Theodore Roosevelt, 1903

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." - Theodore Roosevelt, 1903

Monday, August 5, 2013

The M14 Rifle - Part Two

What came first was the M1 Garand.

General George S. Patton called the M1 Garand, "the greatest battle implement ever devised."

And yes, our military loved the M1. In fact, they loved it so much that after World War II they wanted to improve on it - but not change it.

The M1 Garand was the direct predecessor of the M14 rifle, which replaced it.

The experience gained by US troops during World War II and then the Korean War demonstrated that the beloved M1 Garand rifle had a lot of things to be improved.

The first was the feeding system with its 8-round en-bloc clips that did not allow the refilling, or topping off, of the partially full magazine.

Others were excessive length and weight of the rifle.

The cartridge used in M1 Garand and known as .30-06 (7.62x63mm) was too long and too heavy, effectively limiting the load of ammunition carried by each soldier.

First attempts to improve M1 were made during the war, and numerous experimental modifications in .30-06 were built, mostly using the 20-rounds detachable magazines from Browning BAR M1918 automatic rifle.

One of such prototypes was the T20 ("T" means "test") of 1944.

The T20 was basically the M1 Garand rifle fitted with 20 rounds BAR magazine and with selective fire capability.

This prototype latter evolved into the T37 rifle, which had gas cylinder moved back a little and was chambered for newest American prototype cartridge - T65.

The T65 was no more than .30-06 case, shortened by 1/2 inch (12 mm), but retaining the original ballistic properties due to modern propellants used.

It was slightly lighter and cheaper to made than .30-06, and has long effective range and good potential for accuracy, both desired by US Army.

The idea of a truly "intermediate" round was not acceptable to the US Military during that time.

In the early 1950s T37 evolved into the T44 experimental rifle, which featured redesigned, self-regulated gas system with short stroke gas piston.

Further development and tests lead to the slightly modified T44E4 and T44E5 (heavy barreled squad automatic weapon) prototypes, which were finally adopted by US Army as M14 and M15 rifles in the 1957.

The M15, a heavy barreled weapon, however, was never brought into production.

It must be noted that T44E4 was extensively tested against the only other entree in the US trials, the T48 rifle which was a Belgian FN FAL rifle made under license in USA by H&R Inc..

Both rifles passed the trials with equally high results, but US finally settled on the T44 because it was slightly lighter, similar to M1 Garand in manufacturing and operation, and, above all, it is a "Native American" design.

The contracts to produce M14 rifles were issued to some US companies, such as Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge (TRW Inc), Harrington and Richardson Arms Co (H&R), Winchester-Western Arms Division of Olin Mathieson (Winchester) and Springfield Armory Inc (Springfield).

Initial production contracts for the M14 were awarded to the Springfield Armory, Winchester, and Harrington & Richardson.  Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge Inc. (TRW) would later be awarded a production contract for the rifle as well.

There were 1,376,031 M-14 service rifles were produced from 1959 to 1964

Yes, it's true, production was ceased by US Government in 1964 with some 1,380,000 weapons made. That is a lot of weapons to stockpile in armories.

The termination of the production was the result of combat experience in the SE Asia, particularly in Vietnam.

It was said that the M14 was too long and too heavy to be carried all day long in hot and wet climate.

The 7.62mm NATO ammunition was thought to be too heavy, limiting the amount of ammunition carried by troops on patrols.

It was said that the selective fire capability was mostly useless, since the M14 was way too light for powerful cartridge it fired, and climbed excessively when fired in bursts.

In fact, most of the M14s were issued to troops with fire selectors locked to semi-automatic mode, to avoid useless waste of ammunition in automatic fire.

The squad automatic version, known as M14E2, also was not too successful in its intended role.

As soon as those deficiencies of the M14 became obvious for US Army Command, they started the search for lighter rifle, and finally settled on the Colt/Armalite AR-15 5.56mm assault rifle, adopting it as the M16A1.

After reading some of the negatives attributed to the M14, I figured that this was the conjecture of guys who were never troops - or were biased and trying to get rid of the M14 in favor of the inferior M16A1.

I carried the M14 as a Marine. After using both the M14 and M16, I could never understand the desire to swap a great rifle for one that had so many design flaws.

Note if you will that the M16 rifle is the only rifle ever designed with a "forward assist" to "pound" on if the round doesn't fully seat. Imagine that, designing a rifle with a part that needs to be "pounded" so the rifle operates properly?

While the M14 can take a pounding, it never needs to be pounded on to operate saticfactory.

M14 was replaced as a first line weapon in the late 1960s, but is still used by the United States Marine Corps.

It also served as a platform to build M21 Sniper rifles. Semi-automatic only versions of the M14 rifle are commercially manufactured for civilian and police markets by the Springfield Armory Inc since 1974 under the name of M1A.

Some other US companies are assembling the M14-type semi-automatic rifles using military surplus M14 parts kits.

Beginning in the early 1970s thousands of M14 rifles were given to several nations under military aid programs.

In the 1990s alone, over 100,000 of these rifles have been given away to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey.

In USA, for some time M14 was mostly relegated to Honor Guard and similar duties, but during recent campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan many old M14 rifles were withdrawn from warehouses, dusted off and issued to troops in the field to improve range and lethality of troops armed with 5.56mm weapons.

Some M14 rifles are issued as is, some are fitted with new telscope sights to serve as a designated marksman rifles DMR - a concept similar to Russian SVD rifle.

The United States Marine Corps also re-issued M14 rifles for use in Designated Marksman role (DMR), and those rifles are fitted with newly made polymer stocks with adjustable buttstocks and pistol grips, and other accessories such as detachable bipods or sound moderators (silencers).

Recently US Special Forces, operating under the US Navy flag, stepped forward with the Mk.14 Mod.0 Enchanced Battle rifle, which is an M14 fitted with many new commercially available parts, new stock with adjustable butt and plenty of Picatinny rails, and new accessories such as noise suppressors and optical equipment.

The Mk.14 Mod.0 EBR is currently being used by US Navy SEAL's and possibly some other special operation forces within US Military.

In general, the M14 was developed as a means of taking the place of four different weapons systems—the M1 rifle, the M1 Carbine, the M3 "Grease Gun" and the M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR).

It was thought that in this manner the M14 could simplify the logistical requirements of the troops by limiting the types of ammunition and parts needed to be supplied.

It proved to be an impossible task to replace all four, and the weapon was even deemed "completely inferior" to the World War II M1 in a September 1962 report by the comptroller of the Department of Defense. 

The cartridge was too powerful for the submachine gun role and the weapon was simply too light to serve as a light machine gun replacement for the BAR.

Though it has the accuracy and range of the "old school" military rifles, it was considered too long, too heavy and it lacked the automatic fire firepower of a "true assault rifle" said to be required in modern close combat.

Of course, this is not true. And yes, the M14 being issued today to our troops overseas is a testiment to that fact that it is a vital weapon being used today on battle fields and in towns in the Middle East and elsewhere.

The M14 is a gas operated, magazine fed, selective fire (originally) design.

The gas system is located under the barrel, and has a short stroke (about 1 1/2 inch - 37 mm) gas piston which operates the M1 Garand style action rod.

The gas system features an automatic gas cutoff feature, which limits the amount of gases used to operate the weapon.

The rotating bolt is quite similar to one found in M1 Garand but it has a roller instead of the simple lug, which connects the bolt to the operating rod.

The fire mode selector is located at the right side of the receiver, above the trigger, and could be removed if rifle should not be fired in bursts, or re-installed if required.

The rear receiver bridge features the stripper clips guides, so the detachable magazine could be refilled in place by using standard stripper clips.

The bolt stop device is incorporated into the left wall of the receiver and holds the bolt open when last round from the magazine is fired.

The safety switch is similar to M1 Garand and is located at the front of the triggerguard. Standard sights consist of the blade front sight with two protective "ears" and diopter-type adjustable rear sight, mounted on the rear of the receiver.

Barrel is equipped with long flash suppressor.

To be used in selective fire mode, M14 can be equipped with light detachable bipod.

The M14A1 Squad Automatic rifle differs from M14 in the following: the fire selector is always installed.

The standard wooden single-piece stock with semi-pistol grip is replaced by the "straight line" wooden stock with separate pistol grip and with folding front grip under the forearm.

The hinged shoulder rest is attached to the buttplate. Special removable muzzle jump compensator is fitted to the barrel, as well as lightweight bipod.

General George S. Patton called the M1 Garand, "the greatest battle implement ever devised."

And since the M1 Garand was the direct predecessor of the M14 rifle, I believe, that like me, he would have fallen in love with the M14 because of all of its improvements.

File:M14 rifle - USA - 7,62x51mm - Armémuseum.jpg
Story by Tom Correa

1 comment:

  1. I do believe Patton would have loved the M14 as well. I have the M1A, I absolutely love the rifle. I have an M4 also and have had numerous other rifles such as the Daewoo K2 which is the South Korean copy of the M16, a Hungarian AKM47, Chinese made SKS Carbine and lastly a Ruger Mini-14 which is just as it says and mini M14. It has the very internal workings as the M1A just scaled down a bit for the 5.56NATO round just as the M1 Carbine is. It's my contention the M14 operating system is the finest ever devised, it could even be used for today's US military with lighter stock materials and target acquisition scopes. I have had talks with soldiers in the Middle East who have said they wished like hell they had a 7.62NATO shooting g rifle instead of the M4 because the small round didn't always take down the "Hadjis" unless shot multiple times. Some special forces and SEALS armed with M14 s said the "Hadjis" always went down when hit with just one 7.62NATO round...again, the M14/M1A is simply the finest rifle ever devised...

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comment.