Saturday, March 14, 2026

John Devine, Alias "The Chicken," Hanged For Murder In 1873

John Devine, alias "The Chicken."

John Devine's alias was "The Chicken." Some say his alias was also "Chicken Devine." With a handle like "The Chicken," you wouldn't think he was the notorious character that he was. But in San Francisco in the early 1870s, "The Chicken" was considered a desperate criminal. One of the things that made him such a hard-nosed criminal was his over 70 arrests. Another thing was that he associated with other criminal sorts in, and could be found in any of the seedy saloons and gambling clip joints on that city's waterfront, yes, the dreaded Barbary Coast of San Francisco.

Born during the 1849 California Gold Rush, the Barbary Coast was San Francisco's original vice district. Its name, Barbary Coast, was coined in the mid-1860s. It was inspired by the Pirate reputation of the North African Barbary Coast. It was a lawless 40-square-block area notorious for extreme depravity, crooked gambling, violence, and kidnapping. The Barbary Coast of San Francisco was world-famous for its lawlessness and "shanghaiing," which was the practice of kidnapping intoxicated or drugged men to serve as crews on merchant ships. For nearly 70 years, the Barbary Coast in San Francisco remained a unique criminal enclave where "every vice known to man" was readily available.

In 1871, John Devine was charged with first-degree murder for willfully killing August Kemp. He was charged, tried, and after some court procedural problems, found guilty, retried, again found guilty, and sentenced to hang. The San Francisco Bulletin newspaper published the following report of the legal hanging of John Divine, alias "The Chicken," on May 14, 1873:

THE DEATH PENALTY

The Execution of John Devine for the Murder of August Kamp

This day has been marked by an event of signal import in the history of this city, wherein the slow hand of justice, after a lapse of many years, has overtaken one of the class of reckless criminals who have reveled in rapine and bloodshed, bringing reproach on the fair fame of San Francisco, and red-handed murder has expiated its guilt by the righteous penalty of ignominious death upon the scaffold.

Whatever may be the abhorrence of capital punishment commonly experienced by a portion of the people, while contemplating the events of the past few years, the tardy and uncertain sway of justice, a sense of satisfaction and increased security will be inspired in the whole community by the announcement of John Devine, “The Chicken,” has met the fate which the law prescribes for the destroyer of human life, and there is one murderer less in San Francisco.

From the infamous character of this man, and the terror which his deeds of violence excited through a long course of comparatively unpunishable crime, ere consigning him to oblivion, the public will be interested in a brief sketch of the 

Career of the Murderer.

The man who has now paid the penalty of his last dark crime, leaves a record which has no parallel among the many depraved wretches who have figured in the brief but terrible criminal history of San Francisco, and perhaps the half has not been told.

The police officials considered him the most dangerous and unscrupulous criminal that infested the city, and hint at mysterious deeds of blood, never unravelled by the minions of justice, with which he is believed to have been connected. In truth, he was a fellow by the hand of nature marked, quoted and signed to do a deed of shame — apt, liable to be employed in danger with neither pity, love nor fear.

Devine was a native of Waterford, Ireland, where he was born in the year 1840, and was accordingly 33 years old at the time of his death.

He was of medium size, sharp features, dark-blue eyes, a low forehead, and a generally repulsive expression of countenance. He arrived in San Francisco in the year of 1863, as a seaman on the clipper ship Young America. On the voyage hither, he distinguished himself as a quarrelsome fellow and was frequently confined in irons to restore the discipline of the ship.

After squandering the wages he received in a short spell of carousing on shore, he was driven to the sea again and made a voyage to China, returning in the spring of 1865. He then obtained employment as a runner for sailor boarding-houses, in which capacity he perpetrated innumerable deeds of ruffianism in the “shanghaing” of sailors and citizens on outward-bound ships. Shortly after engaging in this vocation he received the title of 

“The Chicken.”

Which was endearingly conferred by one of his fellows, as significant of his prowess in a prize-fight. Devine had four notable encounters of this order, in the city and vicinity, and displayed remarkable endurance and determination, though not always successful.

His career from the time of setting himself on shore was one continuous round of crime, and he is well suspected of having a knowledge of the manner in which many a corpse found floating in the bay, with fractured skull and rifled pockets, yielded up i[t]s life. His record on the police register shows
Seventy-Nine Arrests! Up to May 16, 1871, when his final arrest for the crime of murder was made.

The charges against him embraced all manner of crimes, principally robberies and assaults with deadly weapons, it being his custom to assault his victims with slung-shot and brass-knuckles. His recorded crimes, however, are not supposed to embrace any near approach to the ull measure of enormities that were charged upon his guilty soul.

He was capable of the most savage treachery, and on one occasion attempted the murder of a prize-fighter named Tommy Chandler, by springing upon him from behind a door with a heavy iron bar. Being foiled in this, he subsequently shot Chandler, but not inflicting fatal injury, he got off with a short term of imprisonment on conviction of assault to murder.

A Characteristic Exploit. 

On the 8th of June, 1867, about 6 o’clock in the morning, Devine assailed an aged German lady, named Mary Martin, as she was walking along Merchant street, near Battery, tore the pocket from her dress, and robbed her of a purse containing a check for [obscure] and $25 in coin.

For this robbery, he was arrested and released on bail, for, notwithstanding the character he bore, he was usually enabled to find friends to go upon his bond in a certain part of the city. When the case came up for trial, officers went in search of Mrs. Martin, who had resided at a house on Powell Street, as the important witness for the prosecution of Devine. The lady had disappeared.

What became of her was never known, but it was possible that Devine might have told. Passing over a list of comparative minor offences, such as knocking down and robbing people, the next noticeable affair in which this remarkable criminal figured was the 

Attempted Murder of Miss McDonald.

On the night of the 9th, October, 1867, Miss Martha McDonald was standing in front of her place of residence, at the Mission, when she was suddenly seized by two men who were masked. 

She was gagged by a handkerchief being forced into her mouth, and prevented from giving any alarm. In this condition, the men dragged her a distance of two blocks and a half, to the bridge which crosses Mission Creek at Sixteenth Street. One of the two then started, according to the directions of his companion to “get the carriage.”

Being left in the custody of one only, Miss McDonald made a desperate effort to release herself. The fellow attempted to chloroform her, but the drug being spilled from the bottle, he then endeavored to secure her with a strap.

At this juncture, the other man returned, and she heard the exclamation, “Kill her, kill her!” A moment after she was pushed off the bridge, and she fell into the muddy waters of the creek, while the two men who had abducted her ran away.

Slowly and surely, she was sinking into the muddy bottom, with no assistance at hand, until the water was about her neck. Fortunately, an alarm of fire started some person past the locality, and her cries of distress being heard, she was discovered and rescued.

Devine was arrested as one of the participants in this crime, and Miss McDonald positively identified him by his voice. Devine extricated himself from the affair by proving an alibi, it appearing that he was serving a term in the County Jail at the time of the attempted murder.

It subsequently transpired, however, that he held the privileged position at the County Jail of “outside trusty,” and was permitted to travel to all parts of the city at will in the performance of errands for prisoners in more restricted limits. And more than this, he was abroad at the very time the abduction of Miss McDonald was made.

The Loss of a Hand.

In the month of May, 1868, Devine was indulging in one of his periodical carousing spells, and often bringing terror to several of the resorts on his beat at the city front, he entered a boarding house kept by William Maitland, on Battery Street. Here he flourished a huge knife with the recklessness of a savage, and caused a precipitate retreat of all who happened to be in the place.

The proprietor had been asleep in the second story of the house, and hearing the uproar, came down for a reconnaissance. Devine immediately started for him when he made his appearance, but Maitland was not of so yielding a disposition as to be driven from his own castle, and closing with Devine, he succeeded in disarming him. 

The latter then made an attempt to recover the knife, when Maitland with a powerful stroke cut him across the wrist. The blade, by wonderful chance, entered the wrist joint, and the completely severed hand fell to the floor.

Devine was appalled for once in his life, and hurriedly departed; but presently he returned and demanded his lost hand, which Maitland kicked out upon the sidewalk to him. Devine took the severed member and hastened to a drug store, where he implored a clerk to try and sew it on again. But the injury was irreparable.

Devine as a Merchant.

After a season of retirement in the County Hospital, Devine emerged as far repaired as medical science would permit, and being a cripple, his condition excited the pity of boarding-house masters and others at the city front with whom he had been associated. A contribution was made among them, amounting to $800, to enable Devine to establish himself in business by keeping a cigar stand.

He took the money, but instead of following the advice of his benefactors, he squandered the whole sum in a few weeks of dissipation, and again returned to the pursuit of crime with all his previous energy. 

He was associated with a woman named Mary Dolan, as bad as himself, and who was punished by terms of imprisonment in the County Jail and Penitentiary. From the time of losing his hand up to his final arrest, he perpetrated numerous larcenies, some of considerable amounts, and was always busily engaged in thieving when not confined in jail.

A complete history of this man and his offenses would be one of the most appalling in the annals of crime. Such was John Devine, and rarely has the slow grip of justice overtaken a criminal more richly deserving of the severest penalty known to the law.

Murder of August Kamp.

The crime which John Devine has now expiated with his life was one of the most cruel and wanton ever recorded in a civilized community, and could only have been accomplished by one utterly depraved. It was in perfect keeping with the whole life and character of Devine, who had become callous to every impulse that elevates a man above the merest savage.

August Kamp was an unsuspecting young German without relatives in the country. On the 10th of May, 1871, he arrived in San Francisco from Antioch, where he had been employed, bringing with him his savings -- to the amount of about $120. He started immediately in search of employment, and while making his inquiries along the city front, he was met by Devine, who offered to procure him a situation on a fishing vessel.

Elated with this promise, young Kamp was persuaded to loan $20 to Devine, on the understanding that it would be repaid to him the following day. The money was not returned as agreed, and Kamp finally suspecting the true character of his debtor, importuned him earnestly for his pay. Devine put him off repeatedly, at one time pretending that he had nothing but greenbacks on hand, and again making some other excuse.

On the 15th of May, Kamp, having again demanded his pay, Devine told him that if he wanted the money very bad, he must go with him to his mother’s ranch, beyond Bay View. Accordingly, the two started for the imaginary ranch, walking as far as Long Bridge, when they boarded one of the Bay View cars. On reaching the terminus of the railroad, the two got off the car and walked along the road. 

After passing the Five-Mile House, Devine pointed off to one side, saying that his mother’s ranch was in that direction, and by striking off across the fields instead of following the road, they might save a distance of one mile out of two. Young Kamp assented, and the two started across a lonely stretch of land, through vales and over hills, until a point was reached which the murderer thought sufficiently secluded for carrying out his design.

Kamp stooped down to crawl between the rails of a fence, Devine walking behind him, when the latter suddenly drew a pistol and fired the fatal shot, the ball entering Kamp’s skull behind the right ear. Devine then ran away, supposing he had effectually dispatched his victim, and was seen hastening back alone to the railroad terminus.

Kamp was shortly after discovered by a Spaniard, who was herding sheep in the locality, and being still able to walk, he was assisted to a saloon on the road, and from thence brought into the city and given in charge of the authorities. From the representations which the mortally wounded youth could make, and other circumstances, the police were immediately confident that Devine was his murderer, and measures were at once instituted for his arrest.

He was traced to various places in the city, where he had boasted of obtaining money by an easy method, admitted to several that he had shot a man and endeavored to dispose of a revolver. He was finally captured on board a steamer at Meiggs’ wharf, which was just about crossing over to Marin County, and the revolver, with two chambers discharged, was still in his possession.

At the City Prison, he was placed in the midst of fifteen or twenty persons, and Kamp, who was yet rational, readily singled him out as the murderer. He walked up and placed his hand on Devine, saying, “You are the man that shot me.” Kamp was taken to the County Hospital, and every effort was made to save his life, but without avail. 

Just before his death, which occurred on the 5th of May, an effort was made to take his ante-mortem deposition, but unfortunately, the Coroner arrived too late, and the important evidence of the murdered man was not secured in the case.

The chain of circumstances presented in the several trials, however, made out a case against the accused as strong circumstantial evidence could be drawn, and a doubt of his guilt was hardily admissible.

The First Trial

Was brought in the Twelth District Court, before Judge McKinstry, on the 20th of February, 1872, and occupied eight days, resulting in a verdict according to the indictment of “murder in the first degree.” The Court sentenced Devine to be executed on the 25th of April, 1872.

Judge Tyler, counsel for the condemned, appealed to the Supreme Court for a new trial on mere technical grounds, his principal point having reference to a minor discrepancy of evidence of one witness as taken before the Coroner at the trial. Although the several points did not affect the merits of the case in the least, the appeal was successful, and to the efforts of most indefatigable counsel, the wretched man was indebted to an extension of his lease of life a full year.

The case was brought to a second trial in March last, in the same court. In the meantime, an important witness had died, and the prisoner and his counsel were exceedingly hopeful of finding complications on this circumstance equal to another successful appeal to the Supreme Court.

After another tedious trial, the inevitable verdict of “guilty” fell upon the ear of the doomed man for the second time, and he was again sentenced to be executed on Friday, the 9th of May.

Hope was still buoyant in his breast, relying upon the determined goal of his counsel, until the 7th, when the announcement was made that the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, and his fate was sealed beyond the further probability of human interference.

By the earnest intercession of the spiritual adviser of the condemned prisoner, the Governor was persuaded to grant a brief reprieve of five days, in the hope that the guilty wretch, with the certainty of speedy death before him, might finally yield to the ministrations of his anxious spiritual adviser, Rev. Father Spreckles, and meet his end in a penitential spirit.

During his long term of imprisonment, Devine manifested a bearing of bravado, never believing that merited retribution would finally overtake him, and on several occasions, he laughed to scorn kindly persons who ought to impress him with a realization of his terrible position, and turn him to preparation for another life. 

By A Remarkable Coincidence

His execution occurred two years to a day from the commission of the murderous act that consigned him to death at the hands of justice, and in his case, it may be said, “God’s mills grind slow but sure.” 

After receiving his brief reprieve from the Governor, Devine realized that no earthly interference could avail him further, and he relinquished all hope of life. At his own solicitation, all visitors were excluded from his cell with the exception of his spiritual advisers, and he gave himself earnestly to preparations for the awful change that awaited him in the few hours that still remained.

At times, he wept bitterly when exhorted to a contemplation of his guilty life and true repentance, and the consolations of religious faith seemed to reconcile him to his fate and enable him to await his end with fortitude. 

On Monday, he received the Sacrament of Communion from Rev. Father Spreckles, and Archbishop Alemany conferred upon him confirmation in the Roman Catholic Church. ,On the succeeding days Devine assumed an air of cheerfulness. On Tuesday, he asked permission of the Sheriff to be shaved, which was granted, the precaution first being taken to bind him securely to guard against any suicidal designs. His ostensible wife, Mary Dolan, was in jail at the time of the execution, having been committed a few weeks since for her common offence of habitual drunkenness.

Parting With His Son.

Devine also had a son, a child of six years of age, whom he had not seen for several years, and he expressed an earnest desire to see him before his death. The Sheriff and his deputies were anxious to gratify this last request, and visited the various charitable institutions in the city yesterday, endeavoring to find the child.

Devine last heard of him at the Protestant Orphan Asylum, where he had caused him to be placed immediately after his arrest for murder, the mother, Mary Dolan, being unfit to care or provide for him in consequence of her continual drunkenness and frequent detentions in jail. The lad had been removed from the Orphan Asylum, but the Sheriff happily discovered him in charge of the Ladies’ Relief Society, comfortably provided for.

When the child arrived at the cell of his wretched father last evening, Devine was much affected and exhibited instincts of humanity he had never known before. He embraced his offspring tenderly, wept over him, and implored him to shun the evil ways that had brought his father to ignominious death, and when the lad was finally removed, he clung to him with convulsive throbs, as if parting with the only object that had ever awakened the emotion of affection in his breast.

Last Hours of the Doomed Man.

Devine retired at about 10 o’clock last night after devotion with his spiritual adviser. He slept soundly through the night until 5 o’clock this morning, when he was awakened by the Jailor. In reply to the inquiries of the officer, he said that he had enjoyed refreshing slumber, as one could who had a clear conscience. He dressed himself with care and gave much attention to combing his hair neatly and arranging his toilet, having been provided with a new black suit and a pair of slippers.

At 8 o’clock, he ate a hearty breakfast, and shortly after his spiritual adviser, Rev. Father Spreckles, Archbishop Alameney, and two Sisters of Mercy arrived. The doomed man devoted the remaining few hours of his life to fervent supplications for mercy.

As the hour for the execution approached, the wickets in all the cells were closed, and the “trustees” allowed the limits of the Jail were locked up. At 11 o’clock, the reporters of the press were admitted and allowed to inspect the preparations for the execution.

The Scaffold

Was laid across the railings of the upper corridor at the north end, the trap in the centre permitting the body to drop to the lower corridor within about three feet of the floor, the rope allowing a fall of six feet. The gallows beam was extended above under the skylights, the ends resting in the ventillating apertures on either side.

On the west side of the scaffold, an iron rod ran up, to which was attached a cord, secured to a ring in one of the cell doors, the slipping of which drew the bolt by a weight and allowed the trap to fall. The gallows was the same used in previous executions, the last murderer who had stood thereon being the Chinaman, Chung Wong, who was executed in 1865.

At twenty minutes to 12, the Sisters of Mercy took their leave of Devine, and shortly after, attended by the Sheriff and the priests, Devine was conducted from the No. 1 cell near the entrance of the lower corridor, which he had occupied since his fate became sealed, to No. 41 cell in the second corridor, which was located nearly opposite the steps leading upon the scaffold. He looked pale and haggard, but a smile rested upon his countenance as he passed the group of reporters at the foot of the stairway.

He ascended the stairway with a light, elastic step and seemed to look carelessly at the gallows as he tripped along the gallery. At half past 12 o’clock, an immense crowd had gathered in the street in front of the jail, and on all sides of the building where a position might be obtained to observe even the grim walls within which the dread scene of violent death was being enacted.

The Sheriff then admitted all those who had received permission to be present, amounting to about two hundred. The spectators included several Sheriffs from adjoining counties, members of the Board of Supervisors, physicians, city officials, and upwards of thirty reporters of the press, among the latter being representatives of some of the Eastern papers, and artists for the New York illustrated journals.

The reporters were assigned a position directly in front of the scaffold, in the west gallery of the upper corridor, and the physicians took their places within the line on the floor of the lower corridor. The prisoner remained in his cell engaged in his final devotions, while the tramping of many feet and the subdued murmur of voices without reminded him of the relentless hand of Justice, eager to close his career.

The corridors, above and below, were greatly crowded, while the side openings, below the skylights, in either direction, were completely occupied, their appearance suggestive of the private boxes of a public exhibition.

The Execution.

At a quarter to 1 o’clock, the Sheriff directed his deputies to their positions upon the scaffold, and immediately after, he entered the cell of the doomed man for a parting interview of brief duration. On emerging, Sheriff Adams mounted the scaffold and stated to the spectators that it was the wish of Devine that all should preserve silence and ask him no questions.

At two minutes before 1 o’clock, the Sheriff opened the door of the cell, and Devine emerged, carrying a crucifix in his hand, followed by Father Spreckles. He ascended the steps to the scaffold with closed eyes, manifesting symptoms of weakness, and though bearing up with great power of nerve, the expression of his countenance and the twitching muscles of his throat indicated the welling up of inexpressible agony of soul. While standing upon the scaffold, his eyes remained closed, while Father Spreckles, taking the crucifix, continued whispering the consolations of the Church in his ear. 

The death-warrant was hurriedly read by Deputy Lamott, but Devine gave no heed thereto, attending closely to the ministrations of Father Spreckles and frequently kissing the crucifix with much fervor as it was placed to his lips.

At the conclusion of the reading of the warrant, Jailor McKenzie bound the doomed man with straps. One was passed round his breast and pinioned the arms at the elbows, another at the waist pinioned the wrists, and two other straps were secured about the knees and the ankles. The rope was then placed about his neck, the large knot of the noose fixed under the left ear.

Last Scene of All.

The murderer now stood upon the verge of the unknown. He opened his eyes for the first time upon the scaffold ere quitting the warm precincts of the cheerful day, and cast one longing, lingering look behind. The bright sunshine shimmered through the skylights into the gloomy corridor, and wrought the shadow of the gallows-beam before him. Loud laughter and the murmur of the thoughtless crowd without disturbed the awful stillness that reigned within.

Nerving himself for the last moment, Devine exclaimed with a loud voice, “Oh, my sweet Jesus, unto thy hands I commend my spirit. Amen.” He kissed the crucifix again, and the black cap was drawn over his head. The spectators awaited with bated breath.

A moment more, and a dull grating sound, like the swinging of a gate, broke the solemn stillness, and the soul of the murderer had passed out. 

As the trap swung, Devine dropped about six feet, a sharp snap indicating that his neck was broken. A few convulsive throes succeeded for a moment with drawing up of the knees, and death resulted speedily with little pain. The physicians made the usual observations and pronounced life entirely extinct in less than 15 minutes. The execution was most successfully carried out in every detail.

The spectators commenced leaving the jail immediately after the fall of the drop, excepting the few whose presence was required to sign as witnesses of the due execution of the sentence. The large crowd lingered until the afternoon was well advanced, in morbid curiosity, discussing the death and career of the departed murderer.

-- end of The San Francisco Bulletin article. 

For me, I find it very interesting that The San Francisco Bulletin paints a serene picture of a man who found religion before being made to pay for what he did. That article stated that Chicken Devine's last escapade was when he invited August Kamp to accompany him to the southern part of the city, and upon arriving at a hill, he murdered Kamp. 

What that article doesn't say is that John Devine shot August Kamp in the neck, and the young man lingered in excruciating pain for 10 days until he died from Devine's attack. And while The San Francisco Bulletin article talks about Devine's child, how he had a "spiritual advisor," and the murderer's supposed repentance, that news article never mentions the victim's family, their loss, or the loss that the murdered man suffered, how that young man's life was snuffed out early, cut short by a callous killer. It seems as if that newspaper used its voice to fight against Capital Punishment. 

As for who John Devine was, with over 70 arrests to his name, he had a reputation for being "criminal smart." Like many criminals, Devine was "criminal smart," or "con-artist smart," meaning he could engage in illegal activities while avoiding detection, arrest, or prosecution. As for being a "con artist," short for confidence artist or confidence trickster, someone who gains a victim's trust — their "confidence" — to manipulate, deceive, or cheat them out of money or valuables, like all con-artists he was a scammer who build rapport before executing a dishonest scheme, or, in the case of John Devine, execute a plan to commit murder. 

As for Devine's whole act of crying "bitterly when exhorted to a contemplation of his guilty life and true repentance, and the consolations of religious faith seemed to reconcile him to his fate and enable him to await his end with fortitude"? I think that was a con job, just a scam to game the system and gain his freedom, or have his sentence reduced to life in prison. Let's remember that he'd already had a trial, and a retrial, and a stay of execution for 5 days that was ordered by the Governor. Knowing this, he may have thought his sentence could be commuted to life in prison instead of dancing on the end of a rope for what he did — especially if there were witnesses in high places, such as an Archbishop who would say he showed remorse and repentance. 

A few days after Devine was hanged, a short article described how "It is generally believed that Devine was one of the men who were hired to murder Miss Martha McDonald, during the prosecution of Stevenson, of Stevenson’s block, in San Francisco, for rape. He said he was in the county jail the night of the attempted murder, but it was afterwards ascertained that he was outside as a trusty and that he left the jail the same night. His last offence was the murder of August Kamp, in May, 1871."
  
Another newspaper article titled "The Criminal Career of John Devine, alias 'The Chicken," was published after he was hanged. In that article, Devine's criminal career is described as "most remarkable." According to that news story, Devine "started out as a prize fighter in San Francisco, and fought four or five battles. His first arrest was for an assault with a deadly weapon. He later shot Tommy Chandler, the pugilist, twice, and had been arrested seventy-nine times altogether."

For the murder of August Kamp, John Devine, alias "The Chicken," was convicted and finally hanged in the San Francisco County jail on May 14, 1873. A very deserving end to a cowardly murderer. 

Tom Correa


Thursday, March 12, 2026

57 Times Sick, Unhinged Democrats Declared War on Law Enforcement



The report below is from The White House. It was published on The White House webpage on January 9th, 2026.

On National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day, the Trump Administration proudly honors the brave patriots of ICE and all law enforcement who put their lives on the line to protect America. In stark contrast, unhinged Radical Left Democrats have escalated their torrent of vicious, inflammatory attacks on these very heroes — branding them as Nazis, terrorists, and Gestapo thugs while inciting their delusional supporters to unleash violence.

As ICE valiantly defends our sovereignty and communities, here are 57 times Democrats have recklessly, deliberately stoked hatred and division against them:
  1. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz smeared ICE officers as a “threat” to the public, called ICE “reckless,” suggested the state is at “war” with federal officers and “under attack” by ICE, and smeared ICE as the “modern-day Gestapo.”
  2. California Gov. Gavin Newsom likened ICE to “secret police,” calling them “authoritarian” and calling for people to “push back.”
  3. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker claimed ICE is turning the country into “Nazi Germany.”
  4. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul accused ICE is “terrorizing people.”
  5. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro claimed ICE officers “make our neighborhoods less safe.”
  6. Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan said ICE officers cause “chaos and terror.”
  7. Sen. Chuck Schumer declared that ICE “does not belong in our neighborhoods.”
  8. Sen. Tina Smith called ICE “a clear and present threat.”
  9. Sen. John Hickenlooper smeared ICE as “a reign of terror.”
  10. Sen. Jeff Merkley likened ICE operations to “fascism” and claimed officers are “doing nothing” but “terrorizing our communities.”
  11. Sen. Bernie Sanders asked people to “stop ICE from what they are doing as soon as possible.”
  12. Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed ICE is “intentionally stok[ing] fear” and “tear[ing] communities apart.”
  13. Sen. Ruben Gallego said ICE exists to “scare the American public.”
  14. Sen. Mark Warner equated ICE officers to a brutal dictator.
  15. Sen. Dick Blumenthal accused ICE of spreading “lawlessness and recklessness.”
  16. Sen. Alex Padilla accused ICE of “indiscriminate violence.”
  17. Sen. Dick Durbin accused ICE officers of committing “atrocities.”
  18. Rep. Ilhan Omar said ICE is “state violence,” called officers “vile and beyond cruel,” and stated “[a]bolishing ICE is not enough.”
  19. Rep. Pramila Jayapal called ICE officers “deranged,” accused them of “kidnapping,” said “resistance” to ICE is “inspiring,” and claimed ICE officers will “shoot at you and kill you.”
  20. Rep. Eric Swalwell smeared ICE officers “masked thugs,” called them “terrorizing bandits,” said it was his “priority” to ensure officers “are no longer faceless,” compared them to the KGB, and demanded they “stay the fuck out of California.”
  21. Rep. Jasmine Crockett compared ICE to “slave patrols” and called them “thugs.”
  22. Rep. Delia Ramirez said ICE is the “single biggest threat to public safety right now” and attacked ICE as “a terror force.”
  23. Rep. Summer Lee said ICE is “out of control” and a “police state.”
  24. Rep. Ayanna Pressley called ICE “a rogue, violent agency that “has no business in our communities” and “must be abolished,” and accused ICE of “terrorizing our communities.”
  25. Rep. Mark Pocan demanded ICE “get the f*ck out of our cities.”
  26. Rep. April McClain Delaney called ICE “lawless.”
  27. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes called ICE an “anti-civilian force” and said ICE “should not exist.”
  28. Rep. Rashida Tlaib said ICE is “terrorizing our communities” and “turning our country into a fascist police state,” called it a “rogue agency,” and called for it to be abolished.
  29. Rep. Julie Johnson excused violence against ICE as people “channeling that frustration.”
  30. Rep. Laura Friedman said ICE officers are “terrorizing our friends and neighbors” and “bringing chaos and violence to our streets.”
  31. Rep. Shri Thanedar called to end legal protections for ICE officers.
  32. Rep. Janelle Bynum said ICE is “state-sponsored terrorism.”
  33. Rep. Sylvia Garcia referred to ICE officers as “thugs.”
  34. Rep. Jan Schakowsky urged people to “fight back” against ICE’s “abuse.”
  35. Rep. Robin Kelly smeared ICE as the “Gestapo” and a “betrayal.”
  36. Rep. LaMonica McIver incited people to “shut down the city” because “we are at war.”
  37. Rep. Max Frost compared ICE operations to “the worst horrors and crimes against humanity.”
  38. Rep. John Larson said ICE is “the SS” and “the Gestapo.”
  39. Rep. Stephen Lynch smeared ICE officers as “the Gestapo” and “nondescript thugs.”
  40. Rep. Dan Goldman compared federal officers to “secret police” who must be unmasked.
  41. Rep. Becca Balint called ICE “vigilantes.”
  42. Rep. Chuy Garcia said ICE brings “nothing but terror and violence” and warned ICE officers they “will be held accountable” for “terrorizing my community.”
  43. Rep. Nikki Budzinski called ICE officers “dangerous and reckless.”
  44. Rep. Gil Cisneros claimed ICE has “terrorized” people through “racial profiling.”
  45. Rep. Lauren Underwood accused ICE of a “horrifying campaign to spread fear… and violently snatch people from our streets.”
  46. Rep. Steve Cohen accused “out-of-control” ICE officers of “misusing their authority.”
  47. Rep. Joaquin Castro called ICE “a rogue organization” that “should be disbanded.”
  48. Rep. Maxine Waters said ICE was causing “mayhem and death.”
  49. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey demanded ICE “get the fuck out” of the city and accused officers of “terrorizing our communities.”
  50. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said ICE enforcement “is an attack on us all.”
  51. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson accused ICE of being “secret police” who are “terrorizing our communities” and said ICE was a “lawless, racist force.”
  52. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu compared ICE officers to a neo-Nazi group.
  53. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass excused violent anti-ICE protests as just like a “Lakers championship.”
  54. New Jersey State Sen. Britnee Timberlake threatened that ICE officers “will find themselves in the same position as those who carried out the illegal acts in Nazi Germany.”
  55. Minneapolis City Council Member Robin Wonsley claimed ICE is carrying out “terrorist attacks.”
  56. Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn called ICE “dangerous.”
  57. Cudahy (California) Vice Mayor Cynthia Gonzalez implored the violent 18th Street and Florencia 13 gangs to “help out and organize” against ICE.
The above report outlines the hate speech and threats coming out of the Democratic Party. While we can see what Democrats are doing and saying to stoke the fires of hate and violence in our country, we should all understand that their campaign of violence is being extremely successful. Working with the Democrat-controlled mainstream media, Democrats are very successful in recruiting the ignorant to fight for criminals. 


Monday, March 9, 2026

A Murderous Plot To Massacre All The Whites Of Choctaw County, Alabama 1882


Here's an interesting news story I found while looking through the 1882 newspaper archives. It's a story that seemed incredible on the face of it. Too hard to believe. And no, it's not every day that I find a story in newspaper archives that has me researching for more information like this one did. 

As for what I found? Well, it made me wonder what drives such people to do such heinous things. I made me wonder why things change yet in many ways stay the same.  

The report of a murder plot by blacks in Alabama to kill every white man in Choctaw County, Alabama, made the news in August 1882. Yes, indeed, it was nationally circulated by telegraph. In fact, the Los Angeles Herald published it in Volume XVII, Number 156, on August 23, 1882, as follows:

A MURDEROUS PLOT 

A Conspiracy among Negroes to Massacre all the Whites of Choctaw County, Alabama — The Ringleader Hanged. 

Mobile, Aug. 22.— In Choctaw County, Alabama, on the 15th, a bundle of papers disclosing a well-organized plot among negroes to kill the entire White population of that county was found on the 18th. 

A quiet meeting of the citizens was called to consider the best mode of suppressing the intended outbreak and massacre. After discussion, it was agreed that the ringleaders were Jack Turner, K D. Barney, Jesse Wilson, Peter Hill, and Willis Lyman. Aaron Scott and Range West, to whom had been assigned the duties of leading their respective squads to Butler Mount, Sterling, De Sotorillc, and other places, and killing all the Whites at each place, should be arrested and lodged in jail. 

Their arrest was effected on the 17th without disturbance or bloodshed. The same day, a mass meeting of the citizens of all classes was called to decide the fate of the prisoners. 

The plot has been in existence since 1878, and the conspirators now number 400. They have powder, shot, and guns, and think themselves sufficiently strong to accomplish their fiendish design. Sunday night, the 17th of September, had been appointed for its consummation. 

The meeting brought together about 700 men, among whom were about 150 negroes, who, after hearing the papers read, by an almost unanimous vote, decided that Jack Turner was a dangerous and turbulent character, a regular firebrand in the community, and that the public good demanded his immediate death.

He was accordingly hanged at a quarter past one o'clock the same afternoon, in the presence of the multitude. The crowd then dispersed. The other prisoners are still in jail to await further developments.

-- end of report. 

But wait, this couldn't have been the end of the story. After they hanged Jack Turner, and the crowd simply "dispersed," what happened to the others who were still in jail? Did they hang them? Were they simply set free? Was that the end of it? It didn't make sense to me. There had to be more to this story. 

Then, I found this news story published in the Morning Press in Volume XI, Number 46, from August 23, 1882:
Bulldozing and Terrorism. 

New York, August 23.— The Tribune's Washington special says the conviction prevails that the remarkable story telegraphed from Alabama about an alleged conspiracy among the Blacks to murder all the Whites in Choctaw County, is the invention of bulldozers and that the hanging of Jack Turner, without trial, is only the beginning of another season of political terrorism.

-- end of report.

Political terrorism? Why did they make reference to his lynching being political? This made me even more interested in finding out what really happened, or at least how the situation with the others in jail was resolved. So again, I researched for a follow-up story. And yes, I found it. 

Published in the Sacramento Daily Union in Volume 16, Number 15, on September 7, 1882, was an in-depth follow-up to what happened on August 22nd in Choctaw County, Alabama. 

THE OLD SPIRIT STILL AT WORK IN THE SOUTH

A dispatch was published in our columns a short time ago relating the particulars of an alleged negro conspiracy in Choctaw County, Alabama. It was said that certain negroes had formed a plan to murder all the White men in the county; that a bundle of papers had been found describing the whole plot; and that on the strength of the information thus obtained, a thousand White citizens had assembled, seized six of the negro ringleaders, and hanged their alleged leader, one Jack Turner. 

The whole story was so incredible on its face that the Record Union at once pronounced it a fiction, and expressed the opinion that when the truth was ascertained, the hanging of Jack Turner would prove to have been a political crime, perpetrated by the Bourbons of Choctaw County to rid themselves of an intelligent and active colored Republican. 

The details of the case are now at hand, and they show that our estimate was singularly correct. The facts are as follows: Jack Turner was the leading negro of Choctaw County. He was a preacher, a man of great native force of character, a Republican, and a natural leader of his people. 

For some time past, it had been the practice of certain Bourbon planters to compel the colored men who worked for them to vote the Democratic Party ticket. On an election day, one of these Bourbons, named Carnathan, hitched up his horses and went to take his hands to the polls as usual. One of them, named Manning, however, declined to vote the Democratic ticket, saying that he had done so for years, and could not see that any good had come to him from it. 

Carnathan became furious, took Manning into a stable, tied him np, and flogged him most brutally with a leather trace, having an iron hook at the end. Manning's back was terribly cut up, and he was for a long time disabled. 

Turner heard of the outrage and persuaded the victim to prosecute the ruffian Carnathan in the Federal Court, for the State Courts have no justice for negroes as yet. Carnathan was indicted, through the energetic work of Jack Turner, and of course, he became the bitter enemy of the man who had brought him to justice. 

This, however, might have been passed over had not Turner had the audacity to act on the theory that colored citizens possess equal political rights in Alabama. He [Turner] organized the colored vote in Choctaw County for the Republican ticket, and he proved himself so good a politician that at the election of August 7th, the Bourbons had a majority of only 20. It was evident that if this active colored leader was not stopped in his political career, he would carry the county next time. 

Turner was Chairman of the Republican County Committee, and his word was law with his followers. So, ten days after the election, a mob of White scoundrels collected under cover of night, took Turner and his principal followers, hanged the former, and flogged and tortured the latter, under the thin pretense of a conspiracy. 

It was, as we surmised from the first, one of those cowardly political outrages by the commission of which the Southern people have succeeded in retarding their own progress, keeping capital and enterprise out of their section, and sustaining in the Northern mind the profound conviction that they cannot be trusted with power again in the councils of the nation. 

Jack Turner was as much a martyr as John Brown. 

He was engaged in a noble cause. He was organizing his people politically, and enabling them to utilize the suffrage conferred upon them by the nation. For this, he was brutally murdered by a mob of cowardly White loafers, who, possessing no deserts of any kind, swagger and strut about their slovenly holdings, and because they are lazy and ferocious and dissolute and profane, flatter themselves that they are "gentlemen" and the very salt of the country. 

One man like poor Jack Turner is worth a battalion of such "White trash" as the mob that murdered him, and until the better elements of the South realize that truth, and act upon it; until public opinion in those States enables justice to be done in the Courts, and accords to every honest man, no matter what his color, equal protection and respect; the South will continue to languish, will cry in vain for capital, and will be doomed to appear at each Presidential election as the "shocking example" which justifies the country in voting down the Democratic Party ticket. 

Here was a man who was doing nothing, which it was not his right to do. He was simply exercising the political attributes which are the heritage of every American citizen. He was working towards higher and better things in politics. He was sustaining and advancing that Republican Party policy which every colored man in the Union must support if he understands his own interests. 

And for this he was seized at midnight, taken from his family and friends, and basely murdered under every accompaniment of insult and humiliation that the mingled cruelty and mendacity of his enemies could devise. The contemptibly silly story which the Choctaw County Bourbons invented as an apology for their foul crime shows what sort of creatures intellectually they are. 

Every schoolboy knew that the account of a "Negro Conspiracy" which was alleged to have been proceeding for six years was a clumsy fiction. Negroes do not enter into conspiracies. Negroes do not prepare elaborate written accounts of what they intend. 

The story of the bundle of papers is even more preposterous than the other. The plain truth, now first disclosed, is as we have stated it. Jack Turner was murdered by the Bourbons because he was a good citizen, not because he was a bad one. He was killed because he had proved himself more enlightened, intelligent, and energetic than the worthless White "canaille" [scoundrel or crook] which arrogates to itself political supremacy in the nest of barbarian-ridden counties which lies in that section. 

For Choctaw County is in the midst of a veritable "dark and bloody ground." It adjoins Sumter County, the scene of the Billings and Ivey assassinations, and that again abuts on Kemper County, Mississippi, made infamous by the Chisolm Massacre. The southwestern portion of Alabama is, in fact, nearly all missionary ground, but the missionaries who go there ought to be well armed with self-cocking revolvers and repeating rifles. 

The murder of Turner and the outrage upon his lieutenants shows that the old detestable Bourbon spirit still lives at the South. The same spirit still lives at the South. The same spirit has been exhibited at the Arkansas election, where the Republican voters were driven from the polls, and a negro was killed. 

Crimes like this, however, react with disastrous effect upon the Counties and States which permit and condone them. The North will never trust the national party, which is in political alliance with the South, so long as such atrocities continue to be perpetrated. For it is only too apparent that under a Democratic Party Administration there would not be even the pretence of fair play toward the colored voters, but that they would, by common consent, be reduced to a state of serfdom and terrorism more galling and intolerable even than the slavery of old.

-- end of report. 

Sadly, the story of "A Murderous Plot" was all made up. All just a hoax fabricated by Democrats in 1882 to cover-up their murder of a Black Republican. By not just any Black Republican, he was responsible for organizing Black voters to vote for the Republican Party that freed them, instead of voting for the Democratic Party that fought a Civil War to keep them in chains. He was a Preacher who used his influence to take power away from those who wanted control of the lives of people they once owned as slaves. 

"Bourbons" were the elite Democrats, the wealthy planters and landowners who dominated post-Reconstruction politics in the South. They sought to maintain control and refused to let go of the pre-Civil War social order that put Black Americans at the bottom of the social ladder. Acting as the local power structure, they violently opposed political alliances of freed slaves with the Whites Republicans who fought to free them. 

Democrats have a legacy of trying to control others. Democrats created Black Codes in Southern states in 1865 and 1866, immediately after the Civil War. The Black Codes were designed to restrict the freedom of emancipated Black Americans and force them back into labor. These laws enforced vagrancy penalties, mandated yearly labor contracts, restricted property ownership, and essentially sought to restore a slave-like economy by passing restrictive laws to do so. 

Laws mandated that Blacks sign yearly labor contracts, often with their former Slave Masters. Failure to do so could result in arrest, fines, or being forced into unpaid labor. Being unemployed was criminalized. Those convicted of "vagrancy" were fined and, if unable to pay, their labor was hired out to Democrat planters. 

Democrats made sure Black people were prohibited from owning firearms, serving on juries, testifying against Whites, and in some areas, owning land outside of designated towns. As for Black orphans or children of parents deemed unable to support them, those children were forced into "apprenticeships" with Democrats planters -- who were often former their former owners.

Democrats created Black Codes to ensure that they'd have a cheap, reliable labor force for Southern agriculture. The oppressive nature of these codes outraged Republicans in the North, leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th Amendment, which aimed to secure equal rights.

While most Black Codes were repealed during Congressional Reconstruction in 1866-1867, Democrats resurrected many aspects of the Black Codes when the Democrats created Jim Crow laws. Democrats instituted Jim Crow laws in the disenfranchised1870s after Reconstruction. Their laws enforced strict racial segregation and disenfranched Black citizens. Democrats kept control over Blacks in the South through state and local statutes until the 1960s. It's hard to believe, but it's true. It took almost 100 years for the legal system of the Democratic Party's Jim Crow Laws to be finally dismantled by federal legislation in the 1960s, specifically the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965
 
When Democrats regained political control of the South in the 1870s, they established discriminatory laws to reverse any sort of Civil Rights gains for Blacks. They used laws enforcing segregation, while poll taxes, literacy tests, and intimidation were used to stop Black people from voting. During all of this, the unofficial militant arm of the Democratic Party, like today's ANTIFA, was the KKK and other terrorist groups, created to terrorize and keep Blacks in line. That's why they murdered Jack Turner in 1882. He stood up to them.

To show you how the Democratic Party playbook has not changed, though the original story of "A Murderous Plot" was disproved by September of that year, Democrat-controlled newspapers kept running the lie of "A Murderous Plot," as it was first circulated in August, through the end of 1882. 

As for those people who would say that the Democrats in 1882 would never have killed a Black Republican because he was a political threat, here's this: Democrats were defeated in the 1882 local elections in Choctaw County, Alabama, by a coalition organized by Black Republican Jack Turner. 

What can we learn from this?

Well, we know the reason why Democrats lynched Jack Turner. He was a political threat, and they killed him. Of course, it's the same reason why Democrats today have incited assassination attempts against Republican President Donald Trump and violent attacks against Republican Trump supporters. It's what they do to political threats. It's what Democrats have always done. Whether it was inciting the assassination of Republican President Abraham Lincoln or lynching Republicans like Jack Turner, it's just what Democrats do. 

History teaches us a great deal about how people conduct themselves, good and bad. As for the bad, history teaches us how people fake changes, how they pretend to be something they are not, how they game the system, and how they return to the same old playbook time and time again. If we look at things for what they are, then we will always see the particular way or method that people do things -- especially things that are characteristic or well-established by them. 

Among the timeless options of the Democratic Party is that of accusing their political opponents of what they are guilty of. Another is their use of authoritarianism to control others. It's their old slave master mentality. And yes, whether we like it or not, Democrats are violent and resort to violence whenever they feel the need to intimidate or cajole people into following them. 

Rather than using honesty and good faith reasoning, Democrats have a history of deception and false promises to trick and manipulate people into doing things -- even to the point of lynching someone like Jack Turner, who they deemed "a dangerous and turbulent character, a regular firebrand in the community, and that the public good demanded his immediate death."

History teaches us that Democrats have always demonized their political opponents and used violence to attack and assassinate them to subvert the will of the people. History teaches us that that's the case. That's all part and parcel of how the Democratic Party has always operated. 

Tom Correa 




Sunday, March 1, 2026

What Made Marriages Work On An 1858 American Homestead


In 1858, American pioneer couples faced incredible challenges during America's Westward expansion. Nothing about their lives was what we today would call "easy." Even the journey itself was arduous and cruel. The journey West often lasted six to eight months with little time for rest, even during childbirth along the trail.

The journey West in the 1850s was a 2,000-mile, six-month ordeal of extreme physical hardship. Those coming West endured brutal weather, freezing nights, scorching heat, unforgiving terrain, scorching deserts, treacherous river crossings, and disease -- especially cholera and dysentery. 

As for the disease? It's true. While accidents and deaths involving wagons, firearms, hostiles, and rattlesnakes were common, it was cholera, dysentery, and measles that were the primary killers of American pioneers coming West. The reason for that is that those diseases were spread by poor sanitation and inadequate nutrition. 

 Wagons moved slowly, only about 8 to 20 miles per day. And yes, this pace forced many to walk the entire journey. Pioneers faced broken wagons, scarce water, and dangerous terrain, with mortality rates estimated between 4% and 10%. If wagons broke down, travelers were often left to fend for themselves since the wagon train couldn't wait for people to make needed repairs or find fresh oxen. This led to the separation of family members who had to push on ahead.

Food supplies often ran low, forcing families to abandon possessions or face starvation. But, despite the perils and the risks, the promise of a better life drove thousands to undertake this journey. That is what drove pioneer married couples to face extreme hardships, physically demanding labor, isolation, and constant danger. It was not romantic or an adventure. It was toughing it out when things weren't easy. It was striving for a better life and working toward a dream of having your own place.

As for women who faced pregnancy and childbirth, most times, whether it was while enduring the long journey West walking beside wagons, or giving birth in wagons with no springs, women often faced childbirth without medical assistance and were considered fortunate to have whatever help they could get from the other ladies in a wagon train. 

On homesteads, the mortality rate for women was high. And yes, that is also the reason that some men were married to multiple wives during their lifetime; many women died during childbirth or from frontier conditions. The isolation meant there was no trained medical assistance nearby. Births were typically handled by midwives or family members, if available. Women often delivered alone or with only family present, making any sort of complication fatal for either or both in some cases.

Let's remember, besides a lot of other things that can go wrong, those pioneer women went without access to antiseptic techniques. That in itself led to high rates of infection. And yes, just as it would be today, with infections, there was the possibility of sepsis.

And here's something else: pioneers worked hard. The extreme physical labor, combined with poverty, meant that life required relentless work to survive. So, along with clearing land, building log cabins, growing crops, tending to livestock, and maintaining things, exhaustion was commonplace. And really, why shouldn't they be exhausted? Their daily life involved working from sunup until sundown.

Chores on an 1858 homestead were relentless, sun-up to sun-down tasks focused on survival, involving heavy manual labor, livestock care, and food production. Daily routines centered on milking cows, feeding animals, tending gardens, chopping wood, hauling water, and repairing tools, with women managing cooking, cleaning, and laundry.

On homesteads, cows and goats required milking twice daily. Livestock was fed, and water was made available by hauling buckets. There's also the chore of cleaning stalls and gathering eggs. And as for the field work, there was plowing, tilling, planting, and harvesting crops, often with horses or oxen. There was seasonal planting in spring, haying in summer, and harvesting in autumn. Harvesting food was usually a family affair, with everyone doing their part.

And let's not forget that a homesteader in 1858 still built and repaired fences. They also built and repaired their tools and harnesses for their horses, mules, or oxen. And in winter, there was still the job of breaking ice for water. As for facing food shortages and poor sanitation, that was a constant fear and a constant problem. Of course, settlers also dealt with the constant strain of cold, insects, and the fear of injury. An injury that kept a man or a woman from working their homestead would have been catastrophic.

Household chores also had to be done. There was carrying water for cooking and cleaning, chopping wood for heating, and using in a cookstove. Doing laundry was all about rubbing clothes on a washboard, boiling, and wringing them by hand. Sewing, mending, and repairing clothing to maximize their use was normal for everyone. So was food preservation like canning, smoking meat, curing, and making soap from lard. Baking bread, churning butter, preparing meals from scratch, and tending the fire.

As for children, they learned that shirking was not tolerated. Some children did fieldwork, milked cows, tended animals, churned butter, helped make soap, brought in wood to keep a fire going, and hauled water. And yes, carrying water, often from distant sources, a task that became harder in winter. The youngest were usually assigned to gathering eggs, weeding the family gardens, and maybe fetching water.

It took a tremendous amount of grit to farm, build a homestead, and navigate the hardships of the frontier. There are reasons that we refer to stalwart Americans as folks who have a "pioneer spirit." Their typical life was all about hard work and being self-sufficient. The couples, back in the day, demonstrated remarkable resilience in carving out lives on the American frontier, often with minimal resources. Frankly, they had limited resources for comfort.

Homesteaders faced constant threats, including harsh weather, illness, and in some areas there was the problems of hostiles of all colors. Daily life required, as one settler noted, living on "work and love," sometimes spending years without basic amenities like a fireplace or stove, relying on wood fires against cabin logs. Wives, while managing the home, played a crucial role in farm labor and managing the homestead itself. 

The irony is that in the 1850s, married women were legally subordinate in the eyes of the law. That meant they had to rely on their husbands for legal standing regarding property, while in fact serving as the emotional backbone of the home.

Life on an 1858 homestead was defined by constant, labor-intensive chores that spanned from dawn until dusk, leaving little time for leisure. Family members, including children, worked from morning until night, leaving few opportunities for rest or comfort. Daily survival required endless tasks. So no, there's no doubt that an 1858 homestead was demanding. But, though that was the case, a lot of families made them work. 

Marriages on homesteads in 1858 required immense strength, grit, and dependence on each other. Often described as "toughing it" through a lifestyle that combined extreme physical labor, isolation, and a lack of basic shelter or resources. Marriage was a partnership essential for surviving the harsh realities of the American frontier.  

Those homesteads succeeded through a survival-based partnership in which traditional roles were respected and encouraged. It was a world where men focused on breaking ground and planting crops to provide for their families, while women managed the home, which included cooking and raising their children. It was all about love and working together with your wife, who shared the same goal, that common objective of building a permanent homestead of their own. Being self-sufficient was just part and parcel of the times. But even though that was the case, chores and having to do for yourself created a strong collaborative family bond.  
 
So when asked, what made marriages work, and ultimately stronger, on an 1858 American homestead? The answer might simply be that, like today, life and marriage require immense emotional fortitude and a strong belief in God on the part of both the husband and the wife. That sort of resilient, clear-headed, purposeful resolve can hold things together through anything.  

Tom Correa

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Robert Phillips' Iwo Jima Memorial Observance Speech -- February 21, 2026

 

Last Saturday, February 21, 2026, we, with Marine Corps League Motherlode Detachment #1080, held our annual Iwo Jima Memorial Observance in Volcano, California. The "town" of Volcano, once known as Soldier's Gulch, sits at about 2060 feet elevation and has a population of about 104 people. 

We hold our observance of the battle of Iwo Jima in the tiny town of Volcano, California. We hold our memorial observance in the town of Volcano because Marine Brigadier General Harry Bluett Liversedge was born and raised in that small California Gold Rush town on September 21, 1894. He was the commanding officer of the Marines who raised the flag on Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima.

In January of 1944, then Col. Liversedge was transferred to the 5th Marine Division and placed in command of the 28th Marines. On February 19, 1945, he and his 28th Marines were among the thousands to land on Iwo Jima. Just a few days after the battle began, on February 23rd, 1945, Col. Liversedge’s 28th Marines raised an American flag on Mount Suribachi. 

The photo of those Marines raising that flag boosts the morale of both men there and Americans at home. Among other things, that photograph symbolized American bravery, endurance, determination, and our nation's will to win that war.

Each year since that battle, Marines remember the Marines who fought and died on Iwo Jima. We remember how their gallantry and scarifice embody our Corps' values of honor, courage, and commitment. We acknowledge how their actions defined how we Marines think, how we act, and how we fight. We recognize that their valor, sense of duty, resolve, and selflessness is why we hold those who fought and died there on Iwo Jima in such high esteem. Their actions during the Battle of Iwo Jima set the standard for all Marines forevermore. Their actions branded the United States Marine Corps and Marines for who we are.

As the Commandant of the Marine Corps League Motherlode Detachment #1080, I look forward to our annual Iwo Jima Memorial Observance. Last Saturday, February 21, 2026, Robert Phillips gave a wonderful speech that encapsulates how Marines feel about those who fought in the Battle of Iwo Jima from February 19 to March 26, 1945.

Here's Robert Phillips' speech: 

From the Perspective of a United States Marine Who Served in Operation Desert Storm Honoring the Heroes of Iwo Jima

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, fellow Marines, veterans, and honored guests. Today, we gather to remember and pay tribute to the brave souls who fought at Iwo Jima—one of the most pivotal battles in Marine Corps history. As a Marine who served in Operation Desert Storm, I stand before you as part of a younger generation, shaped by a different war but forever connected to the legacy forged on those black sands. The brotherhood of Marines endures across generations, and I am privileged to speak on behalf of all who have worn the uniform.

The Legacy of Courage

In February 1945, the men of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Marine Divisions landed on Iwo Jima, facing a determined enemy entrenched in tunnels and fortified positions. The odds were daunting, and the terrain unforgiving. For 36 days, our Marines fought not only for a strategic island, but for each other. They demonstrated what it truly means to be a Marine: courage, commitment, and a willingness to sacrifice for the mission and for the man beside you.

As someone who faced my own trials in the deserts of the Middle East, I often look back on the heroes of Iwo Jima for inspiration. Their courage in the face of overwhelming adversity set the standard for all Marines who followed. The flag raised atop Mount Suribachi stands as a symbol of hope, resilience, and unity — not just for Marines, but for all Americans. Behind that iconic image were countless acts of  heroism and selflessness, many of which will never be fully known beyond the silent memories of those who served. 

The Cost of Freedom


The price paid at Iwo Jima was steep. Nearly 7,000 Marines made the ultimate sacrifice, and thousands more were wounded. Every name etched in history represents a story of valor and loss. As a Marine who served in a different conflict, I honor their memory not only with words, but in how I strive to live my life and uphold the values they fought to protect. Their sacrifice paved the way for every Marine who came after, including those of us who answered the call in places like Kuwait and Iraq.

Lessons for Today— And For Life After The Corps

The battle for Iwo Jima teaches us vital lessons — of perseverance in the face of adversity and of unity despite differences. It reminds us that freedom is never free; it is earned and defended by the bravery of those willing to stand firm, even when the way forward is unclear. 

But these lessons do not end when we take off the uniform. Life after the Marine Corps brings its own challenges—adapting to civilian life, finding new purpose, and facing adversity in ways we may not have expected. The courage, commitment, and brotherhood we learned as Marines remain with us. 

When we encounter obstacles — whether in our careers, our families, or our communities — we draw on the same spirit that carried us through battles overseas. We remember that we are never alone; we are part of a legacy that teaches us to stand tall, support one another, and face every hardship with resilience and honor. 

As a younger Marine, I carry these lessons with me. The legacy of Iwo Jima lives on in every action, every mission, and every commitment to our country and each other. We stand on the shoulders of giants, and it is our duty to live in a way that honors their sacrifice—not just in war, but in every day that follows.

Today, let us remember the fallen, honor the survivors, and recommit ourselves to the ideals that make us Marines. May the spirit of Iwo Jima guide us in times of challenge and inspire us to be worthy of the title we bear — whether we fought on volcanic sands, desert plains, or in the battles of everyday life. 

Semper Fidelis — Always Faithful.

--end of Reobert's speech. 

I want to thank Robert Phillips for allowing me to publish his speech here. He did a fine job at our Marine Corps League Detachment's annual Iwo Jima Memorial Observance. He is a great friend, an outstanding Marine member of our Marine Corps League Detachment, and a wonderful example of a Marine who still lives the ethos. 

While the exact origin is often debated, there is a long-standing mantra among Marines: "You can take the Marine out of the Corps, but you can't take the Corps out of the Marine." 

For Marines who've spent their lives living the life, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, on active duty, always ready, always able, always there, being ready to answer the call when the word comes down that it's time to saddle-up, we lived up to the standards of the code. The idiom, "You can take the Marine out of the Corps, but you can't take the Corps out of the Marine," emphasizes the lifelong nature of being a good Marine. 

And yes, my friends, it really is about living the life, following the code with uncompromising integrity, and practicing ethical behavior. It is about respect for human dignity and having the inner strength to fight against all odds. It signifies that "Once a Marine, always a Marine" really and truly emphasizes that our core values of honor, courage, commitment, our physical and mental toughness, and habits instilled by the Marine Corps do not disappear when a Marine becomes a civilian or veteran. 

Being a Marine on active duty is not a part-time job. You don't show up now and then and still call yourself a Marine if you really earned the title. The whole idea of "Once a Marine, always a Marine," is truly is a tribute to the training, discipline, and identity of a Marine. An identity that remains permanently a part of who we are, even after leaving active duty. 

Being a Marine goes to the heart of how we Marines carry the discipline, work ethic, and sometimes the physical bearing of our service into their civilian lives or new careers. Our time on active duty shaped us for life. And no, that's not a bad thing at all. Most of us agree, the Marines like Robert who still live the title proudly, a title we'd never dishonor, we'd do it all over again without hesitation. And yes, indeed, that says a lot.

Tom Correa

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

A Look At The Battle Of Iwo Jima -- 81 Years Later

Iwo Jima 1945

Iwo Jima is an island with an area of just eight square miles. It is located between Hawaii and Japan. Starting in June of 1944, under Japanese Imperial Army Lt. Gen. Tadamichi Kuribayashi, it took Japanese forces several months to construct the extensive tunnel and fortification network on Iwo Jima.

The defenses, designed to counter American air superiority, included over 11 miles of tunnels, 1,500 rooms, camouflaged artillery positions, and interconnected bunkers. The fortifications were designed to make the island a "death trap," with positions in Mount Suribachi and the northern plateau built to withstand heavy naval and air bombardment. 

The Japanese strategy was to create an underground, "defense-in-depth" system that was virtually invisible to aerial reconnaissance. This allowed them to get past the pre-dawn U.S. Naval gun and bombardment, and wait for Marines to land before opening fire.

The American invasion of Iwo Jima was led by Vice Admiral Raymond A. Spruance, with 1,700 ships and Rear Admiral Marc Mitscher (Task Force 58) providing naval support. Lieutenant General Holland M. Smith, USMC, commanded the V Amphibious Corps (3rd, 4th, 5th Marine Divisions). Officially known as Operation Detachment, its objective was the invasion of Iwo Jima to capture its airfields. 

On February 19, 1945, approximately 30,000 U.S. Marines landed on the beaches of Iwo Jima on Day 1 of the invasion. The initial assault waves consisted of the 4th and 5th Marine Divisions, with total forces for the entire campaign meaning everyone on the island and offshore in support of the operation beng roughly 70,000 to 80,000 American personnel.

The 4th and 5th Marine Divisions launched the invasion of Iwo Jima, on February 19, 1945, landing under intense fire on black, volcanic ash beaches. The beaches were impassable, with 15-foot-high volcanic sand embankments that bogged down tanks and vehicles. But frankly, as Marines came ashore, they had no idea that the worse was yet to come.

Departing from traditional, immediate beach defense, Kuribayashi's strategy focused on a long-term, subterranean defense designed to turn the island into a "meat grinder". Kuribayashi ordered his forces to hold their fire during the initial Iwo Jima landings on February 19, 1945. He wanted to allow the Marines to crowd the beaches and clog the area with equipment. 

Japanese Gen. Tadamichi Kuribayashi waited until he knew the U.S. Marines were crowded and bogged down in the deep sad on the beach. It was then that he ordered his forces, deeply entrenched in bunkers and a network of tunnels, those roughly 22,000 Japanese troops in his command hidden in the complex underground tunnels and fortifications, to ran down fire and inflict immediate, severe casualties to the Marines landing on the beach.

This deliberate strategy aimed to maximize casualties by firing from hidden, entrenched positions only after the landing zone on the beach was heavily congested, had a devastating impact on the Marines. As Marines pushed past the shoreline, Japanese artillery, mortar, and machine gun fire erupted from camouflaged positions in the surrounding high ground. The delayed, intense fire was murderous and caused massive casualties on the beaches. So much so that it brought the initial assault to a halt.

On February 19, 1945, the first waves of U.S. Marines went ashore at 8:30 am. The first day set the stage for one of the most savage and costly battles in Marine Corps history, aiming to secure the island for B-29 bomber emergency landings. On that first day, the soft, black volcanic sand made movement difficult, causing vehicles and troops to get stuck under heavy fire. What the Marines faced were Japanese defenders, who waited until the beaches were packed with Marines and equipment before they opened fire with machine guns, mortars, and artillery fire.

To make the bloody carnage worse, Marines faced "bone-chilling" cold rain that turned the volcanic ash into a sticky, "gluey black sludge," that hampered their movement and fouled their weapons. Tank battalions, naval gunfire, and air strikes were essential for attacking fortified Japanese positions, but progress was slow. At first, the tanks bogged down in the sand and were slow to get into the fight.

Of course, while this was going on, naval gunfire pummeled the island, as air strikes hit elusive Japanese positions. The Japanese, contrary to previous battles, did not launch chaotic banzai charges. Instead, they remained in hidden bunkers and tunnels, inflicting heavy casualties with coordinated artillery and mortar fire from the slopes of Mount Suribachi.

Marines managed to advance off the beaches despite the chaos. And while that first day saw Marines getting hit the hardest on that beach, some units reached the edge of Airfield Number 1 by noon. On that first day, when some Marines didn't even make it off the beach and out of that sand, there would be over 2,400 U.S. casualties.

Of them, on that first day, more than 550 Marines were killed in action, and more than 1,800 Marines were wounded. The 4th and 5th Marine Divisions suffered heavy, immediate losses, with 15-foot volcanic sand banks stalling vehicles and creating a bottleneck for incoming troops. On that first day, on Day 1 of the battle, the 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines alone lost 22 officers and 500 riflemen. And yes, legendary Medal of Honor recipient Gunnery Sergeant John Basilone was killed on that first morning. And that was only Day One of the battle.

What some might not realize is that the Battle of Iwo Jima included the Japanese launching major kamikaze attacks on U.S. Navy vessels offshore. They attacked the carrier USS Saratoga whcih was severely damaged by multiple kamikaze hits, and they severely damaged the escort carrier USS Bismarck Sea -- which ended up sinking on Day 2.

On the second day of the Battle of Iwo Jima, U.S. Marines faced brutal conditions as they attempted to expand their precarious beachhead against a deeply entrenched enemy. On Day 2, Marines still struggled against "bone-chilling" cold rain and the island's unique volcanic ash, which made movement for both men and tanks nearly impossible.

Day 2 of the battle saw a high casualty rate largely due to the "black volcanic sand," which made it nearly impossible for Marines either dig foxholes for cover or get off that beach. That meant the Marines on that beach were exposed to withering Japanese fire.

After landing 30,000 Marines on the first day, the 4th and 5th Marine Divisions focused on widening their positions and pushing toward the island's airfields. That's especially true when we keep in mind that the enemy tactic was that of attrition from underground fortifications. And while the second day of the Battle of Iwo Jima, Marine faced a grueling and costly advance against entrenched Japanese positions, the fighting on Day 2 set the tone for what would become a 36-day "war of attrition" where progress was often measured only in yards.

Day 2, February 20th, 1945, was a day that saw Private First Class Jack Lucas, who had famously lied about his age to enlist in the Marine Corps at age 14, earn the Medal of Honor for his brave action of throwing himself on two Japanese grenades to save his fellow Marines.

On Day 2, the 28th Marines began their assault toward Mount Suribachi. The advance on Mount Suribachi was steady, and progress was measured in yards due to heavy Japanese mortar and machine-gun fire from the volcano's slopes. And yes, on Day 2, the 28th Marine Regiment successfully cut off Mount Suribachi from the rest of the island. That was a critical step toward its eventual capture three days later.

Many units reported heavy losses as they attempted to move inland. For example, some battalions reported hundreds of men missing or being "bypassed" in the chaotic volcanic ash. The Japanese resistance was so strong that it necessitated the early commitment of the 3rd Marine Division, which was held in reserve and was supposed to be deployed much later in the fight.

While this was taking place on Iwo Jima, offshore, Japanese coastal batteries and early kamikaze-style attacks kept our ships busy defending themselves while still trying to supply fire support for the Marines onshore. By Day 2, the escort carrier USS Bismarck Sea was sunk, and ships engaging with the enemy over the first 48 hours had already accounted for hundreds of sailor casualties.

Day 3 of the Battle of Iwo Jima, Wednesday, February 21, 1945, was characterized by deteriorating weather and more Japanese kamikaze attacks against the supporting naval fleet. It was the day that the 21st Marines, part of the 3rd Marine Division, began landing on the island to reinforce the 4th and 5th Marine Divisions. Marines of the 4th and 5th Divisions continued their grueling advance through soft volcanic ash.

And as for the 28th Marines, supported by heavy naval and artillery bombardment, they continued their grueling push toward the base of Mount Suribachi. The Marines were fighting through what they nicknamed the "Meat Grinder" and towards the slopes of Mount Suribachi, experiencing relentless mortar and machine-gun fire. By the end of that day, the 28th Marine Regiment had successfully cut off Mount Suribachi from the rest of the island, setting the stage for its capture two days later.

Marines moved slowly through the extremely difficult "black ash sand that swallowed an individual's foot up to the ankle". Weather conditions were cold and rainy, hampering air support and slowing the movement of supplies from the beaches to the front lines. The 4th and 5th Marine Divisions faced intense, entrenched Japanese resistance, making slow progress across the volcanic, heavily defended, and treacherous terrain.

As for the Japanese forces, the defenders, under General Kuribayashi, were deeply entrenched in tunnels and bunkers, refusing to surrender and forcing a slow, bloody advance. The Japanese remained largely underground by utilizing an extensive network of tunnels and bunkers to direct mortar and machine-gun fire onto the exposed Marines. 

By the end of the third day on Iwo Jima, February 21, 1945, U.S. Marines sustained exceptionally high casualties, with over 3,000 Marines killed or wounded since the initial February 19 landing. It's true. The initial amphibious assault on February 19 alone saw thousands of casualties, and by Day 3, the fight was already considered one of the bloodiest in Marine Corps history.

February 21, 1945, was the third day of the Battle of Iwo Jima, and U.S. Marines faced a two-front struggle involving brutal cave-to-cave combat on land and devastating kamikaze attacks at sea. Marines of the 4th and 5th Marine Divisions continued their slow, yard-by-yard advance through volcanic ash and heavily fortified Japanese pillboxes. Of course, at the same time, Marine engineers were also at work under heavy mortar fire to clear anti-boat mines that were disabling M-4 Sherman tanks and blocking inland movement.

Day 3 was the day that Corporal Hershel "Woody" Williams landed on this day with the 1st Battalion, 21st Marines. He would go on to earn the Medal of Honor for his actions two days later, using a flamethrower to single-handedly destroy seven Japanese pillboxes.

Japanese coastal defense guns remained active, striking the destroyer USS Pensacola six times and causing significant damage. All in all, during this battle, it's believed roughly 21,000 Japanese defenders remained largely entrenched in tunnels and caves, despite the ongoing naval bombardment.

On February 22, 1945, Day 4 of the Battle of Iwo Jima, while the overall operation had originally been planned to last only four days, the fierce Japanese resistance meant that by this date, the Marines were still locked in a brutal struggle for the island's key heights.

Day 4 saw the advance on Mount Suribachi by the 28th Marine Regiment (5th Marine Division) to continue its grueling push to isolate and scale Mount Suribachi at the southern tip of the island. Despite heavy rain and constant mortar fire from Japanese positions, they managed to surround the volcano by the end of the day, setting the stage for the famous flag-raising the following morning.

In the center and north of the island, the 4th Marine Division fought to expand the beachhead and push toward Airfield No. 1. Progress was measured in mere yards as Marines used flamethrowers and demolition charges to clear an intricate network of Japanese pillboxes and tunnels. Elements of the 21st Marine Regiment (3rd Marine Division) began landing to reinforce the 4th and 5th Divisions, who had already suffered thousands of casualties.

The primary objective of Day 4 was to capture Mount Suribachi and Airfield No. 1. Marines of the 28th Regiment (5th Marine Division) successfully completed the isolation of Mount Suribachi at the southern tip of the island. While the 5th Division focused on Mount Suribachi, the 3rd and 4th Marine Divisions began the grueling "Meat Grinder" phase, attacking heavily fortified Japanese positions in the north, such as Hill 362 and the airfields. Hill 382 was the highest point in the north, riddled with hidden antitank guns and machine-nestled crevices.

What the Marines in the "Meat Grinder" were up against were Japanese defenders deeply entrenched in caves and bunkers using interlocking fields of machine-gun fire. So by this stage of the Battle of Iwo Jima, thousands of Marines were already killed or wounded.

To make matters worse, heavy rain and choppy seas hampered the delivery of supplies and the evacuation of the wounded. In fact, the heavy rains on February 22nd hampered movement and air support, but also turned the volcanic ash into a thick, slippery mire that slowed the evacuation of the wounded to a crawl.

By the end of Day 4, U.S. casualties had surpassed 4,500, including approximately 1,000 killed. And of course, as it was from the start, the soft volcanic ash continued to bog down vehicles and tanks.

The following day, February 23, 1945, Day 5, America would see the raising of the American flag on Iwo Jima's Mount Suribachi by the 28th Marines. With intense Japanese resistance as they tightened their grip on the base of Mount Suribachi, Marines pushed into the island's rugged northern interior.

Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima was a crucial Japanese fortress, featuring tunnels and artillery that commanded the landing beaches. The peak had dominated the landing beaches with Japanese artillery fire. It provided Japanese forces with a high-ground observation point, allowing them to fire on U.S. Marines landing on the beaches. 

Capturing it was essential to destroying the interlocking network of caves and tunnels, effectively neutralizing the Japanese defense of the island. So yes, capturing Mount Suribachi on February 23, 1945, was vital for securing the island.

As for the flag raising, if you've heard that there were two flag raisings, it's true. There were two flag raisings. The first flag raising was when a small American flag was initially raised by 1st Lt. Harold G. Schrier and his 40-man patrol, significantly boosting the morale of the troops below -- but the small American flag was deemed too small.

To remedy that situation, about three hours after the first smaller flag went up, a larger flag was used on Mount Suribachi. The second flag measured 56 inches by 96 inches. Lt. Schrier ordered the new flag be raised at the same time that the first flag was lowered. And while six Marines hoisted the new flag into place, Associated Press photographer Joe Rosenthal, Sgt Bill Genaust, and Pvt Bob Campbell captured the moment on film. That second, larger flag was a lot more visible across the island. 

The famous flag-raising photo by Joe Rosenthal was taken on February 23, 1945, on Day 5 of the Battle of Iwo Jima. That photo is famous for capturing Mount Suribachi and the iconic raising of the American flag. It took place at approximately 10:20 a.m., after a patrol from the 28th Marine Regiment reached the summit of the 554-foot volcanic peak on the southern tip of the island.

Believe it or not, some initially thought it was a posed photo. But it was, in fact, entirely spontaneous. The six Marines raising the flag were Sgt Strank, Cpl. Block, PFC Sousley, PFC Hayes, Cpl. Schultz, and Cpl. Keller. Three of those six Marines, Sgt Strank, Cpl. Block and PFC Sousley were killed in action on Iwo Jima. 

During the first 5 days of the Battle of Iwo Jima from February 19 to 23, 1945, Marines sustained over 5,300 casualties within just the first three days. The initial landing alone resulted in roughly 2,400 killed or wounded. The high casualties during the battle were suffered immediately upon landing on February 19, 1945. By the time the flag was raised on Mount Suribachi on Day 5, thousands more were lost to intense, entrenched fire.

While the flag raising didn't stop Japanese resistance from the tunnels and dugouts on Mount Suribachi, it wasn't meant to. It was strategic, and the flag raising also gave a needed boost to the morale of everyone there. Let's keep in mind that by Day 5, only a third of the island had been touched. 

And yes, while the southern end of the island at Mount Suribachi was being secured, the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Marine Divisions continued to push north toward the island's airfields and the main Japanese defensive lines. Marines moved from the open beaches into the northern plateau, where the terrain was jagged rock formations and more caves. 

The Japanese northern sector defense was a mutually supporting defensive system consisting of areas known to Marines as "The Meat Grinder," "Turkey Knob," and "The Amphitheater." Because of Kuribayashi's idea to construct 11 miles of tunnels, Marines would clear a pillbox, move past it, and then get shot in the back by Japanese soldiers who had re-entered the position through other underground tunnels.  

Part of the danger for Marines had to do with how Japanese troops emerged from tunnels and then disappeared. Because standard Marine infantry tactics failed against reinforced concrete and deep caves, Marines had to use a slow, deadly combination of flamethrowers, known as the "blowtorch," to suppress enemy fire, along with explosive satchel charges, called the "corkscrew," to hopefully seal cave entrances permanently. The Marines' "Corkscrew and Blowtorch Tactics," as it became known, worked pretty well.

Of course, the biggest problem for the Marines was that the Japanese were not on the island, but in it. That means that the Japanese troops were deep in their underground bunkers, which were nearly impervious to the massive U.S. Naval gun and air bombardments.

This forced Marines to root out defenders in high-risk, close-quarters combat. And yes, it was close quarters, since the Japanese defenders were ordered to hold fire until Marines were in close range for ambushes. And no, with Japanese troops ducking in caves and popping out of others, and the close-quarter combat, there were no "front lines" in the traditional sense. 

For Marines on Iwo Jima, the enemy could appear from just about any crack in the volcanic rock. The Marines fighting in "Bloody Gorge" saw savage fighting. It was a narrow, final defensive pocket where the last organized Japanese resistance held out until late March.

Kuribayashi's strategy on Iwo Jima was to kill as many Marines as possible. He encouraged his troops with his "Kill 10 Rule." His slogan, "Each man will make it his duty to kill 10 of the enemy before dying". 

Kuribayashi's strategy on Iwo Jima was explicitly designed to maximize American casualties, turning the battle into a slow, agonizing, and costly fight, rather than seeking a direct win.  He wanted to force the Marines to fight for every inch of the island. He wanted the Marines to pay for every inch of that island with their blood.

Kuribayashi's approach using the volcanic terrain to his advantage resulted in over 25,000 American casualties, including nearly 7,000 Marines killed. This made Iwo Jima one of the costliest battles for the Marines in World War II.

Instead of defending the landing beaches, Kuribayashi had his men build a deep interconnected network of over 11 miles of tunnels, bunkers, and camouflaged artillery positions inland and in the north. He banned the standard, what he saw as "reckless banzai charges," instead ordering his soldiers to fight from hidden positions to inflict maximum casualties on the Marines as long as they could.

Some say his goal was to make the cost of victory so high that it would deter, or at least delay, an American invasion of the Japanese home islands. What it did do was get the U.S. Navy and the Joint Chiefs in Washington to truly consider using an atomic bomb instead of facing this sort of battle times a hundred if they invaded Japan.

What was the fighting like? Close-quarter, surprise, savage, ficious, a "no-quarter" environment. In fact, after reading about what went on there for those 36 days, it's obvious that the fighting on Iwo Jima can be characterized by an extreme "no-quarter" environment. The brutality was driven by the Japanese "fight to the death" doctrine and the Marines who experienced Japanese "fake surrenders" in previous battles. 

The result was a brutal battle, which lasted from February 19 to March 26, 1945. It was a five-week battle of attrition where surrender was rare. And even by early March, when the island was largely secured, that didn't stop a major, coordinated "Banzai Attack" launched on the night of March 8 by Japanese Imperial Army Capt. Samaji Inouye. The attack on Airfield No. 2 is said to have caught Americans off guard. What followed was a ferocious Marine close-quarters counterattack that resulted in the death of nearly all Japanese attackers.

Then, on March 25, 1945, a final desperate act 300-man Japanese force launched another, even more, silent, and effective, surprise attack against U.S. Army pilots, Seabees, and Marines. Japanese forces launched surprise nighttime, infiltration-style "Banzai charge" targeting the troops asleep at Airfield No.2's bivouac area. 

The 5th Pioneer Battalion and Army Air Corps pilots on the western side of Airfield No. 2 had turned in for the night. Most were unarmed because they had already turned in their weapons. The troops who turned in their weapon were scheduled to leave Iwo Jima during the day. 

The stealth assault, which was sometimes called a "Silent Banzai" because the Japanese troops didn't scream "Banzai" when they made their charge, was aimed at creating maximum casualties to the airfield's support units and pilots. The 90-minute attack resulted in 56 American troops being killed and 116 Army airmen and Marines being wounded, many were killed and wounded in their tents while asleep.

This final, desperate action solidified the "no-quarter" reality as Marines proceeded to root out and kill the enemy in one final push. They sealed off or destroyed the remaining caves with flamethrowers and explosives, often killing the defenders inside. 

At 09:00 on March 26, 1945, after the final pocket of resistance was cleared, the island was formally declared secured. The conclusion of the 36-day battle was marked by a sentimment of "no-quarter" that intensified after that last Banzi attack. 

There were 27 Medals of Honor presented to those who fought there. Of the 27 Medals of Honor awarded for actions during the Battle of Iwo Jima, 14 were presented posthumously. These medals were awarded to 22 Marines and 5 Sailors. And of those 5 Sailors, 4 were FMF Corpsmen. And here's something else to note, while these Medals of Honor awards account for over 25% of all Medals of Honor given to Marines during World War II, the 27 awards represent the highest number of Medals of Honor awarded for a single battle in United States history.

To understand the scale of losses during these early days, the overall final statistics for the 36-day battle are as follows: Over the 36-day battle, 6,821 to 7,000 Marines were killed in action and 19,217–20,000 wounded, with a significant percentage occurring in the first few days. There were also 209 U.S. Navy personnel, FMF Corpsmen and Navy Surgeons attached to the Marines, who were killed in action. The 4th Marine Division, operating on the right flank, was particularly hard-hit during these early days, eventually losing nearly half its strength — 9,098 casualties — by the end of the 36-day battle.

As for the Japanese, out of a garrison of roughly 21,000, nearly all were killed. And believe it or not, since their code forbade them from surrendering, only about 216 were taken prisoner by the end of the main fighting.

The capture of Iwo Jima was strategically vital for America's advance toward Japan. which served as a vital air base for B-29 bombers on missions to bomb Japan. It provided emergency landing strips for B-29 bombers and a base for fighter escorts to support long-range bombing missions over the Japanese home islands. And yes, it saved the lives of many airmen. By some estimates, securing the airfield on Iwo Jima saved the lives of more than 27,000 airmen.

Think about that for a moment. Securing the mountain helped pave the way for taking the rest of the island, which was necessary for securing airfields for emergency landings of B-29 bombers. Iwo Jima served as a critical, emergency landing base for over 2,400 crippled B-29 bombers returning from raids over Japan, saving an estimated 27,000 crewmen.

As for our Marine Corps legacy, the event, described by Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal, was seen as a defining moment for the Marine Corps' endurance and ferocity in combat.

U.S. Navy Fleet Adm. Chester Nimitz, commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, said of the battle, "Among the Americans who served on Iwo Jima, uncommon valor was a common virtue." He also said, "If there had been any question whether there should be a Marine Corps after this war, the Battle of Iwo Jima will assure that there will always be a Marine Corps."

As for its iconic symbolism, the flag-raising photo, captured by Joe Rosenthal, became a defining image of the war. The iconic flag-raising photograph symbolized American resilience and triumph in the Pacific, boosting morale after the war-weary nation's earlier, devastating losses. Taking Iwo Jima had a huge impact on the war effort at home, and the photo of U.S. Marines raising Old Glory on Mount Suribachi represented American determination and camaraderie. In essense, that photo captured the American will to prevail through heartache and struggle.

Tom Correa