The San Elizario Salt War 1877

Most folks know the Rio Grande is a natural barrier dividing the United States from Mexico. In 1789, when Spain still had Mexico, Spaniards established a fort and called it "Presidio de San Elizario."

A town grew up around the fort, and it soon took the name San Elizario. San Elizario is said to be a corruption of "San Elceario," which is Spanish for Saint Elzear. Saint Elzear of Sabran is the Roman Catholic Patron Saint of Soldiers. After San Elizario was occupied by the U.S. troops during the Mexican-American War, volunteers from California were stationed at the Presidio to prevent the re-occupation.

Before major water-control projects on the Rio Grande, such as Elephant Butte Dike, were constructed in 1911, the river was known to flood regularly. The river stayed the same until an 1831 flood changed the river's course. That 1831 flood left San Elizario on a new island between the new and old channels of the Rio Grande.

After the Civil War, there were several changes created in the political landscape of West Texas. The end of the war and Reconstruction brought many "entrepreneurs" to the area. Some were northern carpetbaggers.

It is said that three groups made up the Republicans in the South after the Civil War, and Southerners referred to two with derogatory terms. "Scalawags" were Southerners who supported the Republican Party, "carpetbaggers" were opportunists who were recent arrivals in the region from the North, and Freedmen who were freed slaves.

Most Republicans coming there settled in Franklin, Texas, a trading village across the Rio Grande from the Chihuahua city of El Paso del Norte, which is present-day Ciudad Juárez. Many San Elizario families had deep roots and didn't readily accept newcomers.

At the same time, in the early 1870s, the Democrat Party had begun to reclaim political influence in Texas. But frankly, Democrat operatives with ties to the Confederacy were not accepted by the people of San Elizario either. And though that was the case, soon alliances shifted and rivalries developed between the Hispanic community, the Anglos there, the Republicans, and the Democrats residing in West Texas.

The San Elizario Salt War is also known as the Salinero Revolt or the El Paso Salt War. So what was the San Elizario Salt War about? Well, salt.

At the base of the Guadalupe Mountains, about 100 miles northeast of San Elizario, lies several dry salt lakes. Before pumping water and oil from West Texas, the area had a periodic shallow water table, and capillary action drew salt of high purity to the surface.

This salt was valuable for a wide variety of purposes. Salt is 39 percent sodium, a chemical element necessary for our survival. Sodium controls a number of our bodily functions. Our need for salt is absolute, and we are forced to seek our health.

But besides salt for our physiological needs, we used salt to cure and preserve meat long before the advent of refrigeration. And yes, salt was necessary for treating leather and stabilizing dyes. It was also used for bartering. And of course, salt was an essential element in the "patio process" for silver mining to extract the silver from ore.

Salt is so essential to humans and animals that we subconsciously know when salt is needed. An example of this is that animals are attracted to salt licks and salt springs. And yes, it is said that Native American Indians often lay in ambush at such places or created artificial salt licks to lure the animals.

Historically, caravans to the salt lakes traveled either down the Rio Grande and then straight north or via what later became known as the Butterfield Overland Mail route. Salt deposits located in the Guadalupe Mountains are 110 miles east of El Paso. They produced salt that was almost chemically pure. It was a two to three-day journey to retrieve salt and return home.

In 1863, the people of San Elizario, as a community, built by subscription a road running east to the salt lakes. The residents of the Rio Grande Valley at El Paso were granted community access rights to the lakes by the King of Spain. Those rights had been grandfathered in by the Republic of Mexico and then again with the Treaty Guadalupe Hidalgo.

So when, beginning in 1866, Texas started allowing individuals to stake claims for mineral rights, the grandfathered community rights were overturned. This did not make for happy locals who had been getting salt from that salt lake for almost a hundred years. To make matters worse, in 1870 there was a group from Franklin, Texas, who tried to claim the salt lake's deposits. This sparked a fight over ownership. And yes, a battle over control of the land began.

Albert Jennings Fountain and his "Salt Ring" favored county government ownership with community access. Then when Fountain was elected to the Texas State Senate, he began pushing his plan. But, when the Republicans lost control of the Texas state government in 1873, Fountain left El Paso for his wife's home in New Mexico.

In 1872, the Army withdrew troops from Fort Bliss and Fort Quitman near San Elizario and left the El Paso area without a military presence. That was the year Charles Howard arrived in town. Howard was said to be Virginian by birth but from Missouri. He went to the region determined to restore the Democratic Party to political power in West Texas.

In the summer of 1877, Howard filed a claim as the owner of the salt lakes in the name of his father-in-law, George B. Zimpelman, who was an Austin capitalist. Howard offered to pay any "salinero" laborers who collected salt the going rate for its retrieval, but he insisted the salt was his.

The Tejanos of San Elizario formed committees known as "juntas" in San Elizario and the largely Tejano neighboring towns of Socorro and Ysleta, Texas, to determine a community-based response to Howard's action. During the summer of 1877, they held several secret meetings.

Then in 1877, anger gave way to an armed conflict that was waged by the Mexican inhabitants living on both sides of the Rio Grande near El Paso, Texas. Their target on the American side of the river was a leading Texas politician supported by the Texas Rangers.

The right of individuals to own the salt lakes previously held as a community asset was established by force of arms.

On September 29, 1877, Jose Maria Juarez and Macedonia Gandara threatened to collect a wagonload of salt. When Howard learned of their activities, he had the men arrested by Sheriff Charles Kerber and went to court in San Elizario to legally restrain them that evening. Armed men arrested the compliant jurist. Others searched for Howard, locating him at Sheriff Kerber's home in Yselta.

Under the leadership of Francisco "Chico" Barela, they seized Howard and marched him back to San Elizario. For three days, Howard was held as a prisoner. He was guarded by several hundred men led by Sisto Salcido, Lino Granillo, and Barela.

On October 3, he was finally released upon payment of a $12,000 bond and his written relinquishment of all rights to the salt deposits. Howard left for Mesilla, New Mexico, where he briefly stayed at the house of Fountain. He soon returned to the area and met up with Louis Cardis in an El Paso mercantile store in October.

Louis Cardis moved to El Paso, Texas, in 1864. He quickly learned the Spanish language and established a political power base with the Mexican American citizens of the area. Cardis favored the Hispanic community concept of the commonwealth.

He became involved in a dispute involving salt deposits and shifting influence and political power from the Hispanic population to the Anglos. He was elected to the Texas House of Representatives with the help of Charles H. Howard. Cardis and Howard with political allies.

Problems escalated, and soon Cardis had a falling out with Howard. Their falling out was because Howard staked an exclusive claim to the salt deposits. Cardis had his allies actually arrest Howard and imprison him. Howard retaliated after he was let out by shooting Cardis to death with a shotgun on October 9, 1877. Howard then fled back to New Mexico.

"On… October 10… Cardis entered the store of E. Schutz and Brother and asked one of the clerks to write a letter for him. He was sitting in a rocker with his back to the door when… Howard enter[ed] the front door with a double-barreled shotgun…. Cardis immediately rose, passed behind the clerk, and took a position back of the desk which concealed the upper part of his body. Howard emptied one barrel into the lower part of [Cardis'] body and legs and as the torso sank into view, the second charge of buckshot penetrated his heart." That's according to The Texas Rangers by Walter Prescott Webb.

The Tejano people of El Paso County were outraged. They effectively stopped all county governments, replacing them with community juntas and daring the sheriff to take action against them.

In response to pleas for help from frightened Anglo residents, Governor Richard B. Hubbard answered by sending Texas Rangers to El Paso. Major John B. Jones was the commander of the Texas Rangers' Frontier Battalion that arrived to take control of the situation.

Arriving on November 5, Texas Ranger J.B. Jones met with the junta leaders, negotiated their agreement to obey the law, at least he thought so, and arranged for Howard's return, arraignment, and release on bail. Jones also recruited 20 new Texas Rangers, the Detachment of Company C, under the command of Lieutenant John B. Tays.

Tays was born on September 6, 1842. He was one of seven children of John and Mary Ellis Tays. Tays was a native Canadian. He was a mining engineer, and an El Paso land speculator. Some say Tays didn't live up to the Ranger ethos of honor and bravery. In fact, some say he was a known rustler of Mexican cattle.

On December 12, 1877, Howard returned to San Elizario with that newly-formed Company of 20 Texas Rangers led by John B. Tays. As soon as they arrived, a large group of armed citizens, some say as many as 500, engaged Howard and the Rangers. The mob was enraged and demanded Howard be surrendered.

The San Elizario Chapel

Of course, Howard and the Rangers immediately took cover in the buildings and soon took refuge in the town's chapel. The San Elizario Chapel is a presidio chapel. It's not a mission. It served the religious needs of the military outpost. It was established in 1789 as a military presidio and the current chapel was built in 1877. 

Because the Presidio Chapel showcases the round archways and golden-trimmed pillars that reflect a traditional Spanish Mission style, I mistakenly referred to it as a "Mission." Since first publishing this article, I've heard from a lot of my readers about my mistakenly calling it a "Mission." 

So please, let me make it clear that the San Elizario Chapel (La Capilla de San Elcear) was never part of the Spanish mission system which was really focused on converting and serving the native population. The "Presidio Chapel" served as a chapel for the military presidio, or outpost, established in 1789 to protect travelers and settlers along the Camino Real (Royal Highway). The chapel provided religious services for the Spanish soldiers and their families stationed at the Presidio.

Today, the chapel continues to function as an active parish church and serves the community of San Elizario. The Presidio Chapel of San Elizario is located at 1556 San Elizario Road in San Elizario, Texas. With it being built in 1877, the Chapel is today a significant part of the San Elizario Historic District and the El Paso Mission Trail.

Now, let's return to the story of what happened when Charles Howard and the newly-formed Detachment of Texas Rangers under the command of Lieutenant John B. Tays took cover in the San Elizario Chapel.

It is said that from the inside of the chapel that they tried to claim "sanctuary." Of course, that didn't work and the local people laid siege to the building. It was only a two-day siege before Canadian-born Texas Ranger John B. Tays surrendered his 20-man company of Rangers. It is believed that the event was the only time in the entire history of the Texas Rangers that a Ranger unit ever surrendered to anyone.

So yes, on December 17, 1877, Tays surrendered and gave up to the mob, which quickly organized a firing squad to take care of Charles Howard and his cohorts. One source states that after the firing squad opened fire, the bodies of Charles Howard and two of his cohorts, who turned out to be Texas Ranger Sergeant John McBride and former lawman John G. Atkinson, both of who were also shot by the firing squad, were hacked to pieces and then dumped down an old well about a half-mile away.

Charles Howard was a greedy opportunist who gamed the system, used it in his favor, and felt he was above the law. Yes, even to the point of thinking that he could get away with committing murder and no have to answer for it. It's no wonder some say he got exactly what he deserved in the end. 

As for Texas Ranger Lt. John Tays and the rest of the Texas Rangers there that day, it's said they were stripped of the arms, humiliated by being disarmed, and then run out of town on foot while being jeered by the town's people who also pelted them with produce. Of course, though the Texas Rangers surrendered that day, no one should say they weren't any good. 

Though the siege only lasted two days, those Rangers did in fact face overwhelming odds -- and there was no way they were going to win without a lot more civilian deaths in the process. The notion of 20 Texas Rangers taking on 500 or more armed civilians put the Rangers at a significant advantage due to sheer numbers. And besides that fact that the Rangers only had 20 men and the limited supplies they carried on them when they took refuge in the Chapel, they were looking at not being supplied while the people assaulting them were able to resupply and recruit replacements if needed. 

Common sense tells us that a larger force, even if not necessarily more skilled, often win due to their ability to overwhelm and outmanuver a smaller defending force. And there's something else, I don't know if the Rangers saw dieing for someone like Charles Howard as something that they wanted to do. 

After the Texas Rangers were marched out of town in disgrace, the local Mexicans rioted and looted the town. In fact, they sacked the buildings and general lawlessness reigned. It was ongoing until U.S. Army Buffalo Soldiers of the 9th Cavalry and a large Sheriff's Posse from New Mexico arrived on the scene. Once they arrived, it's said that hundreds of people fled to Mexico -- most permanently. Among them were many of the civic leaders of San Elizario.

The conflict is said to have climaxed with the siege and surrender of 20 Texas Rangers to a mob of perhaps 500 Mexicans in San Elizario, Texas. All in all, 12 people were killed and 50 wounded during that fight alone. 

So yes, for over twelve years following the Civil War, political and legal struggles took place among Texas politicians and opportunists over salt. It began as a local fight and grew into an armed conflict over time. 

As for the public, newspaper editors throughout the nation covered the story and in many ways it was blown out of proportion as newspapers made it more significant than it was. The newspapers included lurid details that some say are questionable. In reality, it was pure sensationalism at its best. 

Let's remember, the "salt war" went on for 12 years. In fact, over those years, it's believed that as many as 650 residents bore arms against the local authorities. Also, in those 12 years, it is thought that about 20 to 30 men were killed. Of course, it is reasonable to say that double that number were wounded over the years. Yes, all over salt.

After the dust settled, damage to the property was estimated at $31,050. And let's look at that for a moment, $31,050 in 1877 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $939,398.53 today. So yes, there was about a Million Dollars in property damage alone. As for the crop losses, those losses were sustained because local farmers did not till or harvest their fields for several months. 

The wheat loss alone was estimated at $48,000. Again, let's look at that. The fact is that $48,000 in 1877 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $1,452,210.29 today. So yes, while $48, 000 might not sound like much today, for us that would have translated to a loss of almost 1.5 Million Dollars of wheat alone. It's no wonder the area was hit hard. 

Of course, besides the financial losses, there was the loss of further political and economic power of the Mexican-American community of El Paso County. In fact, as a result of the loss of political and economic power, San Elizario lost its status as a County Seat. And mainly since the town's population decreased, the county seat was relocated to Franklin which became El Paso. 

Here's something else, there became a need for a military presence to keep order. In fact, though Fort Bliss was first established in El Paso in March of 1854 and it was actually relocated in the late 1860s, because of the salt war, the 9th Cavalry Buffalo Soldiers who were sent there to maintain order had to reestablish Fort Bliss. They reopened the fort to keep an eye on the border and the local Mexican population there.

It's true, on New Year's Day in 1878, Fort Bliss was established as a permanent post just to keep an eye on things down there. Company L Buffalo Soldiers of the 9th Cavalry and Company C of the 15th Infantry were sent to Fort Bliss to prevent further trouble over the salt flats and help enforce regulations regarding the usage of Rio Grande water for irrigation purposes. 

It is interesting to note that the U.S. government had a policy of simply leasing property for its military installations before this date. It should be noted that the U.S. Army reestablished Fort Bliss to also provide protection to the Southern Pacific Railroad when it came to West Texas in 1883. 

As a matter of spite, it's said the Southern Pacific Railroad lines intentionally bypassed San Elizario altogether as a matter of retribution. It's said that the Southern Pacific Railroad did so as a punishment since towns with railroad lines prospered and those without continued to struggle during that period.

As for John B. Tays? He left the Rangers and married Mrs. Amelia St. Vrain in early 1878. He became El Paso's postmaster between February and August 1879. He also became El Paso's first city marshal, though a short-lived position, from July to October 1880. He's actually listed as an engineer in the El Paso 1880 Federal Census. But frankly, his engineering skills cost him his job as a Marshal.

That came about after Tays attempted to fill a very large pothole on the main street with garbage. Yes, garbage. And no, that obviously didn't work, so the city council fired him. He did better in the private sector in ranching, railroad construction, and real estate speculation in the El Paso area. Many say he was one of the city's largest landowners. In fact, his holdings may have included El Paso's Central Hotel and a large number of tenements. 

In 1883, John B. Tays moved to the Ontario-Upland area of Southern California. There, he became one of the area's top agriculturalists and engineers. In fact, in Ontario, California, Tays became famous for designing a streetcar platform to carry mules downhill after they had labored to pull the cars uphill. On May 6, 1900, he was part of an expedition hunting gold in South America when he and 150 others were killed in a boating accident at the Tumatumari Falls on the Rio Patera. The man with the dubious honor of being the only Texas Ranger commander to surrender his Ranger unit died at 57.

As for the San Elizario Salt War, how you see what transpired might depend on how you view our government. For example, it is said that the Mexican-American uprising down there was a bloody riot by a "howling mob." Of course, the "mob" there that day has also been described as "an organized political-military insurgency to reestablish local control of their fundamental political rights and economic future." But really, who knows which camp is closer to the truth.

Some say it is an example of Mexican Americans not being treated as equal citizens instead of being treated as subjugated people. Others see the San Elizario Salt War of 1877 as an example of Americans simply being pushed too far and subsequently taking up arms to fight an oppressive local government that was out of control.

I believe the people there felt that they had to take up arms as a last resort to obtain a solution to a dire situation created by politicians. That might not make it right, but I believe that that's how it was because salt was so essential to life at the time.

Tom Correa