Monday, March 5, 2012

Random Shots! Gitmo Soccer Classic, Big Reward, Israel Suspicious, and more Aliens?

First Shot!

No Word Yet On The First Annual Gitmo Soccer Classic
 In January, President Obama offered a new Pentagon strategy that cuts billions of dollars for defense over the next decade and will "turn the page on a decade of war."

Obama said that America's military will be reshaped over time, saying, the reality of the U.S. economy is forcing the Defense Department to look at its strategy in an all-new way, even as he insisted that strategy will determine the force structure, "not the other way around."

On Jan. 5, 2011: President Obama announced cuts to the growth in the defense budget in a rare appearance by a president at the Pentagon briefing room.

"We have to renew our economic strength here at home, which is the foundation of our strength in the world. That includes putting our fiscal house in order," the president said.

Calling the "very serious debt and deficit problem here at home" a national security risk, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, speaking after the president, said curbing the growth in the defense budget from its expected $487 billion in increases over the next decade doesn't mean choosing between national and fiscal responsibilities.

Panetta said, "The president has made clear, and I've made clear, that the savings that we've been mandated to achieve must be driven by strategy and must be driven by analysis, and must not be driven by numbers alone."

The U.S. will change its investments, he said, noting that the new structure will be presented to Congress in the president's budget to be presented in the coming weeks.

Among the changes, Panetta announced, would be the size of some branches of the Armed Services.

"The Army and Marines Corps will no longer need to be sized to support the kind of large-scale, long-term military operations that have dominated military priorities and force generations over the past decades," Panetta said, adding that forces will have to become more flexible and adaptable to conflicts around the globe.

Panetta said the U.S. will focus its security more on challenges from the Asia-Pacific and Middle-East and it must manage the rising cost of health care for military families even as the Pentagon pledges to uphold its commitment to troops.

Panetta said, in some cases, investment may increase in special operations forces; in new technologies, like unmanned systems; in space and cyberspace capabilities; and on quick mobilization techniques.

Obama rejected assertions that the U.S. will be forced into retreat. He added that the budget will still be growing, even if more slowly.


"We have global responsibilities that demand our leadership. In fact, the defense budget will still be larger than it was toward the end of the Bush administration. And I firmly believe, and I think the American people understand, that we can keep our military strong -- and our nation secure --with a defense budget that continues to be larger than roughly the next 10 countries combined."

That's not really a truth figure, especially when you consider the huge military build up in countries like China who is building a fleet of 11 Aircraft Carriers and 200 additional warships at last report, Russia who has just started resurrecting its military, and North Korea who building and sell nukes to anyone who will buy their technology - like say Iran. But then I guess, Obama and the left always seems to conveniently leave those facts out when they are cutting the American military.

Panetta did say that there will be trade-offs, and they will be tough for some, but some of it has to be done to avoid "sequestration," the automatic cuts scheduled for 2013 that resulted after "super committee" lawmakers couldn't agree on a plan to reduce the deficit over the next 10 years by $1.2 trillion.

Of course, since January when this all came out, Americans have found out that one priority for the Defense Department that Secretary Leon Panetta didn't report was the spending of the equivalent of 1/3 of the funds allocated for military family housing on a new Soccer Field for the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay.

Since all of the cuts were outlined in January, why did they keep building the Soccer Field throughout both January and February?

And no, there is no word yet on when the First Gitmo Soccer Classic will be held. But yes, I really do think that President Obama and Secretary Panetta should be there at the Grand Opening of Gitmo's New Soccer Field.

Hell, the damn thing cost $744,000 of American Taxpayer dollars!



A Big Reward Is Being Offered For Information On Arsonists

In January, a so-called "Animal Rights group," who destroyed 14 big rig trucks valued at $2 Million. The fire took place at the Harris Ranch feedlot in Coalinga, California.

Please understand, these Jerkweeds are Domestic Terrorist.

Immediately following the fire an "anonymous" Amimal Rights group issued a statement. These were the Jerkweeds who torched the trucks.

They said that they were Animal Rights "activists," and they described their terroist attack in detail. Tey gave detailed information as to just how they carried out the crime. It was information that the Fresno County Sheriff's Office did not disclose to the public.

Now a $100,000 Reward is being offered by the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office for information leading to the arrest of those terrorists responsible for the January fire.

Right now, the scumbags who did the fire are only arsonist. But if, if someone was asleep in one of the sleeper compartments - then the scumbags would be wanted for murder.

It is a sick mind that starts fires. It just proves that the Liberal Left Animal Rights nutcases are just sick!

Third Shot!

Israel Suspicious of Obama?

If they are, then thank God Israel has common sense!

It was reported that the Israelis don't plan to notify the Obama Administration if a decision is made to strike Iran's nuclear facilities.

From what I've read, Israeli officials said that if they do decide that a strike is necessary, they would keep the White House in the dark to decrease the likelihood that the U.S. would be "held responsible for failing to stop Israel's potential attack."

But no, I don't believe it.

Supposedly the Obama Administration has been working with the Israelis for months to persuade them that an attack would be only a temporary setback to Iran's nuclear program.

The problem, as I see it, is that Iran has had absolutely no setbacks at all since starting on the road to gain a Nuclear Weapon. So to me, if the Israelis do this - well, then at least something is being done to stop it from happening.

Israel doing something about this problem, really doing something about the problem instead of just paying it lip service, is 100% better than the do nothing attitude of the Obama Administration.

This reminds me of a situation that occurred during World War II with the Nazi use of the V1 Flying Bombs.

The V-1 flying bomb, which was also known as the Buzz Bomb or Doodlebug, was in fact an early pulse-jet-powered predecessor of today's Cruise Missiles.

Because of their threat, America and Great Britain teamed up to put them out of business. They realized that that time was not on their side. Something needed to be done before the Nazi war machine would arm this weapon with bigger bombs and more accurate target location devices.

Our leaders during World War II knew that they needed to knock them out to buy more time. Buying time in that maybe the war would be over by the time the Nazis rebuilt, or maybe there would be a coup and sane people would be installed as leaders of Germany.

Operation Crossbow was created to do just that and take out the launching sites. It was the code name of the World War II campaign against all phases of the German long-range weapons program.

It specifically targeted research and development sites, manufacturing, transportation, and their launch sites. It also targeted missiles in flight.

Besides the V1, V-2 facilities were also bombed. This was including smaller facilities such as V-2 storage depots and fuel plants. Like the Nazi V-1, the best defence against the V-2 was to destroy it's infrastructure.

The Germans would never be able to rebuild because of the damage made to that weapon's infrastructure. It would have taken Germany too much time to rebuild and complete another program of long range weapons.

At the time, America was a different place. We had a desire to win and overthrow dictatorships bent on slaughtering thousands - if not millions. We had elected people in our government not afraid of the consequence of doing what is right for our people and the world.

In those days, the White House worked hand in hand with the British government. We understood that without question, Great Britain was our greatest ally in war and in peace. We had shared goals and cooperation was usually worked out.

Today, the White House has demonstrated a policy of selling out friends like Great Britain. It does not surprise me that Israel would not notify the Obama administration. Like Operation Crossbow in World War II, we must hit the enemy so hard that it takes him years to redevelop, rebuild, and reestablish an infrastructure for such a program of say launching nuclear weapons.

If I were a Jew, I wouldn't trust the Obama administration not to alert the Iranians of the pending attack. Maybe I'm too cynical when it comes to this administration, but I really believe that they would sell out anyone for their own gain.

Maybe it is the fact that the Obama administration turned over Great Britain's secrets - including its nuclear capabilities - to Russia in order to secure a New START Treaty. Maybe it's that that makes me think that

Israel is better off not notifying the Obama White House if it plans to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, the Israelis might find themselves in the same position as Great Britain - betrayed by someone thought to be a friend.

Last Shot!


OK, the Aliens are here!

Yes, on the History Channel, on an episode of their show Ancient Aliens entitled "Aliens and Mega Disasters," their staff found a way to link the US military, something called "Environmental Warfare Technology," and supposed "Alien Technology."

Since I don't usually watch this junk at all, I was surprised at what I found out. According to what the show is trying to "imply," the U.S. military posses "Alien Technology."

And no, I don't mean the kind of Alien Technology that it takes to dig tunnels under the U.S.-Mexican border completely unseen by Federal Agents. Yes, that's where the Federal Agents all look the other way until it is finished.

No, this is about something called "Alien Technology" from the little green men type of spacemen. Now, what this so-called "technology" is supposed to be is completely unknown - and unproven - but the show infers that the U.S. military has it! Whatever it is!

I'm willing to bet the farm that that is a great surprise to all of the Military Research and Development Labs across the country, but then again it is TV isn't it!

What's bad is that someone out there is really going to believe this BS. Someone out there is probably going to swallow what the show implies as the "truth'.

The show infers that the U.S. military actually created the 2010 7.0 earthquake in Haiti, and implies that they did the same thing in 2011 to create the 9.9 quake that wrecked havoc in Japan.

I personally love the way they say that they have "evidence." Oh, give me a break!

Everyone knows that Aliens are real! They're just not from Outer Space!



Story by Tom Correa

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comment.