In the chaos, France has been attacked, Germany is under siege, Italy is said to be "close to collapse," Great Britain has a two tier society governed under two justice systems, rape and killing or the innocent is rampant, and the rest of Western Europe is on fire.
Paris, France was attacked on Friday, November 13th, and now the French government has declared that a state of war exists between it and Islamic terrorism. France has heightened security measures and has closed its borders out of fear of more terrorists attacks.
To fight Islamic terrorists, France is now getting direct assistance from Russia. Yes, Russia is coming to the aid of France as well as other nations, like Israel, which Obama has turned his back on. Russian president Putin is taking the fight to ISIS and Al Qaeda in a way that Obama is too unwilling to do.
And why is President Obama unwilling to take the fight to ISIS and Al Qaeda? I believe it is for all the same reasons that he is enabling Iran to build nuclear weapons and target Israel. It is because he support the expansionist desires of Islam. That in itself is the only reason that Obama has turned his back on our allies and sought to passively support Islam.
What makes me think such a thing? First, Obama and his political advisers have ruled out the use of ground forces. Obama stating that ISIS is an belief that cannot be beaten militarily and instead needs to be dealt with politically.
He believes this so much that he remarked how the Muslim terrorist attack in Paris is a setback to finding a political solution. He apparently is more concerned about how their attack would affect the political process instead of the lives that were lost.
Second, since starting the supposed air war against ISIS a year ago, there has been very little to show for a year of a supposed air campaign. The reason is simple, Obama is limiting the use of American power to point where America appears impotent facing such a threat.
In fact, there are all sorts of reports from our military commanders to the effect that the Obama White House has been limiting their missions -- as well as refusing the requests to engage the enemy. Yes, we live in an age where the Obama White House has to grant permission to engage the enemy. Because of this asinine use of military power, ISIS has steadily grown to what it is today -- a force which can reach into France and even America to launch attacks.
The third reason that I believe that Obama has supported the spread of radical Islam is Obama domestic policies toward Muslims. They include the Obama decision back in Semptember of this year to prepare to spend BILLIONS in American Taxpayer dollars to import Muslim refugees here.
Yes, according to projections from Heritage Foundation scholar Robert Rector. Extended out over the next 50 years, Obama was importing 10,000 more refugees at a cost of $130 MILLION a year and $6.5 BILLION over their lifetime.
In September, Breitbart reported that a White House spokesman said President Barack Obama would grant residence to 10,000 additional Syrians in 2016, along with the routine inflow of 70,000 refugees and 1 million new immigrants.
Republican presidential candidates Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), Jeb Bush, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), say it's the United States' duty to bring in these Muslim.
Because refugees, by law, are required to apply for lawful permanent resident (LPR) status one year after entering the United States, they will soon become eligible for all Federal benefits paid for by American taxpayers. Yes, those Social Security benefits that were cut from Seniors, and those Veterans Benefits that were cut from Disabled Vets, they are going to Muslims who may also be members of ISIS. Imagine that!
This $6.5 Billion expenditure to provide community services, education, health, welfare and "retirement" costs to 10,000 migrants comes in addition to the approximately $13.5 Billion in foreign aid to Middle Eastern nations that United States taxpayers sent in 2013.
Donald Trump has said that the United States' immigration policy needs to prioritize the national interests of its citizenry. He says, "From a humanitarian standpoint, I’d love to help. But we have our own problems. We have so many problems that we have to solve."
Trump explained that Muslim countries should be willing to take in some of the Muslim migrants, saying, "The Gulf states [are] tremendously wealthy. You have five groups of people, six groups, they’re not taking anybody. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, these are tremendously wealthy and powerful from the standpoint of money. They — they’re not taking anybody. Russia’s not taking. Nobody’s taking. [But we’re] supposed to take — we have to straighten out our own problems."
In complete contrast to Donald Trump, Republican career politicians Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham, all of whom support expanding record high immigration rates, have announced their willingness to accept the Muslim refugees from Syria.
Obama says Americans have nothing to worry about. He says, "Our screening procedures will keep out terrorists."
Yes, that's all wishful thinking considering experts say differently. And now, now the question becomes can the American people trust Obama not to put Americans lives at risk? Obama does not care about the Paris Muslim terrorist attacks, and he has staunchly refused to accept the fact that we are at war with radical Islam.
Ben Rhodes, Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser said that president Obama will not stop accepting thousands of Syrian refugees into the United States in the wake of the terrorist attacks in Paris. And yes, Obama is determined to bring in thousands of whether or not it is possible that those he brings here are in fact Islamic terrorists disguised as refugees like those who attacked Paris.
Let's fact the facts as stated by the FBI, the "screening process" of these Muslims will not catch terrorists coming into our country. In fact, the FBI admits that the same "screening process" can’t even keep Mexican criminals out.
After the Muslim terrorist attacks in Paris last Friday, the city was gripped in fear and recalled the horrors of the Charlie Hebdo carnage just 10 months ago. The January of this year Muslim terrorist attack by masked gunmen on the newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, left 12 people dead.
They killed the top editor, prominent cartoonists, and police officers, over a cartoon. The killers escaped, traumatizing the city and sending shock waves through Europe and beyond. President Obama down-played the Charlie Hebdo Muslim terrorist attack as being "random violence" instead of a planned attack.
In its initial statement in response to the terrorist attack, the Obama White House condemned the attacks, but did not make any judgment calls on the content of the magazine as it had done in the past.
"I strongly condemn the horrific shooting at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris that has reportedly killed 12 people," Obama said in a prepared statement in January of this year.
He went on to say, "We are in touch with French officials and I have directed my Administration to provide any assistance needed to help bring these terrorists to justice."
Immediately following the Friday, November 13th, Muslim terrorist attack, Obama's statement was fairly close to his January statement, saying, "We’re going to do whatever it takes to work with the French people and with nations around the world to bring these terrorists to justice."
A federal official told Fox News that the U.S. government believes that this Muslim terrorist attack was in fact a coordinated attack. Another source pointed out that these attacks took "months of planning" based on the multiple locations where the attacks were playing out.
The Department of Homeland Security put out a statement saying they are "closely monitoring" the events and that "At this time, there is no specific or credible threat to the United States." Of course, Homeland Security appears not to take ISIS threats very seriously.
And why doesn't that shock any of us, especially when Obama is not taking the attacks and the ISIS threats very seriously. I mean let's be frank here, while Obama said that the American people "stand together with the French people in the fight against terrorism and extremism" -- does anyone really believe him at all.
I mean really, how many times have we heard the same line of BS from Obama when he says, as he again said on Friday, "We're going to do whatever it takes to work with the [insert name] [etc. etc.] to bring these terrorists to justice."
The man can't even say "Islamic Terrorist." And yes, I believe the reason that he can't say the words "Islamic Terrorist" is that his loyalty to the Muslim religion supersedes his loyalty to America. Yes, right or wrong, that's what I believe is taking place.
Why would I say such a thing? First, his actions in not wanting to use the full capabilities of the United States military against the Islamic threat. Second, his insistence that Islam is a nation of peace while it consistently demonstrates otherwise. And third, he has demonstrating his support of our enemy by his refused to allow these attacks to change his strategy when dealing with ISIS.
I believe that this is due to his loyalty to Islam and his naive assessment of the capabilities of ISIS. He seems to think that they are just a handful of terrorists that we shouldn't be very concerned with. And yes, he's even gone so far as to call them "JV" as in "Junior Varsity" in the past.
What Obama does not understand is that it was only a handful of terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 which resulted in the loss of over 3,000 lives. Lives of families that didn't care if their loved ones were murdered by a handful or a thousand terrorist -- the numbers accomplishing the act does not mean anything to those who've lost someone to Islamic murderers.
Friends, President Obama has proven that he not a military tactician nor a president who listens to military tacticians. He does not know the first things about combat, he is a creature of politics. His assessment of ISIS because it does not have the troop numbers that large nations do is naive at best. He does not realize that a small well organized group of terrorists can be more effective than a large group because they can go undetected easier than a larger group. A larger group has a lot more liability of being discovered and having their plans thwarted.
But friends, Obama does not care because he has decided that he wants more Muslims in the United States even if it means bringing them here.
We do know that with all of the thousands upon thousands of Muslim refugees entering Europe -- that European leaders have allowed terrorists into their countries. Liberal Policies toward open borders and increased Muslim immigration has created the problems we see in Europe today. That is what enabled the Paris attack, that and European leaders who put political ideology ahead of the security and safety of their own people.
Yes, sounds just like Obama's policies. Obama is tenacious in his political attacks on Republicans and Conservatives which he sees as his enemies. And yes, I've heard people say that it would be a better world if Obama looked upon America's real enemies as he does Republicans and Conservatives -- or attacks the Muslim threat the same way as he has directed his administration to attack Christians, but that won't happen.
Barack Hussein Obama would rather attack Americans than our enemies. And yes, he does this by sacrificing our security needs and safety as he brings into our country over 100,000 Syrian Muslim refugees in the next year.
His mindset is that he is bringing in Muslim refugees, all while knowing that the terrorists who attacked Paris and killed the innocent there entered France as Muslim refugees fleeing Syria. And while it is our safety that I am more concerned about when importing such a threat, to me nothing is more traitorous than a president who is willing to sacrifice American lives and safety to satisfy his own political ideology and religious faith.
This is why Obama does what he does in the war against Islam. This is why Obama is proving stubborn and uncompromising, almost fanatical, in his loyalty to Liberalism and as a sympathizer of the Muslim faith.
I believe he sympathizes with radical Islam because of statements such as when Obama tried to legitimize the actions of Islamic terrorists saying, "More broadly, groups like al Qaeda and ISIL exploit the anger that festers when people feel that injustice and corruption leave them with no chance of improving their lives. The world has to offer today’s youth something better. Efforts to counter violent extremism will only succeed if citizens can address legitimate grievances through the democratic process and express themselves through strong civil societies. Those efforts must be matched by economic, educational and entrepreneurial development so people have hope for a life of dignity."
Yes, President Obama believes that ISIS jihadists, Muslim terrorist, really do have what he calls, "legitimate grievances." And that is our leader!
Because of his screwed up sense of loyalty, he is proving to be useless as an American president and Commander-n-Chief. You see, even though we have a very strong military, our military is worthless because we have a leader who refuses to use our military to its fullest capabilities against an enemy that he has an affinity for.
As for how Obama's fondness toward Islam has effected his leaderships skills, especially as a wartime president?
Well, there is an inspirational quote on leadership that I've always remembered. It comes from my Marine Corps NCO Guidebook. It goes: "An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer."
That is Obama, he is certainly a deer. Yes, I believe that is especially true when it comes to fighting Islam or providing security and safety for the American people.
And yes, that's just the way I see it.
Tom Correa
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.