Thursday, September 20, 2012

RANDOM SHOTS - ObamaCare Tax Penalties For 6 Million Middle Class Americans, Fast and Furious Report, And More!


FIRST SHOT!

ObamaCare Tax Penalty Is Coming To 6 Million Uninsured Middle-Class Americans!

Pay Up, Or Face Liens And Possible Prison Sentence!

All of those folks out there who are uninsured and thought that they were going to get something for free are about to find out that there is no such thing as free stuff.

Someone has to pay for it, and now the Bill for ObamaCare is coming due!

It was reported on September 19th that nearly 6 million Americans - and yes, most of them in the Middle Class - will be facing strict tax penalties for not carrying medical coverage.

Yes, once President Obama's health care overhaul law is fully in place and goes into effect, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office analysts say it estimates at least 6 Million Middle Class Americans will be hit with fines and penalties of about $1,200.00 per person.

That's right, the average penalty: about $1,200 in 2016. That's what Obama's Free Health Care will cost 6 Million Middle Class Americans.

President Obama's Care "Inconvenient Fact" that the Administration did not want to go public before the Election.

Gee, I wonder why?

The new estimate amounts to an "inconvenient fact" for the administration, a reminder of what critics of Obama's over-reaching super expensive federal program see as more broken promises.

The numbers from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office are significantly higher than a previous projection by the same office in 2010, shortly after the law was passed.

The earlier estimate found 4 Million people would be affected by ObamaCare tax Penalties. The difference -- 2 Million Americans - represents a 50% increase. And yes, maybe I do have a suspicious mind - I simply can't believe that the Obama administration forgot to include 2 Million Americans in their math.

The Obama administration may try to play the 6 Million figure down but saying that that's still only a sliver of the population, given that more than 150 Million people currently are covered by employer plans.

But friends, it still goes to the heart of the question as to whether he or his administration has been telling Americans the truth at all about anything.

In his first campaign for the White House, Obama pledged not to raise Taxes on individuals making less than $200,000 a year and couples making less than $250,000. Well guess what? He lied!

The Budget Office analysis found that nearly 80% of those who will face penalties or liens or possible prison time would be Americans who make up to or less than five times the Federal Poverty Level. That currently means that that would work out to $55,850 or less for an individual, and $115,250 or less for a family of four.

So if you are making $55,850 or less, and you don't have Medical Coverage, expect to be hit with a huge Tax Penalty. And yes, the average penalty is about $1,200 a year.

Yes, that's not a one time penalty. It is yearly! It is an average penalty of about $1,200 yearly starting in 2016.

Average Tax Penalty is $1,200 a Year.

"The bad news and broken promises from Obamacare just keep piling up," said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, who wants to repeal the law.

Not surprisingly, there was no immediate response from the administration. It is a Tax, and yes, it comes with

The Budget Office said most of the increase in its estimate is due to changes in underlying projections about the economy, incorporating the effects of new federal legislation, as well as higher unemployment and lower wages.

Starting in 2014, the new health care law requires virtually every legal resident of the U.S. to carry health insurance or face a tax penalty.

The Supreme Court upheld Obama's law as constitutional in a 5-4 decision this summer, finding that the insurance mandate and the tax penalty enforcing it fall within the power of Congress to impose taxes.

The Obama administration is trying to say that the IRS is not responsible for collecting the ObamaCare Tax Penalties, but friends please don't believe that lie. The penalties will be collected by the IRS, just like all Taxes.

Obama knew he needed ways to fund it.

Why would anyone be shocked that there is a price tag attached to it?

The Budget Office said the penalties will raise $6.9 Billion to help fund his program when it's fully in effect in 2016 - proving once again, there is nothing Free about ObamaCare. .

SECOND SHOT!

Al Qaeda, Former Gitmo Prisoner Was In On The Killings Of 4 Americans In Libya

I wonder how Obama and the Justice Department feels knowing that one of the ex-Gitmo Prisoners that they released went on to kill Americans?

It's now being reported that Intelligence sources are convinced that the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was directly tied to Al Qaeda - and yes, a former Guantanamo prisoner is  involved.

That revelation comes on the same day a top Obama administration official actually called last week's deadly assault what it really is: "a terrorist attack".

Today is the first time the attack has been described that way by the Obama administration after claims it had been a "spontaneous" act over some goofy YouTube video.

The whole let's blame a YouTube video didn't pass the sniff test from the get go. It was the usual Obama Blame Game, but it didn't work because they couldn't cover-up the fact that it was what it was - a terrorist attack.

Obama can't hide the fact that this was the second successful terrorist attack on Americans to take place on his watch! 

First it was Army Major Nidal's attack at Fort Hood. A terrorist attack that the Obama administration repeatedly try to play down as "work place violence."

"Yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, director of the National Counter-terrorism Center, said during a Senate hearing Wednesday.

Olsen echoed administration colleagues in saying U.S. officials have no specific intelligence about "significant advanced planning or coordination" for the attack.

However, his statement goes beyond White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and U.N Ambassador Susan Rice, saying the Sept. 11th attack on the U.S. Consulate was "spontaneous" because of the YouTube video.

Olsen is the first top administration official to call the strike "an act of terrorism."

Sufyan Ben Qumu is thought to have been involved and even may have led the attack. Qumu, a Libyan, was released from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 2007 and transferred into Libyan custody on the condition he be kept in jail.

He was released by the Qaddafi regime as part of its reconciliation effort with Islamists in 2008. So much for agreements with Muslim nations.

Sufyan Ben Qumu's Guantanamo files also show he has ties to the financiers behind the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks. The declassified files also point to ties with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a known Al Qaeda affiliate.

So please, tell me again why he was released? If he was found guilty enough for his involvement to the World Trade Center towers on 9/11/2001, whereas he was transferred into Libyan custody on the condition he be kept in jail - then why wasn't he simply hanged for killing Americans?


Olson, repeating Wednesday that the FBI is handling the Benghazi investigation, also acknowledged the attack could lead back to Al Qaeda and its affiliates.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, called Wednesday for an independent review of the attack.

"A State Department Accountability Review Board to look into the Benghazi attack is not sufficient," Collins said. "Given the loss of the lives of four Americans who were serving their country and the serious questions that have been raised about the security at our Consulate in Benghazi, it is imperative that a non-political, no-holds-barred examination be conducted."

As much as the Obama wants to sweep this under a rug, I'm sure that there will be more to follow. The Obama administration always seems to divert responsibility for what takes place in their administration.

THIRD SHOT! 

Department of Justice Officials Quits, Fast & Furious Report Slams Feds For "Disregard For Public Safety"

It was reported that a report was released on Wednesday regarding Operation Fast and Furious.

The report faulted a range of Federal Agencies for the Gunrunning Operation and accused officials in charge of a "disregard for public safety."

In the wake of the report, already one Justice Department official has resigned and another has now retired.

The report by the Department's Inspector General is the most comprehensive account yet as to what took place during that deadly operation which allowed over 2,000 weapons to be smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border.

Instead of working on a small scale, say a half dozen weapons, the Department of Justice used over 2,000 weapon which resulted in hundreds of firearms turning up at crime scenes in both countries so far.

The report says Attorney General Eric Holder was not made aware of potential flaws in the program until February of last year. But the report cites 14 other department employees - including Criminal Division head Lanny Breuer - for potential wrongdoing, recommending the department consider disciplinary action against them.

The report marked Jason Weinstein, the deputy assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division, as the highest-ranking DOJ employee in a position to stop the program. Weinstein, who disputes the findings, is resigning in the wake of the report.

Another official who was criticized for not asking enough questions about the Federal gunrunning operation is former ATF acting director Kenneth Melson. He retired after the report came down.

The huge nearly 500-page report was completed after investigators reviewed 100,000 documents and interviewed 130 people.

The report slams both the Phoenix office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the U.S. Attorney's Office for not taking action.

The program caught the attention of Congress and the rest of the country after weapons from Operation Fast and Furious were found at the crime scene of murdered Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

"Indeed, no one responsible for the case at either ATF Phoenix Field Division or the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona raised a serious question or concern about the government not taking earlier measures to disrupt a trafficking operation that continued to purchase firearms with impunity for many months," the report said.

"Similarly, we did not find persuasive evidence that any supervisor in Phoenix, at either the U.S. Attorney's Office or ATF, raised serious questions or concerns about the risk to public safety posed by the continuing firearms purchases or by the delay in arresting individuals who were engaging in the trafficking.

"This failure reflected a significant lack of oversight and urgency by both ATF and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Phoenix, and a disregard by both for the safety of individuals in the United States and Mexico," the report said.

The office said it "identified serious failures" by ATF leaders in supervising the operation.

The report faults both Breuer and Weinstein for not notifying superiors about a prior Bush-era program called Wide Receiver when questions about Fast and Furious arose. The report also said Weinstein knew about Operation Fast and Furious from discussions with an ATF official in early 2010 and his review of wiretaps that year.

The inspector general's report cites a conversation Weinstein had with ATF official Bill McMahon in April 2010. At the time, the department was trying to bring indictments in the Wide Receiver investigation. Weinstein said he was so upset to learn that ATF walked guns that he met with McMahon and others. After the meeting, McMahon told Weinstein about another operation, describing it to McMahon as "the opposite of Wide Receiver" and insisting it didn't involve gun-walking, according to Weinstein. That was Fast and Furious.

Months later, according to Weinstein, McMahon told Weinstein that some ATF officials in Phoenix felt wiretap applications were moving too slowly and the delay was having an effect on the investigation, so Weinstein helped push that along. Weinstein says he only read the cover sheets of wiretap applications. But the IG report says Weinstein was in a position to stop the program.

The report by Inspector General Michael Horowitz found the ATF and U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona shared equal responsibility for the gun-walking programs.

It also said senior leaders did little immediately after Terry's death to inquire about Operation Fast and Furious.

It faulted ATF headquarters for insufficient oversight of the program. And it cited the "inappropriate" effort to encourage dealers to sell firearms in transactions they knew were unlawful for weapons they did not intend to seize.

Further, the report said that an erroneous claim in a February letter to Congress that the department did not knowingly let guns walk was the result of officials relying on inaccurate information in the letter-drafting process.

DOJ officials Monty Wilkinson and Gary Grindler were also criticized for failing to inform Holder that two guns connected to Operation Fast and Furious were found at the Brian Terry murder scene.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who along with Sen. Charles Grassley led the charge on Capitol Hill to investigate the operation, said Wednesday that the report "confirms" congressional findings "of a near total disregard for public safety" in the program.

"Contrary to the denials of the Attorney General and his political defenders in Congress, the investigation found that information in wiretap applications approved by senior Justice Department officials in Washington did contain red flags showing reckless tactics and faults Attorney General Eric Holder's inner circle for their conduct," he said.

In an interview with Bret Baier on 'Special Report' Wednesday, Issa said that the report was good overall, but questions remain about a cover-up.

"The Terry family wants the answer for the initial failure and for the cover-up," he said.

"[Today's resignation] is only the tip of the iceberg. [Weinstein] should have been gone a year and a half ago and only resigned when the report pointed at him specifically."

Issa told Fox News that there is "no question" that there needs to be "real reform" in the Justice Department.

"We owe it to the Terry family to fix the system," he said. "We don't know, or will never know, why such a reckless or foolish tactic was done, continued and covered up."

Issa called on Obama to "provide accountability" for those "who failed to do their jobs."

To me, there are a few big question that need answering:

First, why did President Obama feel it necessary to evoke Executive Privilege when the Congressional Committee headed by Representative Issa asked for documents from Attorney General Eric Holder?
Second, because of President Obama evoking Executive Privilege, does President Obama have something to do with this operation?

And lastly, if he didn't have anything to do with running over 2,000 guns into Mexico that have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people on both sides of our Southern border, then why evoke Executive Privilege? What's Obama hiding?

FOURTH SHOT!

GM Pushes US Government To Sell Shares


The Obama administration is resisting a push by GM to sell its 26.5 percent stake in the automaker hoping to hold out and recoup more of the $50 billion it sunk into the company during the bailout, The Wall Street Journal Reported.

The way it goes is this, should the government divest itself of the 500 million shares it holds, it would lose about $15 Billion.

While the current GM stock price would have to more than double to $53 a share for the government to break even on the deal, Treasury might be willing to start selling if stock prices were in the $30s.

The Journal also reported there are politics at work here. Republican Mitt Romney opposed the auto bailout. If the federal government takes a big loss on the deal, it might harm the re-election chances of President Barack Obama by making Mitt Romney look like he was right after all.

GM officials are also pressing for the sale for other reasons. First they want to end government intervention in such things as executive pay and the use of corporate jets and such. Second, they want to lift the stigma of being known as "Government Motors," the Journal reported.

The auto bailout amounted to $85 billion that went to GM, Chrysler, and some suppliers. Chrysler is free from government control, having taken out a loan to pay the government back, the Journal reported.

I can't help but wonder if GM is doing better because of restructuring their management, or if they're doing better because they are saving money on things like not having to pay UAW workers for not being there?

FIFTH SHOT!

Analysts see Democrats holding the Senate


Republicans hope to take control of the Senate, but a few analysts say that that may not happen.

Analysts are now projecting that the Democrats will hold on - but with a reduced majority, the Atlantic Wire reports.

Both Nate Silver, author of the FiveThrityEight blog, and Electoral-Vote.com show the Democrats holding on with a one-vote margin.

“In one of the most closely watched and hardest fought races, Democrat Elizabeth Warren has opened up a lead on Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts,” the Atlantic Wire writes.

“FiveThirtyEight gives her a 64 percent chance of winning at the moment. A Michigan Senate race that was thought to be competitive earlier this year is now looking like a blowout for Democrat Debbie Stabenow, and Missouri's Claire McCaskill is pulling away from everyone's favorite rape pregnancy expert Todd Akin.”

Right now there are 51 Senate Democrats who are joined by two independents, Joe Lieberman and Bernie Sanders. Though Joe Lieberman is retiring and his seat may turn red, independent Angus King is likely to take Maine Senate seat from the Republicans.

If Obama wins, at least we'll still have a House of Representatives that can hold him to account for the Bills that he'll try to get through.

The problem that the American people have with Obama is that he likes to bypass Congress, both the House and the Senate, by doing things through Executive Order. And they can't be repealed unless by an incoming President.

If Romney wins, as I hope happens, then he will have to rescind Obama's Executive Orders and battle with the Senate to get anything done to help the country.

It's a tough road ahead of us, with a Republican Senate would definitely make life easier after we get Obama out of the White House. Republican control of the entire Congress would be a blessing!


LAST SHOT!

Contrast 10 Quotes on Islam from Obama with 10 Quotes on Christianity

We all saw the floor of the Democratic National Convention erupted over a move to restore to the Democrat platform a reference to "God" and recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

Democrats were hardly in agreement over the reversal.

As could be plainly heard, a very large and very loud group of delegates shouted "No" as convention chairman, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, called for the vote.

Villaraigosa had to call for the vote three times before ruling that the "ayes" had it. Many in the crowd booed after he determined the language would be restored. Many listening knew that the "nays" were as loud if not louder than the "ayes" but that didn't matter.

It is said that their platform battle over whether to restore to a reference to "God" and recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital was the biggest platform fight in years.

It signaled that Democrats were worried that their platform language could have been politically damaging in a tight election year.

Lately because of President Obama lack of concern with what's happening in the Middle-east, his non-involved attitude has many wondering why?
Why doesn't he care about the Muslim protests? Why it bother him so little that he doesn't attend his National Security Intelligence Briefings?

Of course the big question is: Why does he side with Muslim after they have killed Americans?

I started reading a few of President Obama's quotes regarding Islam to try to find clues as to how he looks at the Muslim faith, Islam. I then tried comparing this to his quotes about Christianity, Christians, and the Bible.

I really believe they reveal a lot about Obama's faith and allegiance.

Here Are 10 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam:

#1 "Islam has always been part of America"

#2 "we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities"

#3 "These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings."

#4 "America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings."

#5 "So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed"

#6 "Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality"

#7 "As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith."

#8 "I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month."

#9 "That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear."

#10 "I also know that Islam has always been a part of America's story."

Now let's do a little contrast and comparison to what Barack Hussein Obama says about Christians and Christianity as a whole.

Here Are 10 Quotes By Barack Obama About Christianity:

As you read his words, you'll see great examples of his absolute contempt for Christianity, Christians, and the Bible.

#1 "Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation"

#2 "We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation."

#3 "Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith?"

#4 "Even those who claim the Bible's inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages - the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ's divinity - are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life."

#5 "The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a Constitutional amendment to ban it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in counseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics."

#6 From Obama's book, The Audacity of Hope: "I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex - nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount."

#7 "I find it hard to believe that my God would consign four-fifths of the world to hell. I can't imagine that my God would allow some little Hindu kid in India who never interacts with the Christian faith to somehow burn for all eternity. That's just not part of my religious makeup."

#8 "Those opposed to abortion cannot simply invoke God’s will--they have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths."

#9 On his support for civil unions for gay couples: "If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount."

#10 "I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people."

In Islam, it is believed that the indoctrination of child is an absolute. It is their belief that by the age of 10, a Muslim child will always be a Muslim child.

Even if Barack Obama is not a Muslim, his indoctrination as a Muslim when he was a child may have taken effect as it was meant to do.

Maybe this is one reason that Obama has a problem with Christians, Christianity and the Bible, while having no problem whatsoever with the teachings of the Koran or the violence being done by Muslims?




Story by Tom Correa

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

RANDOM SHOTS - $5 to $6 A Gallon Gas Coming Soon, Obama Admin Cover-up Of Deaths In Middle-east, Wal-Mart, and More!


FIRST SHOT

Coming Soon: $5 to $6 Gallon Gas - Courtesy Of Barack Obama

Please don't be too surprised if you see $5 to $6 a gallon at the pumps real soon. It was reported recently that gas is headed there because of a combination of factors.

Those factors being instability in the Muslim world, a drought in America's Midwest and South that will effect the price and availability of fuel alternative corn, and a failure to prepare for such an emergency as another Oil Embargo or oil production slow down as a result of the unrest in the Middle-east. 

A little history:  

Under President Barack Hussein Obama, gasoline prices have doubled, now it may get worse yet.

We should all remember the high of $4 a gallon of gasoline under President Bush in the summer of 2008. 

We should also remember that when George W. Bush took over the White House from Bill Clinton almost 8 years before, gas was $1.90 at the pumps.

After it hit that high of $4 a gallon in July of 2008, it took President Bush six months to bring it back down to livable levels of under $2 a gallon.

Barack Obama was sworn in as President on January 20, 2009.  In the week that ended on January 19, 2009, the average weekly retail gasoline price in the U.S. was $1.83 a gallon.
In May of 2011, just 3 years later, retail gasoline prices averaged above $4 a gallon. It has hovered between $3.40 and $4.40 ever since.

At present:

The most recent retail price nationally, as of the week ending September 10, 2012, was $3.91/gallon.

When Barack Obama came to office, President Bush had just a few months earlier opened up Federal lands to more oil drilling. Bush's action's drove the prices from $4 a gallon in July of 2008 to $1.83 a gallon six months later by the time Obama came into office.

One of the first things that Obama did was to stop drilling and make permits harder to come by.

Because of his actions, the price of gas - and the over 6,000 produced using petroleum have risen in price sharply. and yes, as you already know - Obama has done nothing to bring down the price of gas at the pumps or the price of oil used to make everything from cell phones to televisions to clothing and jewelry and so on.

Yes, over 6,000 common everyday items that are used in our everyday lives is made out of oil. Its cost effects our manufacturing and subsequently our hiring.

And yes, one of the things about our oil concerns that no one is talking about has to do with our manufacturing capabilities.

You see, even if we all had Electric Cars powered by the sun, America would still need 54% of all of the oil that we import today just to make products that we all have come to rely on.

Friends, this is very important. And yes, I know that I talk about it a lot.

But really, one single 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest, 54%, is used to make things such as:

 Ink, Floor Wax, Ballpoint Pens, Football Cleats, Upholstery, Men's and Ladies Sweaters, Boats, Insecticides, Bicycle Tires, Sports Car Bodies, Nail Polish, Fishing lures, Dresses, Tires, Golf Bags, Perfumes, Cassettes, Dishwasher parts, Tool Boxes, Shoe Polish, Motorcycle Helmet, Caulking, Petroleum Jelly, Transparent Tape, CD Players, Faucet Washers, Antiseptics, Clothesline, Curtains,  Food Preservatives, Basketballs, Soap, Vitamin and Pill Capsules, Antihistamines, Purses, Shoes, Dashboards, Cortisone, Deodorant, Footballs, Putty, Dyes, Panty Hose, Refrigerant, Percolators, Life Jackets, Rubbing Alcohol, Linings, Skis, TV Cabinets, Shag Rugs, Electrician's Tape, Tool Racks, Car Battery Cases, Epoxy, Paint, Mops, Slacks, Insect Repellent, Oil Filters, Umbrellas, Yarn, Fertilizers, air Coloring, Roofing, Toilet Seats, Fishing Rods, Lipstick, Denture Adhesive, Linoleum, Ice Cube Trays, Synthetic Rubber, Speakers, Plastic Wood, Electric Blankets, Glycerin, Tennis Rackets, Rubber Cement, Fishing Boots, Dice, Nylon Rope, Candles, Trash Bags, House Paint, Water (PVC) Pipes, Hand Lotion, Roller Skates, Surf Boards, Shampoo, Wheels, Paint Rollers, Shower Curtains, Guitar Strings, Luggage, Aspirin, Safety Glasses, Antifreeze, Football Helmets, Awnings, Eyeglasses, Clothes, Toothbrushes, Ice Chests, Footballs, Combs, CD's & DVD's, Paint Brushes, Detergents, Vaporizers, Balloons, Sun Glasses, Tents, Heart Valves, Crayons, Parachutes, Telephones, Enamel, Pillows, Dishes, Cameras, Anesthetics, Artificial Turf, Artificial limbs, Bandages,  Dentures, Model Cars, Folding Doors, Hair Curlers, Cold cream, Movie film, Soft Contact lenses, Drinking Cups, Fan Belts, Car Enamel, Shaving Cream, Ammonia, Refrigerators, Golf Balls, Toothpaste, and so on.

This is only a short list of the over 6,000 products made from oil. If you take a look at the example of some of the products made from oil, you can see that oil (petroleum) is not just used for gas for our cars, trucks, and whatever else takes gas.

If oil production stops or slows, and we are hit with higher oil prices, what does Obama think is going to happen to the price of any of the products that I've mentioned, or our ability to manufacture them, or a company's ability to keep it's workers if manufacturing slows down?

And yes, Obama does nothing about it. I really believe that he thinks that because he is likable that the Muslim world and Arab Oil would never shut down on us.

Of course, now the drought in the heartland has meant less corn for both food for people and feed for animals, yet the Federal Government in the form of the EPA has not found it fit to stop using precious corn as a fuel alternative. Instead the EPA will not relent and the price of food is rising 

Of course the Feds are still making it mandatory to use corn - no matter how it effects the price of food for Americans. And yes, Obama does nothing about it - especially when all it would take is a phone call to the EPA to tell them to stop the fuel alternative mandate during this emergency period. 
Now the Middle-East is on fire and the oil wells over there are slowing production as a result of Barack Obama's marvelous foreign policies.

And yes, even if we did have a Muslim President as many have told me that we already do, it wouldn't matter because the Muslim world would still hate us because they don't want us there.

What have we done to prepare for any embargo or halt to Middle-east Oil? Not a damn thing!

Bush's energy plan to harness our own natural resources would have helped if continued and not scraped like it was almost 4 years ago.

The Keystone XL Pipeline would have helped our Energy Independence, so would opening up more Federal Lands to Drilling.

Both are ideas where Barack Obama said "NO!"

He knows that if he said yes, he'd lose the Environmentalist Wacko vote. They'd turn on him like vegans in an unguarded vegetable garden.

We are in a fix, and Obama has successfully put us there by outlawing drilling and siding with the Muslims who are now ruling much of the Middle-East while it's on fire.

So no, please don't be surprised if you see $5 to $6 a gallon at the pumps real soon. It'll be courtesy of Barack Obama.

Yesterday, I paid $4.49 for a gallon of regular. This really has to stop, but friends, Obama isn't doing a thing about it!

And honestly, I guess that that the rub here. That's the real insult here.

We can see for ourselves that prices are more than double from what they were when Obama was sworn in, yet Obama is always out raising millions of dollars in campaign money for himself because he thinks we should keep him as our president.

He wants us to keep him as our president while he shows us that he is totally unconcerned about our problems. That's really how I see it.

Instead of working on our energy problems, manufacturing capabilities, our military strength, keeping Medicare alive and well, keeping Social Security from failing, keeping Iran from getting the bomb, or a list of other things - no, he's only concerned about Mitt Romney's tax papers from 20 years ago.

Why can't he just do a little of his job while he's running around the country telling us that we should keep him on as president?

Part of Obama's job is having to actually attend his daily National Security Intel Briefings; is making sure our Embassies and citizens are as secure and safe as possible overseas; is to help Americans get back to work instead of always only working on extending his own job; and yes, his job is to try to get oil prices down to a livable level.

Obama doesn't seem to have time for America! Too bad, hell of a talker though!

It would be nice if Obama would find time for America, instead of only worrying about himself and Mitt Romney's tax papers!

SECOND SHOT!

Libyan President says "No" while Obama says "Yes" Controversy

Libyan President el-Megarif Insists Obama YouTube blame "completely unfounded and preposterous"

New Evidence: There Was No Demonstration Before Attack On US Consulate

Was the terrorist attack in Libya "spontaneous" like the Obama administration is trying to make us believe, or was it "planned" as all evidence is pointing to?

Did Obama's policy spark the latest Mideast problem? And really, is Obama even concerned about anti-Americans protesting America - or those killed?

An intelligence source on the ground in Libya told Fox News that there was no demonstration outside the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi prior to last week's attack

This information challenges the Obama administration's claims that the assault grew out of a "spontaneous" protest against an anti-Islam film.

The intelligence source said no protests were happening before the attackers struck at about 9:35 p.m. local time last Tuesday.

The account backs up claims by a purported Libyan security guard who told McClatchy Newspapers late last week that the area was quiet before the attack.

"There wasn't a single ant outside," the unnamed guard, who was being treated in a hospital, said in the interview.

These details appear to conflict with accounts from the Obama administration that the attack spawned from an out-of-control protest. The Libyan president also said Sunday that the strike was planned in advance.

But a senior Obama administration official told Fox News on Monday morning that the Libyan president's comments are not consistent with "the consensus view of the U.S. intelligence community," which has been investigating the incident, and are accordingly not credible.

"He doesn't have the information we have," the U.S. official said of Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif. ""He doesn't have the (data) collection potential that we have."

But honestly, to me it sounds like the Obama Administration is scrambling to cover-up their screw-up.

To have some Obama administration Official call a guard, who was an eye witness with no reason to lie about what he saw, essentially a liar is way over the top.

Many Americans, like myself, were rooting for the overthrew of Qaddafi. And since then, things have been shaky to say the least. And I'm sorry to say, but with the cuts that Obama has made in America's Intelligence capabilities, we simply don't have the sources to be "absolute" in our thinking of what is taking place there and other parts of the world.

We are simply spread too thin to be effective, besides if folks recall Obama's cuts to the Intelligence Community was based on the silly idea that we have spy satellites that can give us the same Intel - when in fact, people there is always the best evidence.

Libyan President insists that Obama's excuse that a small insignificant YouTube is the cause of the turmoil is "completely unfounded and preposterous." And yes, he's in a position to know.

The Libyan leader told CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the government in Tripoli harbors "no doubt" that the Sept. 11 attack that killed U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was "preplanned, predetermined."

As soon as the situation feel apart, the Obama administration went into crisis mode.

They immediately got their talking points out to NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, NPR,  and the liberal News media ran with the lie that it was that goofy YouTube video that incited this explosion in the Muslim world.

Of course the Obama administration wasn't going to leave it to their lap dogs in the liberal media, they had to get out their own people. One such person was Obama's U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, who appeared on all five Sunday morning talk shows.

Remember the Obama administration is calling Libyan President a liar when he insists that Obama's excuse that a small insignificant YouTube is the cause of the turmoil is "completely unfounded and preposterous."
And yes, he's in a position to know.

Libyan President's assessment has conflicted directly with the preliminary conclusion offered on Sunday by the Obama minion.
Ambassador Susan Rice maintained that the Benghazi incident "was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo, as a consequence of the video," and that after the protest outside the U.S. consulate gathered steam, "those with extremist ties joined the fray and came with heavy weapons."

That's the Obama admin's line.!

When she was pushed to answer if the timing of the Benghazi incident - the eleventh anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks - was simply a coincidence, believe it or not, Ambassador Susan Rice said: "It is coincidental. All evidence we have points to this video being the spark of these events. In all of the Intel and traffic, there was no one out there saying, 'Oh, it's September 11th, we must avenge...'"

This Obama administration either have no shame, are liars on a level only seen in Washington, or they're all complete idiots!

When I was trained in security in the Marine Corps, I found out way back then that it really doesn't take a security genius to understand how terrorist operate:
  • they want instant gratification,
  • to get instant gratification - they create a great deal of destruction swiftly,
  • they want instant recognition,
  • to get that instant recognition -  they want a a lot of publicity so that others of their ilk will see what they've done,
  • and though they can pick other days to put their plan into action - they usually want to do it on days of high public exposure in heavily populated areas such as during celebrations, sporting events, political rallies, on religious holidays at religious events, and of course on the anniversary of their great martyr's immortal attack on the "Great Satan" on 9/11.
Does this really surprise Washington? As I said before, even an old broke down former Marine like myself  - who is real far from being some sort of security genius today - can understand that we were going to be attacked on that date at some point.

Anyone who knows anything about security will tell you that terrorist attacks usually take place on significant dates and anniversaries of significant holidays and events - such as 9/11 when their Heroes died. 

Obviously their attacks are not restricted to those dates, days and time, but that is there usual method of operation.

It pains me to no end o think that both Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton did not
  1. put all of our Embassies in the Middle-east, North Africa, and Southeast Asia on some sort of alert footing to be in a position of readiness in case of possible attacks,
  2. advise our forces in Afghanistan to take extra measures to protect our troops because 9/11 may bring an attack as a way for terrorist to commemorate a day of great significance to Muslim terrorist,
  3. make appropriate measure to re-enforce our Embassies prior to the 9/11,
  4. or simply evacuate key personnel until after the anniversary of 9/11.
In today's world where at minimum a message of caution can be sent out and received almost instantly, there's no reason for this absolute failure in leadership from this administration. Both the White House and the State Department are culpable, guilty, and shamefully inept.

THIRD SHOT!

Anyone Ask Obama, "So Where Were The Marines? "

And since we're on this subject, since when do we leave the security of our embassies to other nations?

In preparation for the anniversary of 9/11, why weren't U.S.Marines sent to re-enforce those Embassies weeks ahead of time?

Why weren't Marines sent in slowly so to not alarm the fanatics in the area? Why weren't they armed to repeal an attack?

As an old Marine, I remember a recruiting poster back in the 70's that proudly announced, "No one likes to fight, but someone should know how!"

Marines are not Policemen, they don't arrest and detain criminals - they defend and kill in defense of our lives and liberty. Our enemies understand that.

They understand that if they really want to meet Allah, U.S. Marines can arrange that meeting. Muslims have learned that that is a reality.

Marines were needed, not wannabe military Policemen types from shaky countries. Not other Muslims who might step aside when the shit hits the fan!

White House Officials and the State Department supposedly express satisfaction - that's right, they are satisfied with the security of our Embassies there.

Imagine that! They are "satisfied" with the security that got our people killed!

Are these people so far out of touch with reality that they sacrifice lives because of some sort of political experiment with another country that has been unstable for months?  What the Hell is wrong with our people in Washington?

They are "satisfied!" Yes, they are satisfied with the cooperation they received from foreign governments acting to protect American diplomats and their families. Imagine that!

The White House and the State Department feel this way because President Obama had supposedly reached out to foreign heads of state, namely Egypt, Yemen and Libya.

But wait, if that's the case - then why the big change in staffing now?

Yes, believe it or not, after the fact that the State Department said it was "satisfied" with the security that got our people killed, now the State Department is making a shift of plans that started sometime after Friday evening.

The State Department has now announced the evacuation of diplomats' family members and "non-essential" personnel from U.S. Embassies in Tunisia and Sudan, sites of some of the most violent scenes on Friday.

No kidding! Talk about a week late. This action - done earlier - could have saved lives.

I'd hate to be Hilliary Clinton or Barack Obama when they explain to the widows and families of those they got killed - why exactly it took them so long to do what could have kept their husbands and fathers and sons alive?

Why didn't they take this action before 9/11 to keep those Americans alive? Obviously, there action is too late.

One old saying is, "closing the barn door after the horses escape," but this goes deeper than simply that bit of wit. It goes to lives being lost because of their failure to act. It's criminal.

Barack Obama and Hilliary Clinton failed, and our people died because of their screw up. And no, neither has the cojones to admit they screwed up because they worry more about politics than doing what's right.

All this is, is one more reason for me to vote for Mitt Romney and get that whole stinking gang out of there. Their incompetence is getting Americans killed.

FOURTH SHOT!

Wal-Mart Apologizes To School Choir After Store Refuses To Let Them Sing "God Bless America" On 9/11

It was reported on September 14, 2012, that Wal-Mart apologized for not allowing students to sing "God Bless America" on 9/11 in a store. (WSVN)

Wal-Mart has apologized to a school choir after management at a Florida store refused to allow them to perform "God Bless America" inside the store on Sept. 11.

WSVN reported that choir director Ana Conner's group of 75 students at Coconut Palm Elementary in Pembroke Pines was scheduled to sing inside their local Wal-Mart on the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorism attacks as a tribute to the victims.

However, Conner says when she and her students arrived, the manager refused to allow the children to sing.
"On a scale from one to 10, a 10 as far as disappointment goes," Conner told WSVN.

Principal Terri Thelmas told the Sun Sentinel that in an "effort to right a wrong," the students went outside and performed in the parking lot. The students and parents were already heading to their cars when the police arrived, saying they were responding to reports of a "flash mob."

Thelmas tells the Sun Sentinel that she is the one who arranged the performance with the Wal-Mart store manager named "Frank." The manager on duty that night reportedly called the choir a "liability" and added that "Frank" had been fired.

A spokeswoman for Wal-Mart later apologized to the school on behalf of the company, saying the concert would be rescheduled.

"We regret this happened and apologize to the students, parents and the school for this experience," Kayla Whaling, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, told the Sun Sentinel. "Unfortunately, this was a situation of miscommunication, and it should have been handled differently."

"We're also inviting the kids back to the store to help honor the victims and fallen heroes."

Thelmas told the newspaper that the performance was arranged as part of a school-related "I Will" campaign that encourages public service on 9/11.

I can't help but see this as a trend for Wal-Mart.

You see, when I first read this story - I couldn't help but shack my head. Not out of disbelief but because I've seen Wal-Mart change its attitude over the years.

It used to be the all American store, and not be full of Political Correctness. I can't say that that's the case anymore.

Part of the reason that I say this is because of what took place at the Wal-Mart near here in Jackson, California, a few years ago during the Christmas season.

Employees there were told that they could not say, "Merry Christmas" or they would be fired. No kidding!

The employees were told by the store manager that Wal-Mart policy is that saying "Merry Christmas" offends some people during the "Holiday Season." So they scraped "Merry Christmas"!

When I checked on this, they didn't want to talk about it -  or even referring to that time of year as a "Christmas Holiday". The people there told me that they would be fired if they even said the word "Christmas". They were told to refer to that time of year as the "Holidays" or "Holiday Season."

Since then, that's the way its been. And yes, to my knowledge, it'll be that way again this year.

I see Wal-Mart as surrendering to Political Correctness. They have lost touch with what has made them into the giant they are. Because of this, I see their stores as being less friendly.

And of course, they do have a real problem lately.

I don't know who is running Wal-Mart since their founder died, but they need to get back to basics and offer American made goods. It is extremely apparent that they are carrying less and less "Made In U.S.A" products, while at the same time bringing in more and more foreign made goods.

When I've tried calling them about it, I'm told that they don't see a problem with it.

They don't seem to understand their customer demographics - what kinds of customers they have. Or in some cases, folks who used to shop there.

Americans interested in supporting Americans are a huge part of their base. Either Wal-Mart seems to have forgotten that, or they just don't care.

I really hate to say that that is how I see that big company these days. I really don't know if Wal-Mart cares if people are unhappy seeing less and less American made products - and more and more foreign made goods.

I don't know if they really care if people want stores, all stores, to return to a day when Political Correctness didn't rule the roost - and yes, it was OK to pleasantly wish someone "Merry Christmas."

I really get the impression that it doesn't matter to then because they feel they can lose our business and simply make it up somewhere else. Or so they think!

FIFTH SHOT!

The Great Drought Of 2012!

The Great Drought of 2012 has hit America's Midwest and South hard. So hard that we may be seeing food supplies in America hit all time lows.

The problem is that the ongoing drought continues to impact the region’s major water reservoirs, as lakes and reservoirs have fallen dangerously low.

The rain storms in early July did help some, but not enough to make a difference. And of course, places like Iowa and Missouri haven't seen rain for long time now.

Bart Kinney is from Missouri, and I had a chance to talk to him yesterday about what's going on there.

What he had to say was an eye opener for me. I had heard it was bad, but not that bad.

Corn is smaller than half or non-existent from what it should be this year, cows are dying or having being sold off, and it's all because everything is so dry. Yes, America's Agriculture Producers are in deep trouble like never before.

Sure, I know someone is going to try to remind me of the Dust Bowl of the 1930 - but this is very different than back then. Now droughts have become cyclic, as Bart was saying, its happening every seven years to a much larger area then was effected in the Dust Bowl days of the 1930s.

Yes, ranchers are having to get rid of whole herds - not even being able to keep their seed stock. And as for creeks, and rivers, they along with wells down to 300 feet are drying up. Wells for water for homes in the rural countryside are being dug having to go down to 1,700 feet before hitting water.

And no, though our Agriculture Producers are hardest hit, other residents are not above being effected.

These days the state has mandatory water conservation,  and even the kids in colleges are being told not to waste watter and take shorter showers - as well as not wasting water washing cars or watering lawns.
According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the drought continues to intensify over parts of the central United States.

In August, they note that  we saw extreme and exceptional drought continuing to expand or intensify over parts of Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, and Illinois.

The  Drought Monitor map early this month shows 52.27 percent of the United States and Puerto Rico in moderate drought or worse; 38.48 percent in severe drought or worse; and 20.18 percent of the country in extreme drought or worse.

The U.S. Drought Monitor map is jointly produced by the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and about 350 drought observers across the country. It is released each Thursday based on data through the previous Tuesday.

Statistics for the percent area in each category of drought are automatically added to the U.S. Drought Monitor website each week for the entire country and Puerto Rico, for the 48 contiguous states.

I don't know where the answer is. Obviously we need rain. We also need storage for the future. And we need something else, we need a White House administration that is concerned about Agriculture in America.

If we did have an "Agriculture Friendly" administration, then maybe they would feel inclined to get the EPA to help Ag producers instead of making their lives miserable with more and more burdensome regulations.

What does this have to do with EPA Regulations you ask? Well, catch ponds some more than 5 feet deep have dried up.

In many cases, State and Federal EPA regulations stop farmers and ranchers in many areas from creating bigger deeper catch ponds where our Ag producers can attempt to keep and store water to get them through times like these.

And friends, if folks are right, and it does in fact become a cyclic event that takes place every 7 years, then we need to do something for more water storage to get folks through tough months when rainfall is zero to none at all.

An Ag friendly administration would help.

LAST SHOT!

So How Long Can Insurgents Fight On If They Still Believe In What They're Doing?

Some folks are under the impression that Insurgents are only an Iraq thing. Some folks would make us think IEDs and roadside bombs are a new thing in the history of war.

Many think that all of the fighting stopped after America won World War II. That is was sort of like a light-switch in that everyone just sort of stopped fighting, put down their guns and knives and explosives, and went home, that the Germans and Japanese didn't do anything but resign themselves to peace after the surrenders took place.

History of the aftermath of World War II for Germany and Japan says otherwise. In Germany, there were still Nazi Werewolf Packs (Werewolves) who raided and killed all in the name of their Fuhrer after the war.

The problems faced by the coalition's occupation forces in Iraq were compared to those encountered by occupation forces in Germany after World War II. The Iraqi insurgency would ultimately prove to be as futile in realizing its objectives as had the Werewolves

In Japan, there were also hold outs.

In fact, I remember being in the Marine Corps in the 1970s and reading about this one Japanese Soldier.

I never forgot about it because it was so out of the ordinary.

The final chapter of the story of Japanese Soldier Hiroo Onoda took place in March of 1974.

Yes, a full 29 years after the official end of World War II, Hiroo Onoda, who was a former Japanese Army intelligence officer, finally walked out of the jungle of Lubang Island in the Philippines and surrendered.

When he walked out, he handed over his sword - which is hanging from his hip in photo - his rifle, ammunition belt, and several hand grenades.


Back in December of 1944, as a young officer, Onoda had been sent to Lubang Island to join an existing unit of Japanese soldiers with the objective of hampering and harassing the enemy.

Allied forces overtook the island just a few months later. When that happened, they captured or killed all but Onoda and three other Japanese soldiers.

The four ran into the hills and began a decades-long insurgency extending well past the end of the war.
Several times they found or were handed leaflets notifying them that the war had ended, but they refused to believe it. Imagine that! They refused to believe it.

In 1950, one of the soldiers turned himself in to Philippine authorities.

By 1972, Onoda's two other compatriots were dead, killed during Guerrilla attacks on American and Filipinos.  This left Hiroo Onoda alone.

Then in 1974, Onoda met a Japanese college dropout, Norio Suzuki, who was in the Philippines on his way to traveling the world. They struck up a friendship.

Through Norio Suzuki, Onoda's former Commanding Officer was located and flew to Lubang Island to formally relieve Onoda of duty, and bring him home to Japan.

Over the years, the small group had killed some 30 Filipinos in various attacks, but Onoda ended up going free after he received a pardon from then President Ferdinand Marcos.

And yes, that's a true story!

Story by Tom Correa

Sunday, September 16, 2012

RANDOM SHOTS - Screw 'Em, Libyan President Disagrees With Obama Over YouTube Video, Google Stands Up To Obama, And Much More!


FIRST SHOT!

"Screw 'Em! Don't Give Them A Dime Of Our Money For Killing Our People!"    

Right now, our flag, American flags are being burned across the Middle-East by Muslims who Obama said would respect us and "like" us more if Washington coddled up to them.

We have been told by Obama how Islam has given so much to the world in the form of peace and technology and so on.
Yet all I can go on is what I see, they produce death and destruction! They live in anarchy and apparently enjoy it. Yes, there are some calm heads in the Middle-East, but they seem almost non-existent is a sea of crazies.

Now the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood is calling of  their suggested "Million-Man March" against us.

Imagine that, but don't think it's about wanting peace and friendship with America.

After calling for a "million-man march" today against the United States in response to an anti-Muhammad video, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood suddenly reversed itself and called it off.

Supposedly it realized that it was fanning the flames of violent protests over which it has little control.

Liberal mouthpieces in the media are trying to say that it is likely a response to President Barack Obama’s comment that Egypt is neither an ally nor an enemy – a gaffe, for sure, as Egypt has been an ally of the United States since 1989 – but one that appears to have gotten the Brotherhood’s attention.

Nope, not hardly!

I really believe they've changed their mind for other reasons. Fact is, because of their recent actions they will probably lose Billions of American Taxpayer Dollars when it comes up for a vote in Congress.

And yes, in an election year, not even a dumb as a box of rocks Democrat would vote for Billions of Dollars for Egypt after they have killed our people and demonstrated the hate for us. Rightfully so, we should say, "Screw 'em! Don't give them a dime!"

Egypt has received $1.4 Billion in American Taxpayer Dollars each year since Obama has been in office.

Now that Muslims have murdered 4 Americans and have waged war against us for the last few days, a majority of Americans are saying "Screw 'em! Don't give them a dime of our money!"

And yes, our people in Congress are listening. Obama who is trying to steer the focus to a half-baked YouTube video wants America to still authorize the Billions in aid for the Muslim world.

As I said before, Americans are pretty united in saying, "Screw 'em! Don't give them a dime!" And yes, Congress should be listening.

SECOND SHOT!

Obama Attended No National Security Intelligence Briefings The Week Before The Embassy Attacks

In my last article, I noted the fact that President Barack Hussein Obama has had a dismal record of attending his National Security Intelligence Briefings known as the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB).

George W. Bush did not miss 1 day in 8 years in office. Too bad Obama can't even come close to that record.

During his first 1,225 days in office, Obama attended his PDB only 536 times — or 43.8% of the time.


During 2011 and the first half of 2012, Obama's attendance at those critical meeting became even less frequent — falling to just over 38%.

Now the bad news continues.

Now we find out that according to the White House calendar, there is no record of President Barack Obama attending his daily intelligence briefing - known as the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) - in the week leading up to the attacks on the U.S. embassy in Cairo and the murder of U.S. Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and three American members of his staff:

Prior to the murders of Steven and the 3 others, the last time the White House calendar confirms that Obama actually attended his PDB intelligence briefing was on September 5th.

Obama and Biden did find time off the golf course to meet with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta at 5:00 p.m. yesterday.

According to a recent study by the Government Accountability Institute, Mr. Obama has only attended 43.8 percent of his Presidential Daily Briefs in the first 1,225 days of his Administration.

The White House response to this is to say that President Obama reads his daily intelligence reports on his iPad, even if he does not attend the briefings personally.

And no, I don't know how his iPad answers his questions if he has any. But then again, maybe he never does and simply leaves everything up to other around him.

Maybe the guy writing his teleprompter knows more than he does? It's a good bet that that's the case!

Obama is really something else. Why can't he do his damn job even by attending briefings designed to keep the President of the United States abreast of what's going on?

I still believe that if he had, maybe those 4 Americans would still be alive.

THIRD SHOT!

Libyan President Does Not Agree With Obama That YouTube Video Sparked Turmoil - Also Says Al Qaeda "Preplanned" The Attack On U.S. Consulate

Reported today, Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif said he does not agree with President Obama in that the turmoil there is the result of a YouTube video.

He also believes Al Qaeda is responsible for the coordinated attack at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans. He also said that roughly 50 people have arrested in connection with the violence,.

This is according to the Libyan President in two broadcast interviews on Sunday.

Megarif, president of the Libyan National Congress, reportedly differed with the Obama administration’s position that the attacks Tuesday were sparked by some anti-Islamic video on the Internet.

In an interview with NPR, Megarif said foreigners have been infiltrating his country over the past few months -  which has been undergoing major changes since the uprising against the late dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi.

Megarif says the attackers, who he believes are connected to Al Qaeda, used the protests at the consulate as a cover to undertake a coordinated attack on the U.S. Consulate on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

"We firmly believe that this was a pre-calculated, pre-planned attack, that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. Consulate," Megarif told NPR.

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other U.S. staffers were killed in the attacks.

"Our friend and friend of all Libyans and all residents of Benghazi and we feel very, very, very," deep sadness, Megarif told NPR.

Megarif said in a separate interview with CBS News that Libyan authorities have arrested about 50 people in connection with the attack.

The Americans were killed when attackers fired on the U.S. consulate with rocket-propelled grenades and machinegun fire before torching the building.

Something that I hoe is not missed by our Intelligence people is what the Libyan President said next.

Megarif said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that "a few" of those who joined in the attack were foreigners, who had entered Libya "from different directions, some of them definitely from Mali and Algeria."

"The others are affiliates and maybe sympathizers," he added in the CBS interview.

This should be looked into immediately, maybe after Obama gets back from his next Golf game!

FOURTH SHOT!

Google Rejects White House Request to Pull Muhammad Film Clip

As we all know, the best publicity is controversy. And yes, like others, I decided to go to YouTube and find out what all the talk was about. 

Before I go into my taking a shot at what's going on between Google and the Obama Administration, I have to say that the YouTube video that the Obama White House is trying to say incited all of this appears more a comedy than anything anyone would take serious.

It looks like a poorly made spoof on the religion of Islam, just like other spoofs that I've seen on Christianity. A few parts of it is actually funny in a goofy stupid sort of way. Cheesy may be the right word for it. 

If you want to take a look for yourself, click here: Innocence of Muslims - Muhammad Movie 

For the Obama White House to blame that video for all of this is really stretching it.

I really believe that Obama doesn't want to admit that his 2009 Apology Tour through the Middle-east didn't work out very well - and his foreign policy is a flop.

On Friday, September 14th, Google rejected a request by the White House to reconsider its decision to keep online a YouTube movie clip that the Obama is trying to say is controversial to Muslims.

The Obama administration has got the liberal news media all on script to spin the tale that a hardly viewed YouTube video is the reason that the Muslim world has ignited in anti-American protests.

It couldn't be because of Obama dismal Middle-east policy, or is harping on the fact that the Muslims are no longer a threat because he personally went out and killed Osama Bin Laden with his own hands - or could it?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s insistence that the U.S. government had "absolutely nothing to do with" the “disgusting and reprehensible” anti-Islam movie that the Obama administration is blaming on the violent demonstrations.

Google said it was censoring the video in India and Indonesia after blocking it on Wednesday in Egypt and Libya, where U.S. embassies have been stormed by protesters enraged over depiction of the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud and philanderer.

I guess the truth hurts. I'm sure no one would want to face facts like the one about how Muhammad violated humanity by marrying a 6 year old girl.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed in a well coordinated attack on the embassy in Benghazi.

Google said was further restricting the clip to comply with local law rather than as a response to political pressure.

"We've restricted access to it in countries where it is illegal such as India and Indonesia, as well as in Libya and Egypt, given the very sensitive situations in these two countries," the company said. "This approach is entirely consistent with principles we first laid out in 2007."

White House officials had asked Google earlier on Friday to reconsider whether the video had violated YouTube's terms of service.

Google said on Wednesday that the video was within its guidelines.

U.S. authorities said on Friday that they were investigating whether the film's producer, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a 55-year old Egyptian Coptic Christian living in Southern California, had violated terms of his prison release - how I don't know?

But I'm sure the Obama White House using the power of the Justice Department will find a way to make this guy's silly comedy video a scape-goat. 

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was convicted in 2010 for bank fraud and released from prison on probation last June.

I tip my hat to Google for standing up to the political pressure of the Obama White House.

FIFTH SHOT!

Newt  Gingrich says "Obama Doesn’t Realize Radical Islam Is at War With Us!".

I can't help but agree that President Barack Obama is so wedded to his liberal policies that he can’t comprehend the meaning of the attacks against us in Libya and Egypt — radical Islam is at war with us.

That's what Newt Gingrich says, and he's right!

The president and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned the “senseless” violence, he notes on Politico.

“This concept of ‘senseless violence’ is at the heart of the left’s refusal to confront the reality of radical Islamists,” the former House speaker says. “These are not acts of senseless violence. These are acts of war. . . . It is tragic that the president is so committed to a leftist world view that he cannot allow himself to face these facts.”

The attacks in Libya and Egypt almost certainly were coordinated, Gingrich writes. Yet, “the left is desperate to deal with each new incident as though it is occurring in isolation. . . . Because of congressionally-imposed limitations and administrative and bureaucratic timidity, the fact is we know remarkably little about our enemies.”

The president is much to blame, Gingrich argues. “The policies of Obama have made our intellectual incoherence and strategic incompetence even worse. It is no accident that the embassy in Cairo issued a groveling statement, apologizing to the haters for having inconvenienced them with American freedom of speech.”

Look at White House policy in the Mideast in comparison to its policy at home, Gingrich says. “The Obama administration is waging war on the Catholic Church while appeasing the most extreme elements of Islam. This is the bizarre situation we now find ourselves in.”

You have to admit, when Newt Gingrich is right - he's right real well! And yes, this is one of those times when he hits the nail right on the head.

The president's foreign policy is an utter failure. Obama has given the "radical" Muslims who apparently rule the Muslim World encouragement to do what they are doing. He is to blame for this fire storm in the Middle-East.

It's not some goofy YouTube video, it's not Bush's fault, it's not the Republicans in the House of Representatives fault, it is his, he owns it, and like our sour economy - he should take responsibility for what he has done.

Obama followed in the same exact footsteps of President Jimmy Carter by allowing himself to be seen as a spineless timid American President. He has made all of the same mistakes that Carter had done back in the late 1970s that led to the Iranian Hostage Crisis.

Now we the American people are reaping the rewards from Obama acting like a weak sister among hungry jackals. I'm very surprised that they killed the Ambassador instead of taking him hostage and allowing history to completely repeat itself:

First by having the worse economic policies since Jimmy Carter in the real last Depression, and now in the sacking of one of our Embassies in the Middle-East.

And by the way, anyone who knows anything about how our enemy operates in this War On Terror - and it is that, no matter what Obama and his gay friends say - they use Anniversaries and other significant events to launch attacks.

Why weren't we ready, prepared, or at least put on alert? It's probably just another Obama screw up!

Now that we've had Americans killed at our Embassy, where's big mouth Joe Biden screaming out "Osama Is Dead, and GM is alive!"

I can't help but wonder if someone in the Middle-East heard big mouth Biden's words? After all, their reply in response to Joe Biden has been "We have 1.5 Billion Osama Bin Laden's!"

SIXTH SHOT!

Colorado School Seizes Catholic Rosary Prayer Beads From A Student, And Has The Nerve To Call The Catholic Rosary A "Gang" Symbol

School Officials at a Colorado high school confiscated Catholic Rosary Prayer Beads from a student, claiming the religious necklace is affiliated with gangs and disruptive to learning.

The Rosary is from the Latin word rosarium, which stands for rose garden or "garland of roses".

They are a traditional Catholic devotion. While such prayer beads have been around for a long time, today they can also be used as devotional beads.

A set of rosary prayer beads as used to worship holds special meaning to the person who has them.

My own grandmother gave me my first rosary with I had my First Holy Communion at St Patrick's Church in Kaimuki in Hawaii.

To Catholics, our First Holy Communion is a pretty big deal. It is the ceremony for a Catholic's first reception of the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist.

I carried them in my pocket when I attended mass, and even wore them around my neck when I was in the Marine Corps. The rosary that my grandmother gave me is still cherished by me to this day.

Manuel Vigil, a 16-year-old junior at Thompson Valley High School in Loveland, said the school administrators offered no explanation when they seized his rosary beads twice since school started three weeks ago, KDVR reported.

"They tell me I can’t wear them," Vigil told the station, adding that he wears the beads to protect himself from harm. "I use them for prayer. I feel safe when I have them on," he said.

Sounds Like A Bogus Claim in Thompson High!

Officials, however, claim the religious necklace is not safe for school. "That’s typically not what we want for a safe environment for school," Thompson Valley School District spokesperson Margaret Crespo told KDVR.

Margaret Crespo claims the school gave Manuel Vigil two options before confiscating the beads. She said administrators asked him to either take them off or put them inside his shirt.

"You’re not giving us an alternative than to remove it," Margaret Crespo claims Vigil was told.

But Vigil said he only got a demand from the school, not an option.
"If he would have given me that option, I would have put it in my shirt," he said.

While Colorado is having trouble with Catholic rosaries, some Michigan schools permit "religious" knives into schools there in the form of knives.

It seems that Michigan schools see tolerance of different faiths as a vital part of the foundation of American freedom. Imagine that.

As it is supposed to be, since we do not have a national religion - all religions exist side by side here. But we also have reasonable limits on how people worship, meaning that one religion cannot claim exemption when their practices infringe or threaten the rights of others.

Such was the argument in Michigan where students who follow the Sikh faith have been granted permission to carry into schools the small dagger known as the Kirpan.

The Sikh Kirpan is a symbolic knife and is usually dull. It is assumed that in that state that it is about as dangerous as a butter knife.

The initial ban was ordered after a 4th grader was found to be carrying the dull knife and parents raised questions.

Since that time, members of the Sikh presented their case to the school board and the ban has been lifted, allowing for the Kirpans to be carried into classrooms.
Because of security concerns these days, many school districts around the country make it so that students enter buildings each day through metal detectors designed to protect all students from guns and knives.

In order to guarantee security for all, the question put to Michigan last year was simple: will Sikh students who bring their Kirpans to class will be asked to show that the knives are not sharpened, dull, and can't be used to hurt someone?  And if so, would they be allowed in schools.

Some wondered if they were wearing knives under the cloak of religious freedom?

That should be a legitimate concern, those Kirpans are knives! Dull or not, they are knives!

On the contrary is wearing a Catholic rosary. They only means you are Catholic. That's it, nothing else!

It doesn't mean you are in a gang or anything other than a member of the Catholic Church. As fragile as they are, I don't see anyone attacking someone with prayer beads.

Yes, they only mean that the person in possession of them is Catholic. They are non-offensive except to liberal school officials who want to use what power they have to tear at Christians of all denominations.

For a while, it was handkerchiefs in your back pocket, ball caps worn sideways, football jerseys, and on and on. All are supposedly "gang" related.

And by the way, what if they are a "gang" symbol? Does that mean that a school thinks it has the right to take away the religious freedom of a student? Who the Hell do they think they are?

What makes them think that they can stop a Catholic from wearing his rosary or saying a prayer before a Math test? Gangs wear all sorts of items of symbols and clothing to identify themselves?

What makes her think its only Catholic rosaries that are gang symbols? What would she and the other Thompson Valley High School officials do if they found out that at least half of their students were wearing "gang" related items, colors or apparel or symbols in one way or another by accident or design?

Would they ban handkerchiefs, ball caps, sports jerseys, all types of athletic shoes? How about denim jackets, khaki pants, Levi jeans, muscle shirts, khaki shirts, plaid shirts, solid black t-shirts, solid white t-shirts -  see my point yet?

If this is not simply some bogus way to attack Christians in public schools, and yes they are really concerned about "gang" activity, then why is she and others allowing "gangs" to intimidate them into thinking and acting irrationally?

As for Manuel Vigil's Catholic Rosary, I know for fact that I wore one overseas while in the Marine Corps. I know for fact that right now there are others Catholics who are wearing a rosary or have one on them while serving in our military at home and abroad.

Isn't it a shame that they are fighting for rights that are not threatened on the battlefields overseas, but here at home by ignorant anti-Christians like those school officials at Thompson Valley High School in Loveland, Colorado.

If you think they have more important things to worry about than picking on one boy for wearing his rosary, give them a call at (970) 613-7900 Fax (970) 613-7909

Thompson Valley High School is located at 1669 Eagle Drive Loveland, Colorado 80537.

SEVENTH SHOT!

The Grace Foundation And My Search For A Horse!

I've been looking into adopting a horse that is big enough to carry me comfortably.

A Belgian/Quarter Horse cross is the breed that I'm looking into right now. I was in Old Town Sacramento for Gold Rush Days and met a mounted Sacramento Police Officer on a great looking, very stout, Belgian/Quarter Horse cross.

I liked its temperament and disposition, conformation and the fact that it was really a big built horse. So no, I have put out applications to a few places looking for one for me to ride. One that I can ride and not worry if I'm simply too heavy for it.

I've gotten a lead on a place that may just be the place to help me. Its called The Grace Foundation.
The Grace Foundation is a place that I've heard about a while but didn't know what they did.

According to their website, their "mission is to protect, care for, and heal these two important groups:  
  • Children
  • Abused and Neglected Animals
 Since its founding in 2004, The Grace Foundation has been dedicated to saving the lives of horses and other animals. Grace provides critical care and rehabilitation for abused and neglected horses, livestock, dogs, and other animals.

Many of these animals are then utilized for equine-assisted learning and therapeutic programs for youth and children. Since its inception, The Grace Foundation has helped thousands of kids who are at-risk or have suffered from abuse and neglect themselves.

Grace also offers programs for people of all ages that are struggling with autism and other physical and emotional challenges, as well as a variety of youth leadership programs and life science classes."

The Grace Foundation is a Non-Profit 501(c)(3) Organization. If you're interested in contacting them. They can be contacted at (916) 941-0800. Their mailing address is PO Box 4692, El Dorado Hills, Ca 95762

They are located at 5800 Latigo Ln. El Dorado Hills, California, 95762. And if you'd like to visit their website, you can click on The Grace Foundation

I've got an application with them right now. I'm sure hoping they can help me find what I'm looking for.
Of course, as everyone knows, you can't just look in one place.

So while I'm waiting to hear from the Grace Foundation, I'm searching the Internet for Belgian/Quarter Horse cross horses.

LAST SHOT!

To My Readers: An Apology

Someone sent me an nice e-mail telling me to get off my backside and write more. She actually chewing my ass for not posting articles faster lately..

All I can say to that is that I'm sorry for not being more prompt with my articles this week. I'm apologizing to all of you for not having more articles this month in general.

I really try to post something every other day unless the mode hits me. So far I'm getting some pretty good reviews about my stuff, so please hang in there.

Besides all of the political stuff these days, I'm also working on more American history that I think you might find fascinating. And yes, horse information as well. All as soon as I can, I promise.

A few things are slowing me down right now.

Whether I like it or not, my computer is old and sometimes it simply does not want to go along with the program and work right. It's very frustrating when I'm trying to write when it stalls out on me. The hang time is horrible.

Of course, the worse problem is losing a whole article when the screen goes blank. When that happens, I can only hope that all of my research and work hasn't gone down the drain.

I've been pretty good about keeping this thing working, but I have to admit that working on a computer can be very frustrating.

Besides explaining to you the frustration that I'm having keeping my computer going, I'm also apologizing because my late articles are a result of things being real busy around here.

Of course, I've been hard at work trying to get a head start on winter by getting my small barn and other things ready around here.

And yes, my responsibilities at the local American Legion hasn't lightened up lately.

But one of the other reasons that I have been so busy has to do with horses, please understand they can take time away from everything else - including writing.

Lately I've been really trying to put more time in working a couple of horses around here. Both are mustangs, and though both will never be ridable, I'd like one to be ridable - and the other at least a little easier to handle.

I've written about Buckshot before. He's actually real easy to handle, but was mistreated and those scars run deep. The thing about Buckshot is that I really think he would make a good riding horse. He is built like a tank, and really is a nice horse.

The other is Dancer who was adopted through the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) Adoption Program.

She was too much horse for the guy who adopted her, so he sold her to a lady who tried dealing with her for a year until I got her about 5 years ago.

She was wild and I didn't expect to ride her. The reason that I really expect to ride her is that she's only about 14 hands high. So yes, she's small. But, she is built pretty nice and I took her because I couldn't see her hurting some greenhorn who hasn't been around horses - nevertheless mustangs.

She is a real nice horse. Her only problem is that she gets "herd bound" and refuses to cooperate sometimes. So when that starts, I have to separate her and work on bonding with her all over again.

Mustangs can be some great riding horses, but I would find one that's been gentled to ride - or have someone in mind who can gentle it - before buying one.

If you'd like to check out the National Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Program, click on: Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Program

Right now I'm trying to catch up on this blog, I really hope you don;t mind a little more straight talk and less nice way of writing. I tend to write that way when I'm rushed.

I have some things in mind that should interest you my readers. So please know that your visits mean a great deal to me, and please accept my apology for being late with my articles.

And to you out there who told me to get off my backside and write more, well I'm typing as fast as I can!

Until next time, God Bless and Keep You Safe!

I hope to be seeing you soon!

Story by Tom Correa