Congress to Cut United Nations Funding If The Security Council Loosens Iran Sanctions
On March 12th, 2015, it was reported that Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told Fox News, "If the U.N. Security Council attempts to undo sanctions on Iran imposed by the U.S. Congress, it can kiss its funding good-bye,"
I agree with Senator Graham and other Republicans who say it may be time to rethink our support as well as the role of the United Nations as an organization that oversteps itself.
The Security Council has been lobbied by President Obama to consider lifting U.N. sanctions on Iran, which would make it more difficult for Congress to stop a deal signed by Obama.
But congressional Republicans, joined by some Democrats, say the deal on Iran's nuclear program is a treaty and cannot be signed by the president without Senate approval. GOP leaders vow to retain current U.S. sanctions if they are not allowed to vote on the deal.
Graham was among a group of 47 Republican senators who signed an open letter to Iran last week, saying that no deal would be enforceable without Senate approval.
The senators have been criticized for trying to stymie the ongoing talks. Some in their own party have said the letter was improper.
Graham, appearing Thursday on Fox News Channel's "On the Record with Greta Van Susteren," was unapologetic, saying he signed only after President Barack Obama threatened to veto a bill that would require congressional approval of lifting the current sanctions.
"This is a very big deal," he said. "When the president told the Senate and the House, 'I will veto any effort on your part to look at this deal and have a vote as to whether or not we waive the sanctions we created,' then that became imperial presidency."
Since now Iran is against committing to an agreement with Obama, Obama has resorting to the Chicago method of diplomacy by telling the Iranians that he may throw in a $50 Billion "signing bonus" if they go along with the present agreement.
Yes, "signing bonus" is a basketball term, a sports term, actually used to get an athlete to sign a contract when he doesn't want to. It is a way to "sweeten" the deal. And yes, in some places like Chicago, it is also known as a bribe to get things done.
I hope you don't think Barack Obama is above offering a bribe to the Iranians?
SECOND SHOT!
New Invention Offends Muslims By Using Pig’s Blood to Stop Suicide Bombers
Yes, Muslims Are “Offended”!
Yes, they are offended by cartoons of that pedophile Mohammed. Yes, they are offended by not being able to get their religious food with their food stamps. Yes, they are offended by our laws, our Constitution, our patriotic movies, and the American flag.
Well, now we can add one more thing to the list of what offends Muslims. Now they are offended by the type of pepper spray police are using.
Other than offending Muslims, it is said that Franklin R. Lacy might be to stopping suicide bombings what Jonas Salk was to ending polio and the Wright brothers were to flight.
You might think that moderate Muslims who decry such violence would be elated. But no, this thing that the Obama administration likes to call "moderate Muslims" are not happy with Mr Lacy.
Fact is, Muslims are attacking Mr Lacy because apparently the indignity of a suicide bomber being covered in pig's blood is too much for them to handle.
Mr Lacy is a Tampa inventor who had traveled extensively in the Middle East and had knew how strongly Muslims felt about pig blood.
Having a eureka moment, Mr Lacy created a "system for protecting against terrorist and illegal invasion" that would place a device clearly marked as containing pig blood in an area where a suicide bomber might be tempted to detonate a device.
"It will keep suicide bombers from blowing themselves up near the container of pig blood because they believe that they would be guaranteed not to go to heaven,” Lacy said.
Unlike Mr Lacy’s other inventions — which include a beverage heater, a fudge warmer and a windshield — this one has created a bit of controversy.
Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, said that the invention had "been created by someone who seeks to humiliate specific faiths."
"The patent is particularly troubling if used against Jews or Muslims, because it would be deeply offensive and insulting to their faith and beliefs," the director of the interfaith organization said.
Firstly, let’s dispense with the idea that suicide bombing attacks are evenly distributed among faiths. They are not. There isn't even a sizable minority of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, or Atheist suicide bombers. Suicide bombing is pretty much exclusively a radical Muslim phenomenon.
Secondly, while it remains to be seen whether such a device would actually stop suicide bombings -- those who have found a justification to send "martyrs" off to die with suicide belts can find a way to justify getting pigs blood on you in the course of murdering the kafir -- decrying a pig blood-filled device because it might be "deeply offensive" to suicide bombers is insane.
If one doesn't want to enter into an establishment that has such devices deployed, one does not have to. However, let’s not take offense and talk down this solution all because it screws up a Muslim's suicide attempt and subsequently that is what upsets them.
And, after all, if it stops the violence it"s meant to stop, shouldn"t Muslims be happy as well?
Pig blood may be the answer to stopping stupid Muslims from killing others. While they take offense to this, in reality they should be offended instead by the ritualistic violence that made such a device necessary.
THIRD SHOT!
Border patrol supervisor arrested in California over a hidden bathroom camera
A two-count criminal complaint unsealed in federal court Monday charges a U.S. Border Patrol supervisor with video voyeurism for allegedly placing a video camera in a women’s restroom at the agency’s offices in San Ysidro.
Armando Gonzalez, 45, is also charged with making false statements. He made his initial court appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jill Burkhardt, who set bail at $50,000 and issued an order forbidding the defendant from contacting alleged victims, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Two of the victims, including the agent who found the camera, have asked the court to grant them restraining orders against Gonzalez, claiming they’re afraid Gonzalez, who has access to firearms, will come after them.
A March 19 preliminary hearing and April 2 arraignment were set for Gonzalez, who was arrested Friday.
The complaint alleges Gonzalez made false statements when he stated that the images captured on the hidden camera, were not related to a drug investigation, were deleted, when in fact they were saved.
Prosecutors also said Gonzalez initially reported the camera had been in place briefly.
“He told agents when he self reported that the camera had been there for only a few days when in truth and in fact it had been there for at least two years, we have evidence of videos going back that long,” said Alessandra Serano, Assistant U.S. Attorney.
Serano also said Gonzalez made more than 300 videos.
Beginning in July 2013 and continuing through at least Jan. 9 of this year, Gonzalez allegedly captured images of women’s private areas without their consent, according to the charging document.
According to a statement of probable cause, the hidden video camera contained video files showing a white man believed to be Gonzalez using a screwdriver to install the camera in a drain in the women’s restroom; a woman’s undergarment clad breast as she changed her shirt in the restroom; and part of a woman’s naked buttock as she prepared to sit on the toilet and again as she stood.
Investigators searched the defendant’s office last month and allegedly found video files containing images recorded inside the restroom that showed the private areas of multiple female victims, including images of naked and/or undergarment clad genital, pubic area, buttock and/or woman’s breasts as the victims changed and/or used the toilet.
When F.B.I agents searched Gonzalez’s camera, they found more than 160 different recordings in the camera’s memory card.
According to the statement of probable cause, Gonzalez told officials that he placed the video recorder in the restroom because he suspected one of his employees was engaging in illegal drug use at work.
After the hearing, Gonzalez’s defense attorney, Jan Ronis, did not say much about his client’s defense or why and how the camera ended up in the drain.
Ronis did mention Gonzalez is married and has a very supportive family. Amazing isn't it?
FOURTH SHOT!
Black Lawmaker says, We Need Food Stamps Because All The "Young Eligible Fathers” Are In Prison
This is one of those stories that you can't make up if you wanted to. Believe it or not, Georgia Democrat Representative David Scott denies the existence of food stamp fraud.
Fact is, Muslims are attacking Mr Lacy because apparently the indignity of a suicide bomber being covered in pig's blood is too much for them to handle.
Mr Lacy is a Tampa inventor who had traveled extensively in the Middle East and had knew how strongly Muslims felt about pig blood.
Having a eureka moment, Mr Lacy created a "system for protecting against terrorist and illegal invasion" that would place a device clearly marked as containing pig blood in an area where a suicide bomber might be tempted to detonate a device.
"It will keep suicide bombers from blowing themselves up near the container of pig blood because they believe that they would be guaranteed not to go to heaven,” Lacy said.
Unlike Mr Lacy’s other inventions — which include a beverage heater, a fudge warmer and a windshield — this one has created a bit of controversy.
Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, said that the invention had "been created by someone who seeks to humiliate specific faiths."
"The patent is particularly troubling if used against Jews or Muslims, because it would be deeply offensive and insulting to their faith and beliefs," the director of the interfaith organization said.
Firstly, let’s dispense with the idea that suicide bombing attacks are evenly distributed among faiths. They are not. There isn't even a sizable minority of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, or Atheist suicide bombers. Suicide bombing is pretty much exclusively a radical Muslim phenomenon.
Secondly, while it remains to be seen whether such a device would actually stop suicide bombings -- those who have found a justification to send "martyrs" off to die with suicide belts can find a way to justify getting pigs blood on you in the course of murdering the kafir -- decrying a pig blood-filled device because it might be "deeply offensive" to suicide bombers is insane.
If one doesn't want to enter into an establishment that has such devices deployed, one does not have to. However, let’s not take offense and talk down this solution all because it screws up a Muslim's suicide attempt and subsequently that is what upsets them.
And, after all, if it stops the violence it"s meant to stop, shouldn"t Muslims be happy as well?
Pig blood may be the answer to stopping stupid Muslims from killing others. While they take offense to this, in reality they should be offended instead by the ritualistic violence that made such a device necessary.
THIRD SHOT!
Border patrol supervisor arrested in California over a hidden bathroom camera
A two-count criminal complaint unsealed in federal court Monday charges a U.S. Border Patrol supervisor with video voyeurism for allegedly placing a video camera in a women’s restroom at the agency’s offices in San Ysidro.
Armando Gonzalez, 45, is also charged with making false statements. He made his initial court appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jill Burkhardt, who set bail at $50,000 and issued an order forbidding the defendant from contacting alleged victims, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Two of the victims, including the agent who found the camera, have asked the court to grant them restraining orders against Gonzalez, claiming they’re afraid Gonzalez, who has access to firearms, will come after them.
A March 19 preliminary hearing and April 2 arraignment were set for Gonzalez, who was arrested Friday.
The complaint alleges Gonzalez made false statements when he stated that the images captured on the hidden camera, were not related to a drug investigation, were deleted, when in fact they were saved.
Prosecutors also said Gonzalez initially reported the camera had been in place briefly.
“He told agents when he self reported that the camera had been there for only a few days when in truth and in fact it had been there for at least two years, we have evidence of videos going back that long,” said Alessandra Serano, Assistant U.S. Attorney.
Serano also said Gonzalez made more than 300 videos.
Beginning in July 2013 and continuing through at least Jan. 9 of this year, Gonzalez allegedly captured images of women’s private areas without their consent, according to the charging document.
According to a statement of probable cause, the hidden video camera contained video files showing a white man believed to be Gonzalez using a screwdriver to install the camera in a drain in the women’s restroom; a woman’s undergarment clad breast as she changed her shirt in the restroom; and part of a woman’s naked buttock as she prepared to sit on the toilet and again as she stood.
Investigators searched the defendant’s office last month and allegedly found video files containing images recorded inside the restroom that showed the private areas of multiple female victims, including images of naked and/or undergarment clad genital, pubic area, buttock and/or woman’s breasts as the victims changed and/or used the toilet.
When F.B.I agents searched Gonzalez’s camera, they found more than 160 different recordings in the camera’s memory card.
According to the statement of probable cause, Gonzalez told officials that he placed the video recorder in the restroom because he suspected one of his employees was engaging in illegal drug use at work.
After the hearing, Gonzalez’s defense attorney, Jan Ronis, did not say much about his client’s defense or why and how the camera ended up in the drain.
Ronis did mention Gonzalez is married and has a very supportive family. Amazing isn't it?
Black Lawmaker says, We Need Food Stamps Because All The "Young Eligible Fathers” Are In Prison
This is one of those stories that you can't make up if you wanted to. Believe it or not, Georgia Democrat Representative David Scott denies the existence of food stamp fraud.
But also he argues that the United States government must have the Food Stamp program in our society -- because it is essential to Black Americans.
Here is David Scott's explanation:
"First of all, the situation regarding employment and jobs, poverty, all of that. All of that has been structured into our economic, social policy over the last quarter-century."
"First of all, the situation regarding employment and jobs, poverty, all of that. All of that has been structured into our economic, social policy over the last quarter-century."
But no, he doesn't stop with just that asinine statement, he goes on:
"Our policy of sending so many of our young eligible fathers to prison. Millions. Our prison population went from 300,000 in 1975 to over two million today. These are providers who are not there."
Yes, he is calling those thugs and criminals, the gang bangers, the murderers, the bottom feeders of our society who prey on others and have been caught and are in jail right now -- "providers."
When did they become "providers"? They never were!
But that doesn't stop this idiot David Scott to go on by saying:
"This is why we have so many single female head of households. I mean, so when you look at everything we have done, we’ve got to correct some of these things first."
Yes, he is saying that their criminal acts which put them behind bars is our fault, and we have to correct them. No, I don't know how guys like this can end up in Congress.
Basically, he apparently believes that we at fault for arresting those scumbags he calls "providers."
According to this bozo, we have a responsibility to provide Food Stamps to the families of thugs, thieves, drug dealers, murderers and rapists -- because it was our fault for arresting them.
According to him, if we had not locked up these black thugs, these criminals, then we would not have taken young eligible fathers -- "provider” -- away from there role as a thug who can support their baby's mamas on what they make in street crimes.
The logic behind this is amazing! And frankly, this falls into the category of one of the worse excuses for criminals of any color that we will ever hear.
FIFTH SHOT!
Can Muslims Be Good Americans? NO!
With almost 60% of the Muslims in the United States saying that Free Speech should be made illegal, and another more than 60% saying that when they take over the United States that they will do just that, I don't see how they can be Americans.
A recent poll shows that Muslims living in the USA want to outlaw free speech and a large number even agree that blasphemers of the Muslim god should be executed
Yes, that's here in the USA! It all makes one wonder if it is possible to be both a Muslim can be a true American?
For years during the invasion of Iraq under George W. Bush some doubters of Bush’s tactics said that Muslims cannot be made to understand Western Freedoms and Constitutional Government.
Many at the time said Islam is incompatible with freedom and the modern world. modernity. Bush insisted that Iraqis and other Muslims were "just like everyone else" and yearned to be free.
But while wanting freedom is one things, being submissive to the edicts of a bloodthirsty religion is another.
The poll shows that Muslims living in America right now actually hate America’s most important principles.
The poll points out a fact that many in America are becoming more and more aware of -- for Muslims, unlike any other religion, it is almost impossible to be both an American and a Muslim.
FINAL SHOT!
Obamas as Apes in Europe?
A Belgian newspaper is supposedly in big trouble after printing a picture of Barack and Michelle Obama as Apes. And yes, the Newspaper was forced to apologize.
The picture was obviously photo-shopped to show the Obamas as apes instead of humans.
Do I find this "racist"? No. Disrespectful yes, but racist? No!
Why not racist you ask?
Well the Liberal left did not find it at all racist or demeaning or bad form or tasteless when they depicted George W. Bush as an ape, a chimp, and a baboon on many many occasions over his 8 years in office.
So subsequently, I see this jab at the Obamas depicted as Apes simply as a bit of Karma coming around to give Democrats a taste of what they dish out all the time!
If they don't like, tough!
And yes, that's just the way I see it.
Tom Correa
With almost 60% of the Muslims in the United States saying that Free Speech should be made illegal, and another more than 60% saying that when they take over the United States that they will do just that, I don't see how they can be Americans.
A recent poll shows that Muslims living in the USA want to outlaw free speech and a large number even agree that blasphemers of the Muslim god should be executed
Yes, that's here in the USA! It all makes one wonder if it is possible to be both a Muslim can be a true American?
For years during the invasion of Iraq under George W. Bush some doubters of Bush’s tactics said that Muslims cannot be made to understand Western Freedoms and Constitutional Government.
Many at the time said Islam is incompatible with freedom and the modern world. modernity. Bush insisted that Iraqis and other Muslims were "just like everyone else" and yearned to be free.
But while wanting freedom is one things, being submissive to the edicts of a bloodthirsty religion is another.
The poll shows that Muslims living in America right now actually hate America’s most important principles.
The poll points out a fact that many in America are becoming more and more aware of -- for Muslims, unlike any other religion, it is almost impossible to be both an American and a Muslim.
FINAL SHOT!
Obamas as Apes in Europe?
A Belgian newspaper is supposedly in big trouble after printing a picture of Barack and Michelle Obama as Apes. And yes, the Newspaper was forced to apologize.
The picture was obviously photo-shopped to show the Obamas as apes instead of humans.
Do I find this "racist"? No. Disrespectful yes, but racist? No!
Well the Liberal left did not find it at all racist or demeaning or bad form or tasteless when they depicted George W. Bush as an ape, a chimp, and a baboon on many many occasions over his 8 years in office.
So subsequently, I see this jab at the Obamas depicted as Apes simply as a bit of Karma coming around to give Democrats a taste of what they dish out all the time!
If they don't like, tough!
And yes, that's just the way I see it.
Tom Correa
