Monday, April 6, 2026

Wagon Train Instructional Booklet For Travelers Headed West 1849

Below are the pages of a rare booklet of instructions for members of a wagon train traveling from Independence, Missouri, to San Francisco, California, in 1849. I've read this a few times, and I hope you find this as interesting as I have over the years. 

My advice when reading this is simply to put yourself in the position of a member of the wagon train. Imagine that you are leaving with the wagon train, and this is your guide to making the journey. Imagine all of the preparation, your options, what was required of you along the journey, the rules, the advice of the wagon train company, the items that you were limited to taking, and, among other things, the long walk that was ahead of you. 

There is a lot to digest in this. As a traveler, you are required to do a lot on your part to be successful. The advice and recommendations regarding what to take, what not to take, how much things should cost, and much, much more should all be heeded. 

There is so much to this 11-page booklet. And yes, I really believe that after reading this, you'll get the gist of what to expect on the journey. When reading this, you may find things about making the trip that you may not have really thought about before. 

It wouldn't surprise me to find out that you were indeed surprised to learn about some of the things in this booklet. For me, I have to admit that even though I've read a lot about wagon trains in the past, there are small things in this booklet that surprised me. I hope you enjoy reading this.   






Wednesday, April 1, 2026

What Was California Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell's Relationship With A Chinese Spy?



Since Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell is running for Governor of California, it seems only proper that Californians get answers to some basic questions regarding his relationship with a Chinese spy. 

Was Swalwell a paid Chinese Communist agent? Did he knowingly work with a Chinese Communist agent? Did he assist her in any way? Did he sell sensitive information to the Chinese Communist nation? Did Swalwell take "donations" in the form of campaign funds from Chinese spy Christine Fang, aka Fang Fang?  Or was Fang Fang just using another easily corruptable Democrat, in this case, Eric Swalwell? Was he simply used as a "useful idiot" for Communist China? 

Being a "useful idiot" for Communist China is not a nice term for American professors, teachers, politicians, and business leaders who promote Communist Chinese propaganda. It's a term used to describe Democrats who are so anti-American that they don't comprehend that they are being manipulated by Communist governments for their own end. 

Democratic Party far-left groups promoting Chinese narratives and geopolitical strategies are nothing new. "Useful idiots" are individuals who unwittingly aid the Communist Chinese by promoting Chinese interests, minimizing the regime's authoritarian nature, while attacking American values, and criticizing American foreign policy.

The "No Kings" protest is a perfect example of Democrats in far-left organizations who network and have been documented to coordinate with anti-American pro-Communist groups to organize protests. They use America's domestic issues to attack American values, alter the truth to change the reality of what is taking place, and influence and change the narrative to benefit America's adversaries like China.

Because I live and vote in California, and since there is a real possibility that he may be California's next Governor, I think these questions should be answered. That's why I'm all for the FBI launching a fresh review of documents on Eric Swalwell's relationship with the suspected Chinese spy. And yes, that's why I'm all for the FBI to release the files on Eric Swalwell's relationship with Chinese intelligence operative Christine Fang, also known as Fang Fang. 

Christine Fang operated as a spy for China's Ministry of State Security (MSS) with the primary objective of infiltrating U.S. political circles to gain influence and gather intelligence. Her activities between 2011 and 2015 illustrate a broader strategy that is employed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Their tactic is to "cultivate relationships" with local and state-level politicians who China sees as "up-and-coming" political leaders within the Democratic Party.

Her core mission was to identify and "befriend" promising politicians in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond. The goal was to build deep, multi-year relationships that could be leveraged if these individuals ascended to higher federal offices. She reportedly used information, such as political leaders' private habits, preferences, schedules, and internal rumors to infiltrate into the Democratic Party. 

We know that Christine Fang used whatever means she had to successfully place at least one intern in Rep. Eric Swalwell’s congressional office, demonstrating a method for gaining direct access to legislative staff and operations. By acting as a "campaign fundraiser," also known as a "bundler," she participated in campaign events with Swalwell. All to gain legitimate entry into elite political networks.

Communist China's Influence Operations Strategy
The Swalwell Case is often cited by intelligence experts as a classic example of Communist China's "human intelligence" (HUMINT) and "United Front" work. The Chinese are in it for the "Long Game".

That is, the Communists bosses in Beijing are investing a great deal of money over many years in their effort to cultivate low-level officials, such as city council members or mayors, because the Chinese understand that some will eventually become State Governors or members of Congress.

The "Honey Trap" Tactic is simple and as old as time itself. Christine Fang allegedly engaged in romantic and sexual relationships with at least two politicians to gain proximity to power. This technique is used to compromise, influence, or solicit information from targets.

Communist China uses ethnic Chinese people residing outside Greater China, such as mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, including students and entrepreneurs, as spies to bridge the gap between Chinese intelligence and foreign political systems. An estimated 60 million Chinese people worldwide maintain cultural and economic ties to their homeland. These people are the people who make up Communist China's spy network.

As for their ability to target America so easily? For them, it's all about exploiting America's open society. That's why their operatives often begin in seemingly innocent settings, such as university campus organizations, regional mayoral conferences, or campaign rallies, which provide easy access to public officials.

According to news reports, the Chinese spy, Christine Fang, aka Fang Fang, was part of a concerted effort by the Chinese Communist government to target and infiltrate Democratic Party politicians. The fact that the Communist Chinese see the Democrats as easier to infiltrate than they do Republicans is interesting in itself. The primary reason for their targeting Democrats is that they view Democrats as followers of the Communist ideology. Communist China sees Democrats as Communist kindred spirits who also worship at the altar of totalitarianism and authoritarianism.

Communist China has used the Democratic Party's methods of disguising its authoritarian state as an "effort to work for the common good." It's true. Communist China utilizes authoritarian control tactics within China that some observers compare to the Democratic Party's preference of working for the "common good" over individual rights. Individual rights are not supported by those who adhere to the Communist doctrine in Communist China and the Democratic Party.

The Communist doctrine prioritizes the collective over American-style individual civil and political rights. That's why Communists suppress personal freedoms in practice. Communism views individual rights, such as private property ownership, as things that need to be abolished. If that sounds like modern-day Democrats to you, you're not wrong. And yes, that's part of why Communist China believes they have so much in common with Democrats.  

As an operative for the Chinese Ministry of State Security, Fang Fang "cultivated" an intimate relationship with Eric Swalwell when he was a councilman in Dublin, California. Because she reportedly cultivated a close relationship with him starting in 2012, various news sources have looked into whether or not Democrat Representative Eric Swalwell had a sexual relationship with Christine Fang. It's only fair to note, as far as I can tell, that's not been verified. We may find out differently in the newly released FBI reports.

Reports do say that they must have had a close relationship, one of deep trust and confidence, since she was involved in fundraising for him and placing an intern in his office. As for her fundraising for him? I cannot find out if her superiors at the Chinese Ministry of State Security funded Swalwell's campaigns.

Christine Fang was in charge of bundling donations for Swalwell's 2014 campaign, and she helped place a staffer in his office. So were the donations from Communist China? Was that staffer that she helped place in his office another Chinese spy? Was Swalwell's office a hub for spies in the United States Congress?

In 2015, the FBI gave Swalwell a "defensive briefing." Supposedly, after that, he cut off contact with her. But did he?

Swalwell was never accused of or charged with any criminal wrongdoing by the FBI or Biden's Department of Justice. In May of 2023, the House Ethics Committee closed its investigation into the matter without making any finding one way or another, apparently sweeping the case under a rug and out of the sight of the American people. So no, we don't know if he was accused of wrongdoing or taking campaign funds from the Chinese through his intimate relationship with Christine Fang.

As for any further action? The Biden administration's Intelligence Officials stopped that when they stated that there was no evidence that Swalwell shared any classified or sensitive information with Fang Fang. Let's remember, this was the same Intelligence Officials who said President Trump was a Russian agent and that there was no evidence that Hillary Clinton shared any classified or sensitive information with the Russians in an effort to frame President Trump -- something that we now know she did.

This story is interesting to me on many levels. First, we know that the people at the Democratic Party-controlled FBI and Biden administration Department of Justice, those who cleared Eric Swalwell, were the same players who said that Hillary Clinton did not commit crimes regarding the Russian Collusion Hoax that resulted in the attempted coup of a sitting American president, Donald Trump. And yet, we now know for a fact that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were behind the effort to remove President Trump from office.

Second, Eric Swalwell played a vocal role in pushing for the Impeachment of President Trump, even though President Trump did not commit any crimes and had no ties to Russia. For Swalwell, he was a key player in the Demorcat Party's effort to politically smear President Trump. Swalwell was all for "weaponizing" the FBI and Biden's Department of Justice to falsely accuse President Trump of crimes that he did not commit, all in an effort to stop President Trump from being elected to a Second Term.

The Trump administration has been busy removing Democratic Party operatives in the FBI and the Department of Justice. He has been cleaning house and trying to make both the FBI and the DOJ free of insurgents who are there to do the bidding of the Democratic Party.

So, yes, maybe now that the Trump administration has directed the FBI to compile and release unredacted records of the investigation into California Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell's relationship with Chinese spy Christine Fang, we, the American people, can find out what the Democrats swept under the rug to hide from the public.

Hopefully, we'll finally find out if Eric Swalwell is just another anti-American Democrat politician who received funds from Chinese agents. We may find out if Swalwell took "donations" in the form of campaign funds from Chinese spy Christine Fang, aka Fang Fang, whether he assisted her in obtaining classified information, and whether he sold sensitive information to the Chinese Communist nation.

In 2025 and 2026, investigations by the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means and other oversight bodies highlighted a network of Democratic Party-sponsored far-left organizations accused of promoting Chinese Communist Party narratives. These groups use their tax-exempt status to disseminate pro-Communist Chinese propaganda and incite domestic unrest in the United States.

No, it's not simply a case of some wealthy anti-American Billionaire funding these protests. Our enemies are using "Useful idiots," including "Useful idiots" in Congress, to sponsor division, create riots, and spread violence in America.

Hopefully, now that the FBI is being directed to release records on Eric Swalwell's relationship with a Chinese spy, we may find out if he is not only arrogant and condescending, but also if he was just another easily corruptable Democrat that Fang Fang used sexual favors to corrupt. Hopefully, we will find out if he was indeed a "Useful idiot" for Communist China.

Tom Correa

 

Saturday, March 28, 2026

The Good Samaritan Was Brave, But Not Stupid




Matthew 22:39 says, "Love your neighbor as yourself." That is foundational to Christian ethics. It's God's instructions to extend the same care, respect, and empathy they naturally afford themselves to all others. Simply known as the "Golden Rule" for behavior.

To me, "As Yourself" means that I can hope that other people have the same moral compass as I do. And like me, they already possess some natural sense of self-care and self-preservation. Hopefully, my neighbor is like me in that he's learned to respect others. And yes, to me, that means living a life with kindness and empathy for others. It means that sometimes there may be some sort of personal sacrifice involved to help those in need.

The parable in the Bible about the Good Samaritan, in Luke 10:25–37, talks about a Samaritan man who shows mercy to a Jewish traveler who was beaten up by robbers on the notorious "Way of Blood" between Jerusalem and Jericho. From what I gather reading about it, the road was notoriously dangerous, frequented by robbers and killers of all sorts.

The scene where the attack took place was a remote, desolate area, where the Samaritan himself could have also been easily attacked. The victim was beaten, stripped, and left for dead. The Samaritan acted in a situation that needed his bravery. The victim was left "half-dead." The Samaritan put himself in harm's way to help someone in need, a complete stranger. Yes, the victim was a total stranger. And worse, the victim was a Jew, in a time when Jews were seen as enemies of the Samaritan people and vice versa. So yes, that Samaritan knew the risks to himself but still helped someone when others walked past -- including a Rabbi who saw the victim needed help but instead refused to and kept walking.

The good Samaritan was a man who held himself to a standard. That personal standard, that sense of being true to your moral compass, included treating others with care and kindness. It's said that he did so because he felt that love for others is inseparable from one's love for God. 

But the Samaritan was not naive. He simply chose to act with compassion, and he chose to assist the Jewish man despite recognizing the extreme dangers. He chose to place his own physical safety aside for the sake of another human being. That takes guts. It also takes smarts. Wanting to help and being able to help without getting yourself killed doing so is key. He obviously took that into consideration when doing so. 

I had a friend who lived in a big city. He told me that most folks living in big cities have done the same thing, and simply walked by someone who's needed help. His belief was that people who walk past someone in need are not so worried about getting involved, as they are of becoming a victim also.

I can understand how people can prioritize their own safety and security by not immediately engaging directly with the assailant. If you intervene, you take the risk of also becoming a victim. Of course, if you see someone getting beaten up and don't confront the attacker, then you have to live with that. For me, I would have a hard time justifying to myself and others why I didn't do something if I saw someone being assaulted. Doing that would go against everything that I believe in. 

That's one reason why I'm always ready to assist a police officer in need. I'd have a really hard time justifying to myself why I didn't if I saw it happening and turned yellow. To men, our sense of personal responsibility and having a sense of moral obligation to aid others in need speaks directly to our character as people. It speaks directly to our moral compass. 

Having empathy and assisting someone in need, particularly when they are a stranger and in danger, is an act of compassion and humanity. Such a sense of responsibility reduces the likelihood of crime and increases safety for all when people know others will assist. As for living with not doing anything? Living with one's conscience? Supporting a victim is tied to our own value system and integrity. It is during such tests that we find out who we are and what we're made of.

Also, if someone didn't want to step in to help the side that was being beaten up, what excuse does a person have for not helping someone after the fact when the assailants had left? What excuse does someone have for not helping when the threat to themself isn't there?  

In the case of the Jewish man, he was beaten and left for dead. The Samaritan wasn't there when he was beaten up. He came along later after the victim was lying in the road "half dead." The Summaritan didn't have to, but he probably did take his surroundings into consideration. Would he have done helped the victim if he felt unsafe? Would he have intervened when it took place? We'll never know the answer to that. 

The road was notoriously dangerous. The robbers could still have been in the area. But, it's believed they did leave after attacking and robbing the Jewish man. The Jewish man was going to die if someone didn't help him. That's the situation. There was no such thing as calling 911 and letting trained individuals handle the situation. Someone needed to care for that man, and people were simply saying, it's not my concern. Frankly, I don't understand that sort of mentality. But there are people like that, there always have been, and there always will be.

Many feel a moral imperative, similar to the Good Samaritan, to aid those in crisis, regardless of differences in lifestyle, culture, or background. The Samaritan man showed courage to act in the face of danger. While the danger of being attacked by the same attackers as those who assaulted the victim may have passed, the danger to a Samaritan helping a Jew was enormous.

Jews in the first century despised Samaritans, often calling them "half-breeds" or "dogs" due to historic religious disputes. By saving a Jew, the Samaritan man showed mercy to an enemy, reversing the expected, hateful social order.

And no, the story is not about being stupid or naive to that danger. It's about having the courage to show kindness and mercy despite the risks involved. And let's remember, he helped a Jew in a time when that meant personal repercussions. His helping a Jew meant he positioned himself for problems from his own people. It meant his bravery in helping the victim was even more impressive when we consider the fact that the Samaritan acted against his own interests and safety. 

Matthew 5:44 says, "Love your enemies." But, to my knowledge, nowhere in the Bible does it say that God wants us to be stupid, reckless, or somehow passive and allow ourselves to be killed. The Christian perspective of trying to understand our enemy's motives does not mean that God is instructing us to put ourselves in harm's way.

Loving an enemy is often defined as praying for them. Loving our enemies does not mean the same as when we're talking about love as in that warm feeling we have for those we truly love. It is a deliberate choice of action rather than an affection. It is designed to overcome evil with good, transform enemies, and free ourselves from the negativity of hate.  

It's the same as forgiving an enemy. Regardless of our personal feelings toward them, it's all about us refusing to let hatred for an enemy burn at us. The Bible teaches this in Ephesians 4:31-32, when it says, "Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you."

But let's remember, "love your enemies" does not mean allowing yourself to be abused or for us to become "doormats." The Bible does not instruct Christians to be "doormats."

We do not need to allow anyone to harm us or those we love. Protecting yourself, your family, or your community from someone who intends to harm you is all about being a responsible person. It's not some sort of violation of our Christian duty to do like David and pick up a rock, or carry a gun. Defense of life is not stupid or anti-Christian. 

Helping others while being aware of your surroundings, being vigilant, is not a bad way to live. The Good Samaritan proved that, and that wisdom, prudence, and courage get things done. Proverbs 27:12 says, "The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty."

The prudent person prepares and takes precautions. The simple-minded person doesn't and pays for it in the end. It's not hard to understand how that works. 

True compassion is an active, sacrificial, and courageous virtue, not merely a feeling. By aiding a despised stranger, the Samaritan demonstrated that caring about your neighbor means having to step over social barriers, overcoming personal danger, and providing practical care to those in need.

The Samaritan stopped on the dangerous road to Jericho, a route notorious for robbery and violence. And yes, despite the risks of staying in that location and the risk that his actions to help a Jew may bring repercussions to himself later, he acted with careful, considered action to save a life rather than keep walking by as others did. 
 
His actions were practical, not just emotional. He "bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine," placed him on his own animal, took him to an inn, and paid for his care. So yes, the Samaritan man sacrificed his own time, energy, and money, paying for the inn and promising to cover any extra expenses. And no, I cannot emphasise enough how he risked facing huge problems for potentially violating ritual purity laws because his compassion defied the religious and cultural animosity of the time. 

Though being ostracized by his own people for "doing the right thing" was a real possibility, the parable doesn't say if the Good Samaritan was ostracized by his own people for helping the Jew. So no, there is no record of the Samaritan being shunned, avoided, ignored, banished, or cast out of his own group. Of course, there is also no record of him facing any sort of legal or social repercussions for helping the Jew. 

While Samaritans and Jews detested each other and lived under "walls of bitterness," the parable focuses on breaking through those prejudices to help a neighbor. Though it is not a historical account that goes into details about any sort of consequences of what happened to the Samaritan man among his peers, the parable is, more importantly, a moral lesson about how love, mercy, respect, and our willingness to follow God's teachings override social barriers -- all for the better. 

By "doing the right thing," he helped the Jewish man. And in doing so, the Samaritan broke down religious and social barriers. He proved that neighborly love is universal, not limited by any bias or ingrained hatred. He refused to be concerned about being judged or appearing foolish and was open to the social consequences. His act of compassion proved that true faith and morality are demonstrated through deeds and not just words.

The parable of the Good Samaritan in Luke 10:25-37 teaches us that showing mercy and compassion is the defining action of a good neighbor. The Samaritan, whose people were considered enemies by the Jews, acted like a hero and crossed the line to help a wounded man whom others ignored. He proved that the old saying is right, "If you want a good neighbor, you have to be a good neighbor."

To do that, be selfless and care for anyone in need. True goodness is demonstrated through action. The parable reveals a human need for grace, as the wounded man was entirely helpless, making the Samaritan's rescue a divine act of sacrifice and caring. The phrase "Good Samaritan" has become a universal term for someone who helps a stranger in a time of need. The phrase "Good Samaritan" also carries the connotation of someone courageous and wise in their decision to help, rather than careless.




 



Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Italian "Cowboys" Challenged Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Cowboys In 1890

The Italian Butteri

Italian "Cowboys"? Yes, Italian cowboys, as in cowboys in Italy. And no, I'm not talking about my favorite singer, Dean Martin, who was a great cowboy in his own right. 

Also, I'm not talking about Spanish cowboys, known as "Spanish Vaqueros." Italian cowboys, known as "The Butteri," or "The Italian Butteri," are traditional Italian cowboys from Lazio and Tuscany. Italian cowboys, known as "the butteri," and Spanish cowboys, known as "vaqueros or vaqueros de alzada," are cowboys in their respective countries. Both share the same common purpose of managing cattle on horseback. But they are different in a lot of ways. 

Besides their significantly different histories, the geographic terrain, their clothing, and even their saddles and other "tools" of their trade. In fact, instead of using ropes, a lasso or a lariat, known as a reata, to rope cattle, Italian butteri use a long pole, known as a lancia to move cattle. 

The most traditional and well-known saddle of the Italian cowboy is the "Bardella." It is a treeless saddle, meaning that it doesn't have a rigid internal frame. Traditionally made of suede or smooth leather, it is padded with horsehair. It has a wide, comfortable seat and large, prominent rolls to keep the rider secure during fast movements or "spooks" when working wild livestock. Its color is described as having a predominantly "orange hue" because of its specific leather treatment. 

Italian cowboys of the Maremma region traditionally use specialized saddles like the Bardella, but they do not typically "dally" a rope in the same way American cowboys do. Instead of using a rope or a lariat for roping cattle, the butteri historically use a "mazzarella" which is sort of like a pike. It's a specialized wooden stick used to herd and control livestock. So while some modern Italian-made Western saddles include horns for roping or barrel racing, some traditional Italian military-style saddles known as "Scafarda" sometimes feature a removable stainless steel horn or lack a reinforced roping horn entirely.

Of course, because they don't use a rope, they have no need to dally a rope on a saddle, so their saddles are very different than our Western saddles. The front part of a Western saddle is primarily called the pommel. In Western riding, the raised post attached to this section is specifically known as the "horn." 

The saddle horn is there to dally a rope. "Dallying" is a specific Western technique for securing a rope. Ropers wrap a rope counter-clockwise around a saddle horn to secure a caught animal without tying a permanent knot. This allows the rider to give slack if needed.

Many of the techniques American cowboys use come from techniques developed by the Spanish vaquero. Their techniques are what directly founded the American cowboy tradition of roping. The Spanish vaquero tradition is centuries old and was exported to the Americas in the 1500s by way of Spain's first colony in Florida. They defined the foundational skills of roping, branding, and ranching for American cowboys. 

The Italian butteri are more localized to the coastal marshes of Tuscany.  Italian butteri cowboys are very distinctive for their elegant clothing, which is traditionally dark velvet jackets, corduroy trousers, and wide-brimmed fedora-style hats. Their clothing is practical and designed to withstand the thorns of the Maremma scrubland. On the other hand, Spanish vaquero cowboys wear more chaparreras, chaps, to protect their legs. Yes, they definitely influenced American cowboy leather gear.

Italian butteri are renowned for their ability to break wild horses and manage livestock in the Maremma region in Tuscany and northern Lazio. The hills and marshy landscapes of Tuscany and Lazio can be challenging, especially when going after wild horses. And yes, they are renowned for their skill in handling wild Maremman horses and cattle. In fact, their techniques of doing that is timetested, and they are seen as the "Guardians of an ancient, rugged tradition." The butteri are considered the oldest working cowboys in Western Europe, with traditions dating back centuries to rural Maremma. They certainly predate the American cowboy by a thousand years.

They operate in the coastal Maremma plains, a historically marshy, wild, and challenging landscape north of Rome. They spend their days in the saddle from dawn until dusk, often managing livestock in remote, difficult terrain. They are known for their typical corduroy and moleskin clothing, vests, and wide-brimmed hats. And rather than a lasso, they use the mazzarella — a hooked wooden staff used for managing cattle and navigating the landscape. Their horses, the Maremmano, are smaller horses known for their strength and suitability to the marshy, wooded, and challenging environment. The Italian "buttero" culture remains a deeply rooted, authentic symbol of the Maremma.

The Italian cowboys from regions like Tuscany and Lazio, are similar to American cowboys in that the butteri (singular: buttero) herd, gather, mark, tame, and manage cattle. 

As for the legend of the Italian "Cowboys" who challenged Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Cowboys in 1890?

When Buffalo Bill Wild West Show visited Rome during its European tour, cowboys in his crew were heard boasting of their superiority when it came to dealing with wild horses. Buffalo Bill himself boasted that his cowboys were unmatched. This prompted Italian Prince Onorato Caetani to arrange a challenge against the Maremma butteri. The challenge from the Italians was led by Italian cowboy Augusto Imperiali.

The challenge to Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Show cowboys in Rome was a contest of skill. And yes, the competition took place in Prati di Castello, Rome, on March 8, 1890. It featured horse-taming and livestock-handling contests. 

The challenge, known as "La Sfida," saw local Italian cowboys break wild horses. The Butteri won when they efficiently captured and saddled wild Italian stallions, a feat the Americans struggled with. In fact, by their account, the Italian cowboys did it faster than the American cowboys. 

The expert Italian horsemen used techniques that have been passed down for centuries to famously prove that their ranching skills were superior to those of the American cowboys. The Italian butteri supposedly won when they efficiently captured and saddled wild Italian stallions, something that the American cowboys struggled with. 

So yes, the story goes that a group of Italian butteri led by Augusto Imperiali famously defeated Buffalo Bill in a horse-breaking competition in Rome. Supposedly, they "proved their superior ranching skills." However, some American accounts suggest that the outcome was questioned because Buffalo Bill felt they were too slow. 

Though there was a bet made between Italian Prince Onorato Caetani and Buffalo Bill as to who had the better horsemen, it's said that Buffalo Bill supposedly refused to pay the 1000 Lire wager because the Italian cowboys were too slow. 

Though Buffalo Bill initially dismissed them, the Italian cowboys' skill was said to have been extremely impressive. For Europeans who have always looked down their nose at Americans, the Italian cowboy victory must have been a celebrated moment. Of course, today the event is a cornerstone of Italian cowboy history. Italian lore considers it a historic victory over the famous American Wild West Show.

According to Italian lore, the butteri easily defeated the American cowboys thanks to "their superior riding skills and a soft-spoken horseman named Augusto Imperiali." And supposedly, even to today, modern-day Italian cowboys still maintain that their ancestors won the bet. Imagine that for a moment, to this day, it's said that modern-day Italian cowboys still claim that they won the event and that Buffalo Bill never paid the 1000 Lire he owed from the original bet in 1890. That's what you call holding on to a point of national honor.

Tom Correa

Saturday, March 14, 2026

John Devine, Alias "The Chicken," Hanged For Murder In 1873

John Devine, alias "The Chicken."

John Devine's alias was "The Chicken." Some say his alias was also "Chicken Devine." With a handle like "The Chicken," you wouldn't think he was the notorious character that he was. But in San Francisco in the early 1870s, "The Chicken" was considered a desperate criminal. One of the things that made him such a hard-nosed criminal was his over 70 arrests. Another thing was that he associated with other criminal sorts in, and could be found in any of the seedy saloons and gambling clip joints on that city's waterfront, yes, the dreaded Barbary Coast of San Francisco.

Born during the 1849 California Gold Rush, the Barbary Coast was San Francisco's original vice district. Its name, Barbary Coast, was coined in the mid-1860s. It was inspired by the Pirate reputation of the North African Barbary Coast. It was a lawless 40-square-block area notorious for extreme depravity, crooked gambling, violence, and kidnapping. The Barbary Coast of San Francisco was world-famous for its lawlessness and "shanghaiing," which was the practice of kidnapping intoxicated or drugged men to serve as crews on merchant ships. For nearly 70 years, the Barbary Coast in San Francisco remained a unique criminal enclave where "every vice known to man" was readily available.

In 1869, John Devine, alias “The Chicken,” was mentioned in the newspaper as having been held to answer in the County Court for burglary with his bail fixed at $1,000. In 1871, John Devine was in the news again. That was when he was charged with first-degree murder for willfully killing August Kamp. He was caught, charged, tried, and after some court procedural problems, found guilty, retried, again found guilty, and sentenced to hang.
 
Reading the news story below, you may find it very interesting that The San Francisco Bulletin paints a serene picture of a man who found religion before being made to pay for what he did. That article stated that Chicken Devine's last escapade was when he invited August Kamp to accompany him to the southern part of the city, and upon arriving at a hill, he murdered Kamp. I found it interesting that the writers at The San Francisco Bulletin left out almost any mention of Devine's victim other than his name and where he was from. 

The San Francisco Bulletin newspaper published the following report of the legal hanging of John Divine, alias "The Chicken," on May 14, 1873:

THE DEATH PENALTY

The Execution of John Devine for the Murder of August Kamp

This day has been marked by an event of signal import in the history of this city, wherein the slow hand of justice, after a lapse of many years, has overtaken one of the class of reckless criminals who have reveled in rapine and bloodshed, bringing reproach on the fair fame of San Francisco, and red-handed murder has expiated its guilt by the righteous penalty of ignominious death upon the scaffold.

Whatever may be the abhorrence of capital punishment commonly experienced by a portion of the people, while contemplating the events of the past few years, the tardy and uncertain sway of justice, a sense of satisfaction and increased security will be inspired in the whole community by the announcement of John Devine, “The Chicken,” has met the fate which the law prescribes for the destroyer of human life, and there is one murderer less in San Francisco.

From the infamous character of this man, and the terror which his deeds of violence excited through a long course of comparatively unpunishable crime, ere consigning him to oblivion, the public will be interested in a brief sketch of the 

Career of the Murderer.

The man who has now paid the penalty of his last dark crime, leaves a record which has no parallel among the many depraved wretches who have figured in the brief but terrible criminal history of San Francisco, and perhaps the half has not been told.

The police officials considered him the most dangerous and unscrupulous criminal that infested the city, and hint at mysterious deeds of blood, never unravelled by the minions of justice, with which he is believed to have been connected. In truth, he was a fellow by the hand of nature marked, quoted and signed to do a deed of shame — apt, liable to be employed in danger with neither pity, love nor fear.

Devine was a native of Waterford, Ireland, where he was born in the year 1840, and was accordingly 33 years old at the time of his death.

He was of medium size, sharp features, dark-blue eyes, a low forehead, and a generally repulsive expression of countenance. He arrived in San Francisco in the year of 1863, as a seaman on the clipper ship Young America. On the voyage hither, he distinguished himself as a quarrelsome fellow and was frequently confined in irons to restore the discipline of the ship.

After squandering the wages he received in a short spell of carousing on shore, he was driven to the sea again and made a voyage to China, returning in the spring of 1865. He then obtained employment as a runner for sailor boarding-houses, in which capacity he perpetrated innumerable deeds of ruffianism in the “shanghaing” of sailors and citizens on outward-bound ships. Shortly after engaging in this vocation he received the title of 

“The Chicken.”

Which was endearingly conferred by one of his fellows, as significant of his prowess in a prize-fight. Devine had four notable encounters of this order, in the city and vicinity, and displayed remarkable endurance and determination, though not always successful.

His career from the time of setting himself on shore was one continuous round of crime, and he is well suspected of having a knowledge of the manner in which many a corpse found floating in the bay, with fractured skull and rifled pockets, yielded up i[t]s life. His record on the police register shows
Seventy-Nine Arrests! Up to May 16, 1871, when his final arrest for the crime of murder was made.

The charges against him embraced all manner of crimes, principally robberies and assaults with deadly weapons, it being his custom to assault his victims with slung-shot and brass-knuckles. His recorded crimes, however, are not supposed to embrace any near approach to the ull measure of enormities that were charged upon his guilty soul.

He was capable of the most savage treachery, and on one occasion attempted the murder of a prize-fighter named Tommy Chandler, by springing upon him from behind a door with a heavy iron bar. Being foiled in this, he subsequently shot Chandler, but not inflicting fatal injury, he got off with a short term of imprisonment on conviction of assault to murder.

A Characteristic Exploit. 

On the 8th of June, 1867, about 6 o’clock in the morning, Devine assailed an aged German lady, named Mary Martin, as she was walking along Merchant street, near Battery, tore the pocket from her dress, and robbed her of a purse containing a check for [obscure] and $25 in coin.

For this robbery, he was arrested and released on bail, for, notwithstanding the character he bore, he was usually enabled to find friends to go upon his bond in a certain part of the city. When the case came up for trial, officers went in search of Mrs. Martin, who had resided at a house on Powell Street, as the important witness for the prosecution of Devine. The lady had disappeared.

What became of her was never known, but it was possible that Devine might have told. Passing over a list of comparative minor offences, such as knocking down and robbing people, the next noticeable affair in which this remarkable criminal figured was the 

Attempted Murder of Miss McDonald.

On the night of the 9th, October, 1867, Miss Martha McDonald was standing in front of her place of residence, at the Mission, when she was suddenly seized by two men who were masked. 

She was gagged by a handkerchief being forced into her mouth, and prevented from giving any alarm. In this condition, the men dragged her a distance of two blocks and a half, to the bridge which crosses Mission Creek at Sixteenth Street. One of the two then started, according to the directions of his companion to “get the carriage.”

Being left in the custody of one only, Miss McDonald made a desperate effort to release herself. The fellow attempted to chloroform her, but the drug being spilled from the bottle, he then endeavored to secure her with a strap.

At this juncture, the other man returned, and she heard the exclamation, “Kill her, kill her!” A moment after she was pushed off the bridge, and she fell into the muddy waters of the creek, while the two men who had abducted her ran away.

Slowly and surely, she was sinking into the muddy bottom, with no assistance at hand, until the water was about her neck. Fortunately, an alarm of fire started some person past the locality, and her cries of distress being heard, she was discovered and rescued.

Devine was arrested as one of the participants in this crime, and Miss McDonald positively identified him by his voice. Devine extricated himself from the affair by proving an alibi, it appearing that he was serving a term in the County Jail at the time of the attempted murder.

It subsequently transpired, however, that he held the privileged position at the County Jail of “outside trusty,” and was permitted to travel to all parts of the city at will in the performance of errands for prisoners in more restricted limits. And more than this, he was abroad at the very time the abduction of Miss McDonald was made.

The Loss of a Hand.

In the month of May, 1868, Devine was indulging in one of his periodical carousing spells, and often bringing terror to several of the resorts on his beat at the city front, he entered a boarding house kept by William Maitland, on Battery Street. Here he flourished a huge knife with the recklessness of a savage, and caused a precipitate retreat of all who happened to be in the place.

The proprietor had been asleep in the second story of the house, and hearing the uproar, came down for a reconnaissance. Devine immediately started for him when he made his appearance, but Maitland was not of so yielding a disposition as to be driven from his own castle, and closing with Devine, he succeeded in disarming him. 

The latter then made an attempt to recover the knife, when Maitland with a powerful stroke cut him across the wrist. The blade, by wonderful chance, entered the wrist joint, and the completely severed hand fell to the floor.

Devine was appalled for once in his life, and hurriedly departed; but presently he returned and demanded his lost hand, which Maitland kicked out upon the sidewalk to him. Devine took the severed member and hastened to a drug store, where he implored a clerk to try and sew it on again. But the injury was irreparable.

Devine as a Merchant.

After a season of retirement in the County Hospital, Devine emerged as far repaired as medical science would permit, and being a cripple, his condition excited the pity of boarding-house masters and others at the city front with whom he had been associated. A contribution was made among them, amounting to $800, to enable Devine to establish himself in business by keeping a cigar stand.

He took the money, but instead of following the advice of his benefactors, he squandered the whole sum in a few weeks of dissipation, and again returned to the pursuit of crime with all his previous energy. 

He was associated with a woman named Mary Dolan, as bad as himself, and who was punished by terms of imprisonment in the County Jail and Penitentiary. From the time of losing his hand up to his final arrest, he perpetrated numerous larcenies, some of considerable amounts, and was always busily engaged in thieving when not confined in jail.

A complete history of this man and his offenses would be one of the most appalling in the annals of crime. Such was John Devine, and rarely has the slow grip of justice overtaken a criminal more richly deserving of the severest penalty known to the law.

Murder of August Kamp.

The crime which John Devine has now expiated with his life was one of the most cruel and wanton ever recorded in a civilized community, and could only have been accomplished by one utterly depraved. It was in perfect keeping with the whole life and character of Devine, who had become callous to every impulse that elevates a man above the merest savage.

August Kamp was an unsuspecting young German without relatives in the country. On the 10th of May, 1871, he arrived in San Francisco from Antioch, where he had been employed, bringing with him his savings -- to the amount of about $120. He started immediately in search of employment, and while making his inquiries along the city front, he was met by Devine, who offered to procure him a situation on a fishing vessel.

Elated with this promise, young Kamp was persuaded to loan $20 to Devine, on the understanding that it would be repaid to him the following day. The money was not returned as agreed, and Kamp finally suspecting the true character of his debtor, importuned him earnestly for his pay. Devine put him off repeatedly, at one time pretending that he had nothing but greenbacks on hand, and again making some other excuse.

On the 15th of May, Kamp, having again demanded his pay, Devine told him that if he wanted the money very bad, he must go with him to his mother’s ranch, beyond Bay View. Accordingly, the two started for the imaginary ranch, walking as far as Long Bridge, when they boarded one of the Bay View cars. On reaching the terminus of the railroad, the two got off the car and walked along the road. 

After passing the Five-Mile House, Devine pointed off to one side, saying that his mother’s ranch was in that direction, and by striking off across the fields instead of following the road, they might save a distance of one mile out of two. Young Kamp assented, and the two started across a lonely stretch of land, through vales and over hills, until a point was reached which the murderer thought sufficiently secluded for carrying out his design.

Kamp stooped down to crawl between the rails of a fence, Devine walking behind him, when the latter suddenly drew a pistol and fired the fatal shot, the ball entering Kamp’s skull behind the right ear. Devine then ran away, supposing he had effectually dispatched his victim, and was seen hastening back alone to the railroad terminus.

Kamp was shortly after discovered by a Spaniard, who was herding sheep in the locality, and being still able to walk, he was assisted to a saloon on the road, and from thence brought into the city and given in charge of the authorities. From the representations which the mortally wounded youth could make, and other circumstances, the police were immediately confident that Devine was his murderer, and measures were at once instituted for his arrest.

He was traced to various places in the city, where he had boasted of obtaining money by an easy method, admitted to several that he had shot a man and endeavored to dispose of a revolver. He was finally captured on board a steamer at Meiggs’ wharf, which was just about crossing over to Marin County, and the revolver, with two chambers discharged, was still in his possession.

At the City Prison, he was placed in the midst of fifteen or twenty persons, and Kamp, who was yet rational, readily singled him out as the murderer. He walked up and placed his hand on Devine, saying, “You are the man that shot me.” Kamp was taken to the County Hospital, and every effort was made to save his life, but without avail. 

Just before his death, which occurred on the 5th of May, an effort was made to take his ante-mortem deposition, but unfortunately, the Coroner arrived too late, and the important evidence of the murdered man was not secured in the case.

The chain of circumstances presented in the several trials, however, made out a case against the accused as strong circumstantial evidence could be drawn, and a doubt of his guilt was hardily admissible.

The First Trial

Was brought in the Twelth District Court, before Judge McKinstry, on the 20th of February, 1872, and occupied eight days, resulting in a verdict according to the indictment of “murder in the first degree.” The Court sentenced Devine to be executed on the 25th of April, 1872.

Judge Tyler, counsel for the condemned, appealed to the Supreme Court for a new trial on mere technical grounds, his principal point having reference to a minor discrepancy of evidence of one witness as taken before the Coroner at the trial. Although the several points did not affect the merits of the case in the least, the appeal was successful, and to the efforts of most indefatigable counsel, the wretched man was indebted to an extension of his lease of life a full year.

The case was brought to a second trial in March last, in the same court. In the meantime, an important witness had died, and the prisoner and his counsel were exceedingly hopeful of finding complications on this circumstance equal to another successful appeal to the Supreme Court.

After another tedious trial, the inevitable verdict of “guilty” fell upon the ear of the doomed man for the second time, and he was again sentenced to be executed on Friday, the 9th of May.

Hope was still buoyant in his breast, relying upon the determined goal of his counsel, until the 7th, when the announcement was made that the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, and his fate was sealed beyond the further probability of human interference.

By the earnest intercession of the spiritual adviser of the condemned prisoner, the Governor was persuaded to grant a brief reprieve of five days, in the hope that the guilty wretch, with the certainty of speedy death before him, might finally yield to the ministrations of his anxious spiritual adviser, Rev. Father Spreckles, and meet his end in a penitential spirit.

During his long term of imprisonment, Devine manifested a bearing of bravado, never believing that merited retribution would finally overtake him, and on several occasions, he laughed to scorn kindly persons who ought to impress him with a realization of his terrible position, and turn him to preparation for another life. 

By A Remarkable Coincidence

His execution occurred two years to a day from the commission of the murderous act that consigned him to death at the hands of justice, and in his case, it may be said, “God’s mills grind slow but sure.” 

After receiving his brief reprieve from the Governor, Devine realized that no earthly interference could avail him further, and he relinquished all hope of life. At his own solicitation, all visitors were excluded from his cell with the exception of his spiritual advisers, and he gave himself earnestly to preparations for the awful change that awaited him in the few hours that still remained.

At times, he wept bitterly when exhorted to a contemplation of his guilty life and true repentance, and the consolations of religious faith seemed to reconcile him to his fate and enable him to await his end with fortitude. 

On Monday, he received the Sacrament of Communion from Rev. Father Spreckles, and Archbishop Alemany conferred upon him confirmation in the Roman Catholic Church. ,On the succeeding days Devine assumed an air of cheerfulness. On Tuesday, he asked permission of the Sheriff to be shaved, which was granted, the precaution first being taken to bind him securely to guard against any suicidal designs. His ostensible wife, Mary Dolan, was in jail at the time of the execution, having been committed a few weeks since for her common offence of habitual drunkenness.

Parting With His Son.

Devine also had a son, a child of six years of age, whom he had not seen for several years, and he expressed an earnest desire to see him before his death. The Sheriff and his deputies were anxious to gratify this last request, and visited the various charitable institutions in the city yesterday, endeavoring to find the child.

Devine last heard of him at the Protestant Orphan Asylum, where he had caused him to be placed immediately after his arrest for murder, the mother, Mary Dolan, being unfit to care or provide for him in consequence of her continual drunkenness and frequent detentions in jail. The lad had been removed from the Orphan Asylum, but the Sheriff happily discovered him in charge of the Ladies’ Relief Society, comfortably provided for.

When the child arrived at the cell of his wretched father last evening, Devine was much affected and exhibited instincts of humanity he had never known before. He embraced his offspring tenderly, wept over him, and implored him to shun the evil ways that had brought his father to ignominious death, and when the lad was finally removed, he clung to him with convulsive throbs, as if parting with the only object that had ever awakened the emotion of affection in his breast.

Last Hours of the Doomed Man.

Devine retired at about 10 o’clock last night after devotion with his spiritual adviser. He slept soundly through the night until 5 o’clock this morning, when he was awakened by the Jailor. In reply to the inquiries of the officer, he said that he had enjoyed refreshing slumber, as one could who had a clear conscience. He dressed himself with care and gave much attention to combing his hair neatly and arranging his toilet, having been provided with a new black suit and a pair of slippers.

At 8 o’clock, he ate a hearty breakfast, and shortly after his spiritual adviser, Rev. Father Spreckles, Archbishop Alameney, and two Sisters of Mercy arrived. The doomed man devoted the remaining few hours of his life to fervent supplications for mercy.

As the hour for the execution approached, the wickets in all the cells were closed, and the “trustees” allowed the limits of the Jail were locked up. At 11 o’clock, the reporters of the press were admitted and allowed to inspect the preparations for the execution.

The Scaffold

Was laid across the railings of the upper corridor at the north end, the trap in the centre permitting the body to drop to the lower corridor within about three feet of the floor, the rope allowing a fall of six feet. The gallows beam was extended above under the skylights, the ends resting in the ventillating apertures on either side.

On the west side of the scaffold, an iron rod ran up, to which was attached a cord, secured to a ring in one of the cell doors, the slipping of which drew the bolt by a weight and allowed the trap to fall. The gallows was the same used in previous executions, the last murderer who had stood thereon being the Chinaman, Chung Wong, who was executed in 1865.

At twenty minutes to 12, the Sisters of Mercy took their leave of Devine, and shortly after, attended by the Sheriff and the priests, Devine was conducted from the No. 1 cell near the entrance of the lower corridor, which he had occupied since his fate became sealed, to No. 41 cell in the second corridor, which was located nearly opposite the steps leading upon the scaffold. He looked pale and haggard, but a smile rested upon his countenance as he passed the group of reporters at the foot of the stairway.

He ascended the stairway with a light, elastic step and seemed to look carelessly at the gallows as he tripped along the gallery. At half past 12 o’clock, an immense crowd had gathered in the street in front of the jail, and on all sides of the building where a position might be obtained to observe even the grim walls within which the dread scene of violent death was being enacted.

The Sheriff then admitted all those who had received permission to be present, amounting to about two hundred. The spectators included several Sheriffs from adjoining counties, members of the Board of Supervisors, physicians, city officials, and upwards of thirty reporters of the press, among the latter being representatives of some of the Eastern papers, and artists for the New York illustrated journals.

The reporters were assigned a position directly in front of the scaffold, in the west gallery of the upper corridor, and the physicians took their places within the line on the floor of the lower corridor. The prisoner remained in his cell engaged in his final devotions, while the tramping of many feet and the subdued murmur of voices without reminded him of the relentless hand of Justice, eager to close his career.

The corridors, above and below, were greatly crowded, while the side openings, below the skylights, in either direction, were completely occupied, their appearance suggestive of the private boxes of a public exhibition.

The Execution.

At a quarter to 1 o’clock, the Sheriff directed his deputies to their positions upon the scaffold, and immediately after, he entered the cell of the doomed man for a parting interview of brief duration. On emerging, Sheriff Adams mounted the scaffold and stated to the spectators that it was the wish of Devine that all should preserve silence and ask him no questions.

At two minutes before 1 o’clock, the Sheriff opened the door of the cell, and Devine emerged, carrying a crucifix in his hand, followed by Father Spreckles. He ascended the steps to the scaffold with closed eyes, manifesting symptoms of weakness, and though bearing up with great power of nerve, the expression of his countenance and the twitching muscles of his throat indicated the welling up of inexpressible agony of soul. While standing upon the scaffold, his eyes remained closed, while Father Spreckles, taking the crucifix, continued whispering the consolations of the Church in his ear. 

The death-warrant was hurriedly read by Deputy Lamott, but Devine gave no heed thereto, attending closely to the ministrations of Father Spreckles and frequently kissing the crucifix with much fervor as it was placed to his lips.

At the conclusion of the reading of the warrant, Jailor McKenzie bound the doomed man with straps. One was passed round his breast and pinioned the arms at the elbows, another at the waist pinioned the wrists, and two other straps were secured about the knees and the ankles. The rope was then placed about his neck, the large knot of the noose fixed under the left ear.

Last Scene of All.

The murderer now stood upon the verge of the unknown. He opened his eyes for the first time upon the scaffold ere quitting the warm precincts of the cheerful day, and cast one longing, lingering look behind. The bright sunshine shimmered through the skylights into the gloomy corridor, and wrought the shadow of the gallows-beam before him. Loud laughter and the murmur of the thoughtless crowd without disturbed the awful stillness that reigned within.

Nerving himself for the last moment, Devine exclaimed with a loud voice, “Oh, my sweet Jesus, unto thy hands I commend my spirit. Amen.” He kissed the crucifix again, and the black cap was drawn over his head. The spectators awaited with bated breath.

A moment more, and a dull grating sound, like the swinging of a gate, broke the solemn stillness, and the soul of the murderer had passed out. 

As the trap swung, Devine dropped about six feet, a sharp snap indicating that his neck was broken. A few convulsive throes succeeded for a moment with drawing up of the knees, and death resulted speedily with little pain. The physicians made the usual observations and pronounced life entirely extinct in less than 15 minutes. The execution was most successfully carried out in every detail.

The spectators commenced leaving the jail immediately after the fall of the drop, excepting the few whose presence was required to sign as witnesses of the due execution of the sentence. The large crowd lingered until the afternoon was well advanced, in morbid curiosity, discussing the death and career of the departed murderer.

-- end of The San Francisco Bulletin article. 

What that article doesn't say is that John Devine shot August Kamp in the neck, and the young man lingered in excruciating pain for 10 days until he died from Devine's attack. In fact, in court, Dr. Edwin Bentley, Assistant Surgeon of the United States Army, who made a post-mortem examination of the body thirty-six hours after death, testified in reference to the wound, giving a full description of its extent. 

He said that by the time he saw August Kamp, his condition was "very much diseased and of a dark color; my opinion is that the cause of this man's death was pyemice, induced by the pistol shot wound in his neck. This wound was in a gangrenous condition; he lived about ten days after he was shot. After all the searching, I was unable to find the ball. My conclusion was that the ball passed out of the nose or through the mouth." Dr. Bentley also testified in court that he took "nearly seven hours" to make the examination of the victim.

So while The San Francisco Bulletin article talks about Devine's child, how he had a "spiritual advisor," and the murderer's supposed repentance, that news article never mentions the victim's family, if they were notified of his murder, their loss, or the loss that the murdered man suffered, how that young man's life was snuffed out early, cut short by a callous killer. It seems that the newspaper used its voice to fight against Capital Punishment rather than to report what happened to the victim. 

As for who John Devine was, with over 70 arrests to his name, he may have had a reputation for being "criminal smart." Like many criminals, Devine could have been "criminal smart," or "con-artist smart," meaning he could engage in illegal activities while avoiding detection, arrest, or prosecution. 

As for being a "con artist," short for confidence artist or confidence trickster, someone who gains a victim's trust — their "confidence" — to manipulate, deceive, or cheat them out of money or valuables, like all con-artists he was a scammer who build rapport before executing a dishonest scheme, or, in the case of John Devine, execute a plan to commit murder. 

As for Devine's whole act of crying "bitterly when exhorted to a contemplation of his guilty life and true repentance, and the consolations of religious faith seemed to reconcile him to his fate and enable him to await his end with fortitude"? I think that was a con job, just a scam to game the system and gain his freedom, or have his sentence reduced to life in prison. 

Let's remember that he'd already had a trial, a retrial, and a 5-day stay of execution ordered by the Governor. Knowing this, he may have thought his sentence could be commuted to life in prison instead of dancing on the end of a rope for what he did — especially if there were witnesses in high places, such as an Archbishop who would say he showed remorse and repentance. 

A few days after Devine was hanged, a short article described how "It is generally believed that Devine was one of the men who were hired to murder Miss Martha McDonald, during the prosecution of Stevenson, of Stevenson’s block, in San Francisco, for rape. He said he was in the county jail the night of the attempted murder, but it was afterwards ascertained that he was outside as a trusty and that he left the jail the same night. His last offence was the murder of August Kamp, in May, 1871."
  
Another newspaper article titled "The Criminal Career of John Devine, alias 'The Chicken," was published after he was hanged. In that article, Devine's criminal career is described as "most remarkable." According to that news story, Devine "started out as a prize fighter in San Francisco, and fought four or five battles. His first arrest was for an assault with a deadly weapon. He later shot Tommy Chandler, the pugilist, twice, and had been arrested seventy-nine times altogether."

For the murder of August Kamp, John Devine, alias "The Chicken," was convicted and finally hanged in the San Francisco County jail on May 14, 1873. A very deserving end to a cowardly murderer. 

Tom Correa


Thursday, March 12, 2026

57 Times Sick, Unhinged Democrats Declared War on Law Enforcement



The report below is from The White House. It was published on The White House webpage on January 9th, 2026.

On National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day, the Trump Administration proudly honors the brave patriots of ICE and all law enforcement who put their lives on the line to protect America. In stark contrast, unhinged Radical Left Democrats have escalated their torrent of vicious, inflammatory attacks on these very heroes — branding them as Nazis, terrorists, and Gestapo thugs while inciting their delusional supporters to unleash violence.

As ICE valiantly defends our sovereignty and communities, here are 57 times Democrats have recklessly, deliberately stoked hatred and division against them:
  1. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz smeared ICE officers as a “threat” to the public, called ICE “reckless,” suggested the state is at “war” with federal officers and “under attack” by ICE, and smeared ICE as the “modern-day Gestapo.”
  2. California Gov. Gavin Newsom likened ICE to “secret police,” calling them “authoritarian” and calling for people to “push back.”
  3. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker claimed ICE is turning the country into “Nazi Germany.”
  4. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul accused ICE is “terrorizing people.”
  5. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro claimed ICE officers “make our neighborhoods less safe.”
  6. Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan said ICE officers cause “chaos and terror.”
  7. Sen. Chuck Schumer declared that ICE “does not belong in our neighborhoods.”
  8. Sen. Tina Smith called ICE “a clear and present threat.”
  9. Sen. John Hickenlooper smeared ICE as “a reign of terror.”
  10. Sen. Jeff Merkley likened ICE operations to “fascism” and claimed officers are “doing nothing” but “terrorizing our communities.”
  11. Sen. Bernie Sanders asked people to “stop ICE from what they are doing as soon as possible.”
  12. Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed ICE is “intentionally stok[ing] fear” and “tear[ing] communities apart.”
  13. Sen. Ruben Gallego said ICE exists to “scare the American public.”
  14. Sen. Mark Warner equated ICE officers to a brutal dictator.
  15. Sen. Dick Blumenthal accused ICE of spreading “lawlessness and recklessness.”
  16. Sen. Alex Padilla accused ICE of “indiscriminate violence.”
  17. Sen. Dick Durbin accused ICE officers of committing “atrocities.”
  18. Rep. Ilhan Omar said ICE is “state violence,” called officers “vile and beyond cruel,” and stated “[a]bolishing ICE is not enough.”
  19. Rep. Pramila Jayapal called ICE officers “deranged,” accused them of “kidnapping,” said “resistance” to ICE is “inspiring,” and claimed ICE officers will “shoot at you and kill you.”
  20. Rep. Eric Swalwell smeared ICE officers “masked thugs,” called them “terrorizing bandits,” said it was his “priority” to ensure officers “are no longer faceless,” compared them to the KGB, and demanded they “stay the fuck out of California.”
  21. Rep. Jasmine Crockett compared ICE to “slave patrols” and called them “thugs.”
  22. Rep. Delia Ramirez said ICE is the “single biggest threat to public safety right now” and attacked ICE as “a terror force.”
  23. Rep. Summer Lee said ICE is “out of control” and a “police state.”
  24. Rep. Ayanna Pressley called ICE “a rogue, violent agency that “has no business in our communities” and “must be abolished,” and accused ICE of “terrorizing our communities.”
  25. Rep. Mark Pocan demanded ICE “get the f*ck out of our cities.”
  26. Rep. April McClain Delaney called ICE “lawless.”
  27. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes called ICE an “anti-civilian force” and said ICE “should not exist.”
  28. Rep. Rashida Tlaib said ICE is “terrorizing our communities” and “turning our country into a fascist police state,” called it a “rogue agency,” and called for it to be abolished.
  29. Rep. Julie Johnson excused violence against ICE as people “channeling that frustration.”
  30. Rep. Laura Friedman said ICE officers are “terrorizing our friends and neighbors” and “bringing chaos and violence to our streets.”
  31. Rep. Shri Thanedar called to end legal protections for ICE officers.
  32. Rep. Janelle Bynum said ICE is “state-sponsored terrorism.”
  33. Rep. Sylvia Garcia referred to ICE officers as “thugs.”
  34. Rep. Jan Schakowsky urged people to “fight back” against ICE’s “abuse.”
  35. Rep. Robin Kelly smeared ICE as the “Gestapo” and a “betrayal.”
  36. Rep. LaMonica McIver incited people to “shut down the city” because “we are at war.”
  37. Rep. Max Frost compared ICE operations to “the worst horrors and crimes against humanity.”
  38. Rep. John Larson said ICE is “the SS” and “the Gestapo.”
  39. Rep. Stephen Lynch smeared ICE officers as “the Gestapo” and “nondescript thugs.”
  40. Rep. Dan Goldman compared federal officers to “secret police” who must be unmasked.
  41. Rep. Becca Balint called ICE “vigilantes.”
  42. Rep. Chuy Garcia said ICE brings “nothing but terror and violence” and warned ICE officers they “will be held accountable” for “terrorizing my community.”
  43. Rep. Nikki Budzinski called ICE officers “dangerous and reckless.”
  44. Rep. Gil Cisneros claimed ICE has “terrorized” people through “racial profiling.”
  45. Rep. Lauren Underwood accused ICE of a “horrifying campaign to spread fear… and violently snatch people from our streets.”
  46. Rep. Steve Cohen accused “out-of-control” ICE officers of “misusing their authority.”
  47. Rep. Joaquin Castro called ICE “a rogue organization” that “should be disbanded.”
  48. Rep. Maxine Waters said ICE was causing “mayhem and death.”
  49. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey demanded ICE “get the fuck out” of the city and accused officers of “terrorizing our communities.”
  50. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said ICE enforcement “is an attack on us all.”
  51. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson accused ICE of being “secret police” who are “terrorizing our communities” and said ICE was a “lawless, racist force.”
  52. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu compared ICE officers to a neo-Nazi group.
  53. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass excused violent anti-ICE protests as just like a “Lakers championship.”
  54. New Jersey State Sen. Britnee Timberlake threatened that ICE officers “will find themselves in the same position as those who carried out the illegal acts in Nazi Germany.”
  55. Minneapolis City Council Member Robin Wonsley claimed ICE is carrying out “terrorist attacks.”
  56. Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn called ICE “dangerous.”
  57. Cudahy (California) Vice Mayor Cynthia Gonzalez implored the violent 18th Street and Florencia 13 gangs to “help out and organize” against ICE.
The above report outlines the hate speech and threats coming out of the Democratic Party. While we can see what Democrats are doing and saying to stoke the fires of hate and violence in our country, we should all understand that their campaign of violence is being extremely successful. Working with the Democrat-controlled mainstream media, Democrats are very successful in recruiting the ignorant to fight for criminals.