Wednesday, April 18, 2012

RANDOM SHOTS! Obama & Hugo Chavez, George Washington, Disabled MMA Fireman, and More!


FIRST SHOT!

Obama Supported Socialist Dictator against Democracy in Honduras, so why does Venezuelan Dictator Chavez blame Obama for Cancer?

Dictators always have to blame someone else for their troubles - that's just what they do to divert attention away from their own problems which in most cases was caused by them in the first place.

For a long time, Chavez has questioned whether the U.S. government could be plotting to oust him. No big surprise there. But honestly, Chavez has had to find comfort with Barack Obama in the White House.

After all, Obama has been quick to side with the world's Socialist Dictators and against the defense of Democracy taking place.

Look at what happened just a few months after he entered office in June and July of 2009 in Honduras. In the case of Honduras Socialist Dictator Manuel Zelaya, many still remember how Obama took the side of the Socialist Dictator over those in the coup to bring Democracy to Honduras.

It's been nearly three years, and hundreds of political murders have taken place, but it seems that the Obama administration is still on the side of repression and denial of Hondurans' basic human rights. So with a track record like that, why would a Socialist Dictator like Chavez even think that Obama is not sympathetic to him.

It is said that a Dictator has a long memory and remembers those who cross him. Most tyrants want their people to have a short memory. Their problem is that some people do, and some don't.

Earlier this week, Venezuelan Dictator Chavez proved that his memory might not be as good as it should be.

He must have forgotten that his friend Barack Obama was a staunch supporter of Socialist Dictators like himself, when Chavez said that "it was very strange" that he "and the leaders of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay have struggled with cancer lately."

Chavez went on to say that he does not have any proof that the U.S. is behind this - but asked, "Would it be strange if they [United States] had developed a technology to induce cancer and no one knew it?"

The Obama administration has strongly denounced Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez for questioning whether the U.S. might be behind a rash of cancer cases among Latin American leaders. Since being elected, many Americans have just take it for granted that Obama likes Socialism or is a Socialist himself.

I can't help but wonder if President Obama was hurt by the suggestion that he'd actually hurt a fellow Socialist, and maybe said something like, "That really hurts considering some of my best friends are Socialist - just check with Bill Ayers!"  

Yes, all birds of a feather flock together!


From July of 2009

 
SECOND SHOT!
 
Congressman Allen West says "No Regrets Calling Democrats Communists"
 
As a young U.S. Marine, I remember going through training regarding the Communist threat to our nation and our way of life. Later after leaving the Marine Corps, I entered College and found that many there - especially many members of the faculty - reminded me of the profile of faithful Communists. 
 
As I got older and listened to many Liberals, many who were leaders of the Democrat Party, I saw and noted that they were indeed spouting off Communist Doctrine just like one of the devout faithful would. Never in my wildest imagination would I have thought that one day a U.S. Congressman would actually call it like it is and tell the word what he sees in Washington, D.C. in the halls of Congress.
 
It never occurred to me that a Congressman, with similar military training in understanding the Communist threat, would actually come forward and say what many Americans have thought for years.
 
On April 13th, U.S. Congressman Allen West said "The Democratic Party is full of Communists."
 
Rep. Allen West of Florida is a Tea Party favorite and the only Republican member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
 
At a town hall meeting in Palm City, Florida, Rep West said that he believes there are "about 78 to 81 members of the Democratic Party that are members of the Communist Party."

The comments came after a member of the audience asked him what percentage of Congress are "card-carrying Marxists"? After a drawn-out pause, West clarified his claim, saying, "It's actually called the Congressional Progressive Caucus."

Holy cow, were the Liberals in Washington upset about that. So much that almost all of their usually propaganda media sources called for Representative Allen West to apologize.

Well, on April 17th, Congressman Allen West refused to back away from earlier remarks to constituents in Florida that dozens of Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives were Communists.

The freshman Republican, who is backed by the Tea Party, was asked at a forum whether he had second thoughts about calling the 78 members of the House Progressive Caucus Communists.

"I don't regret it whatsoever," said Representative West - who is being mentioned as a possible running mate for the Vice President slot this year.

"There is a very thin line between Communism, Progressivism, Marxism, Socialism ... it's about nationalizing production, it's about creating and expanding the welfare state. It's about this idea of social and economic justice," said West.

West served in the United States Army for more than 20 years of active duty service, including several combat deployments in Iraq. He achieved the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. After leaving the military he and his family moved to Florida where he taught high school for a year and worked for a defense contractor, including in Afghanistan as a civilian adviser to the Afghan National Army.

To his credit, he has many awards and decorations including the Bronze Star for bravery.

Representative West has asked  fellow Conservatives for their help in his re-election campaign. And no, he has not backed down - but instead is repeating his belief that members of the Progressive Caucus are akin to Communists.

 
THIRD SHOT!

George Washington named as Great Britain's Greatest Military Opponent Ever!

Imagine that  for a moment. We're talking about a nation that has been around for hundreds of years, yet George Washington has been named Great Britain's Greatest Military Opponent ever. It's just hard to believe really.

Great Britain's greatest ever foe was George Washington, according to the United Kingdom's National Army Museum.

During the American Revolution, 1775 to 1787, Congress created the Continental Army on June 14, 1775. George Washington was appointed Major General and Commander-in-chief.

Washington had three roles during the war. In 1775–77, and again in 1781 he led his men against the main British forces. Although he lost many of his battles, he never surrendered his army during the war, and he continued to fight the British relentlessly until the war's end. He plotted the overall strategy of the war, in cooperation with Congress.

Second, he was charged with organizing and training the army. He recruited regulars and assigned Baron and General Friedrich von Steuben, a veteran of the Prussian general staff, to train them. The war effort and getting supplies to the troops were under the purview of Congress, but Washington pressured the Congress to provide the essentials.

In June 1776, Congress' first attempt at running the war effort was established with the committee known as "Board of War and Ordnance", succeeded by the Board of War in July 1777, a committee which eventually included members of the military.

The command structure of the Americans' armed forces was a hodgepodge of Congressional appointees. Congress also had the habit of sometimes making those appointments without Washington's input with state-appointments filling the lower ranks and of all of the militia-officers. The results of his general staff were mixed, as some of his favorites like John Sullivan never mastered the art of command.

Eventually Washington found capable officers, like General Nathaniel Greene, and his chief-of-staff Alexander Hamilton. The American officers never equalled their British opponents in tactics and maneuver, and consequently they lost most of the pitched battles.

The great successes, at Boston (1776), Saratoga (1777) and Yorktown (1781), came from trapping the British far from base with much larger numbers of troops.

Third, and most important, Washington was the embodiment of America's armed resistance to the Crown. He was the representative man of the Revolution. His enormous stature and political skills kept Congress, the Army, our French allies, the many state and local militias, and the states all pointed toward a common goal.

Then by voluntarily stepping down and disbanding his Army when the war was won, he permanently established the principle of civilian supremacy in military affairs.

Earlier in the 1780s, George Washington had been approached twice by the officers who promised their support if he decided to seize civilian power. In one famous incident in 1782, Col. Lewis Nicola wrote a letter urging Washington to overthrow Congress and become America's King. Washington instead scolded Nicola the very same day.

Then in 1783, Washington caught wind of officers wanting to stage a coup d'état against Congress. The so-called Newburgh Conspirators were frustrated that Congress was not paying them what had been promised when the nation desperately needed their sacrifice. Washington would not be moved.

On the Ides of March - a date rich in irony for its association with the tyranny and assassination of Julius Caesar - he called the men together and sternly reprimanded them for losing faith in the idea of America. The new nation had a chance to succeed only if its leaders and military adhered to the rule of law. This was the non-negotiable foundation of a free republic.

When King George III of England heard that George Washington would resign his commission to a powerless Congress instead of being America's King, he told the painter Benjamin West,  "If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world."

He later presided over the writing of our Constitution in 1787.

As all Americans should know, and I blame Liberal Teachers if everyone doesn't, George Washington was the first President of the United States of America. He served as such from 1789 to 1797.

He was in fact the dominant military and political leader of the United States from 1775 to 1799. Washington became the first president by unanimous choice, and oversaw the creation of a strong, well-financed national government that maintained neutrality in the wars raging in Europe, suppressed rebellion and won acceptance among Americans of all types.

Napoleon Bonaparte (Napoleon I of France) said, "Posterity will talk of Washington as the Founder of a Great Empire, when my name shall be lost in the vortex of revolution."

The American Revolutionary War hero and first President became the winner of a vote held at the United Kingdom's National Army Museum to identify Great Britain's most outstanding military opponent, reported by the The (London) Daily Telegraph.

The museum drew up a list of 20 candidates, which was whittled down to a shortlist of five. On Saturday, five historians presented the case for each commander to an audience of 70 guests at the west London museum who then voted.

Washington was named ahead of Michael Collins, who led Ireland to independence from the United Kingdom, France's Napoleon Bonaparte, World War II German commander Erwin Rommel, and Turkish World War I leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

To qualify for the vote, each commander had to come from the 17th century onwards - the period covered by the museum's collection - and had to have actually led an army in the field against the British, which excluded political enemies like Adolf Hitler.

 
FOURTH SHOT!

Bride charged with Faking Cancer for lavish Wedding

From The Times Herald-Record, Goshen, New York, authorities there say a former New York woman pretended to have terminal cancer so she could have a lavish wedding reception and honeymoon.

The Times Herald-Record reports that an Orange County Grand Jury has indicted 25-year-old Jessica Vega, a former Montgomery resident, with grand larceny and scheme to defraud.

According to the indictment, Jessica Vega accepted thousands of dollars in donated services and goods after claiming in 2010 that she was dying of leukemia. And yes. even the newspaper ran a story on Vega's wedding wish to be married to the father of her young daughter before she "died."

The small community reportedly came together, and many having sacrificed, contributed thousands and donated services to provide her with the wedding of her dreams. She married Michael O'Connell in May 2010 and the couple spent their honeymoon in Aruba - all paid for by friends and the community who wanted to help a woman in at death's door.

Four months later, the honeymoon was over when Michael O'Connell told the newspaper that Jessica Vega in reality faking the illness.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman told the paper that Jessica Vega "took advantage of the community’s hearts and minds. Our office will hold this individual accountable for fleecing the public through lies and deception."

The couple divorced over the incident, and Michael O'Connell moved to Virginia. Jessica Vega later joined him. They have two children.

"She's a good mom, and that's all that counts at the end of the day," Michael O'Connell said, according to the report. "I want my kids to have their mother back."

Jessica Vega was arraigned and pleaded not guilty. She's being held in county jail on $10,000 bail.

What can you say about someone so sick as to impersonate someone dying of cancer in order to fleece people? I can't really think of the proper word to describe her, scum is too polite and dirt-bag is too gentle. I guess we're just going to have to call her what she is - nothing but criminal trash.


FIFTH SHOT!

Laid-up Los Angeles fireman arrested after being caught MMA Fighting

Years ago a friend blew his back out, and an acquaintance told him don't let "them" catch you doing something stupid that you shouldn't be doing. The "them" was the State's Workers Compensation Insurance. He didn't have to worry about doing anything stupid, he could hardly get around at the time.

Later when he went through Vocational Retraining, he was amazed to hear stories of how many people fake on the job injuries for quick cash settlements. He was shocked to learn how many abuse a system not really designed for the injured worker - but really suited for the opportunist. That is, unless of course he gets caught.

Recently, a laid-up Los Angeles Fireman was arrested on suspicion of Insurance Fraud after he was caught moonlighting as a Mixed Martial Arts Fighter under the name "The Noodle."

Now, we're not talking about some guy who claimed to have a bad back and insurance investigators have pictures of him hauling a sofa - we're talking a guy who is supposed to be injured who is dumb enough to stay with Mixed Martial Arts Fighting while receiving money compensation from the State.

It's just my opinion, but I think he may have taken too many punches to the head because this Fireman is not very bright. 

Prosecutors allege Raphael Davis, 35 years old, filed for Workers' Compensation between Dec. 2, 2008, to May 20, 2011, even though the "injured" Fireman fought in MMA (Mixed Martial Arts) fights during that time period.

When arrested, Raphael Davis was hit with four felony counts of Insurance Fraud for taking $30,000 in disability checks from the Los Angeles Fire Department.

An office spokeswoman declined to detail what ailments Davis claimed to have that would prevent him from being able to work his regular job. But whatever it was, he is now being held on $30,000 bail and is facing a five-year jail term if convicted.

According to one MMA website, Raphael Davis is 6ft-3in, 203-pounds and has a 12-2 record, and went 6-1 through the workers compensation claim period.


LAST SHOT!

Wisconsin man arrested for slaughtering 100 deer or more in "Thrill Kill"

This is one of those stories that makes me just shake my head and ask why?

In March, four guys in Wisconsin decided to shoot at least 100 deer without a license. Now the hunters are threatening a fine of $ 1,000, or about $ 10 per animal.

That's right! Four Wisconsin man illegally slaughtered as many as 100 deer in what prosecutors call an unprecedented "thrill-kill" spree. They now faces up to six months in jail.

That's all, just six months in jail and a $1000 fine, and they walk.

The oldest is Nathan Blaha, 20 years old, of Hillsboro, Wisconsin. He and his three accomplices allegedly wandered the backroads of Richland County in a pickup truck, stunning deer with a light before shooting them - and yes, they just left their carcasses there to rot.

Supposedly it was a contest to "get the most deer," according to court documents.

"This is the antithesis of hunting," Richland County District Attorney Jennifer Harper told Fox News. "This is thrill killing."

I agree, this isn't hunting. This is a sick sort of blood lust that people in their area should be worried about.

Nathan Blaha, and his accomplices, 17 year old Steven Blaha and 18 year old Brogan Gillingham, face criminal charges in the December killing spree. But it appears that they will only receive lite penalties considering the enormity of the crime.

To me, it's not just about shooting whitetail deer from the road after dark and without a license. It's about the scope and their sick intent. This has nothing to do with hunting. It has everything to do with their twisted idea of entertainment. The aim of unusual entertainment was which of the four could kill more deer.

Blinded by the headlights, the animals near the road were then shot and left to rot. 

District Attorney Jennifer Harper said, a fourth suspect, a juvenile male who has not been named, was issued citations. Steven Blaha, 17, can be tried as an adult under Wisconsin law.

According to a criminal complaint obtained by Fox News, Nathan Blaha is believed to have done most of the shooting and has confessed to killing 20 to 30 deer "this past fall and during the 2011-2012 gun deer season illegally."

"The reason I was doing this was because we all kind of had bets who could get the most deer," Nathan Blaha said in a written statement to Conservation Warden Mike Nice of Richland Center.

But Nathan Blaha's co-defendants estimated the number of slain deer to be much greater, telling authorities they believe he illegally shot and killed as many as 100 whitetail deer within the past two years.

"There have been cases of shining and road hunting," Harper said, "but nothing to this extent."

Deer "shining" is the practice of using a high-powered, hand-held light to see the animal at night. The bright light is commonly used by hunters to track the location of deer herds at night when the animals are most active.

Nathan Blaha, 20,  is charged with three counts that each carry a penalty of up to six months in jail and a $1,000 minimum fine. He also faces revocation of hunting rights for the next nine years.

Nine years, that it? Nine years? Folks, these young Jerkweeds should never be allowed to hunt and kill anything again.

Nine years! That's insane when looking at what they have done and why. And yes, the reason they did this is the most important part of this story.

My God, it was for entertainment!

The investigation into the illegal deer killings began when private landowners reported hearing gunshots at night and finding deer carcasses on their properties.

Licensed deer hunting is a time-honored tradition throughout the scenic landscape of Richland County and other parts of the state during a nine-day period around Thanksgiving. Like other states, residents must obtain a license and conform to various regulations and ethical rules. Hunters can use only certain kinds of weapons, for example, and are prohibited from shooting after sundown.

The suspected illegal slaughtering of deer by Nathan Blaha violates all of the rules of hunting, authorities said, and has since outraged many hunters and conservation groups who claim Nathan Blaha may have depleted the herd and brought unfair notoriety to the sport.

"Some people hear this story and they think that’s what hunters do," said Jeffrey Schinkten, president of Whitetails Unlimited, a national conservation organization based in Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin.

"He’s not a hunter. He’s a game thief," Schinkten told Fox News. "I hope they throw the book at him. It’s unconscionable."

I agree. Nathan Blaha is not a deer hunter, he is a criminal and should be tried much more harsh than what he will get for doing what he has done. As far as I'm concerned, he and his brother should a few years in prison for the needless slaughter.

What a waste! Such a crime! Such creeps! They wouldn't last long around this neck of the woods. To actually receive joy from killing deer like that, with those numbers, is just sad.

In this area, everyone hunts - but we never see stuff like this. This is just too sick to accept simply as just kids having fun.  Killing deer for entertainment, makes me wonder what if they got bored with that and decided to move to shooting people - for entertainment. 

These creeps should not be in possession of any type of firearm ever again. Any hunter worth his salt would never allow these jerks to have hunting permits again, nevertheless allow them the possibility of handling firearms. This guys are sick.


Story by Tom Correa

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists Fear Fracking In Fairfield, Illinois

The national trend in fossil fuel exploration in state and private lands may transform the small town into an oil boom town.

Fairfield, Illinois, is the county seat of Wayne County, the site of Frontier Community College, Fairfield Community High School, Fairfield Memorial Hospital, and Airtex - an auto parts manufacturing facility. The population is around 5,154 by the 2010 census.

According to Wikipedia, Fairfield's median income for a household in the city was $25,797, and the median income for a family was $36,278.  About 8.5% of the families and 13.1% of the population in Fairfield were below the poverty line, including 16.7% of those under age 18 and 9.6% of those age 65 or over.

Well, it appears that's about to change thanks to oil and natural gas exploration in the United States. Yes, state governments and private citizens are tired of waiting for the Obama White House to get off their butts and do something for Americans - so they have taken it upon themselves to go into action.

BMWs, Lincolns and other cars with Louisiana, Texas and Colorado license plates fill so many parking spaces around the Wayne County Courthouse that it's tough for local residents to find spots for their pickups.

Two blocks west, lunchtime business at Jemini Coffee House nearly doubles on some days with new customers who are a little secretive.

And yes, there is a whole new language taking place with fresh phrases creeping into the local vernacular vocabulary such as "lease hound" and "modern-day Clampetts."

Everyone who grew up in the 1960s watched the TV comedy "The Beverly Hillbillies," about a backwoods family that strikes oil. Many now have their fingers crossed!

Wayne County, a rural locale about 270 miles south of Chicago, is experiencing a land rush thanks to a controversial effort to tap into hard-to-reach oil and gas deposits.

A relatively new twist on a 65-year-old technology, horizontal hydraulic fracturing may enable energy companies to hit pay dirt in Southern Illinois. And representatives of those companies, many of them from big oil states like Texas and Louisiana, are descending on Fairfield and Wayne County.

They are digging, but the first diggings are in the County Courthouse looking through land records as to who owns mineral rights where. Once they pinpoint a parcel, they offer leases to farmers and other owners of those mineral rights - and yes, that can mean a lot of money.

According to one industry representative, as much as $100 million has been spent on leasing rights in the region. Wayne County, with a population of about 17,000, is the state's hot spot. At least six companies are there acquiring leases right now.

Now enter the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists!

A regional group of Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists are scrambling to muster opposition as State Lawmakers rush to stitch together some sort of regulations. Looming over Wayne County and several other Southern Illinois counties is a group of Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists ready to suck the prospect of finacial prosperty right out of Wayne County.

Ah yes, the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists! They are well known in many states around the country.

Is my opinion of them a little too harsh? I don't think so because that's what they do. They can suck the prosperity out of an area faster than anything short of a government program.

Look at what the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists hae done to the once great State of California, the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists have so many Liberal Politicians in their pocket that they have successfully attacked every aspect of the California manufacturing industry and it's huge agriculture industry to the point that businesses are leaving in droves.

Between the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists and the Liberal idea of bleeding business through higher taxes, more businesses are actually leaving California than coming to California - and yes, that's just a fact.

At the heart of what the Environmentalist attack on Fairfield, Illinois, is their dire warning that the sky is falling if energy exploration is continued in the region.

Their extreme position is that they believe that oil exploration in America pits their concept of "an environmental catastrophe" against the promise of energy independence and economic gain for years to come.

Of course, Environmentalists are always trying to say that there is "an environmental catastrophe" for just about everywhere - or maybe that's what they want us to believe?

The Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists are experiencing anxiety amid the excitement and prospect of Fairfield doing well as a result of oil exploration. The last thing Environmentalists groups want to be proven wrong in the open in front of everyone. By all means, they don't want to be exposed as the fraud that they are.

The Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists claim that "Fracking," which is the common term for freeing oil and natural gas by pumping water, sand and chemicals into rock deep beneath the surface, has been around for decades - is dangerous and will end mankind as we know it - or something to that effect.

The Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists believe that it will effect the wells and ground water in the area. What the geniuses don't say is that the high-pressure injections are administered at more than 4,000 feet below ground.


Horizontal oil and gas well drilling has become one of the most valuable technologies ever introduced in the oil industry. It is an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) or gas recovery method that is becoming more and more popular as the price per barrel of oil gets higher.
 
Unlike a directional well that is drilled to position a reservoir at entry point, a horizontal well is commonly defined as any well in which the lower part of the well bore parallels the oil zone.

The angle of inclination used to drill the well does not have to reach 90° for the well to be considered a horizontal well. Applications for horizontal wells include the exploitation of thin oil-rim reservoirs, avoidance of drawdown-related problems such as water/gas coning, and extension of wells by means of multiple drain holes.

Fracturing the rock allows fossil fuel to be channeled with the sand, water and chemical mix through the well and to the surface from 4,000 feet below the earth is not going to have anything to do with the water tables.

The Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists have a concern is horizontal drilling. In the last decade, companies have been drilling vertical wells, then turning that drilling horizontally through the shale layer, fracking for oil and gas along the way. At 4,000 feet down, the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists don't understand that people can see that their "dooms day" prophecies are just bogus.

The technique has led to speculation that enough fossil fuel can be extracted below the surface of the United States to meet the nation's energy needs for decades. It also has frightened and angered the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists because they want no, none, nada, zip, zero, oil exploration in America  - and they are putting out a lot of money to Liberals and the Democrat Party to see that no exploration is the future of America.

The Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists see this process as "horrible" and "catastrophic."

Concerns in Illinois and elsewhere center on three issues: disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, well-casing standards to limit the risk of contaminants' escape, and the disposal of millions of gallons of leftover toxic water.

But what fails to make the News is the efforts to cleanup the left-over waste and/or return it in place of what was removed. One disposal method injects the liquid several thousand feet underground.

But wait, the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists are now using Mother Nature as a means to explain the "hazards" of fracking. With a new U.S. Department of Interior report in hand that stated that the U.S. Geological Survey found an "uptick" in seismic activity where wastewater injection from many industries - including hydraulic fracturing — has increased significantly.

An "uptick"? What are they saying? Well, they are saying that it is not a real increase - but only a rise and fall, a fluke, an "uptick," in those states include Arkansas, Colorado, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas.

"It's perfectly healthy for people to wonder what's going to happen," said Steve Everley, spokesman for Energy in Depth, a research project supported by the Independent Petroleum Association of America, headquartered in Washington, D.C. "The answers need to be based in fact. (Hydraulic fracturing) is a safe, proven technology."

In addition, the Independent Petroleum Association of America says that states have regulated the technique for more than 60 years "and by any legitimate measure have compiled an impressive record of enforcement in that time."

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to release preliminary findings of an ongoing report on the subject in January. Anyone think that the report might be a little biased against oil exploration? It's the EPA, of corse they are!

SM Energy Company, which is based in Denver, is one of the companies acquiring leases in Wayne County. Brent Collins, senior director of planning and investor relations, said the company has exploratory energy programs across the U.S., including Southern Illinois, which has a history of producing oil.

So, if the town of Fairfield and Wayne County have problems getting this going and in the process actually do something that benefits all Americans both in as for Energy Independence and the prices at the pump, blame the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists who would rather make the Oil Rich Middle East wealthy and us even more dependant on them.

As energy companies snap up mineral leases in Wayne County, some residents are optimistic and very hopefully that their town might be the direction America goes in the future - but they are worried because of the pressure brought to bare by the big money political savvy Environmentalist groups who don't give a rip of about American prosperity.

Many Americans are started to recognize that the Prosperity-Sucking Environmentalists are really today's Public Enemies Number One!  

Story by Tom Correa

Saturday, April 14, 2012

RANDOM SHOTS! Washington Hypocricy, Border Patrol Running Guns, Texas Needs Skilled Workers, Oklahoma Govr takes on Dems over Oil, and More!


FIRST SHOT!

Report says Obama White House Pays Women Less Than Men

You ever notice how Washington, D.C., is so chock-full of hypocrites?

Back in 2008, Barck Obama was called "The Great Uniter" yet he has done more to harm racial relations and split the country along racial lines than any other person in our nation's history. 

He talks about being for Americans and he talks about no drilling for American oil, of course while pitching alternative energy cars, but he seems to have not given any consideration our country's need to produce the over 6,000 products made from oil. Products that have nothing to do with alternative energy, and everything to do with oil.

Of course, Barack Obama has solid support from the women voters out there. Yes, that's true, even though 92% of all Americans who have lost their jobs under Obama have been women.

But even with the losses of jobs for women, the Hypocrite-In-Chief says he's for helping women in the workplace. What workplace? Well, figures show it's not the White House workplace - that's for certain.


Fact is that President Obama has been outspoken in his criticism of "paycheck discrimination" in that women earn less than men for the same jobs, but an article from The Washington Free Beacon says that reports show that female employees in the Obama White House make considerably less than their male counterparts.

According to the 2011 annual report on the White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary to the male employees $71,000.

Last week the Obama campaign lashed out at Mitt Romney for his failure to immediately endorse the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act, which is a very controversial law that was enacted in 2009 that made it easier to file discrimination lawsuits.

And yes, I'm sure you've wondered it, but for right now it is not known whether any women employed at the White House have filed lawsuits under the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act. But honestly, if some woman has, I seriously doubt that the Pro-Obama News media would readily report it.

President Obama has frequently criticized the gender pay gap, although he has never spoken about the gender gap that exists in the Obama White House. Ironically, all of his talk about bringing CHANGE to the White House has resulted in his changing the long standing George W. Bush policy of paying all White House employees equally.

"Paycheck discrimination hurts families who lose out on badly needed income," Obama said in a July 2010 statement. "And with so many families depending on women's wages, it hurts the American economy as a whole."

My grandpa would have called that Obama statement one of the worse insults women can possible get. It confirms that he really does recognize that a problem exists and yet still refuses to act to repair the situation in the very place that he has total say on things - in this case the White House.

To add further insult to injury, he actually has the cojones to spit in their faces after he refuses to fix the problem in his own White House by actually asking for their support to do what he's doing for another four more years.

The president and his Democratic allies have accused Republicans of waging a “war on women,” and have touted themselves as champions of female equality. Obama’s rhetoric, however, has not always been supported by his actions. That's a nice way of saying that he's all talk and no action.

In a 2011 article titled "The White House Boys’ Club: President Obama Has a Woman Problem," TIME magazine’s Amy Sullivan detailed the president’s fondness for male-dominated environments.

"There’s a looseness to Obama when he’s hanging out with the boys club that doesn’t appear in co-ed gatherings," she wrote. "The president blows off steam on the golf course with male colleagues and friends. He takes to the White House basketball court with NBA stars, men’s college players, and male cabinet members and members of Congress."

As a presidential candidate in 2008, Obama was criticized for paying the women on his campaign staff much less than the men, and far less than his Republican opponent John McCain was paying his female staffers.

Adlai Stevenson, who was the Democrat presidential candidate in 1952 and 1956, once said, "A hypocrite is the kind of politician who would cut down a redwood tree, then mount the stump and make a speech for conservation."

Though Adlai Stevenson may have captured the true Barack Hussein Obama in that quote, I think Tennessee Williams is right on target when he said, "The only thing worse than a liar is a liar that's also a hypocrite!"

SECOND SHOT!

U.S. Border Agent Accused of Smuggling Guns Ordered Detained

News out of El Paso, Texas, is that a U.S. Magistrate Judge ruled on Tuesday that a U.S. Border Patrol agent, who is accused of buying guns in the United States and smuggling them into Mexico for use by Mexican Drug Cartels must remain in jail pending a detention hearing later this week.  

U.S. Border Patrol agent Ricardo Montalvo, 28, and his girlfriend Carla Gonzales-Ortiz, 29, appeared in court for the first time since their arrest on Monday. They are charged with conspiracy to buy firearms and more than 20,000 rounds of ammunition and smuggle them into Mexico.

They are accused of acting as "straw" purchasers of at least nine firearms between November 2010 and January 2011. "Straw purchasers" are people who say that they are buying weapons for themselves, but in fact are concealing the real buyers.

The most routine way of smuggling arms, however, is the ant or "hormiga" run is basically repeated trips across the border with one or a few guns.

A legally eligible or "straw" purchaser buys a few weapons, usually cheap .22 caliber rifles, .25-caliber pistols, ".38 specials," and 9mm pistols from gun stores in El Paso and other US border towns and hands the mover to the trafficker, who sneaks them across the border.

Generally this is either done on foot or in the trunk of a car. A smuggler can repeat this process hundreds of times a year, making multiple trips to gun stores in Florida, Texas, and California, in particular.

A grand jury indictment accuses Montalvo and Gonzales-Ortiz of buying guns, which include five AK-47-type pistols, two .380-caliber pistols, and two .22-caliber rifles. The indictment specifies that the guns are favored by Mexican Drug Cartels. 

The criminal indictment also says. the pair are accused of also buying more than 20,000 rounds of ammunition, 97 high-capacity magazines and four 37mm flair guns, which are sought by Mexican Cartels for conversion into Grenade Launchers.

Back in the late 1980s, I had a friend who told me that the BATF came to his home to pay him a visit. They received a red flag when he tried buying 10,000 rounds from a cataloge company.

So yes, I'm sure that a U.S. Border Patrol Agent buying five AK-47-type pistols, two .380-caliber pistols, two .22-caliber rifles, 20,000 rounds of ammunition, 97 high-capacity magazines and four 37mm flair guns is going to throw up a red flag somewhere.

The indictment does not say if the weapons were actually smuggled into Mexico.

U.S. Border Patrol Agent Montalvo, who is based in El Paso, Texas, had been on administrative desk duty since January 2011 when the investigation started.

The Obama White House wants Americans to believe that the Mexican Drug Cartels rely on purchases of firearms in the United States. And yes, the Mexican government has often complained about the smuggling across the border.

But the facts, well they do not agree with the rhetoric coming out of the Obama administration. In the last few years huge shipments of fully automatic weapons have been stopped coming into the U.S. on its way to Mexico from China. And no, fully automatic weapons are something that most Americans cannot legally buy unless they have a Class 3 Federal Firearms License.

China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO), a commercial shipping company owned by the Communist Chinese government is at issue in this respect. COSCO has been linked to gun smuggling operations of guns from China's defense-related companies. China is believed to be bringing in thousands of illegal fully automatic weapon through U.S. ports like the Port of Long Beach which they control and ports at the Panama Canal.

The arrest of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Montalvo and Gonzales-Ortiz came only days after three men pleaded guilty to charges of trafficking high-powered rifles and other guns to Mexico from Arizona under the botched "Fast and Furious" federal sting operation.

Republicans have criticized President Barack Obama's administration for allowing the Fast and Furious program - under which a government agency permitted thousands of weapons to be smuggled across the border in order to try to nab the criminals in a sting operation.

The failed operation embarrassed the administration and led to some calls for Attorney General Eric Holder to resign.

But more importantly, the Obama administration Operation Fast & Furious has put thousands of guns in the hands of those who randomly kill people on both sides of our Southern border. Those responsible for the slaughter of thousands of Mexicans yearly, and the death of one of our own Agents can thank the Obama administration for the weapons they use to do so.

The Obama administration has made the U.S. government an accessory to murder because it helped fuel violence and killing Mexican violence by allowing "straw" purchasers to buy approximately 2,000 assault-type weapons - which were actually walked into Mexico.

This is a crime that goes to the highest level of our government. And no, no one has answered for that crime as of yet.


THIRD SHOT!

Herman Cain says Rep. Alen West "An Excellent Choice" for Vice President

Former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain thinks Representative Allen West, R-Florida, would make "an excellent choice" for Vice President.

Herman Cain’s endorsement follows similar suggestions last week by Sarah Palin and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley.

Cain, appearing on The Steve Gill Show, was asked by the Nashville radio host who he would suggest for Vice President, should front-runner Mitt Romney ask?  Cain answered without hesitation, "Allen West out of Florida."

"He is well-spoken, he is direct, people in Florida love him, he has a huge following," Cain said. "He is from Florida. Florida is going to be one of those key states. But more importantly Colonel Allen West is a dedicated Patriot. He served in the military and he is willing to serve his country some more."

Cain went on to say, "I know that there might be some pushback on his part because he's just in his first term as a United States Congressman, but my advice to him, if he were to ask me, is you served your country well and now you have a higher calling - and I would strongly recommend that he consider it depending upon any personal consideration he might have."

Cain added, "I think he would be an excellent choice."

Following suggestions by Haley and Palin that he would be good for the No. 2 spot on the Republican ticket, West told CNN that he was humbled and would almost certainly "step up to the plate" if asked.

West said, if asked, he would have to discuss the matter with his family but noted his family has a long tradition of service. West’s father served in World War II. West spent 22 years in the Army before retiring as a lieutenant colonel, including tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and he currently has a nephew in the Army.

Asked whether he would be able to work with Mitt Romney? Rep. West told CNN, he was confident they could work out any differences.

"We would be able to come together as a team and turn this ship of state around for the United States of America," he said.

Representative Allen West has my support for Vice President. He is a man who speaks his mind intelligently, and not like Joe Biden who can't seem keep his foot out of his mouth.


FOURTH SHOT!

Oklahoma Governor says Democrats View U.S. Energy as Hazardous Waste

Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin issued a scathing indictment of President Barack Obama's energy policies in the Republican Party’s weekly radio address over the weekend. Those policies, not a lack of domestic energy supply, are causing the surge in gasoline prices, she said.

"Our [Republican] pro-energy policies stand in stark contrast to the policies supported by President Obama and the Washington Democrats, who seem to view American-made energy as a hazardous waste rather than a resource" Governor Fallin said.

The real issue is a lack of leadership from the president, as illustrated by his delay in allowing completion of the Keystone XL Oil Pipeline. Meanwhile gas prices average $3.93 in some states while others like here in California pays well over $4.20 a gallon on the average.

“Millions of Americans remain out of work, but President Obama continues to propose job-killing tax hikes and obstruct the basic energy infrastructure projects that would lead to the creation of thousands of new jobs, not to mention more revenue in state budgets," Governor Fallin said.

“We recognize that the energy industry is a valuable ally as we seek to create jobs and stimulate the economy, and that's why Oklahoma Republicans continue to support the production of all kinds of energy resources."

What she is saying goes to the heart of the difference between Liberal and Conservative conservators of our nation. Liberals see no hope for the future and an Energy Industry that is a plague upon the earth. Conservatives see endless opportunity and the resources that we can harness and use while we look for other solutions the problems.

Liberals point out problems but never have solutions. Conservatives address problems by coming up with solutions, then wait for the Liberals to say that it won't work and that we're evil.

FIFTH SHOT!

Italian Councilwoman says European Political System Ignores the People

Since Americans on the Left, Liberals and Democrats, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Obama Administration, and are always trying to compare America with Europe, here's an article for you.

Since you always want to point out how America should be more like Europe, read on - and educate yourself to reality in Europe. 

The economic crisis in Europe has been spurred by a self-serving political system that rewards itself and its friends while ignoring the people, says Italian politician Lillia D'Ottavi in an exclusive interview to Newsmax.com.

Lillia D'Ottavi is a pharmacist, business owner, and member of the Regional Council of Lazio, Italy. She says that the solution to the economic crisis in Europe goes beyond the massive rescue fund set up to handle the debt run up by countries on the Euro.

She said, money distributed from the rescue fund "are not real loans. They are really grants that actually we know will never be repaid."

"We are starting to do this reform by cutting down the costs of the political system, including the number of Congressmen and Senators and the privileges that they are accustomed to," she said when asked what the solution would be.

"So we're cutting down their salaries and the whole setup of politics itself. The next thing we're going to work on is bureaucracy within the government.

I’ve been doing politics for many, many years and I believe that even though it's very different from the United States, to a certain extent, like you, one of the problems is the political system. The way the parties are actually creating programs that cost Billions and they are only to serve certain special interests while the real politics - you know the one with a capital ‘P’ - the word people - is not actually being served too much.

I think that the first thing we have to do is to follow the rules. In America, that would be Constitutional rules."

Wait a minute! Are you Liberals listening? Lillia D'Ottavi, a European politicians, recognizes that the Constitution is not just an outdated piece of paper and that it has rules that need to be followed. Imagine the disbelief this will cause at Starbucks when Communist radical Bill Ayers goes to get his Capitalist coffee.

Lillia D'Ottavi  has been active in Italian politics since the late 1970s. She has also travelled extensively in the United States and was recently in Florida to explore the possibility of a "sister province" project between her province, Latina, and Palm Beach County. She notes there are a lot of similarities between the people of the United States and the people of Italy.

"I feel very, very close to the people, the middle class, the people that work, the people that pay taxes and in this sense both the people of the United States and in Italy, they face the same desires, they have the same desires: security both on the job and in their families, and a certainty, a stability in the government that’s supposed to represent them," she said.

Like the United States, Italy has an illegal immigration problem.

"I live the problem of illegal immigration very closely," she said. "Italy, it's a relatively new country as such and especially in the First World War, we had to fight with blood for every inch of our territory. And now it’s just being taken over and not only but because of its position. It’s the gate from where most of the North African and Arab illegal immigration is coming through. It’s hurting directly and very closely a great majority of the Italian people. We are very friendly. We love to have people but we want respect of our laws.”

She said that Italy, a country about the same size as Florida, must face up to the problem because in 2030 as many as 30 million illegal immigrants are going to be in the country in a population of about 60 million.

"One of the reasons it is so large is also because a lot of them receive work," she said. "They work, of course illegal only, but they do work. They’ve been given shelters and many times even the government itself gives them - free education, free health, and a lot of services that actually they are denied to Italians and retirees.

So what we have to do is first of all respect the laws that already are there. If somebody is illegal, he should not work, he should not get all the things that they are getting. If we just stick up for these simple things, then our Christian values and our Christian principles are going to lead us to the right solution.”

On other issues, Lillia D'Ottavi said:

— The way to combat Islamic fundamentalism is to "use security measures, you know, like we use against any other criminals."

— That Italians favor sanctions against Iran, adding, "We have to support Israel because Israel is not only one of the greatest allies of the United States but also one of the greatest friends of Italy, especially because of our Judeo-Christian traditions."

— That there are "two different faces of the Obama administration. In internal affairs within the United States, the Obama administration has taken an extreme leftist position in all kind of social issues. In foreign affairs, they have been trying to be very diplomatic and middle of the road without swinging too much one way or the other."

She is both wise and intelligent. Too bad our politicians can't learn from her.


SIXTH SHOT!

Texas Bosses Gripe About Lack of Skilled Workers

OK, here we go!

Employers and Workforce experts told Texas lawmakers this week that businesses are having difficulty filling thousands of vacant positions across the state because of a shortage of skilled workers, according to the Austin American Statesman.

"Our state leaders are fond of the expression 'Texas is wide open for business,' but I fear there's an increasing risk that the help-wanted signs may go unanswered for many employers," said Joe Arnold, workforce chairman for the Texas Association of Manufacturers.

The State of Texas Senate Committee on Business and Commerce heard from witnesses who provided national statistics and anecdotal information about workforce conditions in Texas.

Texas Workforce Commission Chairman Tom Pauken cited studies saying skilled workers are scarce nationwide and that four out of five employers surveyed report a moderate or severe shortage of production workers. "I hear these same concerns echoed by employers in Texas," Pauken said.

Jane Hanna, president of the Construction Education Foundation, said despite a healthy migration of people into Texas, skilled workers aren’t always among them. Noting that the average age of a skilled craftsman is 49 years of age, she said, "We’re not seeing this migration of skilled workers moving across the country."

"This is a critical, critical impasse we are reaching," Hanna added.

Other committee witnesses blamed the suspected shortage of skilled workers on everything from the recession to drugs, aging baby boomers, and a state education policy that has a bias toward four-year college degrees and doesn’t meet the real needs of today’s employers.

And there's the problem, it's the same old story about college educated type people who simply don't understand the need for vocational training. They have no idea how anything is made or even where milk comes from.

If they are working in state government in among the policy makers than no doubt that they went to a four-year or more college, and they usually have a bias against blue collar workers who they see as uneducated and low class. They do not know how to address the problem because they can't understand the problem.

They simply can't compute the idea that America is lacking in skilled vocational workers, tradesmen, journeymen, who build everything we use.


SEVENTH SHOT!

US Debt Exceeds Euro Zone, UK Combined

In the last few days, it was reported the U.S. government debt now exceeds the combined debt of all of the countries in the crisis-riddled Eurozone - plus Great Britain. Great Britain is not part of the Eurozone but is part of the European Union.

The United States debt at the end of 2011 was at $15.1 trillion, while European debt was at $12.7 trillion according to a chart released by the Senate Budget Committee.

The Eurozone is made up of 17 countries, including France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, and other smaller nations that, among other things, use the euro as their currency. Many of the countries, such as Greece, have recently faced a severe economic crisis brought on by heavy governmental debt that required financial bailouts.

On a small scale version, you and I know how it is if we have more bills than we have money. We know something has to be cut. If not, than we will face financial problems and go into default on our loan obligations and so on.

Most of us understand that hard choices need to be made in those times. Many times those choices are very unpopular and it will not get you "The Greatest Person Award" any time soon. But the consequences are worse! And that is what people need to understand.

At our house, we had to cut our DirectTV package, cut down on frivolous trips to town which meant saving money on gas, less eating out and more eating at home, going to see a movie stopped for awhile, new clothes or shoes or boots, all had to take a back seat to things that we needed to get done that were a heck of a lot more important.

The transmission in my Chevy Tahoe when out and the engine needed work. This is a big priority right now. We looked at buying a new car but found the prices absolutely insane.

So for the last month or so, we've worked on figuring how to get it fixed and we did it without us overspending to do it. All of you who are reading this understand this sort of priority. You and I know real well what it means to go without - just so we can make ends meet.

I think the basic problem with President Obama and both sides of Congress is that most of those Jerkweeds are Millionaires who have no idea how it is to go without to make ends meet. We need more Housewives in Congress. We need more Dads who are paying Child Support and working two jobs to keep a roof over his new family, we need someone who has had to look at his or her son or daughter and knows what it is to say - we just don't have the money to help you buy a new car - nevertheless help you go to College.

Maybe when the rich folks who are running this country finally can get their heads out of their asses and finally look around and see that there are priorities and then then aren't - then we might have a chance to fix things.

We don't need to cut Social Security or Medicare, but we can't keep them around if we spend Trillions of dollars that Obama Care will cost Americans.

We can't afford to feed orphan children in the Sudan or Kenya or Haiti, research the life of a beetle in the Amazon Rain Forrest, build nests for eagles, build bridges to nowhere, or spend Billions of dollars in lawsuits which government creates to right some supposed injustice.

Politicians should learn that not every injustice in the world, whether its natural or man-made can be solved by throwing more money at it. Especially when we don't have the money to throw because we have spent the incomes of our grandchildren on things that made a lot of political points - but made no sense.


LAST SHOT!

Secret Service Agents covering President Obama sent home from Colombia for Misconduct, Prostitution Involved

Hot off the wire, April 14, 2012, at least a dozen U.S. Secret Service Agents who were assigned to protect the President were sent home from Colombia for misconduct - and there may have been prostitution involved.

It is hard to believe that a dozen Secret Service Agents covering President Obama in Colombia, there  for a leaders summit, could have actually been sent back to the United States because of allegations involving prostitution - but Fox News confirmed this story through a senior law enforcement official.

The source says that the situation got serious enough that diplomats were brought in to mediate and the Secret Service Agents were expelled from the country of Colombia. After which a whole new crew of Secret Service Agents were rushed to Colombia to cover President Obama, but officials are saying that President Obama was not in any danger at any time.

So I can't help but ask, if Obama's Secret Service detail was "expelled" and sent home - who was doing security for the President of the United States?

Of those sent home, it was not immediately clear if all of the agents were involved in prostitution or just associated with incidents surrounding it.

And wait, that's not all, word is now coming out that Secret Service Agents have supposedly gotten in big trouble on Presidential trips in the past - but just not so many at one time. That's right, just not so many at one time. Imagine that!

Now I don't know if it's just more Washington spin to make something look better than it appears or if it's really the truth, but according to a Secret Service spokesman, "The behavior in question happened prior to the president’s arrival Friday for the Summit of the Americas."

According to the report, the Secret Service did not specify the misconduct or the exact number of people involved - but they did confirm there were "allegations" and that they were sent home.

To me, I would think there must be more than "allegations" if diplomats were brought in to mediate and the Secret Service Agents were immediately "expelled" from their country.

"The Secret Service takes all allegations of misconduct seriously. This entire matter has been turned over to our Office of Professional Responsibility, which serves as the agency's internal affairs component," agency spokesman Edwin Donovan said.

The alleged misconduct is an embarrassing headline as Obama kicks off meeting with 33 Western hemisphere leaders where issues of trade and economy are intended to be the focus.

On a foreign trip of this size, there’s a sizable fleet of Agents sent in to cover all aspects of the president’s trip and security – from driving official vehicles, to scouting locations over multiple shifts and several days. This "advance party" of Agents typically arrives several days ahead of the president’s arrival.

Prostitution is legal in Colombia in the so-called "tolerance zones."

But since Obama is slated to be in Colombia through Sunday and will attend several working sessions and meetings with other leaders, one can't help but wonder if the new detail of Secret Service Agents will have time to take in the local color - so to speak.


Story by Tom Correa

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

$1.25 Billion of Tax Money to Black Farmers - And Only Black Farmers!

According to the e-mail that I just received, this is sort of an old story - but it sort of slipped under the radar when it first took place. So have a seat and find out how far Reverse Discrimination can go!

Called the:
Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation Settlement

Formally known as the Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation Settlement, (case number, 08-mc-0511 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia), it is also known as "the Black Farmers case" or "Pigford II".

This settlement was the Obama Administration's idea to give $1.2 Billion of Taxpayer money to Black Farmers - and only Black Farmers.

The Department of Agriculture has everything to do with this. Through the Department of Agriculture, President Obama's administration authorized $1.25 Billion of our tax money to go to black farmers as payback for past discrimination from 1981 to 1996.

Yes, this has nothing to do with the Civil War years or even Slavery.

It's all about Affirmative Action. The Agriculture Department said that this was necessary in "addressing an unfortunate chapter in USDA's civil rights history."

On October, 27, 2011, Judge Paul L. Friedman of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted final approval of the Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation Settlement that he had preliminarily approved in May 2011.

"This agreement will provide overdue relief and justice to African American farmers, and bring us closer to the ideals of freedom and equality that this country was founded on," Obama said in a statement at the time.

The Court Order provides that the Claim Submission Period will begin on November 14, 2011 and end on May 11, 2012.

The history behind this goes back to 1997 when it was originally called the Pigford Case. And no, I don't know if or when the National Black Farmers Association got involved in this.

In 1997 and 1998, two class-action lawsuits entitled Pigford v. Glickman ("Pigford") and Brewington v. Glickman ("Brewington"), respectively, were filed on behalf of groups of African-American farmers.

Those lawsuits asserted that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, "USDA", had systematically discriminated against African-American farmers on the basis of race, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

After the Pigford and Brewington cases were consolidated, they were settled by the parties in 1999 and became The Largest Civil Rights Settlement In History.

The terms of the settlement were outlined in a Consent Decree entered by the Court on April 14, 1999, which stated that eligible claimants were required to file their claims with the case administrator by October 12, 1999.

The Consent Decree also stated that claimants who could show "extraordinary circumstances" for missing the October 12, 1999 deadline could file at a later date. At that time, September 15, 2000 was set as the "late-filing" deadline.

While approximately 22,700 claimants filed claims before the October 12, 1999 claims deadline, approximately 61,000 additional individuals requested permission to file claims after the October 12, 1999 claims deadline - but before the September 15, 2000 "late-filing" cut-off date.

Fewer than 3,000 of the 61,000 "late-filers" were found to have demonstrated the required "extraordinary circumstances" for receiving extra time to file their claims.

As a result, more than 58,000 "late-filers" did not have their discrimination claims heard. In addition, thousands of additional potential claimants filed late-filing petitions after the September 15, 2000 late-filing cut-off, but before June 18, 2008, the date of final enactment of the 2008 Farm Bill.

So where does the 2008 Farm Bill come in to play here?

Well, if you remember, Democrats controlled Congress in 2008 and on June 18, 2008, they passed and President Bush signed, a law providing claimants with a right to pursue their discrimination claims if they had petitioned to participate in Pigford, but did not have their petitions considered because they were filed late.

This law was passed as Section 14012 of the Farm, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, also known as the 2008 Farm Bill. It was conveniently tucked away in Section 14012 of the Bill.

The Farm Bill did not "re-open" the Pigford case. Instead, the Democrats in Congress provided a new right for Black Farmers to sue the Federal Government.

Although the 2008 Farm Bill created a cause of action for thousands of Black Farmers, the total amount of funding provided in that bill for valid claims was set at $100 Million.

But then again, $100 Million is not enough for some folks!

Enter the February 18, 2010 Obama Administration Settlement Agreement, where the Obama administration believed that $100 Million would certainly not be enough to pay out for all the claims - they decided to raise it.

After all, it isn't their money is it?

On February 18, 2010, attorneys for tens of thousands of Black Farmers and attorneys for USDA entered into a Settlement Agreement that would require Congress to fund an additional $1.15 Billion over and above the $100 Million for successful claimants - which brought the total funding for valid claims to an amazing $1.25 Billion of Taxpayer dollars.

On December 8, 2010, President Barack Hussein Obama signed into law the Claims Resolution Act of 2010, which provided $1.15 Billion to be added to the $100 Million already provided in the 2008 Farm Bill so that all claims from Black Farmers can be funded under the February 18, 2010 Settlement Agreement.

The Claims Resolution Act of 2010 also prescribed several new terms for incorporation into the Settlement Agreement.

So what's the current status of the Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation Settlement?

Well, the Settlement approved by Judge Friedman on October 27, 2011 resolves that all of the claims asserted in the 23 lawsuits that were consolidated into the single case called In re Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation, 08-mc-0511 (D.D.C.).

Judge Friedman’s October 27, 2011 Order approving the Settlement provides that the 180-day period for submitting claims under the Settlement runs from November 14, 2011 to May 11, 2012. Claims that are postmarked after May 11, 2012 will not qualify for an award.

The judge who approved this allowed for Reverse Discrimination by way of giving the Taxpayer money to people of only one ethnic background.

This is supposed to be a redress of wrongs done to Black Farmers. But how about the wrongs done to Asian, or Hispanic, or Italian, or Irish, or Portuguese Farmers? How about your average White American farmer who was wronged in the same way? Why is this group pulled out from the rest of the population to be used as the model of injustice?

Can anyone tell me that a Settlement based on race and color of skin is not wrong on the face of it, especially when there has been many ethnic groups who have been wronged in one way or another over time in the same way?

This Settlement stems from a lawsuit called Pigford v. Glickman (“Pigford”) was settled in 1999. The lawsuit involved claims by African American farmers that the USDA had discriminated against them between 1981 and 1996 based on race, wrongfully denying them farm loans, loan servicing, and other benefits, or giving them loans with unfair terms.

The basic premise is that no other race, white, yellow, or brown, were ever denied farm loans, loan services and other benefits, or given loans with unfair terms from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

If anyone believes that, than they are obviously living in somewhere other than the real world. Many people who are not Black have experienced those same problems. But no, they are not on the list to receive some sort of compensation - only Black Farmers are.

Something like this does nothing but act as more divisiveness among Americans. 

Remember Judge Friedman’s October 27, 2011 Order approving the Settlement provides that the 180-day period for submitting claims under the Settlement runs from November 14, 2011 to May 11, 2012.

So if you are a Black Farmer and want to submit a claim, remember that claims postmarked after May 11, 2012 will not qualify for an award  - and because the popular myth is that black folks are the only ones in the world who have ever experienced discrimination or problems with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, White, Asian, Native American, and Hispanic farmers need not apply!

Unless of course it happens and yes other ethnic groups do apply, and when they are turned down - then they too can maybe claim some sort of discrimination just like the Black Farmers did! 

Story by Tom Correa