Theodore Roosevelt, 1903

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." - Theodore Roosevelt, 1903

Thursday, March 7, 2013

A Vindictive Obama Now Wants You To Feel Pain

Is Obama a Drama Queen and Liar, or just spoiled and vindictive?

OK, in contrast to what Obama The Drama Queen was telling us prior to "The Great Sequester of 2013" - we all survived.

Just like Y2K, the Mayan calender, and the Last Real Depression under Jimmy Carter, amazing as it may sound to those in the White House, yes we pulled it off again and avoided completely vanishing as a species upon the earth.

Yes, surprising as it was to our Drama Queen In Chief, no one has gone hungry, millions aren't jumping off bridges and out of skyscrapers in despair, the sun came out, and all will go on.

That's the good news.

The bad news however is pretty bad. Not earth shaking, and maybe just an awakening for the liberal left, but it is a look behind the curtain.

You see, if we Americans did have a "real" catastrophe like say the Muslim Terrorist Attack on the World Trade Towers on 9/11, I really believe that President Obama would wet himself.

The Great Sequester of 2013 has shown the American public, sans us who have known for more than 4 years what Obama was made of, what kind of Drama Queen and Liar our president really is.

The scare tactics, the ringing of hands, the dire predictions, the cataclysmic event that the Obama White House told us about simply did not take place.  He has revealed himself to be the liar that most on the right have known about for a long long time.

It must be tough on millionaire socialist types like Tom Hanks and others from Hollywood to see Obama at his worse. And yes, his worse is simply being caught in lie after lie. But then again, the left sees Obama's act as being justified. After all, they don't care about morality or right and wrong, they just want what they want and see Obama as there chance to get it. To Hollywood left and their cohorts in colleges and universities across the country, the end really does justify the means.

But maybe that why I think it must be tough for socialist like George Soros. He waits and plots and schemes and tries again and again to use his billions to create organization after organization to help spread Socialism and plant the roots of Communism.

Then of course, Soros like others of his ilk sees their dream of an American economic collapse thwarted -- at least for a little while.

And yes, I really believe that guys like Soros really do dream of a day when America falls into complete economic and moral bankruptcy. I believe that that is why Soros and others spend so much time and money trying to kill our nation.

I'm willing to wager that there are not all that many out there who really thought that a maniac socialist like George Soros and his leftist friends would get the help of an American President to bring about our ruination.

Poor Barack, the boy cried wolf and was found out. And now, now the American people, on the left and right, really have had a look behind the curtain - and now know for certain that he is as phony as a 3 dollar bill.

The American people have found out that he really is all about scare tactics and lies. They all now see that Obama only knows how to scam and con his way through life to get what he wants.

But the president is so much then just a our Drama Queen and Liar, he is spoiled and extremely vindictive. Actually, he is scary vindictive.

Have you ever wondered if Obama was one of those kids who threw himself into a fit if he didn't get what he wanted as a kid?

Have you ever wondered if he really and truly just lied and scammed his way through life, and if he's just doing more of the same while in the White House?

I have to be honest and say, I have wondered these very things. And honestly, I can't help it.

To me, his mannerisms scream con man, scam artist, swindler, petty criminal, hood, and punk.

I can't help but wonder if I feel that way because I read his autobiographies? Maybe it's just that simple? Maybe that's the reason that I see him as always getting pampered and spoiled? Maybe I see him that way because he was pampered and spoiled from a young age.

I mean let's think about this for a minute, from going to the most expensive private schools in the state of Hawaii starting in the 5th grade and going on to doing dope and drugs all through high school and college. And yes, there were never consequences for his doing drugs.

Sure they were illegal, but I don't think Obama would let a like thing like the law stop him from doing what he wants. Why should it?

After all, he has learned that he is above such things as paying a price for breaking the law. In fact, he has seen how he is rewarded and no one cares if he does what he does.

Example, how can anyone who has done drugs and dope as he has acknowledged in his books that he has, get a Top Secret Security Clearance or be privy to anything Classified.

By his own omissions, it is against the law to give him or anyone else who has used illegal drugs and pot any sort of government Security Clearance -- Top Secret, Secret, or even Classified.

All the way through college and university after university, all through his life, all the way up to when he became a Community Organizer, Obama never had to work a day in his life because others paid his way.

And yes, the guy keeps his college and university transcripts sealed because he doesn't want people to know how he pulled that off.

I mean, think about it, how did he pay for his education after High School? And really, why didn't he have to work like everyone else who was supposedly brought up by a single mother?

Sure his grandparents were well-off, and his mothers was endlessly going to universities either in Hawaii or Washington state - and I'm sure that someone had to pay her way, so where did the money come from?

No one knows because Obama ain't telling, and its just that simple. So let's face it, the guy has been spoiled all his life.

But as being vindictive, how vindictive is Obama? Well, in a word, very. Obama is a product of his being pampers and spoiled as a kid and a young adult.

His character is such that he knows how to get what he wants, and will do anything to achieve getting what he wants. But when he doesn't, he is vindictive as the day is long.

In the news, things are starting to come out showing more and more about what's going on behind the curtain at the White House. Obama's whole line of "transparency" has just been a sham, a hoax, and only now are we learning how his White House works.

And no, its not pretty.

It is not without a bit of irony that, in the 40 years since the explosion of the Watergate story, Bob Woodward would again be under attack from the White House for trying to tell the truth. But this time the attack is coming from a Democrat President, a super secretive administration, and leftist media.

Barack Obama and his White House are the closest thing to the Nixon regime of any that we have seen since then -- both in the extent of their paranoia and their willingness to suppress the truth and push the boundaries of law.

In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness.

In my lifetime, Barack Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness.

Bob Woodward of Watergate fame then went on to say that the Obama White House actually threatened him.

To make matters worse, a few more people came out and said it happened to them also. And no, none were Republicans.

In fact, all of those involved in that story are Democrats. They are either Democrats who work in the news media such as the legendary Bob Woodward or they worked in the Clinton Administration as a Clinton aide. And yes, there are others elsewhere in the Democrat political machine that are coming out as well.

Just as Woodward and Bernstein were attacked back in the early 1970s by the mainstream media for daring to question a president -- or do a story that they wouldn't touch -- the Obama White House is orchestrating an attack with the mainstream media on Woodward the same way that the Nixon White House did back when he and Carl Bernstein pursued Watergate.

Patrick Caddell is a Democratic pollster. He served as pollster for President Jimmy Carter, Gary Hart, Joe Biden and other Democrats. He has spoken out against the media being in the pocket of the Obama White House.

He said recently, "Since Benghazi, when I raised the alarm about a media that was not only willing to blatantly support one political party or one political candidate but for the first time seemed willing to suppress or ignore the facts and truth as related to a disaster of American foreign policy, my fear has been that we are now on a slippery slope.

Almost everything since then has helped to realize that fear. Chuck Hagel, the sequester, Mr. Obama's speeches -- all of these have revealed a mainstream press that has absolutely decided to wear its bias openly as outriders of the Obama administration. Except for one issue -- when the president refused to allow reporters to cover him and Tiger Woods playing golf together. Now that's something they can get riled up about.

During Watergate, there were a number of Republicans who were willing to stand against the president of their party in defense of the United States of America.

Sadly, as as Democrat, I must confess, that today there is no Democratic Senator or member of the House who appears to be willing to publicly put the country ahead of Barack Obama's White House."

Though the media is involved with assisting Obama with his vindictive war on anyone they decide is an enemy, it all doesn't stop with Bob Woodward.

The American people are Obama's new enemy!

Why? How come?

Well my friends, an ego is a terrible thing when you are supposedly working for someone else. In this case, the President of the United States doesn't see himself as working for the American people.

Since "The Great Sequester of 2013" has transpired, he now sees himself in the position to teach America a lesson.

Yes, like a spoiled kid who didn't get what he wanted, Obama is not on a crusade to punish the American people in every way possible.

Higher taxes? Sure he wants more of what you make, but that ain't the half of it.

Leaked email are now showing what the Obama White House has planned for the American people just to drive home the impact of stopping the 2% increase in the government's 2013 annual spending increase.

And let's make that real clear, there were no cuts made to any department. What took place was far from cuts, the $87 Billion was part of an increase for the federal government.

They still got there increase with the exception of 2% which totaled $87 Billion taxpayer dollar.

And by the way, in a total buget of $3.73 Trillion for 2012. Stopping $87 billion in that big a buget is small potatoes to those in Washington, but a big deal if you're increasing the size of the feds and not reducing it as you promised.

Premises that he never intended to live up to. 

Because he didn't get it all, he is now on a mission, a crusade, to make Americans feel the pain of not letting him have what he wants.

It started a few days before the Sequester ever took effect when the Department of Homeland Security let loose illegal aliens who were being held as criminals in jails and prisons.

A few days later, Department head Janet Napolitano said she knew nothing about the political move. If that really is the case, then she should be fire for incompetency.

Fact is, she had to know about it, and most likely ordered it while working with the Obama White House to show the American people how Sequestration will hurt. It was a deliberate effort to become highly political and teach the American people a lesson.

A leaked email from an Agriculture Department field officer adds fuel to claims President Obama's political strategy is to make the billions in recent federal budget "cuts" as painful on the American people as humanly possible.

The email, circulated around Capitol Hill, was sent Monday by Charles Brown, a director at the agency’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) office in Raleigh, N.C.

In his email, he tells his regional team about a response to his recent question on the amount of latitude he has in making cuts.

According to the email, the response came from the Agriculture Department’s budget office and in part states, “However you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we [Obama White House] said the impact would be.”

The response noted that the administration had already told Congress that the APHIS would "eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry without additional funds."

Arkansas Republican Rep. Tim Griffin said the Obama administration’s response to Brown’s email shows a bid to undermine efforts to replace the cuts with worse ones.

“This email confirms what many Americans have suspected: The Obama administration is doing everything they can to make sure their worst predictions come true and to maximize the pain of the sequester cuts for political gain,” Griffin said in a statement.

Rep.Griffin told Fox News on Wednesday that the bosses effectively said, “You can’t do anything that is inconsistent with the negative impact that we’ve told everybody these cuts are going to have.”

Under the 2011 deal reached by Obama and Congress, the cuts are supposed to be across the board, meaning government officials have limited flexibility in moving around money.

The Obama administration in recent weeks has made doomsday predictions about the impact of the cuts.

And the Obama White House so far has appeared unwilling to accept a Republican offer to give the president more autonomy in making the cuts, covering $87 Billion this fiscal year, to help reduce the impact on some of the most essential or hardest-hit programs or agencies.

Some political strategists say the president hopes the cuts hurt enough to compel Republican lawmakers seeking re-election next year to end them by agreeing to more tax increases.

On Sunday, Gene Sperling, the White House’s top economic adviser, suggested Republicans would indeed make this decision.

“Our hope is, as more Republicans start to see this pain in their own districts, they will choose bipartisan compromise over this absolutist position,” he said.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, during a House hearing Tuesday, was asked by South Dakota Republican Rep. Kristi Noem about the Brown email.

Not surprising at all, Vilsack said he was unaware of the email, but denied the administration has a policy of being inflexible and maximizing the cuts’ impact.

The administration had warned inspectors would have to be furloughed, which could reduce supplies of beef, pork and poultry.

The Washington Times discovered, even with the cuts, that APHIS is still hiring new employees and interns. The agency has posted 24 help-wanted ads, including 22 student internships since Sunday. One seeks a clerk in a New York office, and one seeks three “insect production workers” to grow boll worms in Phoenix.

Still, the administration warns that at least a million federal workers may be taking unpaid time off, due to sequestration. The government has begun sending furlough notices, effective in April.

No money because of the Sequester?

Since only 2% of their budget increase is being held back, is this really something the Obama administration wants to go to war with the American people over.

Imagine the pity childish bullshit going on in the White House. Imagine them sitting around on your dime trying to figure out ways to screw you out of services just to make you feel the pain -- all because Barack didn't get all that he wanted.

Imagine it for a second, all of a sudden an Obama aide jumps up and says let's stop the American people from visiting the White House - and we'll tell them that it's all because of Sequestration and those evil Republicans.

Well, that's not funny at all because that's what they have done.

On March 05, 2013, the Obama White House canceled all tours of the White House because of the sequester.

And yes, many lawmakers are pissed and call their decision purely political.

If you were Washington-bound for spring-break, your White House tours have been canceled.

The Obama administration announced Tuesday that it will cancel all tours starting this weekend, due to sequester cuts.

The move prompted swift condemnation from Republican lawmakers, who described the decision as the latest attempt to make the sequester seem worse than it is.

"It's politically motivated," Rep. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., told Fox News. "It seems childish -- take my ball and go home."

Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, declared in a statement that "the people have been banned from the people's house."

The announcement is the latest from the administration about the impact of the cuts that went into effect last Friday. Congressional staffers received a terse email saying White House tours would be canceled effective this Saturday.

The email cited "staffing reductions" because of the sequester.

"Unfortunately, we will not be able to reschedule affected tours," the notice said. "We very much regret having to take this action, particularly during the popular Spring touring season."

White House tours, which are self-guided, are typically scheduled through members of Congress. Visitors can request a tour through their representative up to six months in advance.

Anyone arriving after Saturday, though, is in for a disappointment.

A recorded message on the White House visitor's hot line Tuesday confirmed that the tours will soon be nixed until "further notice."

If you think this is insanity and absolutely childish, you are right!

Did I say Obama was vindictive? You bet I did.

A senior administration official explained to Fox News that the cancellation arose from Secret Service staffing decisions.

According to the Secret Service, officers normally assigned to the public tours are being reassigned to other posts. The Service says the move will reduce costs and "ultimately reduce the number of potential furloughs necessary by our agency."

I'd like to know how many government employees are in on this bullshit?

Rep. Cramer said if he were to give the administration the benefit of the doubt, he could see White House tours being on the list of nonessential items. He said he doesn't think they'll close the White House to the public forever.

Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, said the decision is just a bid to pressure Republican members to change course on the sequester -- he said it would not be successful.

But Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, told Fox News this is another reason why both sides should figure out a compromise. She said the closure of White House tours will be "alarming" for children coming to D.C. for spring break.

The annual National Cherry Blossom Festival also attracts droves of tourists in late March and early April, though the White House can no longer be on their itinerary.

The administration has announced a raft of expected cutbacks in response to the sequester. The Defense Department, and other federal agencies, are planning to furlough thousands of workers to save money. Congress also announced that it would cut back on foreign travel.

Compromise, closed because of the Sequester, what a line of crap!

While the Obama administration is closing the doors to the very people who pay to keep them open, Obama's top diplomat Secretary of State John Kerry advised the anti-American President of Egypt that he is giving him $250 Million dollars -- and that's extra, above and beyond the $3 Billion American taxpayer dollars we just gave the Egyptian bastard.

The Obama White House should really get a clue that making the American people angry is not a good thing. Someone should advise the president that his vindictiveness over not getting his way and closing down some services just to inflict pain upon the American people will only hurt him in the long run.

Do they want to cut funds during this Sequester? If so, then start with no spending billions upon billions of dollars on foreign aid to nations and people that hate our guts.

Start by concealing funds to a billion dollar corporation called Planned Parenthood. Start with cutting $67 Billion a year in waste from the Defense Department. The DOD does not need a cooking show that costs taxpayers a million dollars and so on.

We give billions to nations and organizations for purely political reasons. We should stop and learn to spend wisely. If the managers can't get it in their heads that they need to manage and not just suck up to the White House, then fire their asses and bring in people who want to do the job.

Do I really think that Obama gives a rip about cutting foreign aide or stopping that money John Kerry is freely handing out?

No, the truth is that Obama wants to inflict pain upon the American people, blame the Republicans, and subsequently win the public opinion battle against Republicans with the help of the media.

If Obama can pull this off, then he is hoping to have the Republicans thrown out of Congress in 2014.

If he gets a majority, and subsequent control of Congress and the Senate, then he can put through his number one legislative priority.

What does Barack Obama want? What is his number one legislative priority?

President Obama is seeking to repeal the Twenty-Second Amendment of the United States Constitution which sets a term limit for election to the office of President of the United States.

Congress passed the amendment on March 21, 1947. It was ratified by the requisite number of states on February 27, 1951.

You think I'm off base on this?

Well, fact is that several Democratic congressmen, including former Rep. Barney Frank, Rep. José Serrano, Rep. Howard Berman, and Sen. Harry Reid, have introduced legislation to repeal the Twenty-second Amendment.

But, each resolution died before making it out of its respective committee. Some have introduced bills to make alterations to the Twenty-Second Amendment.

Some have been proposed, including replacing the absolute two term limit with a limit of no more than two consecutive terms and giving Congress the power to grant a dispensation to a current or former president by way of a super-majority vote in both houses.


If you don't think that this is a real possibility, think about this, on January 4th, 2013, this year, Rep. José Serrano once again introduced H.J.Res. 15 proposing an Amendment to repeal the 22nd Amendment, as he has done every two years since Bill Clinton was in office.

The Republican controlled Congress will hopefully stop it. But later, who will stop it if that dimwit Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House again? No one.

I believe that President Barack Obama wants to president for more than two terms. I believe he would have loved to control legislation, the media, the armed forces, and be President for life just as Hugo Chavez was down in Venezuela.

I think Barack Obama would love to do what Hugo Chavez used to do as Dictator of Venezuela, simply point at a building and have it taken over by the government -- nationalize everything.


Story by Tom Correa

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comment.