Slanderers Are Contemptible Creatures Akin To Venomous Snakes

Libel and slander are both forms of defamation, which involve making false statements that damage a person's reputation. Libel is defamation that is written or broadcast, such as in a newspaper, online, or on television. Slander is defamation that is spoken. It is a false statement told to others. Both libel and slander can be the basis for a civil defamation lawsuit. 

I found the article below in the Russian River Flag newspaper published on April 2, 1874. I found it interesting simply because the person writing the article viewed slanderous individuals as most folks did back in the day -- as contemptible, low-character, snakes. Yes, like how they are viewed today.

Read it, and see if you come to the same conclusion. 

Slander

Slander, says an old proverb, is the revenge of a coward. He who uses it will find it a two-edged sword, for though it may wound one to whom it is applied, yet it will finally prove more destructive to the person wielding it. Slander is the offspring of a vicious, envious mind, the poisonous expression of those who are strangers to honor, truth, and justice; it should, therefore, be treated by all with the contempt it merits. 

Those who allow this vice to become a habit are pessimists of the worst sort; mankind is to them only on aggregation of foes placed on earth for the sole purpose of opposing and annoying them, and beating them in the contest of life; hence they exhale their venom on every occasion, hoping that some of it will prove effectual and accomplish the purpose for which it was ejected. 

The purest in the world cannot escape the voice of slander, for its upas-like breath permeates every condition in life, from the lowly to the most exalted. It is rife alike in the professional, as well as in the social circle, and the innocent maiden is no more apt to be free from its sting than the man of the world. The ablest soldiers, the most subtle statesmen, the boldest navigators, and even the most exemplary professors and teachers of the Gospel, have been subjected to the slanderer's venom; so it would seem the more exalted the position, the more actively it is attacked by this social curse. 

In fact, it is proverbial that the more successful and distinguished one becomes, the more he is assailed by the envious; for the latter, with their jaundiced minds, envy all who tower above them, so they try to pull the exalted from the high position which they cannot attain themselves. Such being the purpose of those addicted to the habit of vilifying their more successful fellow beings, their assertions should be treated with contumely by all persons who are imbued with a sense of truth and honor. 

Similes are not required to describe these vilifyers, for one can detect them by every mode of expression. When you hear a politician speak of a rival in discourteous tones, giving him no attributes but the basest; when you hear a man speak slightingly of a young lady, or a professional man speak in terms of disrespect of another in the same profession, because both do not agree in every detail—they belong to the low order of the slanderer, and their expressions are merely the utterances of base, envious minds, and they are therefore devoid of a sense of propriety, let alone honor. 

While it is necessary that scientific men should keep their profession free of charlatans, yet they should adopt the dignified manner of gentlemen, and not the plaintive, scolding tone of a costermonger. If ladies traduce each other without any apparent cause, they are in the category of the slanderer and they should be avoided; for one who will vilify another from mere prejudice is apt to speak in the same tone of even the dearest friend, for the slanderer is guarded by no higher principle than more selfish pleasure. 

You know, for instance, a lady with a nez retrousse [a turned-up nose], as our Gallic friends term it, and another with a beautiful Grecian or aquiline appendage of the same sort. Now speak to the former of the beautiful nasal outlines of the latter, and in nine cases out of ten, she will say: “Oh yes, she has a good nose, but she has a most horrible mouth." This proves that she lacks a sense of truth and justice, and therefore, no attention should be paid to her remarks, for their cause is evident. 

The pure, the honorable, are never addicted to this habit, for they have too much dignity of character to allow themselves to indulge in a vice so base and unwarrantable. All persons, then, should avoid slanderers as they would avoid the venom of a serpent, for they are the most contemptible creatures in the world and the curse of society.

-- end of Russian River Flag newspaper 1874 article.

There are reasons why those who libel and slander others are seen as being similar in nature and character to cold-blooded snakes. Slander can inflict significant harm on folks. That includes damage to reputation, emotional distress, and, in some cases, financial losses. It can lead to the loss of clients, missed opportunities, and even job termination due to the spread of false statements. Furthermore, the lies that a slanderer spreads can cause lasting damage to personal and working relationships.

Slander can severely damage a person's reputation, particularly if the false statements are widely circulated. False statements about a person's abilities, ethics, or behavior can undermine their credibility and professional standing while also leading to a decrease in one's social standing.

Slanderous statements can also damage personal relationships with friends, family, and colleagues. The spread of false information can create division and mistrust within social circles and professional networks. Speaking from my own experience with people spreading lies, experiencing slander is absolutely no fun. It can cause significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and distrust. 

In some cases, slander can create financial losses, such as lead to job loss,, loss of income missed promotions, and missed business opportunities. If a business's reputation is tarnished by slander, it can result in a decline in customers and sales. It can even lead to difficulty finding new employment.

Of course, there are also the costs associated with repairing one's reputation. Again, from my own experience, I've spent thousands of dollars on lawsuits to fight false accusations in the past. And when accusations are shown not to be true, most slanderers, those low-character individuals, don't even have the class to apologize for falsely accusing someone. 

And frankly speaking, that in itself proves that those low-character individuals are morally weak people who lack any sort of personal integrity. They are dishonest and essentially the complete opposite of people with good morals and ethics. They enjoy being liars. They enjoy being fakes. They relish intentionally hurting others, not respecting others, and believe they are never wrong. There is nothing good about them.

 

So what do you think? Have things changed? Have things changed that much at all? Are slanderous individuals still seen as venomous snakes with no redeeming qualities who should be avoided? Should they still be seen as some of the "most contemptible creatures in the world and the curse of society"?

I think so. Just as they were seen in 1874, I believe slanderous individuals are contemptible creatures akin to venomous snakes. They are just low-character lowlifes that we need to avoid. They're not worth spit. 

Tom Correa

Rescuing Big Joe -- A Salute To Rancher Don Mickelsen

The caption on this YouTube video reads: 

This horse is named Big Joe. He is a draft cross that was donated to the Horseshoeing School a few years ago. Riley trained him to ride and taught him the basics. Riley’s father, Don, owner of Rocking M Quarter Horses, found him to be a phenomenal ranch horse. Joe found his home at Don’s Horse ranch in central Idaho. 

A few days ago, Joe fell into a deep hole in a pasture while checking cows. The hole was made by a leaky water mainline and was just big enough for Joe to wedge his whole body in. Thanks to quick thinking by Don Mickelsen, they saved him, and he is making a full recovery.

The description of the video that I saw online stated: 

"Joe’s near demise. Ranching isn't always romance. Often, we are in the middle of a crisis. This morning, we nearly lost Joe, one of our good ranch horses. Thanks to River and Bre, we managed to save him. Pay no mind to the fat guy doing all the yelling. Enjoy the video. We sure didn't enjoy making it. My good wife, Cathy, stayed there through the whole thing, filming it. Thanks to her, we have it recorded."

To me, Don Mickelsen epitomises the can-do spirit of the American Cowboy and the resilience of American Ranchers. He is a prime example of the sort of man who tackles problems with fierce determination and a "never quit" attitude. Cold, wet, and exhausting didn't matter. So yes, if Americans today need an example of toughness and what it is to do right in a stressful situation, this is it. 

I salute Mr. Mickelsen. He's the sort of American that others can learn from. As for River, Bre, and Mrs. Mickelsen, who filmed the rescue, God bless you all.   

Tom Correa

James McCrory Deserved Hanging 1872

An old friend used to say, "Some people deserve hanging." There was no question about what he was talking about. After all, some people are evil. Sadly, some people live to prove that evil exists. It's not merely that they don't have any redeeming qualities; they are evil and need to be dealt with in the harshest manner imaginable. To say, "Some people deserve hanging" is one way, a blunt way, of expressing one's extreme disapproval for someone's heinous behavior.  

Take the case of murderer James G. McCrory in Visalia, California, as an example. He was someone who deserved to be hanged. And frankly, after reading about him, I'm sort of surprised that he evaded dancing on the end of a rope for as long as he did. Was he evil? Well, decide for yourself after reading what he did -- especially what he did to Charles Allen.

James G. McCrory supposedly originated in Arizona, where he supposedly had quite the reputation as a gunman and desperado. For my readers who know that I use the word "supposedly" because there's nothing to confirm the myths about people, though James McCrory was supposedly a badman who is said by some to have killed 13 men -- there's no proof of that. Other than the 2 killings that we know he did for certain, there's no proof that he killed 13 men anywhere -- including in Arizona. 

As with a lot of stories of badmen in the Old West, we need to figure out what's an inflated myth and what's true information. That being the case, we should take note of the fact that the first mention of James McCrory in a newspaper story syndicated by telegraph was on February 16, 1867. I found this small news tidbit in the Sacramento Daily Union and the Mariposa Gazette. 

It wasn't about James McCrory being in a gunfight or prospecting. No, it was about the death of his 9-year-old son James William McCrory. The small notice simply read: 

DIED 

At Visalia, February 4th, 1867, JAMES WIILLIAM McCRORY, son of James G. McCrory, aged 9 years, 1 month, and 6 days.

__________________________________

The next time James G. McCrory was mentioned in a newspaper story was on April 2, 1870, when the Sacramento Daily Union newspaper reported the following:

Shooting at Visalia.

March 30th - On Saturday night last, there was a shooting scrape between a Mexican and James McCrory, which came near resulting fatally to the Mexican. There are two rumors about town in regard to the shooting - some say that there were two, and some say four shots were fired. As we do not know the particulars, we will forbear all comment regarding it until McCrory has his examination, which has been set for next Friday. This is the same Spaniard who was arrested by McCrory and Billy Moore some time last year, for which he has threatened to kill both of them, and this shooting grew out of that in some manner. McCrory was arrested and given bail for his appearance for examination before Justice Bradley.

_________________________________

Did you pick up on the newspaper saying that James McCrory arrested the Mexican? Yes, he was a lawman once. But, while I haven't been able to find out if he was a deputy with Tulare County or a Visalia town deputy, it appears he was a lawman who turned badman. 

About six months later, a second story came out on October 26, 1870, the Sacramento Daily Union reported the following:

Murder in Tulare County

Visalia. October 25th., -  A Mexican, named Manuel Barales, was shot and instantly killed Friday night by James McCrory. Barales was standing in a saloon engaged in conversation with his back to the door when McCrory appeared at the door with a shotgun loaded with buckshot and fired at Barates, blowing nearly half his head off. The testimony at the preliminary examination yesterday fails to show any previous trouble, though McCrory claims the deceased had threatened his life. The prisoner was committed to await the action of the Grand Jury.

_________________________________

A few days later, on October 29, 1870, the Sacramento Daily Union reported a follow-up on the story above with a few more details of how McCrory shot his victim with a shotgun.

Homicide at Visalia.

The Delta [newspaper] of October 26th gives these particulars of a late homicide in its midst: On Friday night last, about half past 11 o'clock, James McCrory shot and killed a Spaniard named Manuel Barales, under the following circumstances: It appears that the Spaniard and McCrory had been running together, drinking with each other all the evening, and while at the Fashion Saloon, McCrory lent him some money, and shortly after left the house. In a few moments after his departure, while Manuel and Thomas Harper were standing talking at the bar.

McCrory returned and pushed the front door open, first with his hand and then with the muzzle of his shotgun. Harper happened to turn his head and saw McCrory in the act of raising the gun, but thought he was only in fun until he heard the gun cocked, when he stepped back one or two steps and the gun was discharged.

The whole charge struck the Spaniard full under the left ear, in the neck, and passed through, making a terrible wound and killing him instantly. McCrory surrendered himself to Sheriff Glasscock. On Monday afternoon, he was examined before Justice Shearer and remanded to jail to await the action of the Grand Jury.

_________________________________

So now, though I haven't been able to find any newspaper coverage of his trial in the archives, we can all see that he was convicted of that killing -- since it says that in the May 1, 1871, the Daily Alta California newspaper report: 

For the Penitentiary.

James McCrory was brought down from Tulare County yesterday, en route to San Quentin Prison, having been convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment.

_________________________________

Okay, so here's a twist that most folks today think only happens today and didn't happen in the Old West. James McCrory was released from prison after being locked up for about a month and a half. He was to have a new trial because of a technical error at his first trial. It's true. On June 16, 1871, this report was in the Sacramento Daily Union newspaper:

People vs. McCrory

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial, with leave to the appellant to withdraw his plea of "guilty of murder in the second degree."

_________________________________

While I've tried to find out why the judgment was reversed, I couldn't. I searched the archives and I couldn't find a report of his new trial. But, in this case, I can safely say that he must have been set free. We know that because he killed again on Christmas Eve of 1872. In that shooting, as with his others, he killed an unarmed man.

The following was reported in the Daily Alta California on December 25, 1872:

LYNCH LAW AT VISALIA.

A Well-known Desperado Kills a Man and is Immediately Hanged by a Vigilance Committee.

Visalia, December 24th, James McCrory, a noted desperado, who has already killed several men in this place, shot and killed Charles Allen about five o'clock this afternoon. He was arrested within a few minutes by an officer in an out-house to which he had fled. He was armed to the teeth. He was twice taken from the officers by an exasperated crowd amid cries of "Hang him, shoot him," but the officers finally succeeded in lodging him in jail.

A vigilance committee was at once organized around the jail door, and a demand made for the prisoner. The sheriff and deputies were overpowered and the keys taken from them. McCrory was taken from the jail and hanged from a bridge in the vicinity. The excitement has all subsided. The body is still hanging from the bridge amid the pouring rain. The unanimous sentiment of the people is "well done." Great praise is due to the Sheriff and deputies for their efforts to avert the hanging.

More details came out in the Marin Journal, Volume 12, Number 41, on 28 December 1872:

Details of the Visalia Tragedy.

The following dispatch to the San Francisco Chronicle is dated Christmas Day: The town has been very quiet all day after the exciting scenes of last night. The body of the murderer, McCrory, after hanging an hour and a half, was moved to an undertaker's. There was not the slightest provocation for the murder. McCrory was abusing a third party in Allen's saloon when the latter entered from the rear door, and accosting McCrory, asked what was the matter. McCrory answered, "I would just as soon shoot you as anyone else," and opened fire on him with a Navy revolver in each hand.

Allen threw up his hands after the first shot, exclaiming, "I am unarmed; for God's sake, don't kill me."

McCrory fired again, one shot penetrating the chest and one going through the skull, making a wound from which the brain oozed out. Allen then sank into a sitting posture against the counter, with his head resting on his breast, insensible. But the murderer, not yet satisfied with his bloody work, fired another shot into the victim's abdomen, and then coolly walked to the back door and took refuge in a small out-house.

When taken from his cell by the vigilantes, the murderer showed fight, but a rope was instantly thrown over his neck and he was dragged to the scene of his execution. The vigilantes were composed of the best men in the community—men who, wearied of the uncertainty of the law, were determined to mete out justice themselves.

McCrory had been previously acquitted of two or three cowardly murders and would probably have been again turned loose in our midst. There is but one expression today in regard to last night's proceedings —it meets unanimous approval. A determination is expressed to keep it up as long as murderers are allowed to escape through the meshes of the law.

_________________________________

Here are more details of his hanging at the hands of Vigilantes in Visalia, as reported in the San Jose Weekly Mercury newspaper on January 2, 1873:

Swift Execution

In Visalia, on Tuesday, James McCrory, a noted desperado, who, it is stated, has killed four or five persons, shot and killed one Chas. Allen, without any apparent cause. He fired five shots into the brain, chest, and abdomen of Allen, either one of which was fatal, firing the last shot as his victim lay prostrate on the floor.

McCrory attempted to escape, but was brought to bay in an outhouse, where he faced the crowd with a Navy revolver in each hand. Deputy Sheriff Reynolds advanced on him and, by the aid of the citizens, succeeded in disarming him. On his way to the jail, a crowd of excited citizens captured him from the officers, but he was retaken and convoyed to jail. The crowd becoming reinforced, moved upon the the jail, broke open the outer door, overpowered the officers, took from them the keys to the cells, went to McCrory's cell, opened it and placing a rope around the neck of the murderer, led him out on to Court street bridge, tied the rope to the railing and swung him into eternity. 

The murderer and his victim died at about the same moment. That sort of swift vengeance is, of course, all wrong, but it is about the only sort of treatment that such desperadoes can appreciate.

__________________________________

James Greenville "Jim" McCrory was born sometime in 1836 in Arkansas. On Christmas Eve in 1872, murderer James McCrory, age 35 or 36, was hanged in the town of Visalia, in Tulare County, California, by local Vigilantes after he killed one of the owners of the El Dorado Saloon. It's said the citizens took McCrory from the jail, dragged him to the Mill Creek Bridge, put a noose around his neck, and threw him over the side of the bridge to hang him. The reason for the hanging is said to be the citizens' frustration with the lawlessness in the town. 

It's said the vigilantes decided to leave his body hanging there for a few hours as a warning to others. Before cutting him down, those who lynched him collected money to provide a decent burial. Imagine that. They collected funds for the burial of McCrory while he swung from that bridge.

It should be noted that James G. McCrory was married once to Julia Ann Bozeman. She had 5 children by her first husband, James G. McCrory: Charles, Ambrose, Mary Frances, Martha, and James. After he was cut down from the Mill Creek Bridge, James G. McCrory was buried in the Visalia Public Cemetery with his 9-year-old son, who died in 1867. The birth year on his headstone is said to be wrong.

  

Tom Correa

A Wild Girl in the Swamp 1855

Below is an interesting news story taken off the syndicated telegraph wire and published by the Los Angeles Star on October 13, 1855:

A Wild Girl in the Swamp

The people of Eaton County, Michigan, have been excited for some time past by the story that a wild girl has been seen wandering in a swamp near the town of Chester. The Eaton Republican gives a long account of the circumstances which seem to prove that some lost child has been changed into a savage, and wanders in a wild condition in the forest. The people had turned out en masse to search for this strange creature, and for more than a week, the pursuit has been kept up.

The Detroit Tribune says, "The girl is described as a white child, apparently of seven or eight years old, with long hair, dressed in what seems to have been once a light colored gown, now very much torn and soiled, and something like an old sun bonnet on her head. School children report having seen the wild girl at various times, on the outside of the swamp, into which, however, she invariably disappeared.

Inquiry has failed to discover that any child has ever been lost in that vicinity, and some of the people are disposed to pronounce the whole affair a delusion or a hoax, but as these reports have been made, in some cases, by children of an age, judgment and character to be respected, the largest portion of the people think there must be something in the matter, of sufficient importance to demand attention.

Handbills have been issued offering a $50 reward for the capture of the child, and the swamp in which the singular creature must be concealed has been thoroughly and repeatedly scoured by the citizens, but without success. Foot prints, however, were discovered, plainly enough to convince those in search that a child had been wandering barefoot through the swamp, and a place was found which was believed to be the sleeping place of the child —a dry, comfortable place, underneath the roots ot a tree.

The swamp contains about forty acres, is quite wet and miry, and rendered nearly impassable by a dense growth of underbrush, but there are roads all around it. and quite a number of cleared fields in its vicinity. At last accounts, an Indian, somewhat noted for his sagacity and intelligence, together with a half-breed friend, had commenced a cautious and deliberate search for the wanderer. 

By next week, we hope to be able to inform our readers whether this story of the lost child is a premeditated hoax, a childish delusion, or a sad reality."

--- end of news story. 

The "Swamp Girl" hoax is today a common urban legend told around campfires. Yes, more or less just a folklore story. While folklore refers to the traditional beliefs, legends, and customs of a people, urban legends are a specific type of folklore that involves stories passed down about unusual or scary events. Those stories are often presented as true, but lack any sort of real, verifiable evidence. Of course, as with most folklore, there are different versions to these stories depending on the region where the story is being told and who is telling the story.

It's a very popular and well-circulated urban legend in the Southern states of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. The core of the urban legend is said to be a woman, or spirit, often called "The Swamp Girl" or a similar name, who roams around in a swamp. Supposedly, she haunts a swamp in search of a child. 

The most common thread is that it's a woman. Some versions say she's lost, abandoned, in search of her lost child, grieving the loss of a child, or involved with seeking revenge for being left to die in the swamp. Some versions suggest her child drowned in the swamp, while others say her child was kidnapped by Indian Warriors.  And yes, there are even versions that warn listeners to stay out of swamps. But if you are dumb enough to enter and say, "I have your baby" three times, then she will attack you. Imagine that. A ritual saying, "I have your baby" three times, to trigger the Swamp Girl's attack. 

The specific details of "The Swamp Girl," her age, what she's wearing, if she's searching for her child, her child's fate, and having to recite the triggering ritual in a specific manner, all change and vary from region to region. And yes, the story's "facts" also change from one storyteller to another. It is said that such stories have been around for a long time because this type of folklore has something to do with our anxieties regarding swamps, the unknown of what may be found there, or what has disappeared there. 

So, how long has "The Swamp Girl" tale been around? 

Well, while the 1855 newspaper report above came out of the Northeast and not the South, where "The Swamp Girl" urban legend is supposedly fairly common, the 1855 news story just shows us how such hoaxes were well circulated around the country even back in the day. Also, the age of "The Swamp Girl" is much younger than other versions. In the 1855 story she's a young girl instead of an older woman, and in the case of the "Wild Girl in the Swamp" story, readers have no clue how she ended up in the swamp or why she hides there. That just adds to that mystery of the story. 

Tom Correa

 

Let's Talk About American Hero 1st Lt. Sharon A. Lane, 67th Medical Group, 44th Medical Brigade

Since this is Memorial Day, let's talk about U.S. Army First Lieutenant Sharon A. Lane, who was with the 67th Medical Group, 44th Medical Brigade, in Vietnam on June 8, 1969. 

According to the U.S. Army Museum, Sharon Ann Lane was born on July 7, 1943, in Zanesville, Ohio. Her family moved to Canton, Ohio, when she was two. That is where she spent her childhood. That's where she grew up. That's where her character was formed and where she dreamt of being a nurse. 

After graduating from Canton High School in 1961, she enrolled at Aultman Hospital School of Nursing, which is now Aultman College of Nursing. She graduated in 1965 before spending the next two years in the Obstetrics Unit at Aultman Hospital. Then, in 1968, supposedly after never having ever talked about joining the military, it's said she surprised her family and friends by joining the U.S. Army Nurse Corps Reserves in April of 1968. 

Let's remember that 1968 was a year of significant anti-military sentiment in the United States. College campuses were rioting, and student protests were common and fueled by the unpopular Vietnam War and pro-Communism professors. The anti-war movement gained momentum throughout the decade, but really reached a peak in 1968. 

The war in Vietnam, which began escalating in the mid-1960s,  and the Tet Offensive in early 1968, where the North Vietnamese launched a surprise attack, significantly shook public confidence in the war's progress and the government's handling of it. Anti-war protests were widespread. The anti-war movement had a significant impact on fueling an anti-military sentiment that plagued American society for many years. The anti-war sentiment had a major impact on how Americans looked down on those serving our country in our military.

It was not uncommon for Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines to return home from duty in Vietnam to people spitting on them. Most who served in the military at the time, including those who never served in Vietnam, were treated horribly by Americans -- especially in colleges and universities, but also by being discriminated against when it came to finding jobs and adjusting to civilian life. Many veterans at the time found it easier to say they never served, rather than put up with disdain and ridicule for serving. 

The anti-war movement had a lasting impact on our American culture for years. It contributed to the shift in public opinion of anyone serving in the military. The 1960s and 1970s were a time when Americans serving our country were treated with disdain and loathing. As for Lt. Lane volunteering to join the military in 1968, I can definitely understand why she would keep her interest in a career in the military a secret. It was extremely unpopular to join the military back in those days. 

For me personally, I remember having to wade through protestors outside of a Marine Corps Recruiting Office in 1972 when I went there for information on enlisting. I also remember later, while being in the Marine Corps and attending an event at a California University in 1976. Even though it was just a year after the fall of Saigon, I was pelted with food and spit on by students who called me all sorts of vile things. And yes, I remember how the faculty looked on with approval. They might not have said they agreed or approved of the actions of their students, but their silence and unwillingness to hold those students to account for their horrid behavior was proof enough for me to understand that they supported what their students were doing. 

As for women in the military in 1968, we should understand that American women were officially forbidden from combat roles in our military until 2013. Women did serve in other areas of the military. Mostly working as rear-echelon nurses. The fact is, it was not until the establishment of the Army Nurse Corps of the Medical Department under the Army Reorganization Act of 1901 that women nurses were allowed to join the Army in a formal capacity. 

Sharon Lane underwent basic training at Brooke Army Medical Center at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas. She graduated in June of 1968 with the rank of Second Lieutenant. Her first post was at the Army’s Fitzsimons General Hospital in Denver, Colorado, in the Tuberculosis Ward. She was soon promoted to First Lieutenant. Her promotion allowed her to move to the Cardiac Care Unit and the recovery room. 

It's said, while Lt. Lane liked her work, she soon requested a transfer to a place far more challenging. She requested duty in Vietnam. Many nurses who served in the Vietnam War were recent graduates and were ordered to go after receiving stipends from the Army while in school. In contrast to others, Lt. Lane volunteered to be sent to Vietnam. 

She arrived at the 312th Evacuation Hospital in Chu Lai, South Vietnam, on April 29, 1969. And yes, it's said that not long after arriving there, Lt. Lane volunteered for one of the most unpopular wards at the hospital. She volunteered to work in the Vietnamese ward where American doctors and nurses not only looked after injured Vietnamese civilians and children. But also, that ward was where wounded Viet Cong prisoners were kept. And yes, they would often spit, kick, and insult the American doctors and nurses there. 

Martha Green, who worked with Lt. Lane, remembered her taking everything in stride. “She didn’t make a big deal out of it,” recalled Green, “she said she was a nurse, and she had to take care of patients. It didn’t make a difference whether they were Vietnamese or POWs or our own soldiers.” 

Attending to her patients kept Lane extremely busy. She worked five days a week for 12 hours each day. During her days off, she volunteered to care for critically injured American Soldiers in the hospital’s intensive care unit. Being so close to the frontlines was dangerous, however, and within weeks of arriving, two enemy rockets struck the hospital compound. 

While it's said that Lt. Lane remained unfazed, in a letter to her parents, she summed up her new environment by saying, “… hardly anyone is scared though. It is just like part of the job.” 

Her attitude and dedication, not only to those she cared for but those she worked with, earned her instant admiration and respect. Forty-one days after she arrived in Vietnam, 1st Lt. Sharon A. Lane was killed by shrapnel from a 122-mm rocket that hit the hospital. She died while trying to protect her patients from the incoming blasts. 

She was laid to rest with full military honors, and the Army posthumously awarded her several medals, including a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star with the “V” for valor decoration. She was the only American servicewoman to be awarded such an honor at the time. Her name can be found on panel 23W, line 112 of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. 

Lt. Lane’s time in the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War, while short, left a lasting impression on all those who met her. Since her death, a memorial has gone up in her honor at Aultman College of Nursing, and she was inducted into the Ohio Military Hall of Fame. 

It's said America's military is full of heroes and heroines. Sharon A. Lane was one such heroine. A member of the U.S. Army Nurse Corps, Lt. Lane has been remembered for being quiet, hardworking, and dedicated to her patients. And while other nurses died in Vietnam, she has the tragic distinction of being the only U.S. military nurse killed by enemy fire in the Vietnam War. 

So, if we talk about a common thread that runs through those who have made the ultimate sacrifice, the character of those who should not be forgotten. We must talk about their caring, their devotion to duty, their devotion to their comrades, their selflessness, their love for others, and their doing what's right -- even if it's at the expense of their own lives.  

Tom Correa

Let's Talk About Trump Hoaxes And Why Americans Don't Trust The News

Most miners made barely enough to get by during the California Gold Rush. Some were convinced that getting rich in California was all just a wicked hoax played on them. The California Gold Rush did see people get rich overnight. And no, that wasn't a hoax at all. But it wasn't the miners who got rich. In fact, those who ended up getting rich at the time were the people who supplied the miners with food, clothing, shovels, and everything else miners needed to get by during their search for those elusive nuggets. 

Like today, there have been small hoaxes and large hoaxes, famous hoaxes and not-so-famous hoaxes. As I was saying in my long six-part series on Was The Capt. Jonathan R. Davis 1854 Gunfight A Hoax? -- Part Four, back in the 1800s, hoaxes were very commonplace. Of course, though that was the case, hoaxes in newspapers didn't stop after 1900. In fact, just as what's taking place today with the Left's money-making Climate Change Hoax, and people trying to make rapists and murderers look like misunderstood victims to sell newspapers, fraud and people perpetrating such things seem eternal. 

A hoax that caught a lot of people off guard took place in 1931 in Dallas, Texas. The initial story of what supposedly took place was big enough. But then, when the fraudster came clean and owned up to the hoax that he tried to pull, well, that really made bigger news. 

The initial story was about how four men attempted to lynch a 30-year-old Baptist Minister by hanging him from a chandelier directly over the pulpit where he stood each Sunday morning. The story had people wanting to know what sort of degenerate would lynch a preacher right over the very spot where he preached the gospel on Sundays. The preacher was Rev. B. P. Brown. He was an assistant pastor at the North Dallas Baptist Church. And yes, it was all a fraud created by him. 

TEXAS PASTOR SAYS HANGING STORY A HOAX

Rev. Brown Confesses That He Lost Nerve In Attempt To Commit Suicide

DALLAS, Texas, June 20, 1931, (UPI) The story of how four men attempted to lynch a 30-year-old Baptist Minister by hanging him from a chandelier directly over the pulpit where he stood each Sunday morning was a hoax, the preacher confessed today. The Rev. B. P. Brown, supply pastor at the North Dallas Baptist Church, hanged himself in an attempt to commit suicide, but lost his nerve and then concocted the story of the lynching. A mental disorder brought on when he was slugged in the head early this year at Midland, Texas, was blamed for his actions.

Brown was beaten by burglars when he discovered them rifling a safe at the hotel where he was working at the time. He then came to Dallas, entered the ministry, and supported himself by working as a baggage clerk in the Adolphus Hotel. Brown confessed that his story was a hoax before his whole congregation, assembled for a revival meeting. He told of the elaborate plan he made to hang himself. 

He looped the rope over the chandelier, placed the loop around his neck, and climbed on a chair, he said. Then, he kicked the chair away and was suspended in mid-air, slowly choking to death. That's when Brown changed his mind and finally freed himself from the knotted rope. 

He was found by police, stripped of his clothing and his mouth bound with strips of adhesive tape, "I intended to kill myself, and then just couldn't do it when 1 was hanging there and looking death right in the face," he said. 

He gave no reason for his action. The "crime" had puzzled Dallas Police ever since Brown was found in the church early Thursday. The "lynching" was first believed to be the result of hatred held for Brown by various members of his church.

Even the Ku Klux Klan entered the case. It was reported that the Klan, once strong in the area, had attempted to punish the minister for Communist leanings. The story Brown first told was elaborate. He claimed to have been kidnapped shortly after midnight Thursday while walking home from work. His abductor, he said, took him to his own church, where three other masked men were awaiting him. They first stripped him of his clothing, bound his mouth with tape, and then hanged him, he told police. He said he was able to save himself only because the rope they used was new and stretched, allowing him to reach a nearby chair with the tips of his toes.

-- end of the 1931 news article.

_____________________

Before his confession, the newspapers in Texas put the news story on the wire and ran with it. They attributed the preacher's faked hanging to everyone but the preacher himself. With egg on their face, the newspapers that ran with the story never took responsibility for having published a false story. Yes, a story that many kept believing was true. Instead of waiting to ferret out the truth, the newspapers simply ran with it. 

While that was in the 1930s, nothing's changed. The news media today wants to be the first to publish a story -- true or not. And no, they don't seem to care if what they are saying is credible or if it's just another lie. They are not held accountable and see themselves above being held to standards of honesty and truthfulness. 

As for running hoaxes, the Mainstream Media outdid themselves when they ran with the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax story. The false information they spread elevated them to a level of fakeness that will never be matched again in our history. They lied and lied and lied for years. They did so by bringing on so-called "legal experts" and others who pushed that story even though there was not an ounce of truth in it. 

After years of hype and distortion, with the Left in America calling for Trump's immediate arrest, Americans were able to read the full 316-page report from Justice Department special counsel John Durham. That report not only debunked the Left's vile assertions that President Trump committed treason, but it indicted some of our country’s leading institutions -- including the FBI. 

In fact, the Durham Report said that the FBI should have never launched an investigation into alleged Russian collusion with Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, given the suspicious evidence coming from biased Democratic Party sources. All in all, the FBI appeared to be either duped or was made a tool by members of the Democratic Party trying to smear President Trump in any way they could. 

President Trump's vindication was a huge win for him, especially after years of unfair treatment by the FBI, a "weaponized" Department of Justice, and a national press with a lynch mob mentality -- of hang him, then we'll find out what he did wrong. To say it was shameful would be an understatement. But no, even though they were proven wrong and exposed for being the political tool of the Democratic Party, that hasn't stopped the news media from continuing to conduct business as usual -- and still fire off lie after lie to attack President Trump.  

The attacks on President Trump from the news media showed them as all too willing to blame President Trump for everything -- just short of the 9-11 attack. The investigation into the "Russia Collusion" hoax affected President Trump’s entire first term. As for the people responsible for the hoax, the news media's complicity in the criminal fraud was brushed aside as Democrats were elated while trying to paint President Trump's first term as "illegitimate." 

To many, what was done to President Trump was criminal, and the people who perpetrated that fraud on the American people should be held to account for their actions. Sadly, because those behind the "Russia Collusion" hoax, those who actually orchestrated and coordinated that effort to unseat a sitting American President, are among the most powerful and wealthy Democrats in the United States, they are above the law and will most likely never be brought to justice. 

Whether some want to admit it or not, the ill effects of the "Russia Collusion" hoax have taken their toll on our society as a whole. While hoaxes and fraud being played on the people have been around forever, the news media lying and distorting the truth is now why only 3 out of 10 Americans trust the news media today. The biased reporting and obviously unfounded attacks on President Trump has ruined the credibility of the Mainstream News Media. 

And yes, while the news media will tell us that it is "essential to maintaining our freedoms," most Americans don't believe it and see their claim as "defenders of Democracy" as their way of trying to justify their criminal behavior. Because their Leftist Political Agenda supersedes their ability to be fair and honest, Americans see the news media today as both horridly unfair and dishonest.  

If you think the news media may have learned a lesson from the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax, they haven't. In fact, they are still doing the same thing by spreading hoax after hoax, lie after lie after lie. For example, take a look at these Trump hoaxes, which were tried and played out by the new media in just the last few months. Since President Trump took office this year, there has been a nonstop deluge of hoaxes and lies from Democrats and their allies in the news media. The news media lies because they know they have followers who will believe anything they say. That's the reason the news media publishes hoaxes, fake information, things that no honest person would think of repeating. 

Take a look at these examples of Fake News:

HOAX: Fake News CNN attempted to “fact check” President Trump’s claim that the Biden Administration spent millions on “making mice transgender.”

FACT: After their so-called “fact check” was thoroughly debunked, they were forced to update it in disgrace and admit the claim was, in fact, true.

_____________________

HOAX: The Fake News claimed the Department of Defense removed Gen. Colin Powell’s name from a list of notable Americans buried at Arlington Cemetery.

FACT: No service members’ names were removed from that section — and Gen. Powell’s name remains among those listed.

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) claimed “no president” presided over more plane crashes during their first month in office as President Trump.

FACT: “There were 55 aviation accidents in the U.S. between Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 21, 2021, and Feb. 17, 2021, compared to 35 during the same period for Trump,” Fox News reported.

_____________________

HOAX: Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL) and Chicago Public Schools officials claimed, without bothering to verify, that ICE agents had conducted a “raid” at an elementary school — a false claim echoed by media outlets, including the Chicago Tribune.

FACT: It was actually the U.S. Secret Service investigating a threat unrelated to immigration.

_____________________

HOAX: Far-left influencers and other leftist hacks falsely claimed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk were out to “cut Social Security.”

FACT: They were referencing an interview in which Musk was clearly referring to the tremendous amount of waste, fraud, and abuse within entitlement programs.

_____________________

HOAX: The media smeared DOGE as “young, inexperienced engineers” engineering a “government takeover.”

FACT: In reality, DOGE is led by seasoned industry professionals, including successful CEOs who paused their lives to aid in the effort of streamlining government and holding the bureaucracy accountable.

_____________________

HOAX: NBC’s Peter Alexander peddled the lie that “constituents in some traditionally red districts” were unhappy with President Trump’s effort to cut waste, fraud, and abuse in government.

FACT: The same “protests” cited by the Fake News were funded and organized by far-left special interest groups.

_____________________

HOAX: NPR claimed NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore — who were stuck on the International Space Station for more than nine months following problems with their spacecraft — were “not stranded.”

FACT: NPR itself had described the astronauts as stranded in prior reporting, and only seemed to take issue with the description once President Trump and Elon Musk made it a priority to bring them home.

_____________________

HOAX: A foreign Fake News outlet reported that President Trump “shut down” the British prime minister during a news conference.

FACT: In reality, President Trump was simply moving on from a reporter who was trying to goad the two leaders into division.

_____________________

HOAX: NPR falsely claimed the White House was actively searching for a new secretary of defense.

FACT: This lie was immediately shut down by multiple Trump Administration officials, including President Trump himself.

_____________________

HOAX: The Fake News attempted to paint illegal immigrant gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia as an innocent “Maryland father” who was unjustly deported by the Trump Administration — and actively censored the truth about him.

FACT: Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador and was deported to his home country amid overwhelming evidence of his gang affiliation.

_____________________

HOAX: Deranged “filmmaker” Michael Moore questioned whether deported illegal immigrants would go on to cure cancer or stop “that asteroid (sic) that’s gonna hit us.”

FACT: Moore’s statement was a strong early contender for the dumbest, most ridiculous statement of the year, considering those deported illegal immigrants were violent criminals.

_____________________

HOAX: The Fake News portrayed Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Hamas radical who led violent protests at Columbia, as an innocent graduate student with an absolute right to remain in the U.S.

FACT: An immigration judge ruled Khalil — who is not a U.S. citizen — can be deported.

_____________________

HOAX: A foreign Fake News reporter claimed President Trump referred to European nations as “parasites.”

FACT: President Trump immediately pushed back on this ridiculous claim — as did the Italian prime minister.

_____________________

HOAX: Fake News CNN’s Brianna Keilar implied the Trump Administration was somehow wrong for stopping illegal immigrants from stealing taxpayer dollars in the form of welfare benefits.

FACT: Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller summarily embarrassed her with the facts: “The federal government will find EVERY illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars — and that’s what Americans expect to happen. I don’t even fathom the premise of your question.”

_____________________

HOAX: A favorite refrain of the Fake News is that Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is “anti-vaccine.”

FACT: Kennedy debunked the lie in his confirmation hearings: “This has been repeatedly debunked … Bringing this up right now is dishonest.”

_____________________

HOAX: Reuters falsely reported that the Trump Administration “stalled a United Nations program in Mexico aimed at stopping imported fentanyl chemicals from reaching the country’s drug cartels.”

FACT: The Department of State is actually trying to expand the initiative.

_____________________

HOAX: Fake News savant Tara Palmeri falsely reported that President Trump’s proposal for Gaza was conceived by Jared Kushner.

FACT: This lie was immediately and summarily debunked by the Trump Administration: “The worst reporter in America makes up fake news for clout because she has no real sources. Sit down, dummy.”

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Chris Murphy, Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and media outlets claimed President Trump’s directive to pause radical, wasteful government spending meant an end to Medicaid, food assistance, and other individual assistance programs.

FACT: Individual assistance programs — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, etc. — were explicitly excluded, as was made clear by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and the Office of Management and Budget. Only unnecessary spending — DEI, Green New Scam, NGOs that undermine the national interest — were included in the directive.

_____________________

HOAX: A “physicians advocacy group” was widely cited as opposing President Trump’s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.

FACT: The “advocacy group” was really an astroturfed partisan organization funded by prominent left-wing donors — and accepted fake signatures.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) and other Democrats pushed the lie that DOGE posted “classified information” on their website.

FACT: That alleged “classified information” was really just an employment headcount — which has been publicly available for years.

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) claimed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem called all Venezuelan immigrants “dirtbags.”

FACT: Secretary Noem actually called illegal immigrant members of the vicious Tren de Aragua gang “dirtbags,” which is true.

_____________________

HOAX: The New York Times wrote that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., wanted to “ban fluoride in drinking water” and “reverse … one of the most important public health practices in the country’s history.”

FACT: New York Times made no mention of their own reporting that fluoride may be “linked to lower IQ scores in children.”

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) repeatedly lied about President Trump “going after” Social Security.

FACT: President Trump has repeatedly pledged to protect Social Security and make it more robust for American citizens.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Mark Kelley (D-AZ) attempted to scare veterans by shamelessly claiming their care was in jeopardy due to “layoffs” at VA hospitals.

FACT: The lie was debunked by Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins: “What changes are you talking about? We’ve not had those layoffs… I put $360 million back into community care… It’s concerning to me that a veteran would actually tell stories to veterans that are not true.”

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) exploited the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport plane crash tragedy by claiming President Trump “froze the hiring” of air traffic controllers.

FACT: Air traffic controllers were exempt from the federal hiring freeze.

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) implied that “cutting” members of an aviation advisory committee was somehow a cause of the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport plane crash tragedy.

FACT: The advisory group hadn’t met since 2023 and was comprised of business and union leaders who gave “advice” to the TSA and had nothing to do with actual air travel.

_____________________

HOAX: A far-left writer claimed Elon Musk and DOGE staffers “illegally installed a commercial server to control federal HR databases that contain sensitive personal information, including SSNs, home addresses, and medical histories.”

FACT: A top official confirmed “there’s nothing illegal and no server, just more made up tall tales from uninformed career bureaucrats.”

_____________________

HOAX: The Washington Post alleged the Trump Administration was setting “quotas” for immigration authorities — and gave the administration just four minutes to comment before publishing.

FACT: As usual, this was a fake story.

_____________________

HOAX: Online liberal activists claimed President Trump “took down” President Obama’s portrait in the White House.

FACT: Obama’s portrait was not taken down — it was simply moved only feet away from its previous location.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) claimed Attorney General Pam Bondi created a “weaponizing task force.”

FACT: It was a task force to END weaponization at the Department of Justice.

_____________________

HOAX: CBS News reported that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered a “makeup studio” be installed inside the Pentagon.

FACT: It was a “totally fake story,” and the alleged studio was really an existing green room with no frills.

_____________________

HOAX: Politico reported the Trump Administration was debating lifting sanctions on Russian energy assets, including the Nord Stream pipeline.

FACT: This was debunked by both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff.

_____________________

HOAX: An illegal immigrant in U.S. custody “simply disappeared,” The New York Times reported.

FACT: The illegal immigrant was a confirmed member of the vicious Tren de Aragua gang. An immigration judge ordered his removal, and he was deported along with other threats to national security.

_____________________

HOAX: The Wall Street Journal alleged that Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was receiving sensitive information on a personal phone while in Moscow and that Russian Intelligence must’ve had access to the information.

FACT: This was a total fabrication. Special Envoy Witkoff did not even have a personal phone with him in Russia. He had only a government phone; a secure line of communication.

_____________________

HOAX: The Wall Street Journal claimed the Trump Administration “sought to portray” deported criminal illegal immigrant gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia as “violent.”

FACT: Abrego Garcia’s own wife filed an order of protection against him and testified that he brutally beat her.

_____________________

HOAX: An AP reporter claimed that FAA staff who worked on “radar, landing and navigational aid maintenance, among others” were “harassed on Facebook” by DOGE.

FACT: That was a total lie. DOGE doesn’t have a Facebook page and no professionals who perform critical safety functions were fired.

_____________________

HOAX: The Daily Beast claimed Vice President JD Vance “broke one of the most notorious Vatican rules during his Easter weekend visit” by being photographed in the Sistine Chapel.

FACT: Buried all the way down in the 14th paragraph, The Daily Beast admitted the vice president was given special permission by the Vatican to have photographs taken inside the Sistine Chapel.

_____________________

HOAX: Left-wing social media accounts promoted fake, AI-generated audio of Vice President Vance “disparaging Elon Musk in private.”

FACT: The audio was debunked as fake.

_____________________

HOAX: The New York Times reported that funding for the Women’s Health Initiative was being slashed by the Department of Health and Human Services.

FACT: Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., himself declared this Fake News and recognized the project is “mission critical.”

_____________________

HOAX: Fox News’s Jennifer Griffin gave legitimacy to a hoax from delusional Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) and Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth requested nearly $140,000 in “upgrades” to his government residence.

FACT: This lie was debunked by Secretary Hegseth — and it was so outrageous, even the Associated Press was forced to admit it was completely fake.

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) and many others claimed the Supreme Court ordered the return of illegal immigrant gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States.

FACT: Even CNN admitted that’s not what happened: “They did not order the administration to return him to the United States … they could’ve said ‘we order him returned,’ but they didn’t do that.”

_____________________

HOAX: Joe Biden accused the Trump Administration of “taking aim at Social Security.”

FACT: As usual, he was lying — President Trump has repeatedly pledged to protect Social Security.

_____________________

HOAX: Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) claimed the arrest of a Milwaukee judge who helped an illegal immigrant evade arrest was “unprecedented.”

FACT: It wasn’t; it has happened before.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) called the arrest of a Milwaukee judge who helped an illegal immigrant evade arrest a “gravely serious and drastic move.”

FACT: The judge violated the law by obstructing an ICE arrest of an illegal immigrant.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) claimed the arrest of the Milwaukee judge who obstructed an apprehension of a criminal illegal immigrant “threatens the rule of law.”

FACT: It literally does the opposite because no one is above the law.

_____________________

HOAX: Politico claimed the Trump Administration “wipe[d] out firefighter health and safety programs.”

FACT: The programs remain a top priority for the administration — and will remain intact.

_____________________

HOAX: Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed that President Trump’s policies make it so “no one wants to make investments in the United States.”

FACT: President Trump has secured more than $5 trillion in investments since taking office, which is expected to create more than 451,000 new jobs — and the list is only expected to grow.

_____________________

HOAX: NBC’s Kristen Welker peddled a Fake News hoax that the Trump Administration was deporting children.

FACT: Secretary of State Marco Rubio shut down her desperate attempt at a hoax by highlighting how the mother, who was in the country illegally, made that choice all on her own.

_____________________

HOAX: The New York Times implied President Trump was alone in wearing a blue suit to the funeral of Pope Francis.

FACT: Photos show dozens of world leaders and other attendees — many situated near President Trump — also wearing blue clothing.

_____________________

HOAX: Teachers’ union boss Randi Weingarten accused President Trump of taking teachers’ salaries and giving them to “billionaires” by cutting the Department of Education.

FACT: President Trump has repeatedly called teachers “the most important people in this country” who should be paid more, not less. The federal government does not pay the salaries of teachers; state and local governments do.

_____________________

HOAX: The Fake News and their predictable allies ran with a story that claimed an American citizen was detained by authorities after he informed them he was, in fact, a citizen.

FACT: That’s not what happened. The individual “approached Border Patrol in Tucson and stated he had entered the U.S. illegally through Nogales. He said he wanted to turn himself in and completed a sworn statement identifying as a Mexican citizen who had entered unlawfully … A few days later, his family presented documents showing U.S. citizenship. The charges were dismissed, and he was released to his family.”

_____________________

HOAX: PBS News claimed “DOGE operatives attempted to gain access to secure spaces,” implying they attempted to access classified information without approval.

FACT: This wasn’t even remotely true.

_____________________

HOAX: The AP falsely claimed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said President Trump is “very good friends” with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

FACT: The AP was humiliatingly forced to retract its story, admitting they were wrong. Stephanie Ruhle also had to issue a correction. DNI Gabbard was referencing President Trump’s relationship with Indian PM Narendra Modi.

_____________________

HOAX: Student visa holders should have unfettered access to do whatever they want in the United States.

FACT: Wrong. As Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, “When you apply to enter the United States and you get a visa, you are a guest… If you tell us when you apply for a visa ‘I’m coming to the U.S. to participate in pro-Hamas events,’ that runs counter to the foreign policy interest of the United States… If you had told us you were going to do that, we never would have given you the visa.”

_____________________

Today, the worst fraud carried out on the American people has nothing to do with some shady character standing on a corner trying to trick you out of your money. Americans today have learned the hard way that believing the lies that the Mainstream Media pushes -- actually demands that we all believe in hoax after hoax after hoax -- lie after lie after lie. And really, that's why the news media as a whole is not trusted today. They lie. 

They lie because they know that political hoaxes are believed. Also known as "Fake News," those deliberately false stories and claims are designed to deceive or manipulate public opinion. And yes, people believe them even after those stories have been debunked. It seems as though it just doesn't matter. The world is such that people would rather believe the lie, even when they've been given the truth. 

Of course, because the Mainstream Media is primarily in bed with the Democratic Party and the extreme Left, the lies that are spread are used to advance a particular political agenda of the Left. Because fraud is being perpetrated on a lot more people today, simply because technology is such that a lie can be spread far and wide in no time at all, the Mainstream Media uses fraud, hoaxes, and lies to promote their Leftist political agenda. That's just the way it is. And really, it doesn't look like it will ever stop.

It's sad, but that's why the Mainstream Media, the news media, the entertainment industry, and other forms of media sympathetic to the agenda of the Democratic Party have lost the trust of the American people. As seen above in example after example, the news media has almost zero credibility today. That's the reason the Mainstream Media is now commonly referred to as "Fake News." 

Tom Correa

Did Obama Remove More Noncitizens From The U.S. Than Any Other President In U.S. History?

President Barack Obama gave an immigration policy speech in El Paso on May 10, 2011. 

(Image from White House video)

  Story by Sofia Sierra, February 13, 2025

Did President Obama remove more noncitizens from the U.S. than any other president in U.S history? 

Yes. Former President Barack Obama formally removed 3 million noncitizens from the U.S. over two terms – more than any other president in American history, according to data from the Department of Homeland Security.

In comparison, President George Bush removed about 870,000 people; Bill Clinton, about 2 million; and Donald Trump about 1.2 million people during his first term.

The DHS defines a removal as a formal court order expelling a person from inside the U.S. Obama does not hold the record for returns, a separate statistic addressing individuals turned away at the border prior to entering the U.S.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, immigration and enforcement policies and practices under the Obama administration focused on recent unauthorized border crossers and those who had committed crimes. When combining removals and returns, Clinton expelled about 12.3 million people, the most of any U.S. president overall. 

___________________

This is short and to the point. Too bad Democrats would rather hate Trump than recognize our past, including what Democrats have done compared to what Trump is doing now. 

Of course, with Democrats fighting for Illegal Aliens who are violent criminals, one has to wonder if they have lost their sanity.  Trump has targeted the worst of the worst first. What's wrong with that? No one on the Left can answer that question because there's nothing wrong with what he's doing. Yes, especially since what he's doing by deporting and imprisoning criminals will make us safer. 

Tom Correa

Running Fire -- A Horse Thief's Wild Ride

The story below was reported in the Fort Wayne News in Fort Wayne, Indiana, on October 5th, 1894:

RUNNING FIRE.

A Midnight Chase With the Patrol Wagon.

A THIEF'S WILD RIDE.

He Steals a Horse and is Hotly Pursued.

A RACE FOR LIBERTY.

Three Policemen Fire at the Fleeting Horse Thief.

Shortly after 1 o’clock this morning John Riedmiller’s valuable pacing horse, with a mark of 2:20, was standing, hitched to a post at the corner of Wayne and Calhoun streets. Officer Bower saw the animal there and had been watching it for some time.

A few minutes after 1 o’clock the policeman saw a negro step into the buggy quietly and drive away without any evidence of being in a hurry or any movement to conceal his identity. The officer watched the colored man drive the horse east on Wayne street.

The carriage was about a block east of Calhoun street, when in an excited manner Mr. Reidmiller made inquiries concerning his horse.

Officer Bower informed him that a colored man whom he supposed was a stable boy taking care of the animal, had driven it east. After a hasty exchange of explanations in regard to the disappearance of the horse, both men concluded that the animal had been stolen.

The patrol wagon was called out in a few minutes and sent east over the East Wayne street pavement at a wild run, manned by Capt. Borgman, Sergt. Dasler and Officer Gallmeier.

The officers flew down the thoroughfare with the horses at breakneck speed. Near the Concordia College, they met a farmer driving into the city. He gave the officers a clue, and the panting patrol steeds were turned south on Walton Avenue. Through the drizzling rain, with mud flying in all directions, the steeds galloped in a maddened run.

Fresh tracks were noticed going east, and the officers turned in that direction. In the darkness, a few hundred feet away, they saw the outlines of a carriage. The speed of the patrol wagon never faltered, and the policemen yelled “halt.”

The vehicle in front forged ahead with unchecked speed. Several shots were fired into the air to frighten the driver of the horse in front of the patrol wagon. The running fire had no effect. After a hot chase for a quarter of a mile, with neither the police nor the fleeing horse-thief gaining or losing any ground, there was a sudden halt.

The carriage in front of the patrol wagon stopped, and almost instantly, the patrol wagon wheeled up beside the foaming horse.

The driver had escaped, and only a few seconds before, as the lines were warm where he had held them in his grasp. The ditch, culvert, and fences in the vicinity were searched in vain. Not a trace of the horse-thief could be found. He successfully eluded the officers and escaped. The horse and carriage were brought back to the city.

This is the wildest ride the Fort Wayne officers have experienced since the patrol wagon has been in the police service. The thief’s daring was bold in the extreme, and his escape was miraculous.

-- end of Fort Wayne News 1894 article. 

This was the sort of thing that fueled dime novels. Some writers expanded on stories like this and ran with it.

Tom Correa

The Battle of Ingalls from the Diary of Dr. Jacob Hiram Pickering

Dr. Jacob Hiram Pickering tended to those wounded in the September 1st, 1893, gunfight in Ingalls, Oklahoma between the Doolin-Dalton Gang and the U.S. Marshals. Dr. Pickering is mentioned in several reports dealing with the gun battle. 

The best of those reports found online is from the State of Oklahoma history website and the Oklahoma State Digital Library. The reason that I believe it's the best is that it actually contains excerpts from Dr. Pickering's personal diary. So yes, this is what he actually wrote down in regards to what he witnessed firsthand at what became known as the Battle of Ingalls.

Here are excerpts from the diary of Dr. Jacob Hiram Pickering:

In July, William Doolan, George Newcomb (alias Bitter Creek), Slaughter Kid, Tom Jones (alias Arkansas Tom), Dynamite Dick, Tulsa Jack, and Bill Dalton began to come here frequently, and in a short time they all stayed here except Dalton. He was out at Bee Dunn’s. 

As a rule, they were quiet and peaceable. They all went heavily armed and constantly on their guard, generally went 2 together. They boarded at the O.K. Hotel, stayed at Bee Dunn’s when not in town. 

The last of this month, a man by the name of Doc Roberts and Red Lucas came to town looking up a proposed railroad route. Both parties took in the haunts of the outlaws. They were both jovial fellows, and soon were drinking and playing cards with them. They left and came back in a week and said they were here to locate a booth, a place for intended settlers to register and get certificates to make a claim for land or town lots. They stayed here until the last week in August, then left. 

On the morning of Sept. 1st, there were 27 Deputy Marshals piloted into town in covered wagons. They caused no suspicion as there were hundreds of Boomers moving the same way. Two wagons stopped at Light’s Black Smith Shop, and one drove up by my house, and they all proceeded to unload in a quiet manner and took positions. 

Doolan, Bitter Creek, Dynamite Dick, Tulsa Jack, and Dalton were in Ransom & Murry's Saloon. Arkansas Tom was in bed at the hotel. Bitter Creek got his horse and was riding up to a small building where Conley stayed, and the Marshals, thinking he was known, moved to try to take him. Marshal Dick Speed from Perkins fired the first shot. 

The magazine was knocked out of Bitter Creek's gun, and he was shot in the leg. He made his escape to the southwest. Speed was shot about this time and instantly killed, also, young Simonds was mortally wounded. The fires of the Marshalls were centered on the Saloon. old man Ransom was shot in the leg. Murry in the arm and side. Walker was shot through the liver. 

By this time, the outlaws had gotten to the stable and saddled their horses. Doolan and Dynamite went out at the back door and down a draw southwest. Dalton and Tulsa made a dash from the front door. As they came out, Dalton’s horse was hit on the jaw, but he had a hard time getting him started, but finally succeeded.

He probably went 75 yards when his horse got his leg broken. He then got off of him & walked on the opposite side for a ways, then left him but came back to his saddle pockets & got his wire cutters & cut a fence, then got behind one of the other boys & rode off. A great many say he shot Shadley, but I seen Shadley run from my place to Dr. Call’s fence & in going through it he was first shot. He then got to Ransom’s house & was debating with Mrs. Ransom, she ordering him to leave when he got his last shots. He fell there and crawled to Selph’s cave. 

A great many believe that Dalton shot him. In fact, he shot so fast when I and Dr. Selph was working with him in the cave, he said Dalton shot him 3 times quicker than he could turn around. But I think I know better, taking the lay of the ground in consideration, and I stood where I saw Dalton most of the time and never saw him fire once, and Shadley was hit in the right hip, and all the balls tended downward. If Dalton had shot him, he would have been shot in front and balls of ranged up. 

The outlaws crossed the draw south of town and stopped a few minutes shooting up the street my house is on. One of these shots hit Frank Briggs in the shoulder, but a slight flesh wound. I took him to my cave and dressed his wound, then went to Walker and gave him temporary (sic) aid, from there to Murry’s and laid his wound open and removed the shattered bone. Some of the doctors wanted me to amputate, but I fought for his arm; 2 2-inch radius (and) was shot away, slight flesh wounds in the side. 

About this time, I was called aside and told to go to the hotel, that Jones was up there, either wounded or killed. I and Alva Peirce, and a boy by the name of Wendell, boys about 12 years old, went over. I went in and called but got no answer and was about to leave when he came to the top of the stairs and says, "Is that you, Doc?" 

I told him it was. I asked him if he was hurt, and he said no. He said for me to come up, and I told him if he wasn’t hurt, I would not, but he insisted. So I went up. He had his coat and vest off, also his boots. Had his Winchester in his hands and revolvers lying on the bed. 

I said, "Tom, come down and surrender." He says, "I can't do it for I won't get justice". He says, "I don't want to hurt anyone, but I won't be taken alive." He says, "Where are the boys?" (meaning the outlaws).

I told him they had gone. He said he did not think they would leave him. It hurt him bad. I never seen a man wilt so in my life. He stayed in the Hotel till after 2 o’clock and then surrendered to Mr. Mason, a preacher. They took him off right away. 

Of the wounded, Simonds died at 6 p.m. Shadley and Hueston were taken to Stillwater, both died in three or four days. Walker shot through the liver, died on the 16th. All the rest recovered. The outlaws stayed close to town as Bitter Creek was not able to travel. Dr. Bland of Cushion tended him. 

I loaned him instruments to work on the wound with, although I did not know just where he was at. A piece of a magazine was blown into his leg. It eventually worked out, and he was able to again ride. Tom was indicted for the killing of Hueston, Speed, and Shadley, and was tried on the Hueston case and convicted of manslaughter in the 1st degree with no leniency of the court. Judge Dale sentenced him to 50 years at hard labor in the Lansing Penitentiary. 

Dalton drifted away from the crowd and was killed near Ardmore. The rest stayed around Dunn’s. Dynamite ordered a big gun sent to Tulsa. The Marshals got onto it and watched for him, thinking he would come in at night to get it, but he rode in at 2 p.m. and got his gun & was getting out of town before they knew it. They started after him and had a running fight from there to the Turkey Track ranch. They killed 2 horses from under him. They thought they had him surrounded in the timber there & sent for more help, but when they got it & searched thoroughly, he was gone. He then left the territory for good. 

Bitter Creek and Tulsa still stayed here. Doolan disappeared, and no one knew where. Also, Edith Elsworth, as they probably went off together. Bitter Creek, Tulsa, Pierce & others went to Dover & held up a train. Was pushed closely & Tulsa, in trying to cover the retreat of the others, was shot and killed. Bitter Creek and Peirce came back to their old haunts, and in a short time were killed on Dall Dunn’s farm. It is the universal belief that they were betrayed by the Dunn boys, if not killed by them.

There is a break in the Diary, and it picks up here:

In March 1896, Bill Doolan was captured in Eureka Springs by Bill Tilghman of Perry. He was brought back and lodged in the Guthrie jail. I went and saw him there. In June, Dynamite Dick was caught in Texas for bootlegging, tried and sent to county jail for 60 days, and they suspected him of being one of the Doolan gang and sent Magee, the U.S. Marshal, word, and he sent a man there to identify him, and they brought him to Guthrie. They got several murder cases against him, but on Sunday night July the 5th, Doolan and a negro overpowered the guards, locked them in cells and 14 of the worst men made their escape, and I think for good. Rumor is they were helped to get out. 

Time will tell, as there is to be an investigation. Toward the last of August, Doolan and a small band were located on Mud Creek about 12 or 15 miles east of Ingalls. He was seen to go to Lawson Post Office several times, and the Marshals laid a trap for him. Between 9 and 10 o’clock Monday night, Aug. 24, he walked into it and was shot and killed dead. No particulars yet in regards to it. I will note them when I get a full account. They say Dynamite Dick and 8 others are hiding close by. 

Later, Doolan was at Lawson making arrangements to leave the country with his supposed wife. He had just left the woman and was walking down the road when he was shot from ambush. He was killed dead. He was put in a wagon and taken to Guthrie that night. The parties that killed him were Heck Thomas, Dall, Bee, George, and John Dunn, with one or two others. They had Dr. Call's No. 8 shotgun.

This did the work, for he had 16 buckshot in him and also 2 Winchester balls. His wife went to Guthrie to get his body, but failed to get it. On the morning of the 25th, the Marshals sighted the remaining outlaws a few miles from where they killed Doolan, but they were on the move heading for Turkey Track ranch. It is doubtful if they ever got them now. There were 4 in the bunch.

Here, the Doctor’s Diary gives some insight into what happened a few months later:

Friday, Nov. 6, at 4 p.m., George Dunn rode into Ingalls very fast and said his brother Bee, had been shot by Deputy U. S. Marshal Canton in Pawnee. They left for there immediately. Saturday afternoon, Mr. Cots of Stillwater & family, also Mrs. Bee Dunn arrived with the dead body of Bee. They took him to his stepfather’s house and kept the body until Sunday noon & then buried it. There was a long funeral procession. They found no bill against Canton for the killing and let him loose at once. The feeling in Pawnee is all in favor of Canton. 

Past reputation is what hurts Dunn. All kinds of reports are afloat in regard to his past life. At Ingalls, people are divided on the case. All were looking for Dunn to be killed, but expected it to come from some of the remaining outlaws. There is bound to be more killing over this. I think it's only a matter of time until more of the Dunn boys are killed or they get Canton. After Bee’s death, John, Dall, and George go on the scout. There are a number of bills against them in Pawnee for cattle stealing. 

T. Boggs and Bill Long left for Kansas to avoid the same charge. They got into trouble there and were sent to jail. As soon as their time was out, McLain wrote for his step-son, Bill Long, to come home. He thought there was not anything against him, but just as soon as he got here, they took him in. He laid in jail at Pawnee a month or 80 and gave bond for two thousand to appear at the Sept. 1897 court. 

Bob Boggs went to Texas to get away and stole down there 47 head of cattle. They caught him & sent him over the road for 4 years. Pawnee County will get him when his time is out. Bill Chappel, Tom Boggh,  A. E. Peirce, and several others left the country for good. William McElhanie (Narrow Gauge Kid) skipped his bond and is gone for good. Some think he went to Cuba. McLain, Dr. Steel & W. Wilson are his bondsmen. 

The Grand Jury found bills against John and Al McLain at our place and several others in Stillwater for perjury. They gave bonds. It was on scheduling their property for taxes.

The above is according to the State of Oklahoma history website. The above diary excerpts are "out of a very interesting book called the 'Chronicles of Oklahoma.'” 

Of the 13 Deputy U.S. Marshals who went into Ingalls to clean out the outlaws that day, because they were spotted before they could get into position and carry out their plan, three Deputy U.S. Marshals were killed during the Battle of Ingalls. Deputy Marshal Speed, Deputy Marshal Thomas Hueston, and Deputy Marshal Lafayette Shadley were shot and killed during a gunfight with a group of seven outlaws in Ingalls, Oklahoma Territory (modern-day Oklahoma). 

The marshals had gone to the town in search of the outlaws, who were wanted for the murder of Marshal Charles Connelly, of the Coffeyville, Kansas, Police Department, and encountered one of them on horseback. The first suspect, George "Bitter Creek" Newcomb, exchanged gunfire with a marshal immediately. Newcomb was wounded.  A second suspect, Arkansas Tom Jones, who was in a nearby hotel, began shooting at officers from his second-story hotel window with a Winchester rifle. 

It was a horrible shootout. One of the things that saved the Marshals was when Deputy Marshal Jim Masterson threw dynamite into the hotel where Arkansas Tom was shooting from. The Marshals were able to capture Arkansas Tom when the blast stunned him.

 

Tom Correa