leaders of three major U.S. unions, including the Teamsters which strongly supported ObamaCare, now warn that unless the health-care law undergoes major changes - it will "destroy the very health and well-being of our members along with millions of other hardworking Americans.”

The Unions have said that ObamaCare will force businesses to reduce hours and subsequently "destroy the foundation of the 40-hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.”

  • Seniors may lose their Medicare coverage because of pre-existing conditions and new regulation under the ObamaCare law;
  • Higher Medicare costs are taking place right now and will keep going up as a result of ObamaCare;
  • ObamaCare will force seniors to suffer higher out-of-pocket expenses over the next five years in an economy that already takes too much from the average senior's pension;
  • Payments will be reduced to hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and home health-care agencies because serviced will not be authorized;
  • ObamaCare will result is fewer insurance companies providing health insurance;
For example, two major health care providers, United Healthcare and Aetna, stopped providing coverage in California because of Obamacare’s requirements.
  • Basic health plans are being delayed;
The Obama administration has postponed until after the 2014 election the health program for low-to-moderate income people who don’t qualify for expanded Medicaid..
  • The ObamaCare Early Retiree Program is already broke, out of funds;
The plan intended to insure early retirees between ages 55 and 65, and their dependents, until government-run exchanges are in place quickly ran out of money in 2011.
  • High-risk pools are failing;
The administration cut payments to doctors and hospitals before it ran out of money to fund the pre-existing condition insurance plan for people with cancer, heart disease and other serious conditions.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius simply announced “health care facilities and providers will get paid less” for providing the same services.
  • Doctors expect worsening care;
Fearing that they will be unable to continue private practice because of low reimbursement rates from Medicaid and Medicare and will end up working for a corporation hospital where the profits are distributed to shareholders.

Doctors fear they will be punished in that system if they spend too much time with a patient or provide too much treatment.
  • Doctors fleeing and opting out;
The Wall Street Journal found ObamaCare is causing fewer doctors to treat Medicare and Medicaid patients.

The number of doctors opting out of Medicare has nearly tripled from three years earlier.

Even fewer Doctors are accepting new Medicaid patients because of ObamaCare.

A survey found six in 10 physicians say it is likely many doctors will retire earlier than planned in the next one to three years.

The same percentage say the practice of medicine is in jeopardy as medical experts lose control of their clinics and compensation because of ObamaCare.

The New York times found health insurance companies are cutting costs by selecting health-care plans that reduce the number of doctors and hospitals available to customers.
  • Death Panels havve been confirmed - by Democrats; 
Doctor and former Democrat National Party Chairman Howard Dean wrote an editorial in July essentially confirming Sarah Palin’s contention that Obamcare will have a “death panel.”

Sarah Palin was racked over the coals for asserting such a thing. Ultra-Liberal PolitiFact.com even dubbed it 2009′s “Lie of the Year.”

But now times have changed, extreme liberal Howard Dean confirmed the ObamaCare Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB, “is essentially a health-care rationing body.”

Howard Dean asserts that the IPAB will “be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them.”
  • The ObamaCare Rationing Board; 
The IPAD will decide whether or not some patients get potentially life-saving treatments, which is basically how Palin described “death panel” in her 2009 Facebook post.
  • IRS “honor” system;
The IRS in-charge leaves the door open for potential widespread fraud and improper subsidy payments.

It also makes taxpayers liable to repay any subsidies and/or tax credits erroneously granted while the honor system is in effect.
  • Schools can’t afford insurance;
Because of ObamaCare, schools have already begun cutting hours to avoid paying insurance for substitute teachers and support staff such as classroom aides, cafeteria workers and bus drivers.

ObamaCare requires employers to offer health coverage to all employees who work an average of 30 or more hours per week each month, or else pay a fine.
  • Fines, Penalties, and why young people expected to opt out;
Fact is ObamaCare needs enough healthy people ages 18-34 to join health insurance exchanges to “cross-subsidize” people who are older and not as healthy.

But, instead of joining, many are opting to pay the individual mandate penalty of $95 or one percent of income.

Approximately 3.7 million of those ages 18-34 will be at least $500 better off if they forgo insurance and pay the penalty.

It is estimated that more than 3 million young people do this.

Here it is, my favorite reason why I hate ObamaCare!
  • ObamaCare grants the Federal Government and its agents unbridled authority over us.
ObamaCare in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution by allowing involuntary forced home inspections;

Americans will actually be forced to allow home inspections or face fines, jail, and loss of their property.

And for what reasons?

ObamaCare provides hundreds of millions of dollars to make “evidence-based” inspections of “high-risk populations,” defined as families in which any of these conditions apply:
  • the mother is under 21,
  • someone is a tobacco user,
  • children have low student achievement,
  • developmental delays or disabilities,
  • individuals are serving or have formerly served in the military,
  • guns are in the home.
Yes, if you own a gun, smoke, are a woman not yet 21, who is serving or has served in the military, who has a disability, and has a child who might not be doing too good in school - your home is open to a government inspection under ObamaCare -- without a warrant!

Home Schoolers and Gun Owners Beware!
  • Critics say even Home Schoolers may be subject to “intervention” in “school readiness,” and farm families could face intervention to “prevent child injuries.”
  • Under ObamaCare, gun owners may be required to comply with "firearm safety inspections."
Yes, warrantless searches are included in the ObamaCare law that the Democrats passed without ever reading.

As for those who voted to pass something into law without even reading what the law will do?

Fact is those ignorant bastards are being re-elected time and time again by their constituents who are dumber than they are.

After reading the above, can you see why a Health Care Law can be considered detrimental to the American Public?

But, if you still don't think ObamaCare is a big deal and a threat to our basic freedoms and privacy's, how about this:

President Obama can bypass our representatives in Congress to make changes to the law as he sees fit.

Yes, Obama can bypass Congress and rewrite the law to say and do anything he wants it to.

Does that smack of a Dictatorship? You bet it does!

And worse, Obama has already done it - and may do it again.

It is a fact that the Obama administration used the IRS to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act, ObamaCare, this new health-care law already.

That is not proper and is criminal.

The Obama administration did so to fix a problem it did not anticipate, they did that without consulting Congress.

The administration had expected all states to create health-insurance exchanges, but so far only 17 have done so and 27 states have defaulted to the federal exchange.

The problem is, ObamaCare authorized tax credits and subsidies for the purchase of qualifying health insurance plans in state-run exchanges (Section 1311) but not federal ones (Section 1321).

So, in May 2012, the administration simply had the IRS issue a rule to authorize tax credits and subsidies in federal exchanges.

Guess what, Federal exchanges were not allowed to do so under the Affordable Care Act passed by the Democrat Congress in 2010 and signed into law by President Obama.

But folks, the administration directed the IRS to unilaterally change the law without involving Congress in May 2012.

ObamaCare is illegal! It is criminal!

The Good News is that a Federal judge rejected the federal government’s motion to dismiss Oklahoma v. Sebelius. Oklahoma is challenging the legality of the IRS regulation giving tax credits to federal exchanges under ObamaCare.

The Affordable Care Act passed by Congress and signed into law by the president allows those tax credits only to state exchanges, but only 17 states have established such exchanges.

So what did Obama do? Well, the administration simply had the IRS issue a rule in May of 2012 to authorize tax credits and subsidies in federal exchanges.

What you have to remember is that President Obama exempts Congress and its staff from the ObamaCare law.

As far as I'm concerned, there are better options than ObamaCare that wouldn't have tried to turn the whole nation on its head.

And as for those who didn't read it, but passed it into law?

Well, as far as I'm concerned, those Democrats who voted to pass this law are criminally treasonous and should be tried and imprisoned.

Why? Bottom line, it gives the Government too much Power over our lives - it Helps them to become Slave Masters and us Slaves to the State!

Story by Tom Correa    


Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Shutdown: It's About Politicians Above The Law


Dear Readers,

This shutdown could have been avoided!

But let's be frank and state what this is really all about, it's about politicians - both Democrat and Republican - wanting to be above the law!

As President Obama, the Democrats, and Republicans like Senator John McCain want to remind us, the Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare, is indeed "The Law of the Land."
Of course, this means that ObamaCare is the law and as such should be funded. But, the problems start there.

It has to do with the law and equality.

In America, under our standards of law, equality under the law is defined as the right to equal protection and equal application of the laws.

Our basic rights and freedoms to which all Americans are entitled, and in whose exercise - our government may not interfere.

This includes the rights to life and liberty as well as freedom of thought and expression and equality before the law. All of this is for every American.

We do not exempt citizens because of their wealth, position, political status. Just as billionaire Bill Gates is held to the same laws as I am, President Barack Hussein Obama is held to the same laws as I am.

Granted both billionaire Gates and millionaire Obama can afford better lawyers, they are governed by the same laws.

This lack of a privileged class, a social upper class, a political class, which is exempted from the law because of their position or status or wealth is at the heart of our Justice System.

No man is above the law, no man is better than the next in the eyes of the law - Justice wears a blindfold and holds the scales of justice while brandishing the sword of retribution just for that reason.

All men are created equal.  Americans understand and respect that!
So why do Politicians feel they are above the Rule of Law?  

The rule of law refers to the authority of law within our society, especially as a constraint upon our behavior, including the behavior of government officials.

In its general sense, "the rule of law" means that every citizen is subject to the law.

It means that no one, including the President of the United States, Senators, and members of the House of Representatives is above the law.

No one has the divine right of a King or Emperor, not here in America.

All government officers of the United States, including the President, the Justices of the Supreme Court, and all members of Congress, pledge first and foremost to uphold the Constitution.

That's right, they take an oath to abide by and uphold the Constitution of the United States.

That oath affirms that the rule of law is superior to the rule of any citizen - even if he is in a leadership position.

The Federal government has considerable discretion:
  • The Judicial Branch has its judicial discretion,
  • The Executive Branch of the president has various discretionary powers including prosecutorial discretion,
  • The Legislative Branch is free to decide what statutes it will write, as long as it stays within its enumerated powers and respects the Constitutionally protected rights of individuals,  
  • But still, none of those people within these branches of government are exempt from the laws governing the United States.
The U.S. Constitution is explicit in its references that all are to obey the law - as its laws are the Law of the Land .

As a nation of laws, our foundation is built around the concept that no man is above the rule of law - and that's why the government is shutdown today October 1st, 2013.

ObamaCare, while it is indeed the law of the land, yet it exempts Politicians who voted for it. 

Because of this, there are Republicans who now refuse to fund a law that applies to some - but not all.

Yes, it is just that simple.

The worse problem with ObamaCare is that those politicians who passed it are exempt from it.

Remember that ObamaCare is the law of the land as Republican John McCain has reminded us many times lately.

But don't forget the inconvenient facts that both Slavery and Prohibition were also the Law of the Land at one time or another - and both were deemed detrimental to the people of the United States.

Because both were found to be detrimental, both are no longer the Law of the Land.

Yes, President Obama personally negotiated an exemption with the Democrats who were in charge of Congress at the time that ObamaCare was put into law.

The Democrats, those in the White House and in control of Congress at the time, exempted themselves from having to follow the law.

This while they will have 75% of their health insurance costs paid by the government.

Yes, Democrats believe so much in ObamaCare that they don't want to part of it and have put themselves above the law - which as a matter of fact is a clear violation of the

An old friend sent me this note:

"As you know I am employed with the FAA. Today I was called and told not to report for duty as the FAA is non-operational. This is all because we have people in office who have forgotten they are there to serve us. We bitch and complain and vote the bastards back in. It shows the mentality of the voters is going down. I am sitting here without pay through no fault of my own. Congress, the House and the President should all be furloughed."

I couldn't agree with her more. She is absolutely right.  Democrats could have avoided this through negotiation and compromise. 

I blame Democrats and Liberal Republicans like John McCain for this because together they fought against any sort of resolution - just so they would not be included as being covered by the new Obamacare law.   

As I see it, because Democrat and some Republicans like John McCain think they are above the law and feel that ObamaCare should not apply to them - this is the result. 

And who suffers? Good hard working Americans like my friend suffer.

She's right, the furlough without pay - or perks - should fall on the President and the entire Congress who are not effected by this.

While this is a fight, not so much about ObamaCare but about those who want to be exempt themselves from the law - I believe that the ones who suffer are not the ones who should be held accountable.

As a nation, we cannot declare classes of men and women to be above others when observing the law. If we do that now, where does it stop.

Do we make it so that they are exempt from other aspects of the law or other laws altogether?

This is a road Americans cannot allow our government to take us. Those in our government must be held to the same laws as the rest of us - laws that they themselves passed!

The Republicans and the Tea Party want everyone to be covered under the same law.

By exempting themselves from the law covering ObamaCare, powerful politicians are essentially saying that they are above the law of the land - and that the U.S. Constitution does not matter.

They are saying that equal application of the law no matter what your wealth, status, position, or political affiliation, does not pertain to them. 

If we let this happen with ObamaCare, where will it stop? We cannot have two sets of laws, one for the powerful and another for us.

The Democrats don't want to negotiate or compromise. They want to be above the law.

Though many are out of work on furlough because of this, we should get behind those in Congress who are fighting to stop this.

We should not let Republicans like John McCain and Democrats like Harry Reid get away with this.

No one should be above the law of the land.

Remember, our politicians work for us. We have power in our vote. 

Theodore Roosevelt said, "A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."

Some voters have voted to have people like Obama and Reid and Pelosi and McCain return to Washington, I question the character of those people.

Others vote for people who stand against the powerful and wealthy, those self-serving politicians in both parties who seem to spend a lifetime in office - and yes, feel they are above the law.

Look into what your character is made of, and ask yourself who do you support or will vote for in the future?

Will your vote be for the same old bastards and political whores that screw the American people?

Or will it be for people who will stand up against the corruption of politics -  the same corruption that makes some like Obama and Reid and Pelosi believe they don't have to follow laws they pass?

How could we have elected such people into office? How have we put such people in powerful positions to where they feel that they are not governed by the laws they themselves pass?

How did we get to this point?

The Good News is that we can see them for who they are - and we can rid ourselves of them come the next election!

Story by Tom Correa


 


Sunday, September 29, 2013

Oil Is More Than Just Fuel - And We Don't Need Obama


Dear Readers,

Some of you have asked if I could take this information from a RANDOM SHOTS article that I did in March 2012 and publish it as a stand-alone article? Well friends, here it is.

Oil Is More Than Just Gasoline: There Are Consequences For Not Drilling Right Here Right Now!

Americans are saying "We Don't Need Obama!"

Domestic Oil Drilling Advocates Warn Of Increased Global Demand As The Mid-East Oil Supply Dwindles

That was an article in the news in March 2012, it was reported that more people are buying cars and using more gas around the world than ever before.

Countries that traditionally did not use cars and depended on bicycles and such are now moving to more and more cars. This growth in the global economy increases the demand for fuel, while oil supplies are projected to get tighter from the Middle East sources. Between the oil used for fuels such as gasoline and the oil used to manufacture consumer products, the world desire to be consumer driven is using more and more oil.

"China was at 5 million barrels a day in 2005. Today, they are at 10 (million). By 2015, they are going to be at 15-million-barrels-a-day demand," said John Hofmeister, founder of Citizens for Affordable Energy. "That's 10 million new barrels over 10 years. India is going from 4 to 7 (million) in the next three to four years."

President Obama seems to recognize the coming explosion in demand, but he has a different solution for the problem of more demand and less oil. Do nothing! Yes, Obama wants to do nothing in the way of more drilling to tap into our abundant natural resources.

Even though currently the United States consumes 19.6 million barrels per day, and demand will rise, Obama argues that more drilling and the Keystone XL pipeline are not the way of the future. Instead, he wants to wean Americans off of oil entirely by turning to alternatives energy options like electric and hybrid cars, solar and wind power - and what I call his "AOTO" philosophy.

AOTO is not a tribe in Kenya, it is a Liberal train of thought. No matter how high gas prices at the pump go, "AOTO" is the mantra from the wealthy Liberal Left. AOTO" is the acronym for "Anything Other Than Oil."

The problem with Obama's thinking, besides completely ignoring the need for oil to manufacture every day products, according to most analysts, he is completely ignoring the fact that the transition from oil to alternative energy fuels takes far longer than more drilling would.

"And we have a capital stock of hundreds of million of vehicles," Guy Caruso of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said. "So these types of transformations take decades and maybe even 50 to 60 years."

Last year, obviously because it was an Election Year, Obama talked about oil drilling as if he were for it. Imagine that! Like a true double-talking politician, Obama was telling Americans that he was cutting red tape and issuing all sorts of oil permits for companies to get to work on Federal lands.

Obama was lying to the American people.  And like these days, last year he might have gotten a few to believe him - the majority won't.

Why do more and more believe Obama is nothing but a liar? Because the data speaks for itself, and proves he is.

Official government figures show that Obama is issuing far fewer permits on Federal land than George W. Bush did while he was president. At the end of his two terms, George W. Bush issued 6,000 to 7,000 permits a year. Under Barack Hussein Obama the numbers have dropped significantly to a range of 4,000 to almost 4,500 a year.

Since it can take seven to 10 years for a permit to turn into an actual producing oil well, that means less oil will be coming from Federal lands in years to come. That combined with a rise in global demand for oil is a recipe for disaster for the United States. Yes, all thanks to Obama's attitude of "AOTO" and doing nothing to prepare for the future right now.

Advocates of more domestic drilling say we know a crunch is coming, so we should be drilling more right now. Otherwise, the result could be ugly.

"The reality of the situation, with respect to global supply is that Americans can find themselves in gasoline lines, with gas rationing by 2015 or 2016 by us not producing more of our own oil," Hofmeister said.

Obama is either purposing neglecting the facts, or he's just too damn dumb to understand the facts. Either way, he should understand that the facts clearly point out that even with alternatives, the U.S. Energy Department predicts that in 2035 we will still be relying on oil for 83% of our transportation needs alone. And yes, those figures are not taking into consideration all of our other needs for oil.

For some reason, Obama and the Democrats who support him only think oil is for gasoline and transportation. But folks, Obama can't get it in his head that it's not just about gasoline and cars.

Just as important as our fuel needs, are our manufacturing needs - Over 6,000 products we use on a daily basis are manufactured from oil!

Yes, over 50% of a barrel of oil goes to something other than fuels.

One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest, over half, is used to make things like:



Yes, friends the list above is only about 150 of the approximately 6000 items made from oil that we use everyday. The list above is only a partial list of products made from petroleum. As we can see, it's not only about gasoline and cars.

Maybe Obama should look around and maybe take a long look at how many products that we depend on comes from oil?

And ask yourself this, if 50% of all the oil we use is for fuel and the other 50% is for manufacturing products - how much oil would we still need if somehow every Liberal in America could wave their magic wand and eliminate the need for oil for our fuel needs?

Yes, since currently the United States consumes 19.6 million barrels per day, even if every truck, car, big rig, train, jet plane, power plant and home had an alternative fuel source to go to - we would still need at least 50% (or half) the amount of the oil we are using today for our manufacturing needs.

Yes, even if we never needed oil as an energy fuel source again, we would still consume over 10 million barrels a day just for our manufacturing processes.

That means, oil as a base product is almost indispensable for us or others. If we want to continue making the products that we use on a daily basis, than we need to recognize the importance, the absolute need, of oil.

So ask yourself, as I have asked myself lately, when the President of the United States talks about not drilling for more oil because he wants us to find other "energy" sources -- and he completely ignores the manufacturing aspects of oil -- just how many manufacturing jobs is he talking about putting at stake by not drilling right now?

How expensive will these oil based products become if they can't be made easily and here? How many companies are going to have to relocate their manufacturing facilities overseas because they make one or a few of the thousands of oil based products? How many companies will want to take their manufacturing jobs somewhere else because oil is not readily available in the United States and may also be cheaper in other countries than it is here?

Ask yourself, how many Americans are going to suffer because of Obama's arrogance or ignorance?
Fact are facts, there are reasons to drill for oil that have nothing to do with cars and transportation - and everything to do with manufacturing and the industrial might of the American economy.

The Good News -- Americans are Ignoring President Obama

Yes, the Good News is that Americans are ignoring him and opposing him in many ways. One way is by recognizing that "America Doesn't Need Obama!"

It's true. Americans are recognizing the need for more oil, having a desire to rid ourselves of being slaves to Muslim oil rich nations, and have decided to say "We Don't Need Obama!"

Americans are doing this be striking out and going around the Federal Government -- cutting the Feds completely out of the picture. Americans are exploring and harvesting oil using newer, more modern, and safer technologies to drill and increase America's Oil Supply - more so than ever before.

No, not from oil rich Federal Lands which are supposed to be owned by the American people but have seemed to have now become the sole property of Liberal Environmentalists. No, not that which is controlled by people in favor of our being slaves to Muslims nations, but instead on Private and State lands where Liberals are not in control and America can thrive.

And yes, that is Great News indeed. By saying, "We Don't Need Obama!" By relegating him to being a non-entity, Americans are prospering in some states. While Blue States march down the road to destruction and burden Americans with more debt, Red States are producing low unemployment, higher salaries, and looking after each other without the need to include the Federal Government or Obama.

Tom Correa